Abstract
The ecotoxicological consequences of synthetic pesticides have encouraged stakeholders to search for eco-friendly pest control tools, like essential oils (EOs). Nano-delivery systems (nanoparticles and nano-emulsions) seem ideal for developing EO-based biopesticides, although production processes should be standardized and implemented. In this study, nano-emulsions loaded with a high amount of Allium sativum L. EO (15%) were developed using different mixed bottom-up/top-down processes. Garlic EO was chemically analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and formulations were physically characterized using Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) apparatus. The insecticidal activity against Planococcus citri Risso (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and selectivity toward Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) worker bees was evaluated. Garlic EO was mainly composed of sulphur components (96.3%), with diallyl disulphide and diallyl trisulphide as the most abundant compounds (37.26% and 28.15%, respectively). Top-down processes could produce stable nano-emulsions with droplet size in the nanometric range (< 200nm) and good polydispersity index (PDI < 0.2). In contrast, the bottom-up emulsion was unstable, and its droplet size was around 500nm after 24 hours. High-energy emulsification processes significantly increased the residual toxicity of garlic EO against 3rd instar P. citri nymphs, whereas the developed formulations were harmless to A. mellifera workers in topical application. This study confirmed that the production process significantly affected the physical properties and efficacy against target pests. The lack of adverse impact on honeybees denotated the potential of these formulations as bioinsecticides in organic and/or IPM programs, although further extended ecotoxicological studies are necessary.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In recent years, alternatives to synthetic pesticides for crop protection have been investigated due to environmental and health problems caused by the widespread use of these substances (Nenaah et al. 2015; Rizzo et al. 2020). Among the alternative solutions, botanical extracts as essential oils (EOs) could be the ideal candidates for the development of new eco-friendly bioinsecticides (Franzios et al. 1997; Priestley et al. 2003; Raybaudi-Massilia et al. 2006; Zhou et al. 2008; Campolo et al. 2020; Ben Abdallah et al 2023).
Despite the efficacy of different EOs under laboratory conditions, some characteristics of these natural substances limited their use in real-field situations. Volatility, flammability, rapid degradation, poor solubility in water, and phytotoxicity are the challenges that should be overcome before using these substances as biopesticides (Pavela and Benelli 2016; Karalija et al. 2020).
These limitations of EOs can be mitigated through the development of more stable and effective formulations using nanotechnological interventions (Giunti et al. 2023). Among the different nano-formulations, EO-based nano-emulsions seem to be the ideal due to their easy preparation and scalability at the industrial level (Campolo et al. 2017).
Nano-emulsions are produced using bottom-up and top-down approaches (Donsì and Ferrari 2016). Bottom-up processes (e.g., self-emulsification, phase inversion composition or temperature, solvent demixing, etc.) are highly effective in combining very small molecules into more structured systems and producing nano-emulsions. Bottom-up approaches in general require a large amount of surfactant or co-surfactants to develop EO-based nano-emulsions at the nanoscale (droplet size < 200 nm) (Tadros et al. 2004; Sagalowicz and Leser 2010; Sugumar et al. 2014). Top-down approaches like sonication, high-pressure homogenization, high-pressure microfluidization, etc.) on the other hand, use high energy or pressure to create homogeneous nano-emulsions from large structured materials (Verma et al. 2009; Chan and Kwok 2011; Arole and Munde 2014). Top-down methods are generally considered more advantageous than bottom-up methods. They are easier to apply at industrial scale and reduce the occurrence of undesired effects, such as coalescence and flocculation, with reduced amount of surfactants and without co-surfactants and thickeners (Anton et al. 2008; McClements and Rao 2011; Santana et al. 2013; Barradas and de Holanda e Silva 2020).
Planococcus citri Risso (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), commonly known as citrus mealybug, is a polyphagous insect-pest that can affect agricultural and ornamental plants (Franco et al. 2004). This is one of the most important citrus pests due to its direct and indirect damages. The mealybug induces falling and deformation reduces plant growth and fruit size. The production of abundant honeydew that soils the fruits and attracts other undesirable insects, such as ants, can have significant economic consequences (Afifi et al. 2010; Zappalà 2010). Its management can be done through different strategies, such as agronomic practices and biological control using predators and/or parasitoids, but the primary control strategy is based on chemical insecticides (Ghaffari et al. 2017; Mansour et al. 2018).
The efficacy of EOs as insecticides has been investigated against several pests including P. citri (Koul et al. 2008; Mossa 2016; Campolo et al. 2018). Cloyd et al. (2009) highlighted that the EOs of cottonseed, cinnamon, rosemary, and lavender provided > 90% mortality of citrus mealybug. Similarly, EOs of Pimpinella anisum L., Rosmarinus officinalis L., Mentha piperita L., Origanum onites L., Thymus vulgaris L., and Thymus capitatus L. exhibited good fumigation efficacy against P. citri adults (Erdemir and Erler 2017, 2018; Alloui-Griza et al. 2022). Attia et al (2022) showed that the topical application of Mentha pulegium L. EO at 40.96 mg/L provided 100% mortality of P. citri nymphs.
In literature, the efficacy of Allium sativum (L.) EO has been extensively investigated against several pests. Garlic EO was highly effective against different mites such as Tetranychus urticae Koch, Tetranychus truncates Ehara (Acari: Tetranychidae), Aceria oleae (Nalepa), and Tegolophus hassani (Keifer) (Acari: Eriophyidae) (Attia et al. 2012; Mossa et al. 2018; Sararit and Auamcharoen 2020). Furthermore, A. sativum EO can also be used as a pesticide for nematode management (Catani et al. 2023). Its fumigant or contact toxicity was indeed confirmed against Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White), Meloidogyne javanica (Treub) Chitwood, (Nematoda: Meloidogynidae), Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Bursxy) (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae) and Panagrolaimus sp. (Nematoda: Panagrolaimidae) (Park et al. 2005; Jardim et al. 2020; Oro et al. 2020; Galisteo et al. 2022, Nguyen et al. 2022). Among stored product pests, garlic EO and its major compounds revealed fumigant and contact toxicity against Tribolium confusum J. du Val and Tribolium castaneum (Herbest) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky and Sitophilus oryzae L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) (Huang et al. 2000; Yang et al. 2010; Douiri et al 2013; Chude and Chude 2020; Palermo et al. 2021). Crude garlic EO was also tested against crop pests although with contrasting results; as an example, it exhibited low toxicity against Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae (Hamada et al. 2018). In contrast, Ricupero et al. (2022) produced a garlic EO-based nano-emulsion which highlighted good efficacy in terms of larval and egg mortality as well as oviposition deterrence against Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). On this basis, the impact of formulation can be a critical point to investigate the bioactivity of this EO against major pests.
Among the different EOs used for the control of P. citri, garlic EO seems a good choice for the development of new control tools since this phytocomplex has been proved to exert good insecticidal activity without affecting the survival of its main predator Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) (Modafferi et al. 2024). In this study, the authors investigated the insecticidal activity of a garlic EO nano-emulsion produced with a single low energy method and its stability over time was determined (Modafferi et al. 2024). In view of the promising insecticidal activity of garlic EO, this study was aimed at developing various garlic EO-based emulsions comparing single or mixed bottom-up/top-down approaches, and maintaining the same high EO/surfactant ratio (3:1). The EO and the formulations were chemically and physically characterized using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) apparatus, respectively. The suitability of the different methods to produce stable nano-emulsion formulations was assesses in terms of their efficacy against 3rd instars of P. citri and selectivity toward adults of A. mellifera bees.
Materials and methods
Biological materials
Planococcus citri laboratory rearing was established from hundreds of specimens collected from citrus groves located in the Reggio Calabria province (Italy) in 2023. The mealybug colony was reared for several generations at the Entomology laboratory of the Department of Agriculture, University Mediterranea of Reggio Calabria. Insects were reared on organic butternut pumpkin fruit inside a climatic chamber under constant climatic conditions: 28 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 5% R.H., with a photoperiod of 12 h:12 h (L:D). Newly emerged (< 48 h) Apis mellifera ligustica Spinola (Hymenoptera: Apidae) worker bees used in the toxicity trial were collected from the experimental apiary of the Department of Agriculture, University Mediterranea of Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy. During the past three months, the apiary did not undergo any chemical treatment for Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman (Acari: Varroidae) control.
Chemical characterization of Allium sativum EO
Commercial Allium sativum EO (GEO) was purchased from Esperis S.p.A. (Milan, Italy). The chemical characterization of the garlic EO was carried out following the methods described by Giunti et al. (2019). Briefly, a Thermo Fisher TRACE 1300 GC with a MEGA-5 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm; coating thickness = 0.25 μm) and a Thermo Fisher ISQ LT mass detector (ionization mode: EI; scan time: 1.00 s; scan mass range: 30–300 m/z) were used setting injector and transfer line at 250 and 240 °C, respectively, and a temperature ramp from 60 to 240 °C at 3 °C min−1 (carrier gas: He 1 mL min−1). The pure EO was diluted (1:10 v:v) in hexane (95%, Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany), and 0.2 μL were injected at a split ratio of 1:30. The identification of peaks was made using computer matching against the commercial libraries (NIST 05, Wiley FFNSC and ADAMS) comparing linear retention indices (LRI). The LRIs were calculated using the formula of Van den Dool and Kratz (1963) by comparing the retention times of the compounds to be identified with those of a standard mixture of alkanes (C8-C20 saturated alkanes standard mixture, Supelco®, Bellefonte, PA, USA) which was analyzed in GC–MS under the identical operating conditions as the sample (Yoshiro 1976; Davies 1990; Jennings 2012; Adams 2017).
Formulation and physical characterization of nano-emulsions
The A. sativum EO-based nano-emulsions were obtained using different methodologies characterized by different amounts of energy supplied to the system (Supplementary Table S1). In detail, we developed four garlic EO-based formulations: (i) Raw emulsion (RAW), (ii) Sonicated nano-emulsion (SN), (iii) Sonicated and Microfluidized nano-emulsion (SH) and (iv) Microfluidized nano-emulsion (HPM). The RAW emulsion was obtained through the self-emulsification method (low-energy process) described by Bouchemal et al. (2004) with modifications. Specifically, to obtain the organic phase, GEO and Tween 80® (polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monooleate, Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) (ratio 3:1 w:w) were mixed for 30 min at 7,000 rpm at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C). Double-distilled water (aqueous phase) was then added slowly (1 mL min−1) to the preliminary mixture (ratio 4:1 w:w) without mixing. The obtained emulsion (EO 15% w/w; Tween 80® 5% w/w; water 80% w/w) was mixed for 3 h at 7,000 RPM. Aliquots of the obtained RAW emulsion were used to develop the other EO-based nano-formulations like SN, SH, and HPM.
The SN nano-emulsion was obtained using the self-emulsifier process followed by sonication (high-energy process) as described by Laudani et al. (2022) with modifications. The RAW emulsion was sonicated for 5 min in an ice bath using a UP200ST ultrasonic immersion homogenizer (Hielsher©, Teltow, Germany) at 100 W power. The (HPM) nano-emulsion was obtained by high-pressure micro-fluidization technique as described by Modafferi et al. (2024), using an LM20 microfluidizer (Microfluidizer™ Processor, USA) for 5 cycles at 30,000 PSI. To avoid the degradation of the EO due to the heat generated during the process, the interaction chamber and heat exchanger were immersed in an ice bath to maintain a low temperature (< 10 °C). The SH nano-emulsion was obtained by integrating both the sonication and the microfluidization processes, respectively, at the same operative conditions. The nano-emulsions were then stored at 4 °C until characterization.
Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) instrument was used to evaluate the physical characteristics. Particularly, droplet size, polydispersity index (PDI), and surface charge (ζ) values of each developed nano-formulation were measured. The analysis was repeated 1, 7, 50, and 100 days after preparation to assess the stability of the developed nano-emulsions over time. The DLS analyses were done by diluting the samples with double distilled water (1:400 v:v).
Residual contact toxicity against Planococcus citri
The bioactivity of the developed garlic EO-based nano-emulsions was determined through leaf dip method to evaluate their residual contact toxicity. Circular sections (Ø 5 cm) of untreated citrus leaves were individually immersed for 10 s in different nano-formulation dilutions. The treated leaf discs were dried at room temperature and placed in ventilated plastic Petri dishes (Ø 5.5 cm). Fifteen unsexed 3rd instar of P. citri nymphs from the laboratory rearing were gently placed on the surface of treated leaf. Petri dishes were placed inside climate chambers set at the same climatic conditions used for insect rearing. Mortality was recorded 24 and 48 h after treatment. Insects were considered dead if immobile after stimulation with a fine brush. Preliminary tests were conducted to check mortality at high concentration (2.5% EO). To estimate lethal doses, only formulations that caused 100% mortality of the exposed mealybugs were subsequently tested by applying serial dilutions (1.87, 1.25, 0.93, 0.625, and 0.46% EO). Dilutions of each nano-emulsion were made by adding the required amount of distilled water. Each dose was replicated six times and distilled water was used as untreated control.
Toxicity toward Apis mellifera
The acute toxicity of SN, SH, and HPM nano-emulsions toward A. mellifera was evaluated using LD50 and LD90 estimated on P. citri after 48 h. The raw emulsion was excluded due to its instability and low efficacy against P. citri. For this trial, we followed the topical application method described by Medrzycki et al. (2013). Briefly, bees were collected and anaesthetized with carbon dioxide. Then, 1 µL of nano-emulsions diluted in distilled water was placed on each bee's thorax to achieve the desired concentration. Treated bees were then transferred inside Bugdorm cages (30 × 30 × 30 cm) and fed ad libitum with a 50% (w/v) sucrose solution. Each replicate included 10 worker bees and the experiment was replicated six times. The experimental procedure included a treated (dimethoate applied at 0.01 ppm) and an untreated (distilled water) control, and it was conducted under laboratory conditions at 25 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 5% R.H. with a photoperiod of 16 h:8 h (L:D). The mortality of the bees was recorded at 24, 48, and 96 h after the treatment. Specimens were considered dead if they failed to move when stimulated with a fine brush.
Data analysis
Datasets were checked for normality and homoscedasticity of variance through Levene and Shapiro–Wilk tests (P > 0.05) and log-transformed whenever needed. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the differences in physical characteristics over time among the different nano-formulations with size, polydispersity index (PDI), and zeta potential values as dependent variables, and the methodology used as fixed factors. Multiple comparisons were assessed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test. P. citri mortality registered 24 and 48 h after the treatment was corrected for control mortality using Abbott’s formula (Abbott 1925). LD50 and LD90 values and their fiducial limits were estimated using the Probit analysis. LD values were considered significantly different if their 95% fiducial limits did not overlap. The effects of the different treatments on honeybee mortality were subjected to the Kruskal–Wallis test. Statistics were carried out using IBM® SPSS® Statistics v. 23 (IBM Corp. Released 2015. Armonk, NY, USA).
Results
Chemical composition of Allium sativum EO
The chemical composition of A. sativum EO is shown in Table 1. A total of 44 peaks were recorded (Supplementary Fig. S1), and twenty-four compounds corresponding to 96.3% of the total area were identified from GC–MS analysis. The A. sativum EO was composed of sulfur compounds with diallyl disulfide (37.26%), diallyl trisulfide (28.15%), diallyl tetrasulfide (12.20%), 1-allyl-3-(2-(allylthio)propyl)trisulfane (6.69%) and diallyl sulfide (5.84%) as the most abundant detected compounds.
Physical characteristics of Allium sativum EO-based nano-emulsions
The developed nano-emulsions showed different physical characteristics. The use of high-energy methods allowed the development of highly stable nano-emulsions with droplet size in the nanometric range, low PDI values, and good stability indicated by negative surface charge. Conversely, the self-emulsifier method resulted in droplet sizes that did not fall within the nanometric range (> 500 nm) and a high polydispersity index (PDI tending to 1). Statistical differences were recorded over time in all physical characteristics between the different production processes (P < 0.05). Generally, the droplet size showed an increasing trend over time. After one day the smallest droplet sizes were registered in SH and HPM methods (72.61 ± 0.13 and 73.56 ± 0.19 nm, respectively) (F = 12,986.2; df = 3; P < 0.01), while at the end of the observations (100 days after the nano-emulsions production), the droplets in the HPM nano-emulsion (108.3 ± 0.35 nm) were smaller than those of the formulations produced with the other methods (F = 287.81; df = 3; P < 0.01) (Fig. 1A). The PDI registered during the entire period of observation showed low values (0.06 ± 0.006—0.187 ± 0.01) in SN, SH, and HPM nano-emulsions, while the RAW nano-emulsion was characterized by high PDI values (0.912 ± 0.07–0.988 ± 0.008). After one day, statistical differences were observed among all nano-emulsions, and the HPM method highlighted the best homogeneity (0.06 ± 0.006) (F = 129.1; df = 3; P < 0.01). On the other hand, 100 days after preparation, statistical differences were observed almost among all the different production methods (F = 5.21; df = 3; P < 0.05) (Fig. 1B). The ζ -potential analysis showed negative values for all the formulations, and the surface charge varied with time and the production method (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1C).
Toxicity against Planoccoccus citri
The A. sativum EO-based nano-formulations exhibited different efficacy against the immature stages of P. citri. The preliminary trial at the high percentage of active ingredient (a.i.) (2.5% of EO) showed that the nano-emulsions obtained through the use of a high-energy process (i.e., SN, SH and HPM) provided effective control of the pest, resulting in 100% mortality. Differently, RAW emulsion did not particularly affect the insects either 24 or 48 h after the treatment (Fig. 2). The mortality registered in P. citri treated with serial dilution of SN, SH, and HPM fitted in the Probit model (P > 0.05) showing dose–response mortality both 24 and 48 h (Fig. 3). In all cases, the lethal doses (LD50 and LD90) highlighted no statistical difference between the different exposure times (24 and 48 h) and between the different production processes (Table 2).
Toxicity toward Apis mellifera
The acute topic toxicity of the nano-emulsions (SN, SH, and HPM) toward A. mellifera workers is shown in Fig. 4. 96 hours after the exposure, no statistical differences were observed among LD50, LD90, and negative control (water) for all the developed nano-emulsions. Conversely, statistical differences were observed between positive control (dimethoate) and the LD50 and LD90 of nano-emulsions (H = 23.000; df = 7; P < 0.05). In particular, the nano-emulsions had no effect on the exposed honeybees (100% survival), while dimethoate resulted in the death of all the bees.
Discussion
The GC–MS analysis showed that garlic EO was mainly composed of sulfur compounds (over 95%), and among them, diallyl disulfide was the most abundant (37.26%) followed by diallyl trisulfide (28.15%). Modafferi et al. (2024) on the other hand showed that garlic EO was mainly composed of diallyl disulfide (73.5%) followed by diallyl sulfide (16.2%). According to our results, Sommano et al. (2016) proved that garlic EO from different countries contained the same proportion of these two principal compounds. However, the amount of these molecules within the EO depends on the extraction and drying methodologies (Satyal et al. 2017; Condurso et al. 2019), as well as by the sampling technique can also impact the identified compounds. As an example, in the present study, garlic EO diluted in hexane was directly injected in GC–MS port; this methodology can impair the identification of the smallest EO components with retention indexes similar to the solvent’s one, since their GC_MS pikes can be covered by solvent (i.e., hexane). On the other hand, the methodology used by Modafferi et al. (2024), i.e., headspace SPME (solid phase micro extraction) technique, requires no solvent but can be less sensitive to the less volatile molecules or to substances weakly affine to the selected fiber or extraction substrates.
This work aimed to develop four different A. sativum EO-based insecticide nano-emulsions with high a.i. (15% w/w) and low surfactant (5% w/w) amounts through mixed bottom-up/top-down approaches. Generally, bottom-up processes cannot produce emulsions with fine and homogeneous droplets in the nano-meter range (Campolo et al. 2020). In agreement with this study, our RAW emulsion had mean droplet sizes around 500 ± 83.60 and 1,647 ± 440.69 nm after 1 and 100 days, respectively. Furthermore, the RAW emulsion exhibited highly polydisperse droplets with PDI values close to 1 throughout the observation times. Conversely, several studies reported the effectiveness of these approaches in the preparation of nano-emulsions with other EOs. Using the self-emulsification process, Chang and McClements (2014) obtained a transparent orange EO nano-emulsion (20% surfactant, 10% oil phase, and 70% water w/w) that showed droplet size around 20 nm. Another study reported that the phase inversion temperature (PIT) method allowed to obtain different Origanum vulgare EO-based nano-emulsions (20% surfactant; 10% oil phase and 70% water w/w) with droplet size in the range of 35–55 nm (Moraes-Lovison et al. 2017). The use of the bottom-up process presents some limitations depending on the type of EO, the surfactant, and their relative ratios that reduce its application in nano-emulsion preparation (Sessa and Donsì 2015; Donsì and Ferrari 2016). This aspect should be considered since high amount of surfactant often results in phytotoxicity toward crop plants (Temple and Hilton 1963; Falk et al. 1994; Appah et al. 2020; Mirgorodskaya et al. 2020).
The top-down approaches allowed us to develop garlic EO-based nano-emulsions (i.e., SN, SH, and HPM) with droplet size in the nanometric range (< 200 nm) and good homogeneity (PDI less than < 0.2), Other researchers highlighted the efficacy of the top-down approaches to develop garlic EO-based nano-emulsions. Through sonication methods, Palermo et al. (2021) prepared several EOs-based nano-insecticides, including a garlic nano-emulsion. This garlic formulation had similar characteristics to our SN nano-emulsion, with a droplet size of 144.30 ± 0.15 nm and PDI of 0.164 ± 0.008. Similarly, Liu et al. (2022) developed different garlic EO-based nano-emulsions using different sonication duration (0, 1, 5 and 10 min). All the developed formulations had droplet sizes and PDI values higher than those obtained in this study by SN, SH, and HPM approaches.
The surface charge, achieved (− 5.13 to − 38.5 mV) in our garlic EO nano-emulsion should contribute, together with the steric repulsion, to the stability recorded over time. Usually, surface charges around ± 30 mV are considered predictors of stability, but the use of non-ionic surfactants (i.e., Tween 80) owes their main stability to both steric and electrostatic repulsions (Gul et al. 2018; Akbari and Nour 2018; Liu et al. 2022). In these cases, ζ-potential values of ± 20 mV coupled with small droplet size could stabilize nano-emulsions (Müller et al. 2001; Malhotra and Coupland 2004; Campolo et al. 2020).
The biological activity of aqueous or solvent garlic extracts against scale pests has been quite well studied. As an example, Fand et al (2012) demonstrated the efficacy of aqueous garlic extract against 2nd instar nymphs of Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), proving that the topical application of a 1% concentrated garlic solution reduced the insect population by about 50%. Similarly, Prishanthini and Vinobaba (2014) highlighted the efficacy of different botanical extracts, including garlic, against P. solenopsis adults. The results showed a dose–response mortality with an estimated LC50 of 1.15% for A. sativum extract. Garlic extract was also found effective against Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead (Hemiptera: Diaspididae), and its application reduced the insect population in field conditions (Siam and Othman 2020). Furthermore, garlic extract exhibited strong residual toxicity (LC90 = 121.96 ppm) against Icerya purchasi Maskell (Homoptera: Margarodidae) (Allam et al. 2022). Other authors reported that the methanolic extract and EO of garlic were effective against 3rd instar of Pseudococcus viburni Sigornet (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), with an estimated LC50 of 0.12% and 0.31% 48 h after the exposure, respectively (Ramzi et al. 2022), and against Pseudococcus longispinus Targioni Tozzetti (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) with an estimated LC50 of 1.65% (Smith 2015).
Limited studies are available about the EO obtained from this plant toward scale pests. Mwanauta et al. (2023) reported the efficacy of this EO against Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). The results obtained 72 h after the exposure highlighted a good mortality (73.0 ± 1.7%) caused by pure garlic EO at 1.5% concentration. Modafferi et al. (2024), also investigated the bioactivity of garlic EO-based nano-emulsion against P. citri. The results highlighted a high efficacy of this formulation through direct and indirect application of EO exhibiting LC90 of 0.967 and 1.088%, respectively, 48 h after the exposure. The LD90 calculated in this study after 24 and 48 h are comparable to the above-mentioned results and suggest that the formulation of the EO in nano-emulsion can improve the bioavailability and bioactivity of garlic EO also against other target scale pests.
The selectivity of these substances toward non-target organisms (e.g., predators, parasitoids, and pollinators) is a poorly investigated aspect about the use of EOs or their formulations as biopesticides. Nevertheless, several studies have proven the detrimental effect of biopesticides toward several bee species, including A. mellifera (reviewed in Borges et al. 2021; Cappa et al. 2022). Concerning botanicals, EOs were extensively investigated for the potential use in beekeeping for controlling Varroa spp. mites or other parasites on A. mellifera, and the majority of these compounds showed low toxic effects for honeybees (Ntalli et al. 2022; Catania et al. 2023). The present study tested the garlic EO-based nano-emulsions (i.e., SN, SH, and HPM) for selectivity toward A. mellifera. These nano-emulsions did not affect the honeybee mortality, and 100% of the specimens survived after exposure to all the concentrations of the tested formulations. Overall, the selectivity of these natural substances was influenced by some variables (e.g., type of EO, application rate, doses, insect species, etc.) (Giunti et al. 2022). For example, Xavier et al. (2015) assessed the toxicity of several botanical pesticides toward A. mellifera adults. The results demonstrated that citronella oil, eucalyptus oil, garlic extract, neem oil, and rotenone were highly toxic against bee larvae in ingestion bioassay, while andiroba oil was not statistically different from negative control. Furthermore, all the tested botanical extracts were repellent toward adult bees (Xavier et al. 2015). Some EOs can cause severe mortality for honeybees, as well as for other bee species. Melo et al. (2018) proved that the topical application of thymol and carvacrol caused high mortality (> 80%) toward A. mellifera adults, as also reported in Tetragonisca angustula (Latreille) (Meliponinae), in which more than 70% of mortality was caused by topical application of Artemisia annua L. EO (Seixas et al. 2018). Similarly, da Silva et al. (2020) reported lower toxicity of mint and ginger EOs toward honeybees than oregano and thyme EOs. Nevertheless, toxicological studies should take into account that thyme EOs is considered safe for honeybees in field conditions, since it is a widely used acaricide for the control of Varroa mites (van der Steen and Vejsnæs 2021). Moreover, EO doses and its application methods used for toxicological test against A. mellifera should be comparable to those used in real conditions. As an example, garlic extract and EO were safely applied on honeybee colonies by Mazeed and El-Solimany (2020) to manage Varroa destructor Anderson & Trueman.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study is focused on developing garlic essential oil (GEO)-based nano-emulsions for potential insecticidal applications. Mixed and single bottom-up/top-down approaches were used to develop the nano-emulsions, the latter proving effective in achieving nanometric droplet sizes (< 200 nm) and good homogeneity. The limited research on their bioactivity against P. citri prompted this investigation, which confirmed promising results in terms of mortality. An essential aspect addressed in this study was the selectivity of garlic EO-based nano-emulsions for honeybee workers. The results indicated a lack of adverse effects of garlic EO on A. mellifera mortality, suggesting its environmentally friendly potential. Further research is warranted to explore the full potentiality of these nano-emulsions in integrated pest management strategies and their broader ecological impact.
Author contribution
AM, GG and OC conceived and designed research. AM, FL and IL conducted experiments. AM, AU, MPH, MR and VP analyzed data. AM wrote the manuscript. All authors revised, read and approved the manuscript.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abbott WS (1925) A method for computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18(2):265–267. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/18.2.265a
Adams RP (2017) Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. 5, online. Texensis Publishing, Gruver, TX USA
Afifi AI, El Arnaouty SA, Attia AR, Alla AEMA (2010) Biological control of citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso.) using coccinellid predator, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. Pak J Biol Sci 13:216–222. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2010.216.222
Akbari S, Nour AH (2018) Emulsion types, stability mechanisms and rheology: a review. Int J Innov Res Sci Stud 1:14–21. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v1i1.4
Allam ROH, Mohanny KM, Mohamed GS et al (2022) Toxicity of three insecticides and some alternatives against cottony cushion scale, Icerya purchasi (Maskell) under laboratory conditions. SVU-Int J Agric Sci 4:135–142. https://doi.org/10.21608/SVUIJAS.2022.149264.1221
Alloui-Griza R, Cherif A, Attia S et al (2022) Lethal toxicity of Thymus capitatus essential oil against Planococcus citri (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and its coccinellid predator Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). J Entomol Sci 57(3):425–435. https://doi.org/10.18474/JES21-81
Anton N, Benoit JP, Saulnier P (2008) Design and production of nanoparticles formulated from nano-emulsion templates—a review. J Control Release 128:185–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCONREL.2008.02.007
Appah S, Jia W, Ou M et al (2020) Analysis of potential impaction and phytotoxicity of surfactant-plant surface interaction in pesticide application. J Crop Prot 127:104961. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CROPRO.2019.104961
Arole VM, Munde SV (2014) Fabrication of nanomaterials by top-down and bottom-up approaches-an overview. J Mater Sci 1:89–93. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202451101003
Attia S, Grissa KL, Mailleux AC et al (2012) Effective concentrations of garlic distillate (Allium sativum) for the control of Tetranychus urticae (Tetranychidae). J Appl Entomol 136(4):302–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2011.01640.x
Attia S, Mansour R, Abdennour N et al (2022) Toxicity of Mentha pulegium essential oil and chemical pesticides toward citrus pest scale insects and the coccinellid predator Cryptolaemus montrouzieri. Int J Trop Insect Sci 42(5):3513–3523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-022-00870-y
Barradas TN, de Holanda e Silva KG (2020) Nanoemulsions of essential oils to improve solubility, stability and permeability: a review. Environ Chem Lett 19:1153–1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10311-020-01142-2
Ben Abdallah S, Riahi C, Vacas S et al (2023) The dual benefit of plant essential oils against Tuta absoluta. Plants 12(5):985. https://doi.org/10.3390/PLANTS12050985/S1
Borges S, Alkassab AT, Collison et al (2021) Overview of the testing and assessment of effects of microbial pesticides on bees: strengths, challenges and perspectives. Apidologie. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-021-00900-7
Bouchemal K, Briançon S, Perrier E, Fessi H (2004) Nano-emulsion formulation using spontaneous emulsification: solvent, oil and surfactant optimisation. Int J Pharm 280(1–2):241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.05.016
Campolo O, Cherif A, Ricupero M et al (2017) Citrus peel essential oil nanoformulations to control the tomato borer, Tuta absoluta: Chemical properties and biological activity. Sci Rep 7:13036. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-017-13413-0
Campolo O, Giunti G, Laigle M et al (2020) Essential oil-based nano-emulsions: effect of different surfactants, sonication and plant species on physicochemical characteristics. Ind Crop Prod 157:112935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112935
Campolo O, Giunti G, Russo A, Palmeri V, Zappalà L (2018) Essential oils in stored product insect pest control. J Food Qual. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6906105
Cappa F, Baracchi D, Cervo R (2022) Biopesticides and insect pollinators: detrimental effects, outdated guidelines, and future directions. Sci Total Environ 837:155714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155714
Catani L, Manachini B, Grassi E et al (2023) Essential oils as nematicides in plant protection—a review. Plants 12(6):1418. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12061418
Catania R, Lima MAP, Potrich M, Sgolastra F, Zappalà L, Mazzeo G (2023) Are botanical biopesticides safe for bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea)? InSects 14(3):247. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030247
Chan HK, Kwok PCL (2011) Production methods for nanodrug particles using the bottom-up approach. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 63(6):406–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADDR.2011.03.011
Chang Y, McClements DJ (2014) Optimization of orange oil nanoemulsion formation by isothermal low-energy methods: Influence of the oil phase, surfactant, and temperature. J Agric Food Chem 62(10):2306–2312. https://doi.org/10.1021/JF500160Y
Chude CF, Chude C (2020) Effects of Zingiber officinale and Allium sativum as biopreservative against weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) infested rice grains. Eur J Food Sci Technol 8(2):24–31. https://doi.org/10.37745/ejfst.2013
Cloyd RA, Galle CL, Keith SR et al (2009) Effect of commercially available plant-derived essential oil products on arthropod pests. J Econ Entomol 102(4):1567–1579. https://doi.org/10.1603/029.102.0422
Condurso C, Cincotta F, Tripodi G et al (2019) Influence of drying technologies on the aroma of Sicilian red garlic. LWT 104:180–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LWT.2019.01.026
Davies NW (1990) Gas chromatographic retention indices of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes on methyl silicon and Carbowax 20M phases. J Chromatogr A 503:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)81487-4
da Silva IM, Zanuncio JC, Brügger BP et al (2020) Selectivity of the botanical compounds to the pollinators Apis mellifera and Trigona hyalinata (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Sci Rep 10(1):4820. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61469-2
Donsì F, Ferrari G (2016) Essential oil nanoemulsions as antimicrobial agents in food. J Biotech 233:106–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBIOTEC.2016.07.005
Douiri L, Boughdad A, Assobhei O, Moumni M (2013) Chemical composition and biological activity of Allium sativum essential oils against Callosobruchus maculatus. Toxicol Food Technol 3(1):30–36. https://doi.org/10.9790/2402-0313036
Erdemir T, Erler F (2017) Repellent, oviposition-deterrent and egg-hatching inhibitory effects of some plant essential oils against citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri Risso (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). J Plant Dis Prot 124:473–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/S41348-017-0112-X
Erdemİr T, Erler F (2018) Fumigant toxicity of five plant essential oils against citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri Risso (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Fresenius Environ Bull 27:3231–3235. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010109
Falk RH, Guggenheim R, Schulke G (1994) Surfactant-Induced Phytotoxicity. Weed Tech 8(3):519–525. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0890037x00039610
Fand BB, Gautam RD, Kamra ANJU, Suroshe SS, Mohan SHARAD (2012) Bioefficacy of aqueous garlic extract and a symbiotic bacterium, Photorhabdus luminescens against Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Biopestic Int 8:38–48
Franco JC, Suma P, Da Silva EB, Blumberg D, Mendel Z (2004) Management strategies of mealybug pests of citrus in Mediterranean countries. Phytoparasitica 32:507–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02980445
Franzios G, Mirotsou M, Hatziapostolou E et al (1997) Insecticidal and genotoxic activities of mint essential oils. J Agric Food Chem 45(7):2690–2694. https://doi.org/10.1021/JF960685F
Galisteo A, González-Coloma A, Castillo P, Andrés MF (2022) Valorization of the hydrolate byproduct from the industrial extraction of purple Allium sativum essential oil as a source of nematicidal products. Life 12(6):905. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12060905
Ghaffari S, Karimi J, Kamali S, Mahdikhani Moghadam E (2017) Biocontrol of Planococcus citri (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) by Lecanicillium longisporum and Lecanicillium lecanii under laboratory and greenhouse conditions. J Asia Pac Entomol 20(2):605–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ASPEN.2017.03.019
Giunti G, Benelli G, Palmeri V et al (2022) Non-target effects of essential oil-based biopesticides for crop protection: impact on natural enemies, pollinators, and soil invertebrates. Biol Control 176:105071. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOCONTROL.2022.105071
Giunti G, Campolo O, Laudani F et al (2023) Essential oil-based nanoinsecticides. Development and Commercialization of Biopesticides. Elsevier, pp 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95290-3.00002-9
Giunti G, Palermo D, Laudani F et al (2019) Repellence and acute toxicity of a nano-emulsion of sweet orange essential oil toward two major stored grain insect pests. Ind Crops Prod 142:111869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111869
Gul O, Saricaoglu FT, Besir A et al (2018) Effect of ultrasound treatment on the properties of nano-emulsion films obtained from hazelnut meal protein and clove essential oil. Ultrason Sonochem 41:466–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTSONCH.2017.10.011
Hamada HM, Awad M, El-Hefny M, Moustafa MAM (2018) Insecticidal activity of garlic (Allium sativum) and ginger (Zingiber officinale) oils on the cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Afr Entomol 26(1):84–94. https://doi.org/10.4001/003.026.0084
Huang Y, Chen SX, Ho SH (2000) Bioactivities of methyl allyl disulfide and diallyl trisulfide from essential oil of garlic to two species of stored-product pests, Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J Econ Entomol 93(2):537–543. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-93.2.537
Jardim IN, Oliveira DF, Campos VP et al (2020) Garlic essential oil reduces the population of Meloidogyne incognita in tomato plants. Eur J Plant Pathol 157:197–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-020-02000-1
Jennings W (2012) Qualitative analysis of flavor and fragrance volatiles by glass capillary gas chromatography. Elsevier
Karalija E, Dahija S, Parić A, Zeljković SĆ (2020) Phytotoxic potential of selected essential oils against Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle, an invasive tree. Sustain Chem Pharm 15:100219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2020.100219
Koul O, Walia S, Dhaliwal GS (2008) Essential oils as green pesticides: potential and constraints. Biopestic Int 4(1):63–84. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9030365
Laudani F, Campolo O, Caridi R et al (2022) Aphicidal activity and phytotoxicity of Citrus sinensis essential-oil-based Nano-Insecticide. InSects 13:1150. https://doi.org/10.3390/INSECTS13121150
Liu M, Pan Y, Feng M et al (2022) Garlic essential oil in water nanoemulsion prepared by high-power ultrasound: Properties, stability and its antibacterial mechanism against MRSA isolated from pork. Ultrason Sonochem 90:106201. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTSONCH.2022.106201
Malhotra A, Coupland JN (2004) The effect of surfactants on the solubility, zeta potential, and viscosity of soy protein isolates. Food Hydrocoll 18(1):101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-005X(03)00047-X
Mansour R, Belzunces LP, Suma P et al (2018) Vine and citrus mealybug pest control based on synthetic chemicals. A Review Agron Sustain Dev 38:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0513-7
Mazeed AR, El-Solimany EA (2020) Garlic, Allium sativum L. and onion, Allium cepa L. as a potent anti-mite Varroa destructor, parasited on honey bee, Apis mellifera L. in Egypt. J Plant Prot Pathol 11(1):25–28. https://doi.org/10.21608/jppp.2020.82425
McClements DJ, Rao J (2011) Food-grade nanoemulsions: formulation, fabrication, properties, performance, biological fate, and potential toxicity. Crit Rev Food Sci 51(4):285–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.559558
Medrzycki P, Giffard H, Aupinel P et al (2013) Standard methods for toxicology research in LD. J Apic Res 52(4):1–60. https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.52.4.14
Melo CR, Picanço MC, Santos AA et al (2018) Toxicity of essential oils of Lippia gracilis chemotypes and their major compounds on Diaphania hyalinata and non-target species. Crop Prot 104:47–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CROPRO.2017.10.013
Mirgorodskaya AB, Kushnazarova R, Lukashenko SS et al (2020) Carbamate-bearing surfactants as effective adjuvants promoted the penetration of the herbicide into the plant. Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng 586:124252. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COLSURFA.2019.124252
Modafferi A, Ricupero M, Mostacchio G et al (2024) Bioactivity of Allium sativum essential oil-based nano-emulsion against Planococcus citri and its predator Cryptolaemus montrouzieri. Ind Crops Prod 208:117837. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INDCROP.2023.117837
Moraes-Lovison M, Marostegan LFP, Peres MS et al (2017) Nanoemulsions encapsulating oregano essential oil: production, stability, antibacterial activity and incorporation in chicken pâté. LWT 77:233–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LWT.2016.11.061
Mossa ATH (2016) Green pesticides: essential oils as biopesticides in insect-pest management. J Environ Sci Technol 9(5):354. https://doi.org/10.3923/jest.2016.354.378
Mossa ATH, Afia SI, Mohafrash SMM, Abou-Awad BA (2018) Formulation and characterization of garlic (Allium sativum L.) essential oil nanoemulsion and its acaricidal activity on eriophyid olive mites (Acari: Eriophyidae). Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:10526–10537. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-017-0752-1
Mwanauta RW, Ndakidemi PA, Venkataramana PB (2023) Biopesticide efficacy of four plant essential oils against papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14162
Müller RH, Jacobs C, Kayser O (2001) Nanosuspensions as particulate drug formulations in therapy: Rationale for development and what we can expect for the future. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 47(1):3–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(00)00118-6
Nenaah GE, Ibrahim SIA, Al-Assiuty BA (2015) Chemical composition, insecticidal activity and persistence of three Asteraceae essential oils and their nanoemulsions against Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). J Stored Prod Res 61:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2014.12.007
Nguyen MH, Nguyen THN, Tran TNM et al (2022) Comparison of the nematode-controlling effectiveness of 10 different essential oil-encapsulated lipid nanoemulsions. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot 55(4):420–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2021.2025321
Ntalli NG, Spochacz M, Adamski Z (2022) The role of botanical treatments used in apiculture to control arthropod pests. Apidologie 53:27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-022-00924-7
Oro V, Krnjajic S, Tabakovic M et al (2020) Nematicidal activity of essential oils on a Psychrophilic panagrolaimus sp. (nematoda: Panagrolaimidae). Plants 9(11):1588. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111588
Palermo D, Giunti G, Laudani F et al (2021) Essential oil-based nano-biopesticides: formulation and bioactivity against the confused flour beetle Tribolium confusum. Sustainability 13(17):9746. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13179746/S1
Park IK, Park JY, Kim KH et al (2005) Nematicidal activity of plant essential oils and components from garlic (Allium sativum) and cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum) oils against the pine wood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus). Nematology 7(5):767–774. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854105775142946
Pavela R, Benelli G (2016) Essential oils as ecofriendly biopesticides? Challenges and Constraints. Trends Plant Sci 21(12):1000–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2016.10.005
Priestley CM, Williamson EM, Wafford KA, Sattelle DB (2003) Thymol, a constituent of thyme essential oil, is a positive allosteric modulator of human GABA(A) receptors and a homo-oligomeric GABA receptor from Drosophila melanogaster. Br J Pharmacol 140(8):1363–1372. https://doi.org/10.1038/SJ.BJP.0705542
Prishanthini M, Vinobaba M (2014) Efficacy of some selected botanical extracts against the cotton mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Int J Recent Sci Res 4(3):1–6
Ramzi S, Seraji A, Azadi Gonbad R, Roofigari Haghighat S (2022) Effects of the extract and the essential oil of Allium sativum on tea mealy bug, Pseudococcus viburni Sigornet (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 42:102359. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BCAB.2022.102359
Raybaudi-Massilia RM, Mosqueda-Melgar J, Martín-Belloso O (2006) Antimicrobial activity of essential oils on Salmonella Enteritidis, Escherichia coli, and Listeria innocua in fruit juices. J Food Prot 69(7):1579–1586. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-69.7.1579
Ricupero M, Biondi A, Cincotta F et al (2022) Bioactivity and physico-chemistry of garlic essential oil nanoemulsion in tomato. Entomol Gen 1127:921–930. https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2022/1553
Rizzo R, Lo Verde G, Sinacori M et al (2020) Developing green insecticides to manage olive fruit flies? Ingestion toxicity of four essential oils in protein baits on Bactrocera oleae. Ind Crops Prod 143:111884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111884
Sagalowicz L, Leser ME (2010) Delivery systems for liquid food products. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 15(1–2):61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COCIS.2009.12.003
Santana RC, Perrechil FA, Cunha RL (2013) High- and low-energy emulsifications for food applications: a focus on process parameters. Food Eng Rev 5:107–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12393-013-9065-4
Sararit P, Auamcharoen W (2020) Biological activities of essential oils from Anethum graveolens L. and Allium sativum L. for controlling Tetranychus truncatus Ehara and Tetranychus urticae Koch. J Biopest 13(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.57182/jbiopestic.13.1.01-12
Satyal P, Craft JD, Dosoky NS, Setzer WN (2017) The chemical compositions of the volatile oils of garlic (Allium sativum) and Wild Garlic (Allium vineale). Foods 6:63. https://doi.org/10.3390/FOODS6080063
Seixas PTL, Demuner AJ, Alvarenga ES et al (2018) Bioactivity of essential oils from artemisia against Diaphania hyalinata and its selectivity to beneficial insects. Sci Agric 75:519–525. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992x-2016-0461
Sessa M, Donsì F (2015) Nanoemulsion-based delivery systems. Microencapsul Microsph Food Appl. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800350-3.00007-8
Siam A, Othman E (2020) Field evaluation of botanicals extracts for suppressing the mango scale insect, Aulacaspis tubercularis (Newstead) (Hemiptera: Diaspididae). Egypt J Biol Pest Control 30:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41938-020-00221-4
Smith K (2015) 24, 48 and 72 hour contact toxicity test of peppermint (Mentha piperita), garlic (Allium sativum L.) and lemon (Citrus limon L.) essential oil on the long-tailed mealybug (Pseudococcus longispinus). Concordia Univ College of Alberta’s EnSc 495 Progr. https://doi.org/10.7939/R3-AZPA-4J88
Sommano S, Saratan N, Suksathan R, Pusadee T (2016) Chemical composition and comparison of genetic variation of commonly available Thai garlic used as food supplement. J Appl Bot Food Qual 89:235–242. https://doi.org/10.5073/JABFQ.2016.089.030
Sugumar S, Clarke SK, Nirmala MJ et al (2014) Nanoemulsion of eucalyptus oil and its larvicidal activity against Culex quinquefasciatus. Bull Entom Res 104(3):393–402. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485313000710
Tadros T, Izquierdo P, Esquena J, Solans C (2004) Formation and stability of nano-emulsions. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 108:303–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIS.2003.10.023
Temple RE, Hilton HW (1963) The effect of surfactants on the water solubility of herbicides, and the foliar phytotoxicity of surfactants. Weeds 11:297–300. https://doi.org/10.2307/4040537
van Den Dool H, Dec. Kratz P, (1963) A generalization of the retention index system including linear temperature programmed gas-liquid partition chromatography. J Chromatogr 11:463–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)80947-X
van der Steen J, Vejsnæs F (2021) Varroa control: a brief overview of available methods. Bee World 98(2):50–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.2021.1896196
Verma S, Gokhale R, Burgess DJ (2009) A comparative study of top-down and bottom-up approaches for the preparation of micro/nanosuspensions. Int J Pharm 380(1–2):216–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPHARM.2009.07.005
Xavier VM, Message D, Picanço MC et al (2015) Acute toxicity and sublethal effects of botanical insecticides to honey bees. J Insect Sci 15:137. https://doi.org/10.1093/JISESA/IEV110
Yang FL, Zhu F, Lei CL (2010) Garlic essential oil and its major component as fumigants for controlling Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) in chambers filled with stored grain. J Pest Sci 83:311–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10340-010-0300-Y
Yoshiro M (1976) Analysis of essential oils by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. Wiley & Sons Inc., New York
Zappalà L (2010) Citrus integrated pest management in Italy. Integrated management of arthropod pests and insect borne diseases. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8606-8_4
Zhou C, Rao Y, Rao Y (2008) A subset of octopaminergic neurons are important for Drosophila aggression. Nat Neurosci 11(9):1059–1067. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2164
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Salerno within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. This study was carried out within the project ASTER from Call Prima Sect. 2 2021—Multi-Topic, the Agritech National Research Center and received funding from the European Union Next-Generation EU (PIANO NAZIONALE DI RIPRESA E RESILIENZA (PNRR) – MISSIONE 4 COMPONENTE 2, INVESTIMENTO 1.4 – D.D. 1032 17/06/2022, CN00000022). This manuscript reflects only the authors’ views and opinions, neither the European Union nor the European Commission can be considered responsible for them.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Additional information
Communicated by Azucena Gonzalez-Coloma.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Modafferi, A., Giunti, G., Urbaneja, A. et al. High-energy emulsification of Allium sativum essential oil boosts insecticidal activity against Planococcus citri with no risk to honeybees. J Pest Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-024-01800-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-024-01800-2