Skip to main content
Log in

Development of a Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatographic Assay for the Quantification of Total Persipeptides in Fermentation Broth

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emergence and prevalence of multi-drug-resistant bacterial strains increase the potential for outbreaks of incurable infections. The discovery of novel antibiotics and pharmacological preparations requires the identification of novel bioactive small molecules. A specific, sensitive, and reliable quantification method using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with UV detection was developed for the determination of total persipeptides (A and B), which are cyclic pentapeptides found in the fermentation broth of Streptomyces zagrosensis UTMC 1154 that exhibit bioactivity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). A simple liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) method using butanol was employed to extract persipeptides from the fermentation broth prior to HPLC analysis. The chromatographic separation of persipeptides and the internal standard, virginiamycin, was achieved with a gradient of acetonitrile and water on a C18 reversed-phase analytical column in a 25-min analytical run utilizing a flow rate of 0.8 mL min−1 and detection at 210 nm. The whole assay was validated, and the method presented a linear response range with a regression coefficient of determination R 2 of 0.9996 for the quantification of persipeptides in the concentration range of 3.9–250.0 µg mL−1, as well as extraction recoveries ranging from 54.78 ± 9.83 % to 56.45 ± 16.33 %. The bias and the precision of the proposed method were <10 %. The detection and quantification limits for the persipeptides were 27 and 83 µg L−1, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wise R, Blaser M, Carrs O, Cassell G, Fishman N, Guidos R, Levy S, Powers J, Norrby R, Tillotson G (2011) The urgent need for new antibacterial agents. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:1939–1940

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Walsh C (2003) Antibiotics: actions, origins, resistance. American Society for Microbiology (ASM), Washington, DC

  3. Fischbach MA, Walsh CT (2009) Antibiotics for emerging pathogens. Science 325:1089–1093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hancock Robert EW, Chapple DS (1999) Peptide antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:1317–1323

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Perlman D, Bodanszey M (1971) Biosynthesis of peptide antibiotics. Annu Rev Biochem 40:449–464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mohammadipanah F, Matasyoh J, Hamedi J, Klenk H, Laatsch H (2012) Persipeptides A and B, two cyclic peptides from Streptomyces sp. UTMC 1154. Bioorg Med Chem 20:335–339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohammadipanah F, Hamedi J, Spröer C, Rohde M, del Carmen Montero-Calasanz M, Klenk HP (2014) Streptomyces zagrosensis sp. Nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:3434–3440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Laatsch H (2011) A data base for rapid dereplication and structure determination of microbial natural products. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paim CS, Führ F, Barth AB, Gonçalves CE, Nardi N, Steppe M, Schapoval EE (2011) Gemifloxacin mesylate (GFM) stability evaluation applying a validated bioassay method and in vitro cytotoxic study. Talanta 83:1774–1779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Berridge N, Barrett J (1952) A rapid method for the turbidimetric assay of antibiotics. J Gen Microbiol 6:14–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Salem H (2004) Selective spectrophotometric determination of phenolic β-lactam antibiotics in pure forms and in their pharmaceutical formulations. Anal Chim Acta 515:333–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Frutos P, Torrado S, Perez-Lorenzo M, Frutos G (2000) Validated quantitative colorimetric assay for gentamicin. J Pharm Biomed Anal 21:1149–1159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ašperger D, Mutavdžić D, Babić S, Horvat AJ, Kaštelan-Macan M (2006) Solid-phase extraction and TLC quantification of enrofloxacin, oxytetracycline, and trimethoprim in wastewater. J Planar Chromat 19:129–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sulc M, Fadrhoncova I, Jelinkova M, Chudomelova M, Felsberg J, Olsovska J (2011) Determination of sibiromycin and its natural derivatives using new analytical and structural approaches. J Chromatogr A 1218:83–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dong MW (2013) A three-pronged template approach for rapid HPLC method development. LC-GC N Am 31:456

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gilroy JJ, Dolan JW (2004) Gradient performance checks. LC-GC Eur 17:566–572

  17. Schwalbe R, Steele-Moore L, Goodwin AC (2007) Antimicrobial susceptibily testing protocols. CRC, New York

  18. US FDA (1994) Reviewer guidance: validation of chromatographic methods. Center for Drug Evaluation Research (US FDA), Washington, DC

  19. ICH (2008) IHT guideline: validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology, Q2 (R1), current step 4 version, parent guidelines on methodology dated November 6 1996, incorporated in November 2005. International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH), Geneva. http://www.ich.org

  20. Dong MW (2006) Modern HPLC for practicing scientists. Wiley, Hoboken

  21. Dejaegher B, Heyden YV (2007) Ruggedness and robustness testing. J Chromatogr A 1158:138–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW (2010) Basic concepts and the control of separation. In: Introduction to modern liquid chromatography. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 19–86

  23. USP (2006) Chromatography: system suitability. The United States Pharmacopeia, 30th edn. The United States Pharmacopeia Convention (USP), Rockville, p 254

  24. US FDA (2001) Guidance for industry: bioanalytical method validation. Center for Veterinary Medicine (US FDA), Rockville

  25. Islam M, Toledo R, Hamdy M (1999) Stability of virginiamycin and penicillin during alcohol fermentation. Biomass Bioenerg 17:369–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatemeh Mohammadipanah.

Ethics declarations

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest is reported by the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 437 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammadipanah, F., Kazemi Shariat Panahi, H., Imanparast, F. et al. Development of a Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatographic Assay for the Quantification of Total Persipeptides in Fermentation Broth. Chromatographia 79, 1325–1332 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-016-3140-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-016-3140-y

Keywords

Navigation