Abstract
Solanum torvum has broad resistance to wilt-causing bacteria and fungi and nematodes. Here, we applied virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) in S. torvum and optimized the experimental conditions to suppress a carotenoid biosynthesis gene with high efficiency. Using this optimized method, we suppressed the StPsbO and StPsbP genes, which encode components of the oxygen-evolving complex, in S. torvum. Silencing of StPsbO and StPsbP impaired defense response in S. torvum, making it more susceptible to Ralstonia solanacearum. These results indicate that the optimized VIGS method can be used to identify genes required for plant immunity in S. torvum.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bhattacharyya D, Chakraborty S (2018) Chloroplast: the Trojan horse in plant–virus interaction. Mol Plant Pathol 19:504–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12533
Brigneti G, Martín-Hernández AM, Jin H, Chen J, Baulcombe DC, Baker B, Jones JDG (2004) Virus-induced gene silencing in Solanum species. Plant J 39:264–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02122.x
Burch-Smith TM, Anderson JC, Martin GB, Dinesh-Kumar SP (2004) Applications and advantages of virus-induced gene silencing for gene function studies in plants. Plant J 39:734–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02158.x
Burch-Smith TM, Schiff M, Liu Y, Dinesh-Kumar SP (2006) Efficient virus-induced gene silencing in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 142:21–27. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.084624
Chen J-C, Jiang C-Z, Gookin TE, Hunter DA, Clark DG, Reid MS (2004) Chalcone synthase as a reporter in virus-induced gene silencing studies of flower senescence. Plant Mol Biol 55:521–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-004-0590-7
Collonnier C, Fock I, Kashyap V, Rotino GL, Daunay MC, Lian Y, Mariska IK, Rajam MV, Servaes A, Ducreux G, Sihachakr D (2001) Applications of biotechnology in eggplant. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 65:91–107. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010674425536
Deb DB (1979) Solanaceae in India. In: Hawkes JG, Lester RN, Skelding AD (eds) The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae. Academic Press, London, pp 87–112
del Pozo O, Pedley KF, Martin GB (2004) MAPKKKα is a positive regulator of cell death associated with both plant immunity and disease. EMBO J 23:3072–3082. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600283
Dommes AB, Gross T, Herbert DB, Kivivirta KI, Becker A (2019) Virus-induced gene silencing: empowering genetics in non-model organisms. J Exp Bot 70:757–770. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery411
Ekengren SK, Liu Y, Schiff M, Dinesh-Kumar SP, Martin GB (2003) Two MAPK cascades, NPR1, and TGA transcription factors play a role in Pto-mediated disease resistance in tomato. Plant J 36:905–917. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01944.x
Fu D-Q, Zhu B-Z, Zhu H-L, Jiang W-B, Luo Y-B (2005) Virus-induced gene silencing in tomato fruit. Plant J 43:299–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02441.x
Fu QS, Yang RC, Wang HS, Zhao B, Zhou CL, Ren SX, Guo Y-D (2013) Leaf morphological and ultrastructural performance of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) in response to water stress. Photosynthetica 51:109–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-013-0005-6
Gousset C, Collonnier C, Mulya K, Mariska I, Rotino GL, Besse P, Servaes A, Sihachakr D (2005) Solanum torvum, as a useful source of resistance against bacterial and fungal diseases for improvement of eggplant (S. melongena L.). Plant Sci 168:319–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.07.034
Hayward AC (1991) Biology and epidemiology of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Annu Rev Phytopathol 29:65–87. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.29.090191.000433
Liu Y, Schiff M, Dinesh-Kumar SP (2002) Virus-induced gene silencing in tomato. Plant J 31:777–786. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01394.x
Liu H, Fu D, Zhu B, Yan H, Shen X, Zuo J, Zhu Y, Luo Y (2012) Virus-induced gene silencing in eggplant (Solanum melongena). J Integr Plant Biol 54:422–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2012.01102.x
Lu R, Malcuit I, Moffett P, Ruiz MT, Peart J, Wu A-J, Rathjen JP, Bendahmane A, Day L, Baulcombe DC (2003) High throughput virus-induced gene silencing implicates heat shock protein 90 in plant disease resistance. EMBO J 22:5690–5699. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg546
Medina-Puche L, Tan H, Dogra V, Wu M, Rosas-Diaz T, Wang L, Ding X, Zhang D, Fu X, Kim C, Lozano-Duran R (2020) A defense pathway linking plasma membrane and chloroplasts and co-opted by pathogens. Cell 182:1109-1124.e25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.020
Mukaihara T, Tamura N, Iwabuchi M (2010) Genome-wide identification of a large repertoire of Ralstonia solanacearum type III effector proteins by a new functional screen. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 23:251–262. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-23-3-0251
Nahar K, Matsumoto I, Taguchi F, Inagaki Y, Yamamoto M, Toyoda K, Shiraishi T, Ichinose Y, Mukaihara T (2014) Ralstonia solanacearum type III secretion system effector Rip36 induces a hypersensitive response in the nonhost wild eggplant Solanum torvum. Mol Plant Pathol 15:297–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12079
Nakano M, Mukaihara T (2018) Ralstonia solanacearum type III effector RipAL targets chloroplasts and induces jasmonic acid production to suppress salicylic acid-mediated defense responses in plants. Plant Cell Physiol 59:2576–2589. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcy177
Nakano M, Mukaihara T (2019) Comprehensive identification of PTI suppressors in type III effector repertoire reveals that Ralstonia solanacearum activates jasmonate signaling at two different steps. Int J Mol Sci 20:5992. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20235992
Nakano M, Ichinose Y, Mukaihara T (2020) Ralstonia solanacearum type III effector RipAC targets SGT1 to suppress effector-triggered immunity. Plant Cell Physiol 61:2067–2076. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcaa122
Ryu C-M, Anand A, Kang L, Mysore KS (2004) Agrodrench: a novel and effective agroinoculation method for virus-induced gene silencing in roots and diverse Solanaceous species. Plant J 40:322–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02211.x
Serrano I, Audran C, Rivas S (2016) Chloroplasts at work during plant innate immunity. J Exp Bot 67:3845–3854. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw088
Wang J-E, Li D-W, Gong Z-H, Zhang Y-L (2013) Optimization of virus-induced gene silencing in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Genet Mol Res 12:2492–2506. https://doi.org/10.4238/2013.July.24.4
Funding
This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science[(to M.N. (JP18J02213 and JP19K15847)]; Yamazaki Spice Promotion Foundation (to M.N.); Fuji Foundation for Protein Research (to M.N.); and Institute for Fermentation, Osaka (to M.N.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Human and animal participants
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
10327_2021_1040_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Figure S1: Silencing of PsbO and PsbP in Solanaceae plants. (a) Expression levels of NbPsbO and NbPsbP in leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana plants after tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-based virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS). Gene expression was analyzed using semi-quantitative RT-PCR. NbActin was used as the endogenous control. (b) Phenotypes of the control, NbPsbO-, and NbPsbP-silenced plants 3 weeks after VIGS. (c) Growth of VIGS plants. Stem length of plants in (b). Values are means ±SD of 10 replicates. Asterisks denote significant differences compared with the TRV:GUS control (P < 0.01, Dunnett’s test). (d) Chlorophyll content of the VIGS plants. Foliar chlorophyll content was measured for plants assessed in (b) using a chlorophyll meter. Values are means ± SD of 10 replicates. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences compared with the TRV:GUS control (P < 0.01, Dunnett’s test). (e) Expression levels of CaPsbO and CaPsbP in leaves of the VIGS Capsicum annuum plants. Gene expressions were analyzed using semi-quantitative RT-PCR. CaActin was used as the endogenous control. (f) Phenotypes of the control, CaPsbO-, and CaPsbP-silenced plants 5 weeks after VIGS. (g) Growth of the VIGS plants. Stem length was measured for plants in (f). Values are means ± SD of 10 replicates. Asterisks denote significant differences compared with the TRV:GUS control (P < 0.01, Dunnett’s test). (h) Chlorophyll content of VIGS plants. Foliar chlorophyll content was measured for the plants in (f) using a chlorophyll meter. Values are means ± SD of 10 replicates. Asterisks denote significant differences compared with the TRV:GUS control (P < 0.01, Dunnett’s test)
10327_2021_1040_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
Figure S2: Effect of PsbO- and PsbP-silencing on disease development in Solanaceae plants. (a) Daily disease index for wilt on the control, NbPsbO-, and NbPsbP-silenced Nicotiana benthamiana plants after inoculation with Ralstonia solanacearum. (b) Photographs of plants assessed in (a) at 9 days after inoculation. (c) Daily disease index for wilt on the control, CaPsbO-, and CaPsbP-silenced Capsicum annuum plants after inoculation with R. solanacearum. Stems of silenced plants were inoculated with R. solanacearum, and wilt was scored daily. (d) Photographs of plants assessed in (c) at 6 days after inoculation. All experiments were done three times with similar results; representative results are shown
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakano, M., Mukaihara, T. Virus-induced gene silencing in Solanum torvum. J Gen Plant Pathol 88, 10–16 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-021-01040-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-021-01040-7