Abstract
Spatial training can be durable and transferable if the training involves cognitive process-based tasks. The current study explored different spatial training methods and investigated the sequences of process-based mental simulation that was facilitated by various structures of external spatial representation, 3D technology, spatial cues, and/or technical languages. A total of 115 Columbia University’s students were conducted through three experiments using a between-subjects design to examine the effects of spatial training methods on spatial ability performance. The conditions for training environments included 3D-virtual and 3D-physical interactions with abstract (nonsense-geometric) and concrete (everyday-object) contents. Overall, learners in the treatment conditions improved in their spatial skills significantly more than those in the control conditions. Particularly, 3D-direct-manipulation conditions in the third experiment added promising results about the specific sequences during spatial thinking formation processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Baddeley AD, Hitch GJ (1974) Working Memory. In: Bower GA (ed) Recent Advances in Learning and Motivation, vol 8. Academic Press, New York, pp 47–89
Card SK, Mackinlay JD, Shneiderman B (eds) (1999) Readings in information visualization: using vision to think. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington
Carroll JB (1993) Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press, New York
Goldin-Meadow S (2005) Hearing gesture: how our hands help us think. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Hegarty M (2010) Components of spatial intelligence. Psychol Learn Motiv 52:265–297
Hegarty M, Waller D (2005) Individual differences in spatial abilities. In: Shah P, Miyake A (eds) The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking. Cambridge University Press, pp 121–169
Just MA, Carpenter PA (1985) Cognitive coordinate systems: accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. Psychol Rev 92(2):137
Kosslyn SM (1994) Image and brain. MIT Press, Cambridge
McNamara TP (1986) Mental representations of spatial relations. Cogn Psychol 18(1):87–121
Mitchell WJ, McCullough M (1995) Digital design media, 2nd edn. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
Miyake A, Friedman NP, Rettinger DA, Shah P, Hegarty M (2001) How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. J Exp Psychol Gen 130(4):621
Newcombe NS (2010) Picture this: increasing math and science learning by improving spatial thinking. Am Educ 8:29–43
Shepard RN, Metzler J (1971) Mental rotation of three dimensional objects. Science 171:701–703
Talmy L (1983) How language structures space. In: Pick HL, Acredolo LP (eds) Spatial orientation theory, research and application. Springer, New York
Tversky B (2009) Spatial cognition: embodied and situated. In: Aydede M, Robbins P (eds) The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge University Press, New York
Tversky B, Lee PU (1998) How space structures language. In: Spatial cognition. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 157–175
Uttal DH, Miller DI, Newcombe NS (2013) Exploring and enhancing spatial thinking links to achievement in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics? Curr Dir Psychol Sci 22(5):367–373
Wright R, Thompson WL, Ganis G, Newcombe NS, Koss-lyn SM (2008) Training generalized spatial skills. Psychon Bull Rev 15:763–771
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kornkasem, S., Black, J.B. Formation of spatial thinking skills through different training methods. Cogn Process 16 (Suppl 1), 281–285 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0707-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0707-8