Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hydrophobic Eutectic Solvents Based on Perfluorinated Hydrogen Bond Donors as Extractants for Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, six hydrophobic eutectic solvents composed of menthol, tetrabutylammonium chloride, and tetrahexylammonium chloride as hydrogen-bond acceptors and trifluoroacetic acid and hexafluoroisopropanol as hydrogen-bond donors were prepared. All solvents exhibit a higher than water densities ranging from 1.094 to 1.237 g mL−1. The quaternary ammonium salt-based solvents have moderate viscosities varying between 46.4 and 70.6 mPa s. The viscosities of both menthol-based liquids were over an order of magnitude lower. The extraction properties of the solvents were evaluated employing phthalates, parabens and flavonoids as model analytes. Four solvents demonstrated considerably better overall extraction efficiency than conventional chlorinated solvents (CH2Cl2, CHCl3, and CCl4). The developed solvents were examined as sample diluents for RP-HPLC separations. Finally, solvent consisting of tetrahexylammonium chloride and trifluoroacetic acid was applied for dispersive liquid–liquid micro-extraction of four parabens from wastewater samples prior to HPLC analysis. Under optimized extraction conditions, the enrichment factors ranged from 66 to 72. Calibration curves were linear (R2 ≥ 0.9970) for a concentration level between 1.00 and 500 μg L−1 and the detection limits were in the range 0.44–0.58 μg L−1. The recoveries of the parabens of the developed method for the spiked wastewater samples were 84–104%, with the coefficients of variation less than 7.5%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu HH, Dasgupta PK (1996) Analytical chemistry in a drop. Solvent extraction in a microdrop. Anal Chem 68:1817–1821

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jeanot MA, Cantwell FF (1996) Solvent microextraction into a single drop. Anal Chem 68:2236–2240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rezaee M, Assadi Y, Hosseini MRM, Aghaee E, Ahmadi F, Berijani S (2006) Determination of organic compounds in water using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. J Chromatogr A 1116:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang YF, Lee HK (2012) Determination of ultraviolet filters in water samples by vortex-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1249:25–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leong MI, Fuh MR, Huang SD (2014) Beyond dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. J Chromatogr A 1335:2–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saraji M, Boroujeni MK (2014) Recent developments in dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. Anal Bioanal Chem 406:2027–2066

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shishov A, Bulatov A, Locatelli M, Carradori S, Andruch V (2017) Application of deep eutectic solvents in analytical chemistry. A review. Microchem J 135:33–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Li LN, Liu YM, Wang ZT, Yang L, Liu HW (2021) Development and applications of deep eutectic solvent derived functional materials in chromatographic separation. J Sep Sci 44:1098–1121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Abbott AP, Capper G, Davies DL, Rasheed RK, Tambyrajah V (2003) Novel solvent properties of choline chloride/urea mixtures. Chem Commun 1:70–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang QH, Vigier KD, Royer S, Jerome F (2012) Deep eutectic solvents: syntheses, properties and applications. Chem Soc Rev 41:7108–7146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith EL, Abbott AP, Ryder KS (2014) Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) and their applications. Chem Rev 114:11060–11082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. van Osch DJGP, Zubeir LF, van den Bruinhorst A, Rocha MAA, Kroon MC (2015) Hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents as water-immiscible extractants. Green Chem 17:4518–4521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ribeiro BD, Florindo C, Iff LC, Coelho MAZ, Marrucho LM (2015) Menthol-based eutectic mixtures: hydrophobic low viscosity solvents. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 3:2469–2477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. van Osch DJGP, Dietz CHJT, Warrag SEE, Kroon MC (2020) The curious case of hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents: a story on the discovery, design, and applications. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8:10591–10612

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee J, Jung D, Park K (2019) Hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents for the extraction of organic and inorganic analytes from aqueous environments. Trends Anal Chem 118:853–868

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rezaee M, Yamini Y, Faraji M (2010) Evolution of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method. J Chromatogr A 1217:2342–2357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Deng WW, Zong Y, Xiao YX (2017) Hexafluoroisopropanol-based deep eutectic solvent/salt aqueous two-phase systems for extraction of antraquinones from Rhei Radix et Rhizoma samples. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:4267–4275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Deng WW, Yu L, Li X, Chen J, Wang XX, Deng ZX, Xiao YX (2019) Hexafluoroisopropanol-based hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents for dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of pyrethroids in tea beverages and fruit juices. Food Chem 274:891–899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shishov A, Pochivalov A, Nugbienyo L, Andruch V, Bulatov A (2020) Deep eutectic solvents are not only effective extractants. Trends Anal Chem 129:115956

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Makoś P, Słupek E, Gębicki J (2020) Hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents in microextraction techniques—a review. Microchem J 152:104384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. VanMiddlesworth BJ, Dorsey JG (2012) Quantifying injection solvent effects in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1236:77–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Layne J, Farcas T, Rustamov I, Ahmed F (2001) Volume-load capacity in fast-gradient liquid chromatography: effect of sample solvent composition and injection volume on chromatographic performance. J Chromatogr A 913:233–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Keunchkarian S, Reta M, Romero L, Castells C (2006) Effect of sample solvent on the chromatographic peak shape of analytes eluted under reversed-phase liquid chromatogaphic conditions. J Chromatogr A 1119:20–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AP designed the study, VK and VO performed the experiments. All authors contributed to the initial writing of the manuscript. AP finalized the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Audrius Padarauskas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 459 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kavaliauskas, V., Olšauskaitė, V. & Padarauskas, A. Hydrophobic Eutectic Solvents Based on Perfluorinated Hydrogen Bond Donors as Extractants for Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction. Chromatographia 85, 255–262 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-022-04129-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-022-04129-z

Keywords

Navigation