Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Why Russian gas diplomacy fails: the geopolitics-energy nexus in Ukraine and Turkey

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Asia Europe Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper argues that Russia’s foreign policy vis-à-vis Ukraine and Turkey severely compromises its gas diplomacy. In utilizing the concept of issue salience, it attempts to show how, by means of prioritizing geopolitical benefits in both cases, Russia has failed to serve its energy security goals in two distinct ways. Firstly, it has not managed to resolve transit-related impediments to its export strategy, by both failing to break transit dependence on Ukraine and damaging relations with prospective transit state Turkey. Secondly, it has jeopardized its customer base in two significant markets. This brings severe repercussions not only for its energy industry but also for its grand strategy. The paper thus proceeds to suggest ways in which Russia’s energy and geopolitical interests can come to be served together, rather than undermine each other, as is currently the case. This is essential if Russia is to retain its political clout and international standing, given its strong dependence on energy-born revenues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aalto P (ed) (2012) Russia’s energy policies: national, interregional and global levels. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Aalto P et al (2012) How are Russian energy policies formulated? Linking the actors and structures of energy policy. In: Aalto P (ed) Russia’s energy policies: national, interregional and global levels. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 20–44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aalto P et al (2014) Russia’s energy relations in Europe and the Far East: towards a social structurationist approach to energy policy formation. J Inter Rel Dev 17(1):1–29. doi:10.1057/jird.2012.29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badykova N (2015) Do Russian‐Turkish energy relations have a future? The Turkey Analyst. 9 December

    Google Scholar 

  • Baev P (2015) Russia’s policy in the Middle East imperiled by the Syrian intervention. Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre. November, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Balcameda M (2012) Russia’s Central and Eastern Europe energy transit corridor: Ukraine and Belarus. In: Aalto P (ed) Russia’s energy policies: national, interregional and global levels. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 136–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman A (2014) The political influence of the Russian security services. J Slav Mil Stud 27(3):380–403. doi:10.1080/13518046.2014.932626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechev D (2015) Russia and Turkey—what does their partnership mean for the EU? EPC Policy Brief, 13 February

    Google Scholar 

  • Belyi A (2015) Transnational gas markets and Euro-Russian energy relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Belyi A, Goldthau A (2015) Between a rock and a hard place: International market dynamics, domestic politics and Gazprom’s strategy. Florence EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2015/22

  • Biersack J, O’Lear S (2014) The geopolitics of Russia’s annexation of Crimea: narratives, identity, silences, and energy. Eurasian Geogr Econ 55(3):247–269. doi:10.1080/15387216.2014.985241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brzezinski Z (1998) The grand chessboard: American primacy and its geostrategic imperatives. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist (2015) Russia v Turkey. Over the borderline. Turkey shoots down a Russian jet, and Syria grows yet more complicated”. 28 November., http://www.economist.com/news/europe/21679252-turkey-shoots-down-russian-jet-and-syria-grows-yet-more-complicated-over-borderline. Accessed 12 Feb 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Europe NG (2015) Russian gas: Europe or China? 4 June., http://www.naturalgaseurope.com/russian-gas-europe-or-china-23864. Accessed 30 June 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Godzimirski J (2013a) Actors, ideas and actions. In Godzimirski J (ed) Russian energy in a changing world. What is the outlook for the hydrocarbons superpower? Ashgate, Surrey, p 13-34

  • Godzimirski J (2013b) Russian energy: summing up and looking ahead. In: Godzimirski J (ed) Russian energy in a changing world: what is the outlook for the hydrocarbons superpower? Ashgate, Surrey, pp 177–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein J, Keohane R (eds) (1993) Ideas and foreign policy: beliefs, institutions and political change. Cornell University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthau A, Boersma T (2014) The 2014 Ukraine-Russia crisis: implications for energy markets and scholarship. Energy Res Soc Sci 3:13–15. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman J (1942) The background of geopolitics. Mil Aff (Winter) 6:197–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Götz E (2015) It’s geopolitics, stupid: explaining Russia’s Ukraine policy. Glob Aff 1(1):3–10. doi:10.1080/23340460.2015.960184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of the Russian Federation (2003) Energy strategy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of the Russian Federation (2009) Energy strategy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of the Russian Federation (2014) Energy strategy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2035

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray CS (1988) The geopolitics of super power. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  • Guardian (2015) What is Russia up to in Syria?: a Kurdish perspective. 1 October., http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/01/russia-targeting-non-isis-groups-syria-airstrikes. Accessed 24 Feb 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenclever A, Mayer P, Rittberger V (1997) Theories of international regimes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson J (2014) Non-Gazprom Russian producers: finally becoming truly independent? In: Henderson J, Pirani S (eds) The Russian gas matrix. How markets are driving change. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 314–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson J, Pirani S (eds) (2014) The Russian gas matrix: how markets are driving change. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson J, Pirani S, Yafimava K (2014) Russia’s domestic gas market development, prices and transportation. In: Henderson J, Pirani S (eds) The Russian gas matrix. How markets are driving change. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 108–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood A (2010) Global politics. Palgrave McMillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, Blank S (2015) US shale revolution and Russia: shifting geopolitics of energy in Europe and Asia. Asia Eur J 13(1):95–112. doi:10.1007/s10308-014-0400-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivinen M (2012) Public and business actors in Russia’s energy policy. In: Aalto P (ed) Russia’s energy policies: national, interregional and global levels. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 46–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson R (2006) Russia’s energy policy. Security dimensions and Russia’s reliability as an energy supplier. Swedish Defense Agency, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley-French J (2014) Ukraine: understanding Russia. RUSI J 159(3):36–39. doi:10.1080/03071847.2014.927997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liuhto K (2010) Energy in Russia’s foreign policy, Pan-European Institute 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo B (2003) Vladimir Putin and the evolution of Russian foreign policy. Blackwell Publishing, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lunden LP, Fjærtoft D (2013) The impact of domestic gas price reform on Russian gas exports. In: Godzimirski J (ed) Russian energy in a changing world: what is the outlook for the hydrocarbons superpower? Ashgate, Surrey, pp 131–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttwak EN (1990) From geopolitics to geo-economics: logic of conflict, grammar of commerce. Nat Int 20:17–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch AC (2016) The influence of regime type on Russian foreign policy toward ‘the West’, 1992–2015. Communis Post-Commun. Advance online publication

  • Mabro R, Wybrew-Bond I (eds) (1999) Gas to Europe: the strategies of four major suppliers. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mironova I (2014) A sneak peek into Russia’s energy strategy up to 2035. European Energy Review. 30 January. http://europeanenergyreview.com/site/pagina.php?id=4250. Accessed 18 Feb 2016

  • Mitrova T (2014) The political and economic importance of gas in Russia. In: Henderson J, Pirani S (eds) The Russian gas matrix. How markets are driving change, Oxford University Press, pp 6–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Kraenner S (2008) Energy security. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesvetailova A (2016) Against all odds? Russia’s financial crisis and global geopolitics. Int Spectator 51(1):113–130. doi:10.1080/03932729.2016.1126421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak Z, Ćwiek-Karpowicz J, Godzimirski J (2015) The power to influence Europe? Russia’s grand gas strategy. Pol Inst Int Aff 6(69):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppermann K, de Vries K (2011) Analyzing issue salience in international politics: theoretical foundations and methodological approaches. In: Oppermann K, Viehrig H (eds) Issue salience in international politics. Routledge, London, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppermann K, Viehrig H (2009) The public salience of foreign and security policy in Britain, Germany and France. West Eu Polit 32(5):925–942. doi:10.1080/01402380903064804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppermann K, Viehrig H (eds) (2011) Issue salience in international politics. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G (1998) Geopolitics: past, present and future. Pinter Pub Ltd, New York

  • Pascual C (2015) The new geopolitics of energy. Center on Global Energy Policy, Columbia

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirani S (2014) Ukraine’s imports of Russian gas: how a deal might be reached, Oxford Energy Comment: 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirani S, Stern J, Yafimava K (2010) The April 2010 Russo-Ukrainian gas agreement and its implication for Europe. Oxf Inst Energy Stud NG 42:1–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirani S, Henderson J, Honoré A, Rogers H, Yafimava K et al (2014) What the Ukraine crisis means for the gas markets, Oxford Energy Comment: 1-21

    Google Scholar 

  • Proedrou F (2012) EU energy security in the gas sector: evolving dynamics, policy dilemmas and prospects. Ashgate, Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  • Proedrou F (2015) What is the Turkish Stream and why does it matter? Central European Journal of International and Security Studies E-Contribution. http://www.cejiss.org/econtribution/what-is-the-turkish-stream-and-why-does-it-matter. Accessed 10 Feb 2016

  • Proedrou F (2016) EU energy security beyond Ukraine: towards holistic diversification. Eur Foreign Aff Rev 21(1):57–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Proedrou F, Frangonikolopoulos CA (2010) Russia’s re-emergence in the global system: globalising or anti-globalising force? J Contemp Eur Stud 18(1):79–90. doi:10.1080/14782801003638752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabadus A (2015) Turkey-Russia stand-off: energy and a difficult neighborhood. Natural Gas Europe. 30 November. http://www.naturalgaseurope.com/turkey-russia-stand-off-and-energy-relations-26797. Accessed 14 Feb 2016

  • Sakwa R (2014) Frontline Ukraine: crisis in the borderlands. IB Tauris

  • Siddi M (2015) The EU-Russia gas relationship: new projects, new disputes. FIIA Brief Pap 183:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Skalamera M, Goldthau A (2016) Russia: playing hardball or bidding farewell to Europe? Debunking the myths of Eurasia’s new geopolitics of gas. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Discussion Paper. June, p 1-54

  • Stern J (2014a) The matrix: an introduction and analytical framework for the Russian gas sector. In: Henderson J, Pirani S (eds) The Russian gas matrix. How markets are driving change. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern J (2014b) Russian responses to changes in the European gas market: exports, pricing and pipelines. In: Henderson J, Pirani S (eds) The Russian gas matrix. How markets are driving change. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 50–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern J, Pirani S, Yafimava K (2015) Does the cancellation of South Stream signal a fundamental reorientation of Russian gas export policy? Oxford Energy Comment: 1-15

    Google Scholar 

  • Strategic Comments (2014) Russia’s motives in Ukraine. Strategic Comments 20(4):vii–ix. doi:10.1080/13567888.2014.932067

    Google Scholar 

  • Suslov MD (2014) ‘Crimea is ours!’ Russian popular geopolitics in the new media age. Eurasian Geogr Econ 55(6):588–609. doi:10.1080/15387216.2015.1038574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver C (2013) The politics of the Black Sea region: EU neighborhood, conflict zone or future security community? Ashgate, Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  • Whist BS (2008) Nord Stream: not just a pipeline: an analysis of the political debates in the Baltic Sea region regarding the planned gas pipeline from Russia to Germany, Fridtjof Nansen’s Institute Report 15/2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanik L (2015) Keep(ing) calm and carry(ing) on business? Turkey-Russia relations as seen from Turkey 1. Turk Rev 5(5):366–375

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Visiting Lecturer at the International Hellenic University, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Filippos Proedrou

  2. Associate Research Fellow at the Institute of International Relations, Prague, Czech Republic

    Filippos Proedrou

Authors
  1. Filippos Proedrou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filippos Proedrou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Proedrou, F. Why Russian gas diplomacy fails: the geopolitics-energy nexus in Ukraine and Turkey. Asia Eur J 15, 21–37 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-016-0460-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-016-0460-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation