Skip to main content
Log in

Does niche-overlap facilitate mixed-species flocking in birds?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foraging niche overlap between attendant species and the nuclear species of mixed-species flocks may induce competition as well as facilitation. In this study, we hypothesized that canopy species would appear more frequently in flocks where nuclear species foraged in the canopy and that species with greater niche overlap with nuclear species would have lower departure rates. Flocking and foraging behaviors of flocks led by the Grey-cheeked Fulvetta Alcippe morrisonia were studied in northeastern Taiwan for two consecutive non-breeding seasons from 1998 to 2000. The foraging height spectrum increased with increasing group size of fulvettas because more fulvettas were found foraging across different strata. The number of species and number of individuals of canopy attendants in a flock increased more rapidly than understory attendants as the group size of fulvettas increased. The more the foraging height of an attendant species overlapped with that of the nuclear species, the lower its departure rate. Specifically, canopy attendant species that usually had a lower niche overlap with the nuclear species dropped out of the flock more frequently than understory attendant species. These observations indicate that foraging niche overlap between attendant species and the nuclear species may facilitate the formation of mixed-species bird flocks. It is therefore important to incorporate the role of positive interactions when trying to understand the formation and maintenance of biological communities.

Zusammenfassung

Die Überlappung von Nahrungsnischen zwischen vereinzelt anwesenden Arten und den Hauptarten in gemischten Schwärmen könnte sowohl zu Konkurrenz als auch zu Begünstigung führen. In dieser Untersuchung stellen wir die Hypothese auf, dass Arten der Kronenbereiche häufiger in Schwärmen vorkommen, in denen die Hauptarten in der im Kronenbereich Nahrung suchen und dass Arten mit größerer Nischenüberschneidung mit der Hauptart des Schwarms geringere Abflugraten zeigen. Zwischen 1998 und 2000 wurde in Nordosttaiwan schwarmbildendes und Nahrungsverhalten in Trupps von Grauwangenalcippen Alcippe morrisonia außerhalb der Brutzeit untersucht. Mit zunehmender Gruppengröße an Alcippen stieg das Höhenspektrum zur Nahrungssuche an, da mehr Alcippen in verschiedenen Baumstraten nach Nahrung suchten. Die Anzahl der Arten und Individuen der Begleitarten im Kronenbereich in einem Schwarm stieg mit zunehmender Gruppengröße der Alcippen mehr an als die der Unterholzarten. Je mehr die Höhe der Nahrungssuche der Begleitarten sich mit der der Hauptart überschnitt, desto geringer waren deren Abflugsraten. Insbesondere die Begleitarten im Kronenbereich, die im Allgemeinen eine geringere Nischenüberlappung mit der Hauptart zeigen, verlassen den Schwarm häufiger als die Begleitarten des Unterholzes. Diese Beobachtungen zeigen, dass Nischenüberschneidungen bei der Nahrungssuche zwischen vereinzelt anwesenden Begleitarten und der Hauptart die Formierung von gemischten Vogelschwärmen begünstigen können. Zum Verständnis von Bildung und Erhaltung von Artengemeinschaften ist es daher wichtig, die Rolle positiver Interaktionen mit einzubeziehen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alatalo RV (1982) Evidence for interspecific competition among European tits Parus spp.: a review. Ann Zool Fen 19:309–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin GT, Smith EL (1972) Winter foraging ecology of mixed insectivorous bird flocks in oak woodland in southern Arizona. Condor 74:17–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery ML (1994) Finding good food and avoiding bad food: does it help to associate with experienced flockmates? Anim Behav 48:1371–1378

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard CJ (1979) Predation and the evolution of social mimicry in birds. Am Nat 113:613–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertness MD, Callaway R (1994) Positive interaction in communities. Trends Ecol Evol 9:191–193

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bock CE (1969) Intra- vs. interspecific aggression in Pygmy Nuthatch flocks. Ecology 50:904–905

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno JF, Stachowicz JJ, Bertness MD (2003) Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol Evol 18:119–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskirk WH (1976) Social systems in a tropical forest avifauna. Am Nat 110:293–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskirk WH, Powell GVN, Wittenberger JF, Buskirk RE, Powell TU (1972) Interspecific bird flocks in tropical highland Panama. Auk 89:612–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen C-C, Chou L-S (1999) The diet of forest birds at Fushan Experimental Forest (in Chinese, with English abstract). Taiwan J For Sci 14:275–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen C-C, Hsieh F (2002) Composition and foraging behaviour of mixed-species flocks led by the Grey-cheeked Fulvetta in Fushan Experimental Forest, Taiwan. Ibis 144:317–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Croxall JP (1976) The composition and behaviour of some mixed-species bird flocks in Sarawak. Ibis 118:333–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond JM (1981) Mixed-species foraging groups. Nature 292:408–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi K, Yamagishi S, Randrianasolo V (1993) The composition and foraging behaviour of mixed-species flocks of forest-living birds in Madagascar. Ibis 135:91–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallow PM, Magrath RD (2010) Eavestropping on other species: mutual interspecific understanding of urgency information in avian alarm calls. Anim Behav 79:411–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsman JT, Mönkkönen M, Helle P, Inkeröinen J (1998) Heterospecific attraction and food resources in migrants’ breeding patch selection in northern boreal forest. Oecologia 115:278–286

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaddis P (1980) Mixed flocks, accipiters, and antipredator behavior. Condor 82:348–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodale E, Beauchamp G (2010) The relationship between leadership and gregariousness in mixed-species bird flocks. J Avian Bio 41:99–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodale E, Kotagama SW (2005a) Testing the roles of species in mixed-species bird flocks of a Sri Lankan rain forest. J Tropical Ecol 21:669–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodale E, Kotagama SW (2005b) Alarm calling in Sri Lankan mixed-species bird flocks. Auk 122:108–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodale E, Kotagama SW (2008) Response to conspecific and heterospecific alarm calls in mixed-species bird flocks of a Sri Lankan rainforest. Behav Ecol 19:887–894

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodale E, Beauchamp G, Magrath RD, Nieh JC, Ruxton GD (2010) Interspecifi information transfer influences animal community structure. Trends Ecol Evol 25:354–361

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graves GR, Gotelli NJ (1993) Assembly of avian mixed-species flocks in Amazonia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:1388–1391

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg R (2000) Birds of many feathers: the formation and structure of mixed-species flocks of forest birds. In: Boinsk S, Gerber PA (eds) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 521–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Hino T (1998) Mutualistic and commensal organization of avian mixed-species foraging flocks in a forest of western Madagascar. J Avian Biol 29:17–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad O (1978) Differentiation of foraging niche among tits, Parus spp., in Norway during winter. Ibis 120:139–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad O (1989) Social organization and dominance behavior in some Parus species. Wilson Bull 101:254–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutto RL (1987) A description of mixed-species insectivorous bird flocks in western Mexico. Condor 89:282–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutto RL (1988) Foraging behavior patterns suggest a possible cost associated with participation in mixed-species bird flocks. Oikos 51:79–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutto RL (1994) The composition and social organization of mixed-species flocks in a tropical deciduous forest in western Mexico. Condor 96:105–118

    Google Scholar 

  • King H-B, Hsia Y-J (1997) Establishment, progress and performance of the Taiwan ecological research network program. In: King H-B, Hamburg SP, Hsia YJ (eds) Long-term ecological research in east Asia-Pacific region. Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Taipei, pp 83–96

    Google Scholar 

  • King DI, Rappole JH (2000) Winter Flocking of insectivorous birds in montan pine-oak forests in Middle America. Condor 102:664–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotagama SW, Goodale E (2004) The composition and spatial organisation of mixed-species flocks in a Sri Lankan rainforest. Forktail 20:63–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (2009) Ecology, the experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1973) Social learning and the significance of mixed-species flocks of chickadees (Parus spp.). Can J Zool 51:1275–1288

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, MacRoberts MH, Cullen JM (1972) Flocking and feeding in the Great Tit Parus major—An experimental study. Ibis 114:507–530

    Google Scholar 

  • LaGory KE, LaGory MK, Meyers DM, Herman SG (1984) Niche relationships in wintering mixed-species flocks in western Washington. Wilson Bull 96:108–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin RS (1996) The breeding and flock ecology of Grey-cheeked Fulvetta (Alcippe morrisonia) (in Chinese, with English abstract). M.Sc. National Taiwan University, Taipei

  • Littell RC, Freund RJ, Spector PC (1991) SAS system for linear models, 3rd edn. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Magrath RD, Pitcher BJ, Gardner JL (2007) A mutual understanding? Interspecific responses by birds to each other’s aerial alarm calls. Behav Ecol 18:944–951

    Google Scholar 

  • Mönkkönen M, Forsman JT (2002) Heterospecific attraction among forest birds: a review. Ornithol Sci 1:41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Mönkkönen M, Helle P, Soppela K (1990) Numerical and behavioural responses of migrant passerines to experimental manipulation of resident tits (Parus spp.): heterospecific attraction in northern breeding bird communities? Oecologia 85:218–225

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mönkkönen M, Forsman JT, Helle P (1996) Mixed-species foraging aggregations and heterospecific attraction in boreal bird communities. Oikos 77:127–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Mönkkönen M, Helle P, Niemi GJ, Montgomery K (1997) Heterospecific attraction affects community structure and migrant abundance in northern breeding bird communities. Can J Zool 75:2077–2083

    Google Scholar 

  • Mönkkönen M, Härdling R, Forsman JT, Tuomi J (1999) Evolution of heterospecific attraction: using other species as cues in habitat selection. Evol Ecol 13:91–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison ML, With KA, Timossi IC, Milne KA (1987) Composition and temporal variation of flocks in the Sierra Nevada. Condor 89:739–745

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse DH (1970) Ecological aspects of some mixed-species foraging flocks of birds. Ecol Monogr 40:119–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse DH (1977) Feeding behavior and predator avoidance in heterospecific groups. Bioscience 27:332–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse DH (1978) Structure and foraging patterns of flocks of tits and associated species in an English woodland during the winter. Ibis 120:298–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan M (1960) Some adaptations which help to promote gregariousness. Proc Int Ornithol Congr 12:523–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan M (1962) The organization and probable evolution of some mixed specie flocks of neotropical birds. Smithson Misc Coll 143(7):1–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Munn CA, Terborgh JW (1979) Multi-species territoriality in Neotropical foraging flocks. Condor 81:338–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Palameta B, Lefebvre L (1985) The social transmission of a food-finding technique in pigeons: what is learned? Anim Behav 33:892–896

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka ER (1973) The structure of lizard communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:53–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell GVN (1979) Structure and dynamics of interspecific flocks in a neotropical mid-elevation forest. Auk 96:375–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell GVN (1985) Sociobiology and adaptive significance of interspecific foraging flocks in the Neotropics. Ornithol Monogr 36:713–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragusa-Netto J (2002) Vigilance towards raptors by nuclear species in bird mixed flocks in a Brazilian savannah. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ 37:219–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Remsen JV Jr, Robinson SK (1990) A classification scheme for foraging behavior of birds in terrestrial habitats. Stud Avian Biol 13:144–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein DI, Barnett RJ, Ridgely RS, Klopfer PH (1977) Adaptive advantages of mixed-species feeding flocks among seed-eating finches in Costa Rica. Ibis 119:10–21

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1999) SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 8. SAS Institute, Cary

  • Satischandra SHK, Kudavidanage EP, Kotagama SW, Goodale E (2007) The benefits of joining mixed-species flocks for Greater Racket-tailed Drongos Dicrurus paradiseus. Forktail 23:145–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1984) The controversy over interspecific competition. Am Nat 70:586–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Seppänen J-T, Forsman JT, Mönkkönen M, Thomson RL (2007) Social information use is a process across time, space, and ecology, reaching heterospecifics. Ecology 88:1622–1633

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sridhar H, Beauchamp G, Shanker K (2009) Why do birds participate in mixed-species foraging flocks? A large-scale synthesis. Anim Behav 78:337–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan U, Raza RH, Quader S (2010) The nuclear question: rethinking species importance in multi-species animal groups. J Anim Ecol 79:948–954

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan KA (1984) Information exploitation by downy woodpeckers in mixed-species flocks. Behaviour 91:294–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y-H, Wang Y (1998) Mixed-species bird flocks in the low-elevation forests of the Taroko National Park (in Chinese, with English abstract). Q J Chin For 31:209–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson RL, Forsman JT, Mönkkönen M (2003) Positive interactions between migrant and resident birds: testing the heterospecific attraction hypothesis. Oecologia 134:431–438

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yen C-W (1990) An ecological study in the Timaliinae (Muscicapidae) of Taiwan. Bull Natl Mus Nat Sci 2:281–289

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by grants from the National Science Council of Taiwan under postdoctoral fellowship NSC88-2811-001-0052 and NSC89-2811-001-0047 to C.-C. Chen, and projects NSC88-2118-002-002 and NSC89-2118-001-012 to F. Hsieh. We thank the Fushan Experimental Forest for their tremendous support during this study. We are also grateful to S.-S. Hsieh, P.-J. Chiang, and several volunteers from the I-Lan Wild Bird Society for assistance in fieldwork. Editorial comments from C.-F. Tsai and A. Warneke greatly improved the presentation of this paper. We would also like to thank several anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. All field work conducted complied with the laws of Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao-Chieh Chen.

Additional information

Communicated by T. Friedl.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 26 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 9 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsieh, F., Chen, CC. Does niche-overlap facilitate mixed-species flocking in birds?. J Ornithol 152, 955–963 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-011-0678-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-011-0678-1

Keywords

Navigation