Abstract
A simple and sensitive method for the determination of 39 antibiotics, including sulfonamides and quinolones, in pork, chicken, fish tissues and eggs, has been developed. The sample preparation included ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) with 0.1% formic acid in 90:10 acetonitrile/water (v:v) and a final clean-up with Oasis PRiME HLB, a new reversed phase SPE without traditional pre-equilibration and washing steps before eluting SPE. Analysis was performed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry (UPLC–MS/MS). The positive ionization in multiple reaction monitoring mode (MRM) and product ion confirmation scan (PICs) were used in the method. The PICs provides additional confirmation for compound identification through acquisition of MS/MS spectra in the same injection and a means of verifying that the signal from the MRM peak is from the compound of interest. In particular, single test is simultaneously able to gain both quantitative MRM and qualitative full-scan MS/MS data without the need for long analysis times or repeat injection. All solvent and matrix-matched calibration curves showed excellent correlation coefficient >0.990, with the dynamic range 0.2–100 ng mL−1. For over 90% of the analytes, the recoveries were between 60 and 120% in all matrices studied at three spiked levels of low, medium, and high concentrations, with the intra-day precision values in the range of 2.7–20.0% and the inter-day precision values in the range of 6.2–21.3%. The limits of detection (LODs) and limits of quantification (LOQs) of all drugs were 0.05–2.6 and 0.12–5.6 μg kg−1, respectively. A weak matrix effect was observed for most of the compounds in four complex samples. The proposed method was proven very simple, fast, sensitive, and selective and has been successfully applied in real samples from local markets and farms.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
22 November 2017
In the original version of this article the affiliation 2 contained a mistake.
References
Wassenaar TM (2005) Crit Rev Microbiol 31:155–169
Xu Y, Ding J, Chen H, Zhao Q, Hou J, Yan J (2013) Food Chem 140:83–90
World Health Organization (2011) Tackling antibiotic resistance from a food safety perspective in Europe. http://www.euro.who.int/_data/assets/pdf_file/0005/136454/e94889.pdf. Accessed 09 Aug 2015
Chen DM, Yu J, Tao YF, Pan YH (2016) Chromatogr B 1018:82–88
Shen JZ, Xia X (2016) Food Chem 204:252–262
Lombardo M, García-Campaña AM, Cruces-Blanco C, Gámiz-Gracia L (2015) Food Control 50:864–868
Pontes FLD, Gasparetto JC, de Francisco TMG (2017) Food Anal Methods 10:1063
Kaufmann A, Widmer M (2013) Anal Chim Acta 797:81–88
Tian H, Wang JQ, Zhong YD, Li SL, Jiang JD, Tao DL (2016) Chromatogr B 1033–1034:172–179
Routine UPLC–MS/MS Quantification of Pesticide Residues in Okra with Simultaneous Acquisition of Qualitative Full-Spectrum MS and MS/MS Data. http://www.waters.com/webassets/cms/library/docs/720004789en.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2013
Pena A, Lino C, Alonso R, Barceloa D (2007) J Agric Food Chem 55:4973–4979
Lopes RP, Reyes RC, Romero-Gonzàlez R, Vidal JL (2012) Chromatogr B 895:39–47
Dasenaki ME, Thomaidis NS (2015) Anal Chim Acta 880:103–121
Biselli S, Schwalb U, Meyer A (2013) Food Addit Contam 30:921–939
Kaufmann A (2009) Anal Chim Acta 637:144
Bialk-Bielinska A, Kumirska J, Palavinskas R, Stepnowski P (2009) Talanta 80:947–953
Te-An K, Chung-Wei T, Ku BC, Wei-Hsien W (2015) Food Chem 175:189–196
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-017-3445-5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
He, J., Song, L., Zhou, G. et al. The Rapid Analysis of Antibiotics in Animal Meat and Egg Using a Novel SEP Method and UPLC–MS/MS. Chromatographia 80, 1329–1342 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-017-3366-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-017-3366-3