Skip to main content
Log in

GNSS carrier phase time-variant observable-specific signal bias (OSB) handling: an absolute bias perspective in multi-frequency PPP

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In precise satellite clock estimation, the satellite clock offsets absorb the pseudorange and carrier phase time-variant hardware delays. The dissimilarity of the satellite clock estimated with observations at different frequencies is termed the inter-frequency clock bias (IFCB). The bias inconsistency suggests that the simple ionospheric-free satellite clock cannot directly be applied to the multi-frequency carrier phase observations in multi-frequency precise point positioning (PPP). We propose the carrier phase time-variant observable-specific signal bias (OSB) concept and the corresponding estimation approach to solve this. The definition, rationality, reliability and validity of the carrier phase time-variant OSB are clarified. The new concept advantage is that a set of the carrier phase time-variant OSB values can directly amend on the carrier phase observations, and thereafter, the IFCB effect can be eliminated, which provides the flexibilities for the GNSS carrier phase observation handing. Datasets collected from 144 Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) stations are adopted for the carrier phase time-variant OSB estimation and an analysis of its effect on the GNSS multi-frequency PPP performance. The various multi-frequency PPP models are tested and evaluated considering the carrier phase time-variant OSB correction. The results indicate that the GPS, BDS-2 and BDS-3 carrier phase time-variant OSB time series have the obvious amplitudes and the amplitudes of the Galileo and QZSS carrier phase time-variant OSB are small. The GPS and BDS-2 multi-frequency PPP performance is significantly enhanced when correcting the carrier phase time-variant OSB. The GPS-only kinematic ionospheric-float PPP exhibits the positioning accuracy of 1.0 cm, 2.2 cm and 2.6 cm in the north, east and up components when correcting the carrier phase time-variant OSB, whereas the positioning accuracy of the case without the correction is 1.4 cm, 2.8 cm and 3.7 cm in three directions, respectively. The mean convergence time of two dual-frequency and three triple-frequency BDS-2-only kinematic PPP is reduced by 5.0%, 4.9%, 5.4%, 4.7% and 4.6%, respectively, with the carrier phase time-variant OSB correction. The carrier phase time-variant OSB improvement on BDS-3-only multi-frequency PPP is not obvious owing to the relatively few available and stable carrier phase time-variant OSB values. The reliability, suitability and effectiveness of the GNSS carrier phase time-variant OSB are demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The used GNSS observation data are provided by the MGEX network (ftp://igs.ign.fr/pub/igs/data/campaign/mgex/daily/rinex3/). The precise products are provided by the GFZ (ftp://ftp.gfz-potsdam.de/GNSS/products/mgex/).

References

  • Cai C, He C, Santerre R, Pan L, Cui X, Zhu J (2016) A comparative analysis of measurement noise and multipath for four constellations: GPS, BeiDou, GLONASS and Galileo. Surv Rev 48:287–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dvulit P, Savchuk S, Sosonka I (2021) Accuracy estimation of site coordinates derived from GNSS-observations by non-classical error theory of measurements. Geod Geodyn 12(5):347–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erol S, Alkan R, Ozulu İ, İlçi V (2020) Performance analysis of real-time and post-mission kinematic precise point positioning in marine environments. Geod Geodyn 11(6):401–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo J, Geng J (2018) GPS satellite clock determination in case of inter-frequency clock biases for triple-frequency precise point positioning. J Geod 92:1133–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild A, Steigenberger P, Rodriguez-Solano C (2012) Signal, orbit and attitude analysis of Japan’s first QZSS satellite Michibiki. GPS Solut 16:127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khodabandeh A, Teunissen P (2016) PPP-RTK and inter-system biases: the ISB look-up table as a means to support multi-system PPP-RTK. J Geod 90:837–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leick A, Rapoport L, Tatarnikov D (2015) GPS satellite surveying. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Zhou X, Wu B, Wang J (2012) Estimation of the inter-frequency clock bias for the satellites of PRN25 and PRN01 Science China Physics. Mech Astron 55:2186–2193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Zhou X, Wu B (2013) Fast estimation and analysis of the inter-frequency clock bias for Block IIF satellites. GPS Solut 17:347–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Li B, Xiao G, Wang J, Xu T (2016) Improved method for estimating the inter-frequency satellite clock bias of triple-frequency GPS. GPS Solut 20:751–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Jiang X, Zhang X, Ge M, Schuh H (2020a) GPS+ Galileo+ BeiDou precise point positioning with triple-frequency ambiguity resolution. GPS Solut 24:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Liu G, Li X, Zhou F, Feng G, Yuan Y, Zhang K (2020b) Galileo PPP rapid ambiguity resolution with five-frequency observations. GPS Solut 24:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu T, Zhang B, Yuan Y, Zhang X (2020) On the application of the raw-observation-based PPP to global ionosphere VTEC modeling: an advantage demonstration in the multi-frequency and multi-GNSS context. J Geod 94:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Yu K, Wang E, He X, Lu T, Li Q (2021) Evaluation of BDS and GPS RAIM availability based on data collected in June 2020. Geod Geodyn 12(3):181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montenbruck O, Hugentobler U, Dach R, Steigenberger P, Hauschild A (2012a) Apparent clock variations of the Block IIF-1 (SVN62) GPS satellite. GPS Solut 16:303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montenbruck O, Hugentobler U, Dach R, Steigenberger P, Hauschild A (2012b) Apparent clock variations of the Block IIF-1 (SVN62) GPS satellite. GPS Solut 16:303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odijk D, Zhang B, Khodabandeh A, Odolinski R, Teunissen PJ (2016) On the estimability of parameters in undifferenced, uncombined GN network and PPP-RTK user models by means of S-system theory. J Geod 90:15–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan L, Li X, Zhang X, Li X, Lu C, Zhao Q, Liu J (2017a) Considering inter-frequency clock bias for BDS triple-frequency precise point positioning. Remote Sens 9:734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan L, Zhang X, Li X, Liu J, Li X (2017b) Characteristics of inter-frequency clock bias for Block IIF satellites and its effect on triple-frequency GPS precise point positioning. GPS Solut 21:811–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan L, Zhang X, Guo F, Liu J (2019) GPS inter-frequency clock bias estimation for both uncombined and ionospheric-free combined triple-frequency precise point positioning. J Geod 93:473–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaer S (2016) SINEX BIAS—solution (Software/technique) INdependent EXchange Format for GNSS BIASes Version 1.00. In: IGS workshop on GNSS biases, Bern, Switzerland

  • Su K, Jin S (2020) Analysis and comparisons of the BDS/Galileo quad-frequency PPP models performances. Acta Geod Cartogr Sin 49:1189

    Google Scholar 

  • Su K, Jin S (2021) Analytical performance and validations of the Galileo five-frequency precise point positioning models. Measurement 172:108890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang N, Yuan Y, Li Z, Montenbruck O, Tan B (2016) Determination of differential code biases with multi-GNSS observations. J Geod 90:209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang N, Li Z, Duan B, Hugentobler U, Wang L (2020) GPS and GLONASS observable-specific code bias estimation: comparison of solutions from the IGS and MGEX networks. J Geod 94:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanninger L, Sumaya H, Beer S (2017) Group delay variations of GPS transmitting and receiving antennas. J Geod 91:1099–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Chen Y, Yuan Y (2019) PPP-RTK based on undifferenced and uncombined observations: theoretical and practical aspects. J Geod 93:1011–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Teunissen P, Yuan Y (2017) On the short-term temporal variations of GNSS receiver differential phase biases. J Geod 1–10

  • Zhao Q, Wang C, Guo J, Wang B, Liu J (2018) Precise orbit and clock determination for BeiDou-3 experimental satellites with yaw attitude analysis. GPS Solut 22:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the reviewers and editors’ valuable comment to improve the paper quality.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ke Su.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, K., Jin, S. & Jiao, G. GNSS carrier phase time-variant observable-specific signal bias (OSB) handling: an absolute bias perspective in multi-frequency PPP. GPS Solut 26, 71 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-022-01255-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-022-01255-x

Keywords

Navigation