Abstract
Grape varieties, rootstocks and genotypes belonging to the Vitis species have been grown for various purposes since ancient times. Different Vitis species can be propagated through both grafted and non-grafted methods. There are significant differences in rooting and shoot development among the rootstocks of different Vitis species. These differences significantly affect sapling yield and quality. In our study, we used grape varieties belonging to different species and polyploidy levels and the American grapevine rootstocks most commonly used in Türkiye to investigate the effects of five organic and inorganic based products on rooting and shoot development. We used 12 different grape varieties and seven different American grapevine rootstocks as materials. Two of the grape varieties belonging to different Vitis species were tetraploid. We investigated the effects of the five different applications on callus formation, root development level, number of roots, root length, number of shoots, shoot length and number of leaves on the shoot (excluding the rootstock). As a result, MAS RAIZ application, which is an organic based product, gave the best results in terms of callus development and shoot number, and 2000 ppm indole butyric acid applications gave the best results in terms of root development level and number of roots. Considering the general averages in terms of root length, shoot length and number of leaves on the shoot, pure water application gave better results than other applications. Growers must choose the most appropriate application, especially considering efficiency and cost. In addition, new products of chemical and organic origin that claim to promote rooting enter the market every year. These new products should be compared with scientific research, and the most accurate information should be provided to both growers and nurseries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Astha BV, Mishra S, Narayan S, Amir M (2022) Effect of growth regulator (IBA) and various natural substances on shoot growth of grape cuttings (Vitis vinifera L.). J Commun Mobbilization Sustain Dev 17(3):1006–1010
Barlass M, Skene KGM (1980) Studies on the fragmented shoot apex of grapevine: ii. factors affecting growth and differentiation in vitro. J Exp Bot 31(2):489–495. https://doi.org/10.1093/Jxb/31.2.489
Boeno D, Zuffellato-Ribas KC (2023) A quantitative assessment of factors affecting the rooting of grapevine rootstocks (Vitis vinifera L.). Acta Sci 45(1):e57987. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v45i1.57987
Botelho RV, Souza J, Schreider E, Pires EJP, Terra MM (2009) Propagation of the ‘niagara rosada’ grapevine (Vitis labrusca), grafted on the rootstock ‘VR-043-43’ (V. vinifera x V. rotundifolia). Sci Agrar 10(5):359–364. https://doi.org/10.5380/rsa.v10i5.15190
Çelik H (2000) The effects of different grafting methods applied by manual grafting units on grafting success in grapevines. Turk J Agric For 24(4):499–504 (https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/agriculture/vol24/iss4/11)
Durmaz K, Oruç E, Cangi R (2019) Market conditions and marketing issues for grapevine sapling producers. J N Results Sci 8(2):26–36
El Shaima MB, Saleh MMS (2018) Effect of some natural substances on grape cuttings rooting. Middle East J Agric Res 07(04):1702–1709
Frick EM, Strader LC (2018) Roles for IBA-derived auxin in plant development. J Exp Bot 69:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx298
Gainza F, Opazo I, Muñoz C (2015) Graft incompatibility in plants: metabolic changes during formation and establishment of the rootstock/scion union with emphasis on Prunus species. Chil J Agric Res 75(1):28–34. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392015000300004
Goode Junior DZ, Lane RP (1983) Rooting leafy muscadine grape cuttings. HortScience 18(6):944–946
Goode Junior DZ, Krewer GW, Lane RP, Daniell JW, Couvillon GA (1982) Rooting studies of dormant muscadine grape cuttings. HortScience 17(4):644–645
Ikeuchi M, Favero DS, Sakamoto Y, Iwase A, Coleman D, Rymen B, Sugimoto K (2019) Molecular mechanisms of plant regeneration. Ann Rev Plant Biol 70:377–406. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100434
İsfendiyaroğlu M, Kacar E (2019) Effects of Different Pre-sized Rooting Blocks and IBA Concentrations on the Rooting of Ramsey Grapevine Rootstock Cuttings. Ege Üniv Ziraat Fak Derg 56(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.396612
İşlek F, Yenikalaycı A, Bayram A, Çakır A (2021) The effect of some plant growth regulators applications on rooting and seedling performance of cuttings of Vakkas grape variety. Turk J Agric Nat Sci 8(4):1139–1145. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.977278
Jaleta A, Sulaiman M (2019) A review on the effect of rooting media on rooting and growth of cutting propagated grape (Vitis vinifera L). World J Agri Soil Sci 3(4):1–8. https://doi.org/10.33552/WJASS.2019.03.000567
Jindo K, Goron TL, Pizarro-Tobías P, Sánchez-Monedero MÁ, Audette Y, Deolu-Ajayi AO, van der Werf A, Goitom Teklu M, Shenker M, Pombo Sudré C, Busato JG, Ochoa-Hueso R, Nocentini M, Rippen J, Aroca R, Mesa S, Delgado MJ, Tortosa G (2022) Application of biostimulant products and biological control agents in sustainable viticulture: a review. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.(2022).932311
Kim S‑H, Zebro M, Jang D‑C, Sim J‑E, Park H‑K, Kim K‑Y, Bae H‑M, Tilahun S, Park S‑M (2023) Optimization of plant growth regulators for in vitro mass propagation of a disease-free ‘shine muscat’ grapevine cultivar. Curr Issues Mol Biol 45(10):7721–7733. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45100487
Köse B, Uray Y, Karabulut B, Türk F, Bayram K, Çelik H (2023) Determination of rooting and vine sapling rates of single-bud cuttings prepared from Vitis labrusca L. Grape varieties. Erwerbs-Obstbau 65:2005–2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-023-00894-9
Leakey RRB (2014) Plant cloning: macropropagation. In: Van Alfen NK (ed) Encyclopedia of agriculture and food systems. Academic Press, pp 349–359 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-52512-3.00223-0
Madhavan S, Sivasankar S, Elakkuvan S, Gayathri M (2021) The effect of IBA on the rooting of grape cuttings (Vitis vinifera). Int J Bot Stud 6(5):288–289
Matsuoka H, Hinata K (1979) NAA-induced organogenesis and embryogenesis in hypocotyl callus of solarium melongena L. J Exp Bot 30:363–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/30.3.363
Roberto SR, Pereira FM, Neves CSVJ, Jubileu BDS, Azevedo MCBD (2004) Herbaceous cutting rooting of ‘Campinas’ (IAC 766) and ‘Jales’ (IAC 572) vine roostocks on different growth medium. Ciên Rural 34(5):1633–1636. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782004000500051
Rolaniya MK, Mahendra B, Khushbu, Sarvanan S (2018) Effect of plant growth regulators (IIA, IBA, GA3) on rooting of hardwood cutting of grape (Vitis Vinifera L.) cv. Thompson seedless. J Pharm Phytochem 7(1):398–400
Satisha J, Adsule PG (2006) Rooting behavior of grape rootstocks in relation to IBA concentration, biochemical constituents of mother vines. In: International symposium on grape production and processing, vol 785, pp 121–126 https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.785.14
Şen A, Yağcı A (2016) Effects of different rooting places on seedling quality and efficiency in production of potted grapevine saplings. Fruit Sci 3(1):22–28 (https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/meyve/issue/19546/208126)
Shahzad U, Shahbaz T, Khan AA, Hassan Z, Naqvi SA, Iqbal M, Abbas T, Shahjahan M (2019) Effects of auxin (Iba) concentrations with different dipping time on root ability of grape cuttings (Vitis Vinifera). Int J Sci Technol 7(12):45–48
Singh KK, Chauhan JC (2020) A review on vegetative propagation of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) through cutting. GJBB 9(2):50–55
Smart DR, Kocsis L, Walker AM, Stockert C (2002) Dormant buds and adventitious root formation by vitis and other woody plants. J Plant Growth Regul 21:296–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-003-0001-3
Waite H, Whitelaw Weckert M, Torley P (2015) Grapevine propagation. Principles and methods for the production of high-quality grapevine planting material. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci 43(2):144–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2014.978340
Zhao Y, Chen Y, Jiang C, Lu M‑Z, Zhang J (2022) Exogenous hormones supplementation improve adventitious root formation in woody plants. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 10:1009531. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.(2022).1009531
Acknowledgements
This study includes some of the results obtained from Kevser Çorak’s Master’s thesis study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A. Atak: Oversaw the experiment, literature review, planned research, performed data analysis, supervised the study and wrote the manuscript. K. Çorak: Literature review, planned research, organised experiments, statistical analyses.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
A. Atak and K. Çorak declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Atak, A., Çorak, K. Comparison of the Effects of Some Applications on Root and Shoot Development of Different Vitis Species. Applied Fruit Science (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-024-01063-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-024-01063-2