Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of organic, inorganic and slow-release urea fertilisers on CH4 and N2O emissions from rice paddy fields

  • Article
  • Published:
Paddy and Water Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vietnam is one of the world’s top two rice exporting countries. However, rice cultivation is the primary source of agriculture’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Vietnam. In particular, strategies are required to reduce GHG emissions associated with the application of organic and inorganic fertilisers. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of various combinations of biochar (BIOC), compost (COMP) and slow-release urea (SRU) on methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. In total, 1170 gas samples were collected from closed gas chambers in rice paddies at Thinh Long commune and Rang Dong farm in northern Vietnam between June and October 2014. The gas samples were analysed for CH4-C and N2O-N fluxes using gas chromatography. The application of BIOC alone resulted in the lowest CH4 emissions (4.8–59 mg C m−2 h−1) and lowest N2O emissions (0.15–0.26 µg N m−2 h−1). The combined application of nitrogen–phosphorus–potassium (NPK) + COMP emitted the highest CH4 (14–72 mg C m−2 h−1), while ½NPK + BIOC emitted the highest N2O (1.03 µg N m−2 h−1 in the TL commune), but it was the second lowest (0.495 µg N m−2 h−1) in the RD farm. Green urea and orange urea reduced N2O emissions significantly (p < 0.05) compared to white urea, but no significant differences were observed with respect to CH4 emissions. SRU fertilisers and BIOC alone measured the lowest greenhouse gas intensity, i.e. <2.5 and 3 kg CO2 eq. kg−1 rice grain, respectively. Based on these results, application of fertilisers in the form of BIOC and/or orange or green urea could be a viable option to reduce both CH4 and N2O emissions from rice paddy soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akiyama H, Yan X, Yagi K (2010) Evaluation of effectiveness of enhance deficiency fertilizers as mitigation options for N2O and NO emissions from agricultural soils: meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol 16:1837–1846. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02031.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angst TE, Patterson CJ, Reay DS, Anderson P, Peshkur TA, Sohi SP (2013) Biochar diminishes nitrous oxide and nitrate leaching from diverse nutrient sources. J Environ Qual 42:672–682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borrell AK, Garside AL, Fukai S, Reid DJ (1998) Season, nitrogen rate and plant type affect nitrogen uptake and nitrogen use efficiency in rice. Aust J Agric Res 49:829–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs CM, Breiner JM, Graham RC (2005) Contributions of Pinus ponderosa charcoal to soil chemical and physical properties. http://nature.berkeley.edu/classes/es196/projects/2005final/Briggs.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2015

  • Bruun EW, Müller-Stöver D, Ambus P, Hauggaard-Nielsenet H (2011) Application of biochar to soil and N2O emissions: potential effects of blending fast-pyrolysis biochar with anaerobically digested slurry. Eur J Soil Sci 62:581–589

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clough T, Bertram J, Ray J, Condron L, O’Callaghan M, Sherlock R, Wells N (2010) Unweathered wood biochar impact on nitrous oxide emissions from a bovine-urine-amended pasture soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74(3):852. doi:10.2136/sssaj2009.0185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corton TM, Bajita JB, Grospe FS, Pamplona RR, Asis CA Jr, Wassmann R, Lantin RS, Buendia LV (2000) Methane emission from irrigated and intensively managed rice fields in Central Luzon (Philippines). Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 58:37–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuong TV, Trinh MV, Ha PQ, Khai PM (2012) Influence of biochar on rice yield and acrisols properties. J Nat Sci 28–4S:19–25

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2006) World reference base for soil resources 2006: a framework for international classification, correlation and communication. World Soil Resources Report No. 103, Rome

  • FAO (2013) The database of FAOSTAT. http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/download/G1/*/E. Accessed 15 May 2015

  • Feng Y, Xu Y, Yu Y, Xie Z, Lin X (2012) Mechanisms of biochar decreasing methane emissions from Chinese paddy soils. Soil Biol Biochem 46:80–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer U, Marschner B, Brodowski S, Amelung W (2004) Interactive priming of black carbon and glucose mineralization. Org Geochem 35:823–830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton NJ, Cloy JM, Bell MJ, Chadwick DR, Topp CFE, Rees RM (2015) Managing fertiliser nitrogen to reduce nitrous oxide emissions and emission intensities from a cultivated Cambisol in Scotland. Geoderma Reg 4:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, pp 104. https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_full_report.pdf. Accessed 30 April 2016

  • IPL (2014) IPL sustainability report products and services research and development. http://www.incitecpivot.com.au/~/media/Files/IPL/Sustainability/Online%20Report/Report%20Sections/Products%20and%20Services/Research%20and%20Development.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2016

  • Jain N, Dubey R, Dubey DS, Singh J, Khanna M, Pathak H, Bhatia A (2013) Mitigation of greenhouse gas emission with system of rice intensification in the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Paddy Water Environ. doi:10.1007/s10333-013-0390-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan JM, Malik A, Zaman M, Khan Q, Habib ur Rehman (2014) Nitrogen use efficiency and yield of maize crop as affected by agrotain coated urea in arid calcareous soils. Soil Environ 33(1):1–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khosa MK, Sidhu BS, Benbi DK (2010) Effect of organic materials and rice cultivars on methane emission from rice field. J Environ Biol 31:281–285

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laird D, Fleming P, Wang BQ, Horton R, Karlen D (2010) Biochar impact on nutrient leaching from a Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158:436–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Da Silva JP, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Gllaser B (2003) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological anthrosol and a ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil 249:343–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindau CW, Bollich PK, Delaune RD, Patrick WH Jr, Law VJ (1991) Effect of urea fertilizer and environmental factors on methane emissions from a Louisiana, USA rice field. Plant Soil 136:195–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linquist B, van Groenigen KJ, Adviento-Borbe AM, Pittelkow C, van Kessel C (2012) An agronomic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from major cereal crops. Glob Change Biol 18:194–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Shi B, Zhou J, Tang C (2011) Quantification and characterization of microporosity by image processing, geometric measurement and statistical methods: application on SEM images of clay material. Appl Clay Sci 54:97–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu G, Zotarelli L, Li Y, Dinkins D, Wang Q, Ozores-Hampton M (2014) Controlled-release and slow-release fertilizers as nutrient management tools. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/HS/HS125500.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2015

  • Ma J, Li XL, Xu H, Han Y, Cai ZC, Yagi K (2007) Effects of nitrogen fertiliser and wheat straw application on CH4 and N2O emissions from a paddy rice field. Aust J Soil Res 45(5):359–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Major J, Steiner C, Downie A, Lehmann J (2009) Biochar effects on nutrient leaching. Chapter 15. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, p 271

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijide A, Díez JA, Sánchez-Martín L, López-Fernández S, Vallejo A (2007) Nitrogen oxide emissions from an irrigated maize crop amended with treated pig slurries and composts in a Mediterranean climate. Agric Ecosyst Environ 121:383–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MoNRE) (2014) The initial biennial updated report of Viet Nam to the United Nations framework convention on climate change, Viet Nam Publishing House of Natural Resources, Environment and Cartography, Hanoi. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/vnmbur1.pdf. Accessed 30 April 2016

  • Miura Y, Kanno T (1997) Emissions of trace gases (CO2, CO, CH4, and N2O) resulting from rice straw burning. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 43(4):849–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash RP, Motavalli PP, Nelson KA (2012) Nitrous oxide emissions from claypan soils due to nitrogen fertilizer source and tillage/fertilizer placement practices. Soil Sci Soc Am J 76:983–993

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey A, Mai VT, Vu DQ, Bui TPL, Mai TLA, Jensen LS, de Neergaard A (2014) Organic matter and water management strategies to reduce methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddies in Vietnam. Agric Ecosyst Environ 196:137–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peng X, Ye LL, Wang CH, Zhou H, Sun B (2011) Temperature- and duration-dependent rice straw-derived biochar: characteristics and its effects on soil properties of an Ultisol in southern China. Soil Tillage Res 112:159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajkovich S, Enders A, Hanley K, Hyland C, Zimmerman AR, Lehmann J (2011) Corn growth and nitrogen nutrition after additions of biochars with varying properties to a temperate soil. Biol Fertil Soils 48:271–284. doi:10.1007/s00374-011-0624-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochette P, Eriksen-Hamel NS (2008) Chamber measurements of soil nitrous oxide flux: are absolute values reliable? Soil Sci Soc Am J 72(2):331–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-García M, Roig A, Sánchez-Monedero MA, Cayuela ML (2014) Biochar increases soil N2O emissions produced by nitrification-mediated pathways. Environ Sci 2(article 5):1–9. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2014.00025

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1988) SAS technical report: P-174 changes and enhancements to the SAS system release 5.16 for the VSE operating system

  • Segers R (1998) Methane production and methane consumption: a review of processes underlying wetland methane fluxes. Biogeochemistry 41:23–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shang Q, Yang X, Gao C et al (2011) Net annual global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in Chinese double rice-cropping systems: a 3-year field measurement in long-term fertilizer experiments. Glob Change Biol 17:2196–2210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh B, Singh BP, Cowie AL (2010) Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment. Aust J Soil Res 48(7):516–525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith KA, Conen F (2004) Measurement of trace gas, I: gas analysis, chamber methods and related procedures. In: Smith KA, Cresser MS (eds) Soil and environmental analysis: modern instrumental technical, 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares JR, Cantarella H, Vargas VP, Carmo JB, Martins AA, Sousa RM, Cristiano A, Andrade CA (2015) Enhanced-efficiency fertilizers in nitrous oxide emissions from urea applied to sugarcane. special section: improving nitrogen use efficiency in crop and livestock production. J Environ Qual 44:423–430. doi:10.2134/jeq2014.02.0096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner C, Das KC, Melear N, Lakly D (2010) Reducing nitrogen loss during poultry litter composting using biochar. J Environ Qual 39(4):1236–1242. doi:10.2134/jeq2009.0337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trenkel ME (2010) Slow- and controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers: an option for enhancing nutrient efficiency in agriculture, 2nd edn. International Fertilizer Industry Association, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Truc NTT, Sumalde ZM, Espaldon MVO, Pacardo EP, Rapera CL, Palis FG (2012) Farmers’ awareness and factors affecting adoption of rapid composting in Mekong Delta, Vietnam and Central Luzon, Philippines. J Environ Sci Manag 15:59–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner D, Edis R, Chen D, White B, Christie R (2008) Nitrogen loss from top-dressing fertilisers to wheat. BGC 2000 season research results. http://www.farmtrials.com.au/trial/13971. Accessed 10 April 2016

  • UN (United Nation-Vietnam) (2013) Greenhouse gas emissions and options for mitigation in Viet Nam, and the UN’s responses. http://www.un.org.vn/en/publications/cat_view/130-un-viet-nam-joint-publications/209-climate-change-joint-un-publications.html. Accessed 15 Mar 2016

  • Uprety DC, Dhar S, Hongmin D, Kimball BA, Garg A, Upadhyay J (2012) Technologies for climate change mitigation: agriculture sector. Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby

    Google Scholar 

  • van Zwieten L, Singh B, Joseph S, Kimber S, Cowie A, Chan Y (2009) Biochar and emissions of non-CO2 greenhouse gases from soil. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, p 227

    Google Scholar 

  • van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Morris S, Chan KY, Downie A, Rust J, Joseph S, Cowie A (2010) Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of paper mill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant Soil 327(1–2):235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velthof GL, Oenema O (1995) Nitrous oxide fluxes from grassland in the Netherlands: I. Statistical analysis of flux-chamber measurements. Eur J Soil Sci 46:533–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven E, Six J (2014) Biochar does not mitigate field-scale N2O emissions in a Northern California vineyard: an assessment across two years. Agric Ecosyst Environ 191:27–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Pan X, Liu Y, Zhang X, Xiong Z (2012) Effects of biochar amendment in two soils on greenhouse gas emissions and crop production. Plant Soil 360:1–2. doi:10.1007/s11104-012-1250-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamato M, Okimori Y, Wibowo IF, Anshori S, Ogawa M (2006) Effects of the application of charred bark of Acacia mangium on the yield of maize, cowpea and peanut, and soil chemical properties in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 52:489–495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yanai Y, Toyota K, Okazaki M (2007) Effects of charcoal addition on N2O emissions from soil resulting from rewetting air-dried soil in short-term laboratory experiments. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 53(2):181–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Z, Zhou Z, Zheng X, Xie B, Mei B, Wang R, Bahl KB, Zhu J (2010) Effects of organic matter incorporation on nitrous oxide emissions from rice–wheat rotation ecosystems in China. Plant Soil 327:315–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang A, Cui L, Pan G, Li L, Hussain Q, Zhang X, Zheng J, Crowley D (2010) Effect of biochar amendment on yield and methane and nitrous oxide emissions from a rice paddy from Tai Lake plain, China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:469–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman AR, Gao B, Ahn MY (2011) Positive and negative carbon mineralization priming effects among a variety of biochar-amended soils. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1169–1179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zou J, Huang Y, Jiang J, Zheng X, Sass RL (2005) A 3-year field measurement of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddies in China: effects of water regime, crop residue, and fertilizer application. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 19(2):GB2021. doi:10.1029/2004GB002401

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway for the financial support provided through the Royal Norwegian Embassy in Hanoi to carry out the research as part of the ClimaViet project. We thank also Dr. Bo and the two anonymous reviewers for the helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vietnam Academy of Agricultural Sciences (VAAS), Vinh Quynh Commune, Thanh Tri District, Hanoi, Vietnam

    Mai Van Trinh, Thi Phuong Loan Bui, Vu Duong Quynh & Le Quoc Thanh

  2. Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Frederik, A. Dahls vei 20, 1430, Ås, Norway

    Mehreteab Tesfai & Udaya Sekhar Nagothu

  3. Hermitage Research Facility, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Warwick, QLD, 4370, Australia

    Andrew Borrell

Authors
  1. Mai Van Trinh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mehreteab Tesfai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrew Borrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Udaya Sekhar Nagothu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Thi Phuong Loan Bui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Vu Duong Quynh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Le Quoc Thanh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehreteab Tesfai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trinh, M.V., Tesfai, M., Borrell, A. et al. Effect of organic, inorganic and slow-release urea fertilisers on CH4 and N2O emissions from rice paddy fields. Paddy Water Environ 15, 317–330 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-016-0551-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-016-0551-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation