Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Asymmetric Flow Field-Flow Fractionation: Current Status, Possibilities, Analytical Limitations and Future Trends

  • Perspective Article
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 04 June 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

The development and applications of asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) are outlined in comparison with the older and better-known size exclusion chromatography. Recent advances in AF4 instrumentation and predictions for further progress of the technique are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Wahlund KG, Giddings JC (1987) Properties of an asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation channel having one permeable wall. Anal Chem 59:1332–1339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Litzen A, Wahlund KG (1991) Zone broadening and dilution in rectangular and trapezoidal asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation channels. Anal Chem 63:1001–1007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Joensson JA, Carlshaf A (1989) Flow field flow fractionation in hollow cylindrical fibers. Anal Chem 61:11–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Johann C, Elsenberg S, Roesch U, Rambaldi DC, Zattoni A, Reschiglian P (2011) A novel approach to improve operation and performance in flow field-flow fractionation. J Chromatogr A 1218:4126–4131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Marassi V, Roda B, Casolari S, Ortelli S, Blosi M, Zattoni A, Costa AL, Reschiglian P (2018) Hollow-fiber flow field-flow fractionation and multi-angle light scattering as a new analytical solution for quality control in pharmaceutical nanotechnology. Microchem J 136:149–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Berek D (2010) Size exclusion chromatography—a blessing and a curse of science and technology of synthetic polymers. J Sep Sci 33:315–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Podzimek S (2012) Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation encyclopedia of analytical chemistry. John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470027318.a9289

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Podzimek S (2011) Light scattering size exclusion chromatography and asymmetric flow field flow fractionation. John Wiley and Sons

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Mudalige TK, Qu H, Sanches-Pomalez G, Sisco PN, Linder SW (2015) Simple functionalization strategies for enhancing nanoparticle separation and recovery with asymmetric flow field flow fractionation. Anal Chem 87:1764–1772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gigault J, Pettibone JM, Schmitt C, Hackley VA (2014) Rational strategy for characterization of nanoscale particles by asymmetric-flow field flow fractionation: a tutorial. Anal Chim Acta 809:9–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Otte T, Pasch H, Macko T, Bruell R, Stadler FJ, Kaschta J, Becker F, Buback M (2011) Characterization of branched ultrahigh molar mass polymers by asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation and size exclusion chromatography. J Chrom A 1218:4257–4267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Makan AC, Williams RP, Pasch H (2016) Field flow fractionation for the size, molar mass, and gel content analysis of emulsion polymers for water-based coatings. Macromol Chem Phys 217:2027–2040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Beckett R, Bigelow JC, Jue Z, Giddings JC (1988) Analysis of humic substances using flow field-flow fractionation in aquatic humic substances. American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ba-1988-0219.ch005

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Cho TJ, Hackley VA (2010) Fractionation and characterization of gold nanoparticles in aqueous solution: asymmetric-flow field flow fractionation with MALS, DLS, and UV–Vis detection. Anal Bioanal Chem 398:2003–2018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Alasonati E, Caebergs T, Petry J, Sebaihi N, Fisicaro P, Feltin N (2021) Size measurement of silica nanoparticles by asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation coupled to multi-angle light scattering: a comparison exercise between two metrological institutes. J Chromatogr A 1638:461859

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Collins ME, Soto-Cantu E, Cueto R, Russo PS (2014) Separation and characterization of poly(tetrafluoroethylene) latex particles by asymmetric flow field flow fractionation with light-scattering detection. Langmuir 30:3373–3380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fraunhofer W, Winter G (2004) The use of asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation in pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 58:369–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Evjen TJ, Hupfeld S, Barnert S, Fossheim S, Schubert R, Brandl M (2013) Physicochemical characterization of liposomes after ultrasound exposure—mechanisms of drug release. J Pharm Biomed Anal 78–79:118–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bousse T, Shore DA, Goldsmith CS, Hossain MJ, Jang Y, Davis CT, Donis RO, Stevens J (2013) Quantitation of influenza virus using field flow fractionation and multi-angle light scattering for quantifying influenza A particles. J Vir Met 193:589–596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ehrhart J, Mingotaud AF, Violleau F (2011) Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation with multi-angle light scattering and quasi elastic light scattering for characterization of poly(ethyleneglycol-b-ɛ-caprolactone) block copolymer self-assemblies used as drug carriers for photodynamic therapy. J Chrom A 1218:4249–4256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang H, Lyden D (2019) Asymmetric-flow field-flow fractionation technology for exomere and small extracellular vesicle separation and characterization. Nat Protoc 14:1027–1053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Caputo F, Clogston J, Calzolai L, Roesslein M, Prina-Mello A (2019) Measuring particle size distribution of nanoparticle enabled medicinal products, the joint view of EUNCL and NCI-NCL. A step by step approach combining orthogonal measurements with increasing complexity. J Control Release 299:31–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Caputo F, Mehn D, Clogston JD, Rösslein M, Prina-Mello A, Borgos SE, Gioria S, Calzolai L (2021) Asymmetric-flow field-flow fractionation for measuring particle size, drug loading and (in)stability of nanopharmaceuticals. J Chrom A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu Y, Crist RM, Clogston JD (2020) The utility of asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation for preclinical characterization of nanomedicines. Anal Bioanal Chem 412:425–438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Johann C, Elsenberg S, Schuch H, Roesch U (2015) Instrument and method to determine the electrophoretic mobility of nanoparticles and proteins by combining electrical and flow field-flow fractionation. Anal Chem 87:4292–4298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This is not a supported research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wyatt Technology Europe, Dernbach, Germany

    Stepan Podzimek

  2. University of Pardubice, Institute of Chemistry and Technology of Macromolecular Materials, Pardubice, Czech Republic

    Stepan Podzimek

  3. SYNPO, Pardubice, Czech Republic

    Stepan Podzimek

  4. Wyatt Technology, Santa Barbara, USA

    Christoph Johann

Authors
  1. Stepan Podzimek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christoph Johann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SP prepared the first draft of the manuscript and focused mainly on the applications in polymer area and comparing SEC with AF4. CJ expanded the text mainly in the area of pharmaceuticals and nanoparticle research. Both authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stepan Podzimek.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest from the side of authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Podzimek, S., Johann, C. Asymmetric Flow Field-Flow Fractionation: Current Status, Possibilities, Analytical Limitations and Future Trends. Chromatographia 84, 531–534 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-021-04035-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-021-04035-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation