Skip to main content
Log in

The Rapid Analysis of Antibiotics in Animal Meat and Egg Using a Novel SEP Method and UPLC–MS/MS

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 22 November 2017

This article has been updated

Abstract

A simple and sensitive method for the determination of 39 antibiotics, including sulfonamides and quinolones, in pork, chicken, fish tissues and eggs, has been developed. The sample preparation included ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) with 0.1% formic acid in 90:10 acetonitrile/water (v:v) and a final clean-up with Oasis PRiME HLB, a new reversed phase SPE without traditional pre-equilibration and washing steps before eluting SPE. Analysis was performed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry (UPLC–MS/MS). The positive ionization in multiple reaction monitoring mode (MRM) and product ion confirmation scan (PICs) were used in the method. The PICs provides additional confirmation for compound identification through acquisition of MS/MS spectra in the same injection and a means of verifying that the signal from the MRM peak is from the compound of interest. In particular, single test is simultaneously able to gain both quantitative MRM and qualitative full-scan MS/MS data without the need for long analysis times or repeat injection. All solvent and matrix-matched calibration curves showed excellent correlation coefficient >0.990, with the dynamic range 0.2–100 ng mL−1. For over 90% of the analytes, the recoveries were between 60 and 120% in all matrices studied at three spiked levels of low, medium, and high concentrations, with the intra-day precision values in the range of 2.7–20.0% and the inter-day precision values in the range of 6.2–21.3%. The limits of detection (LODs) and limits of quantification (LOQs) of all drugs were 0.05–2.6 and 0.12–5.6 μg kg−1, respectively. A weak matrix effect was observed for most of the compounds in four complex samples. The proposed method was proven very simple, fast, sensitive, and selective and has been successfully applied in real samples from local markets and farms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 22 November 2017

    In the original version of this article the affiliation 2 contained a mistake.

References

  1. Wassenaar TM (2005) Crit Rev Microbiol 31:155–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Xu Y, Ding J, Chen H, Zhao Q, Hou J, Yan J (2013) Food Chem 140:83–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization (2011) Tackling antibiotic resistance from a food safety perspective in Europe. http://www.euro.who.int/_data/assets/pdf_file/0005/136454/e94889.pdf. Accessed 09 Aug 2015

  4. Chen DM, Yu J, Tao YF, Pan YH (2016) Chromatogr B 1018:82–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shen JZ, Xia X (2016) Food Chem 204:252–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lombardo M, García-Campaña AM, Cruces-Blanco C, Gámiz-Gracia L (2015) Food Control 50:864–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pontes FLD, Gasparetto JC, de Francisco TMG (2017) Food Anal Methods 10:1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaufmann A, Widmer M (2013) Anal Chim Acta 797:81–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tian H, Wang JQ, Zhong YD, Li SL, Jiang JD, Tao DL (2016) Chromatogr B 1033–1034:172–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Routine UPLC–MS/MS Quantification of Pesticide Residues in Okra with Simultaneous Acquisition of Qualitative Full-Spectrum MS and MS/MS Data. http://www.waters.com/webassets/cms/library/docs/720004789en.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2013

  11. Pena A, Lino C, Alonso R, Barceloa D (2007) J Agric Food Chem 55:4973–4979

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lopes RP, Reyes RC, Romero-Gonzàlez R, Vidal JL (2012) Chromatogr B 895:39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dasenaki ME, Thomaidis NS (2015) Anal Chim Acta 880:103–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Biselli S, Schwalb U, Meyer A (2013) Food Addit Contam 30:921–939

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaufmann A (2009) Anal Chim Acta 637:144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bialk-Bielinska A, Kumirska J, Palavinskas R, Stepnowski P (2009) Talanta 80:947–953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Te-An K, Chung-Wei T, Ku BC, Wei-Hsien W (2015) Food Chem 175:189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Song.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-017-3445-5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, J., Song, L., Zhou, G. et al. The Rapid Analysis of Antibiotics in Animal Meat and Egg Using a Novel SEP Method and UPLC–MS/MS. Chromatographia 80, 1329–1342 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-017-3366-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-017-3366-3

Keywords

Navigation