Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of plant secondary metabolites on feeding behavior of microtine and arvicoline rodent species

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Pest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rodents are among the most damaging pests in agriculture worldwide. High-density populations of rodent pests can kill plants or diminish their growth, and reduce both fruit size and the number of seeds. Therefore, rodent pests can lead to considerable crop loss and require management actions to minimize damage. Optimal management of pest rodents is usually based on the combination of methods to reduce damage. Although rodenticides are usually the most commonly deployed approach, they have undesirable side effects. Consequently, more environmentally benign approaches such as repellents or attractants to lure rodents away from fields are gaining traction. The dispersal of a large number of juvenile males at certain times of year has prompted us to focus on male rodents for our experiments. We used laboratory feeding experiments to measure how the odor of plant secondary metabolites (PSMs) affects two pest rodents: common voles (Microtus arvalis, Pallas) and house mice (Mus musculus, L.). We tested eighteen different PSMs or combinations thereof with voles. Four PSMs reduced feeding and seven PSMs increased feeding of male common voles. Five of six tested odors were effective as repellents against house mice. However, we assume a species-specific response to volatile PSMs repellents. This study demonstrated that four repellents reduced feeding in both rodent species. Our results contribute to the development of non-lethal management tools for rodent pest species that are potentially more suitable than traps and rodenticides. This approach could be applicable to a variety of crops if effective at field conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn YJ, Lee SB, Okubo T, Kim M (1995) Antignawing factor of crude oil derived from Thujopsis dolabrata S. et Z. var. hondai sawdust against mice. J Chem Ecol 21:263–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Apfelbach R, Blanchard CD, Blanchard RJ, Hayes RA, McGregor IS (2005) The effects of predator odors in mammalian prey species: a review of field and laboratory studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:1123–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bäumler W, Mielke H, Zahner V (1990) Behandlung von Eicheln mit Repellentien gegen Nagetierschäden. Anz Schädlingskd Pfl Umwelt 63:15–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnefoy X, Kampen H, Sweeney K (2008) Public health significance of urban pests. WHO, Copenhagen: 1–569

  • Borrecco JE (1976) Controlling damage by forest rodents and lagomorphs through habitat manipulation. In: Siebe CC (ed) Proceedings of the 7th Vertebrate Pest Conference, Monterey. University of California, Davis, California pp 203–210

  • Brown PR, Singleton GR, Tann CR, Mock I (2003) Increasing sowing depth to reduce mouse damage to winter crops. Crop Prot 22:653–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryja J, Nesvadbova J, Heroldova M, Janova E, Losik J, Trebaticka L, Tkadlec E (2005) Common vole (Microtus arvalis) population sex ratio: biases and process variation. Can J Zool 83:1391–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckle A, Prescott C, Ward K (1994) Resistance to the first and second generation anticoagulant rodenticides-a new perspective. In: Halverson WS, Crabb AC (eds) Proceedings of the 16th Vertebrate Pest Conference, Santa Clara. University of California, pp 138–141

  • Cameron T (1949) Diseases carried by house mice. Can J Comp Med Vet Sci 13:262

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis PD, Rowland ED, Good GL (2002) Developing a plant-based vole repellent: screening of ten candidate species. Crop Prot 21:299–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearing MD, Foley WJ, McLean S (2005) The influence of plant secondary metabolites on the nutritional ecology of herbivorous terrestrial vertebrates. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:169–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • delBarco-Trillo J, McPhee ME, Johnston RE (2011) Syrian hamster males below an age threshold do not elicit aggression from unfamiliar adult males. Aggress Behav 37:91–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer BC, Clarke AR, Fuller SJ (2011) Population dynamics, diet and pest status of the grassland melomys (Melomys burtoni) in northern Queensland sugarcane crops. Wildl Res 38:330–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edlich SC, Stolter C (2012) Effects of essential oils on the feeding choice by moose. Alces 48:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Field A (2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, 2nd edn. Sage, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer D, Imholt C, Pelz HJ, Wink M, Prokop A, Jacob J (2013a) The repelling effect of plant secondary metabolites on water voles, Arvicola amphibius. Pest Manag Sci 69:437–443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer D, Imholt C, Prokop A, Jacob J (2013b) Efficacy of methyl nonyl ketone as an in-soil repellent for common voles (Microtus arvalis). Pest Manag Sci 69:431–436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geduhn A, Esther A, Schenke D, Mattes H, Jacob J (2014) Spatial and temporal exposure patterns in non-target small mammals during brodifacoum rat control. Sci Total Environ 496:328–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gershenzon J, Fontana A, Burow M, Wittstock U, Degenhardt J (2012) Mixtures of plant secondary metabolites: metabolic origins and ecological benefits. In: Iason GR, Dicke M, Hartley SE (eds) The ecology of plant secondary metabolites: from genes to global processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 56–77

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Glendinning JI, Brower LP, Montgomery CA (1990) Responses of three mouse species to deterrent chemicals in the monarch butterfly. I. Taste and toxicity tests using artificial diets laced with digitoxin or monocrotaline. Chemoecology 1:114–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hadler MR, Buckle AP (1992) Forty five years of anticoagulant rodenticides—past, present and future trends. In: Borrecco JE, Marsh RE (eds) Proceedings of the 15th Vertebrate Pest Conference, Newport Beach. University of California, pp 149–155

  • Hansen S, Stolter C, Jacob J (2015) The smell to repel: the effect of odors on the feeding behaviour of female rodents. Crop Prot 78:270–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosea RC (2000) Exposure of non-target wildlife to anticoagulant rodenticides in California. In: Salmon TP, Crabb AC (eds) Proceedings of the 19th Vertebrate Pest Conference, Reno. University of California, pp 236–244

  • Howarth FG (1991) Environmental impacts of classical biological control. Annu Rev Entomol 36:485–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob J, Tkadlec E (2010) Rodent outbreaks in Europe: dynamics and damage. In: Singleton GR, Belmain S, Brown PR, Hardy B (eds) Rodent outbreaks: ecology and impacts. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, pp 207–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob J, Singleton GR, Hinds LA (2008) Fertility control of rodent pests. Wildl Res 35:487–493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob J, Manson P, Barfknecht R, Fredricks T (2014) Common vole (Microtus arvalis) ecology and management: implications for risk assessment of plant protection products. Pest Manag Sci 70:869–878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • John A (2014) Rodent outbreaks and rice pre-harvest losses in Southeast Asia. Food Secur 6:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaukeinen DE, Buckle AP (1992) Evaluation of aversive agents to increase the selectivity of rodenticides, with emphasis on denatonium benzoate (Bitrex®) bittering agent. In: 15th Vertebrate Pest Conference. University of California, Davis, CA, pp 192–198

  • Kimball BA, Taylor JD (2010) Mammalian herbivore repellents: tools for altering plant palatability. Outlooks Pest Manag 21:181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis RJ (1992) The selective impact of herbivores. In: Fritz RS, Simms EL (eds) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution, and genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 301–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore BD, Andrew RL, Külheim C, Foley WJ (2014) Explaining intraspecific diversity in plant secondary metabolites in an ecological context. New Phytol 201:733–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nolte DL, Mason JR, Clark L (1993) Avoidance of bird repellents by mice (Mus musculus). J Chem Ecol 19:427–432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pavey CR, Eldridge SR, Heywood M (2008) Population dynamics and prey selection of native and introduced predators during a rodent outbreak in arid Australia. J Mammal 89:674–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt P, Bryant J, Mattes B, Clausen T, Chapin F III, Meyer M (1990) Winter chemical defense of Alaskan balsam poplar against snowshoe hares. J Chem Ecol 16:1941–1959

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shore RF, Birks JD, Freestone P (1999) Exposure of non-target vertebrates to second-generation rodenticides in Britain, with particular reference to the polecat Mustela putorius. New Zeal J Ecol 23:199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumake SA, Hakim AA (2000) Evaluating Norway rat response to attractant and repellant odors to improve rodenticide baiting effectiveness. In: Brittingham MC, Kays J, McPeake R (eds) 9th Wildlife Damage Management Conference Proceedings, Pennsylvania. University of Nebraska

  • Singleton GR, Brown PR, Jacob J, Aplin K, Sudarmaji (2007) Unwanted and unintended effects of culling—a case for ecologically-based rodent management. Integr Zool 2:247–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton GR, Belmain S, Brown PR, Hardy B (2010) Rodent outbreaks: ecology and impacts. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen RB, Nuti RC, Lamb MC (2007) Rodent management for surface drip irrigation tubing in corn, cotton, and peanut. Pean Sci 34:32–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterner RT, Hollenbeck KA, Shumake SA (1999) Capsicum-laden soils decrease contact time by Northern pocket gophers. Physiol Behav 67:455–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan TP, Crump DR, Sullivan DS (1988) Use of predator odors as repellants to reduce feeding damage by herbivores. IV. Nothern Pocket Gophers (Thomomys talpoides). J Chem Ecol 14:379–389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tordoff MG, Alarcon LK, Lawler MP (2008) Preferences of 14 rat strains for 17 taste compounds. Physiol Behav 95:308–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tran TT, Hinds LA (2012) Fertility control of rodent pests: a review of the inhibitory effects of plant extracts on ovarian function. Pest Manag Sci 69:342–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby IH (2011) The use of repellents to reduce predation of tree seed by wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus L.) and grey squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis Gmelin). Eur J For Res 130:601–611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiscomb GW, Messmer TA (2010) Pocket Gophers. Utah State University, Logan

    Google Scholar 

  • Witmer G, Snow N, Humberg L, Salmon T (2009) Vole problems, management options, and research needs in the United States. In: Boulanger JR (ed) 13th Wildlife Damage Management Conference Proceedings, Lincoln. University of Nebraska, pp 235–249

Download references

Acknowledgments

This presented study was funded by Netafim™. The authors address thanks to all farmers in Thuringia and North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany for their cooperation. We thank Stefan Endepols for the provision of the gypsum granules and Georg Gruber for the provision of the jatropha oil. We thank Bill Foley for comments that greatly improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vertebrate Research, Institute for Plant Protection in Horticulture and Forests, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kühn Institute, Münster, Germany

    Sabine C. Hansen & Jens Jacob

  2. Biocenter Grindel and Zoological Museum, University Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Sabine C. Hansen & Caroline Stolter

Authors
  1. Sabine C. Hansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Caroline Stolter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jens Jacob
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabine C. Hansen.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and with the permission of the animal ethics committee of LANUV North Rhine-Westphalia (file number 84-02.04.2012.A151).

Additional information

Communicated by M. Traugott.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hansen, S.C., Stolter, C. & Jacob, J. Effect of plant secondary metabolites on feeding behavior of microtine and arvicoline rodent species. J Pest Sci 89, 955–963 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-015-0723-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-015-0723-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation