Abstract
In this study, the ionospheric response related to the January 15, 2022, Tonga volcanic eruption is investigated using total electron content extracted from the global navigation satellite system network in New Zealand. Significant covolcanic ionospheric disturbances (CVIDs) are observed after the eruption. Two wide-wavelength CVIDs first appeared with a propagation speed of 581 m/s. Then, they split into two modes at about 2400 km away from the explosion center, the fast one with a speed of 643 m/s and the slow one with a speed of 380 m/s. Following the wide-wavelength CVIDs, many narrow-wavelength CVIDs occur from about 2000 km away from the explosion center with various propagation speeds of 380 m/s, 358 m/s and 252 m/s. According to the propagation characteristics, the wide-wavelength CVIDs can be attributed to the shock waves in acoustic–gravity modes excited by the volcanic eruption; the fast narrow-wavelength CVIDs (380 m/s and 358 m/s) are caused by the Lamb waves that generate atmospheric resonance at gravity wave modes, while the slow narrow-wavelength CVIDs (252 m/s) could be due to the eruption-induced gravity waves. These new observed results can provide a deeper understanding of volcano-ionosphere coupling.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
GNSS and tide gauge data are available from the public website https://data.geonet.org.nz/.
References
Aa E, Zhang SR, Erickson PJ, Vierinen J, Coster AJ, Goncharenko LP, Spicher A, Rideout W (2022) Significant ionospheric hole and equatorial plasma bubbles after the 2022 Tonga volcano eruption. Space Weather 20:e2022S-e3101S. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003101
Astafyeva E (2019) Ionospheric detection of natural hazards. Rev Geophys 57(6):1265–1688. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000668
Astafyeva E, Maletckii B, Mikesell TD, Munaibari E, Ravanelli M, Coisson P, Rolland L (2022) The 15 January 2022 Hunga Tonga eruption history as inferred from ionospheric observations. Geophys Res Lett 49:e2022GL098827. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098827
Artru J, Ducic V, Kanamori H, Lognonné P, Murakami M (2005) Ionospheric detection of gravity waves induced by tsunamis. Geophys J Int 160(3):840–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02552.x
Cahyadi MN, Rahayu RW, Heki K, Nakashima Y (2020) Harmonic ionospheric oscillation by the 2010 eruption of the Merapi volcano, Indonesia, and the relevance of its amplitude to the mass eruption rate. J Volcanal Geoth Res 405:107047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2020.107047
Cahyadi MN, Handoko EY, Rahayu RW, Heki K (2021) Comparison of volcanic explosions in Japan using impulsive ionospheric disturbances. Earth Planets Space 73:228. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-021-01539-5
Choosakul N, Saito A, Iyemori T, Hashizume M (2009) Excitation of 4-min periodic ionospheric variations following the great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake in 2004. J Geophys Res Space Phys (1978–2012) 114:A10313. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013915
Dautermann T, Calais E, Mattioli GS (2009) Global positioning system detection and energy estimation of the ionospheric wave caused by the 13 July 2003 explosion of the Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat. J Geophys Res Solid Earth (1978–2012) 114:B02202. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005722
Ghent JN, Crowell BW (2022) Spectral characteristics of ionospheric disturbances over the southwestern Pacific from the 15 January 2022 Tonga eruption and tsunami. Geophys Res Lett 49:e2022GL100145. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100145
Heki K (2006) Explosion energy of the 2004 eruption of the Asama Volcano, central Japan, inferred from ionospheric disturbances. Geophys Res Lett 33:L14303. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026249
Lin JT, Rajesh PK, Lin CC, Chou MY, Liu JY, Yue J, Hsiao TY, Tsai HF, Chao HM, Kung MM (2022) Rapid conjugate appearance of the giant ionospheric lamb wave signatures in the Northern Hemisphere after Hunga-Tonga Volcano Eruptions. Geophys Res Lett 49:e2022G-e98222G. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098222
Liu X, Zhang Q, Shah M, Hong Z (2017) Atmospheric-ionospheric disturbances following the April 2015 Calbuco volcano from GPS observations. Adv Space Res 60(12):2836–2846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.07.007
Maletckii B, Astafyeva E (2022) Near-real-time analysis of the ionospheric response to the 15 January 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai Volcanic Eruption. J Geophys Res Space Phys 127:2e2022JA030735. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030735
Nakashima Y, Heki K, Takeo A, Cahyadi MN, Aditiya A, Yoshizawa K (2016) Atmospheric resonant oscillations by the 2014 eruption of the Kelud volcano, Indonesia, observed with the ionospheric total electron contents and seismic signals. Earth Planet Sc Lett 434:112–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.11.029
Nishida K, Kobayashi N, Fukao Y (2014) Background Lamb waves in the Earth’s atmosphere. Geophys J Int 196(1):312–316. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt413
Occhipinti G, Rolland L, Lognonne P, Watada S (2013) From Sumatra 2004 to Tohoku-Oki 2011: The systematic GPS detection of the ionospheric signature induced by tsunamigenic earthquakes. J Geophys Res Space Phys 118(6):3626–3636. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50322
Rolland LM, Occhipinti G, Lognonné P, Loevenbruck A (2010) Ionospheric gravity waves detected offshore Hawaii after tsunamis. Geophys Res Lett 37:L17101. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044479
Shults K, Astafyeva E, Adourian S (2016) Ionospheric detection and localization of volcano eruptions on the example of the April 2015 Calbuco events. J Geophys Res Space Phys 121:10303–10315. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023382
Schaer S (1999) Mapping and predicting the Earth's ionosphere using the Global Positioning System. Geod-Geophys Arb Schweiz, 59.
Shestakov N, Orlyakovskiy A, Perevalova N, Titkov N, Chebrov D, Ohzono M, Takahashi H (2021) Investigation of Ionospheric Response to June 2009 Sarychev Peak Volcano Eruption. Remote Sens 13:638. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13040638
Tang L, Zhang X, Li Z (2015) Observation of ionospheric disturbances induced by the 2011 Tohoku tsunami using far-field GPS data in Hawaii. Earth, Planets Space 67:88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-015-0240-0
Tang L, Li Z, Zhou B (2018) Large-area tsunami signatures in ionosphere observed by GPS TEC after the 2011 Tohoku earthquake. GPS Solut 22:93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-018-0759-1
Themens DR, Watson C, Žagar N, Vasylkevych S, Elvidge S, McCaffrey A, Prikryl P, Reid B, Wood A, Jayachandran PT (2022) Global propagation of ionospheric disturbances associated with the 2022 Tonga Volcanic Eruption. Geophys Res Lett 49(7):e2022G-e98158G. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098158
Zhang S, Vierinen J, Aa E, Goncharenko LP, Erickson PJ, Rideout W, Coster AJ, Spicher A (2022) Tonga volcanic eruption induced global propagation of ionospheric disturbances via Lamb waves. Front Astron Space Sci 9:871275. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2022.871275
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the GeoNet Data Center for providing the GNSS and tide gauge data. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42274017 and Grant No. 41804021), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Grant No. 2020A1515010811) and Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project (Grant No. 202201010129).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 (AVI 8739 kb)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tang, L. Ionospheric disturbances of the January 15, 2022, Tonga volcanic eruption observed using the GNSS network in New Zealand. GPS Solut 27, 53 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-023-01395-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-023-01395-8