Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the positioning performance and tropospheric delay retrieval with precise point positioning using products from different analysis centers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance of precise point positioning (PPP) strongly depends on the quality of satellite orbit and clock products. To give a full evaluation of PPP performance with the various publicly available precise satellite orbit and clock products, this contribution comprehensively investigates the positioning performance as well as tropospheric delay retrieval of GPS-, GLONASS-, and Galileo-only PPP with the precise products from eight International GNSS Service (IGS) (i.e., cod, emr, esa, gfz, grg, igs, jpl, and mit) and five multi-GNSS experiment (MGEX) analysis centers (ACs) (i.e., com, gbm, grm, jax, and wum) based on the observations of 90 MGEX tracking stations in a 1-month period (April 2019). The positioning performance in terms of convergence time and positioning accuracy is assessed by coordinate-static and coordinate-kinematic PPP modes, while the tropospheric delay estimation in terms of accuracy is evaluated by coordinate-fixed PPP mode. For GPS- and GLONASS-only PPP with different AC products, the positioning performances are comparable with each other except that with emr, jpl, mit, and jax products. Overall, the positioning performance with cod and com products provided by CODE ranks the first. For Galileo-only PPP, the grm product performs the best. For ZTD estimation, the accuracy derived from GPS-, GLONASS-, and Galileo-only solutions agrees well and the differences in accuracy among different AC products can be negligible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold D, Meindl M, Beutler G, Dach R, Schaer S, Lutz S, Prange L, Sosnica K, Mervart L, Jaggi A (2015) CODE’s new solar radiation pressure model for GNSS orbit determination. J Geod 89(8):775–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blewitt G (1989) Carrier phase ambiguity resolution for the global positioning system applied to geodetic baselines up to 2000 km. J Geophys Res 94(B8):10187–10203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm J, Möller G, Schindelegger M, Pain G, Weber R (2015) Development of an improved empirical model for slant delays in the troposphere (GPT2w). GPS Solut 19(3):433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byun S, Bar-Sever Y (2009) A new type of troposphere zenith path delay product of the international GNSS service. J Geod 83(3–4):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen K, Zamora N, Babeyko AY, Li X, Ge M (2015) Precise positioning of BDS, BDS/GPS: implications for Tsunami early warning in South China Sea. Remote Sens 7:15955–15968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow JM, Neilan RE, Rizos C (2009) The international GNSS service in a changing landscape of global navigation satellite systems. J Geod 83(3–4):191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gautam P, Sathyaseelan R, Pappachen J, Kumar N, Biswas A, Philip G, Dabral C, Pal S (2019) GPS measured static and kinematic offsets at near and far field of the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Geod Geodyn 10(3):213–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge M, Gendt G, Rothacher M, Shi C, Liu J (2008) Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in precise point positioning (PPP) with daily observations. J Geod 82(7):389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge Y, Zhou F, Dai P, Qin W, Wang S, Yang Y (2019) Precise point positioning time transfer with multi-GNSS single-frequency observations. Measurement 146:628–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo F, Li X, Zhang X, Wang J (2017) The contribution of multi-GNSS experiment (MGEX) to precise point positioning. Adv Space Res 59:2714–2725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouba J (2015) A guide to using international GNSS service (IGS) products, September 2015 update. http://kb.igs.org/hc/en-us/articles/201271873-A-Guide-to-Using-the-IGS-Products

  • Labib B, Yan J, Barriot J, Zhang F, Feng P (2019) Monitoring Zenithal Total Delays over the three different climatic zones from IGS GPS final products: a comparison between the use of the VMF1 and GMF mapping functions. Geod Geodyn 10(2):93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leick A, Rapoport L, Tatarnikov D (2015) GPS satellite surveying, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Zhang X (2014) Integrating GPS and GLONASS to accelerate convergence and initialization times of precise point positioning. GPS Solut 18(3):461–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Feng Y, Shen Y, Wang C (2010) Geometry-specified troposphere decorrelation for sub-centimeter real-time kinematic solutions over long baselines. J Geophys Res 115:B11404. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Dick G, Lu C, Ge M, Nilsson T, Ning T, Wickert J, Schuh H (2015) Multi-GNSS meteorology: real-time retrieving of atmospheric water vapor from BeiDou, Galileo, GLONASS, and GPS observations. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 53(12):6385–6393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Zhang XH, Guo F (2017) Ambiguity resolved precise point positioning with GPS and Beidou. J Geod 91(1):25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Zheng N, Wang J, Gao J (2018) Performance comparison among different precise satellite ephemeris and clock products for PPP/INS/UWB tightly coupled positioning. J Navig 71(3):585–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou Y, Zheng F, Gu S, Wang C, Guo H, Feng Y (2016) Multi-GNSS precise point positioning with raw single-frequency and dual-frequency measurement models. GPS Solut 20(4):849–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malys S, Jensen PA (1990) Geodetic point positioning with GPS carrier beat phase data from the CASA UNO experiment. Geophys Res Lett 17(5):651–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melbourne W (1985) The case for ranging in GPS based geodetic systems. In: Proceedings of the first symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, positioning with GPS-1985. U.S. Department of Commerce, Rockville, MD, pp 373–386

  • Montenbruck O, Steigenberger P, Prange L, Deng Z, Zhao Q, Perosanz F, Romero I, Noll C, Stürze A, Weber G, Schmid R, Macleod K, Schaer S (2017) The multi-GNSS experiment (MGEX) of the international GNSS service (IGS)—achievements, prospects and challenges. Adv Space Res 59:1671–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit G, Luzum B (eds) (2010) IERS conventions (2010). IERS Technical Note 36, Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. http://tai.bipm.org/iers/conv2010

  • Saastamoinen J (1973) Contributions to the theory of atmospheric refraction—part II. Refraction corrections in satellite geodesy. Bull Géod 47(1):13–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon B, Zhang Z, Rateb A, Sun A, Wiese D, Save H, Beaudoing H, Lo M, Müller-Schmied H, Döll P, van Beek R, Swenson S, Lawrence D, Croteau M, Reedy R (2019) Tracking seasonal fluctuations in land water storage using global models and GRACE satellites. Geophys Res Lett 46:5254–5264. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer T, Beutler G, Rothacher M (1999) A new solar radiation pressure model for GPS Satellites. GPS Solut 2(3):50–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessel P, Smith WHF, Scharroo R, Luis J, Wobbe F (2013) Generic mapping tools: improved version released. EOS Trans AGU 94(45):409–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Tu R, Gao Y, Liu N, Zhang R (2019) Evaluation of carrier-phase precise time and frequency transfer using different analysis center products for GNSSs. Meas Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ab0f7f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou F, Dong D, Ge M, Li P, Wickert J, Schuh H (2018a) Simultaneous estimation of GLONASS pseudorange inter-frequency biases in precise point positioning using undifferenced and uncombined observations. GPS Solut 22:19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-017-0685-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou F, Dong D, Li W, Jiang X, Wickert J, Schuh H (2018b) GAMP: an open-source software of multi-GNSS precise point positioning using undifferenced and uncombined observations. GPS Solut 22:33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-018-0699-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou F, Dong D, Li P, Li X, Schuh H (2019) Influence of stochastic modeling for inter-system biases on multi-GNSS undifferenced and uncombined precise point positioning. GPS Solut 23:59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-019-0852-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zumberge JF, Heflin MB, Jefferson DC, Watkins MM, Webb FH (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res 102(B3):5005–5017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the IGS and MGEX analysis centers for providing GNSS ground tracking data, and precise orbit and clock products. The figures were generated using the public domain GMT software (Wessel et al. 2013). This work is sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41904027; 41904011), the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (No. ZR2019QD003), and the Scientific Research Foundation of Shandong University of Science and Technology for Recruited Talents (No. 2017RCJJ074).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weiwei Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, F., Cao, X., Ge, Y. et al. Assessment of the positioning performance and tropospheric delay retrieval with precise point positioning using products from different analysis centers. GPS Solut 24, 12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-019-0925-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-019-0925-0

Keywords

Navigation