Abstract
The diaphragm is the main inspiratory muscle and separates the thorax and the abdomen. In COPD, the evaluation of the diaphragm shape is clinically important, especially in the case of hyperinflation. However, delineating the diaphragm remains a challenge as it cannot be seen entirely on CT scans. Therefore, the lungs, ribs, sternum, and lumbar vertebrae are used as surrogate landmarks to delineate the diaphragm. We herein describe a CT-based method for evaluating the shape of the diaphragm using 3D Slicer—a free software that allows delineation of the diaphragm landmarks—in ten COPD patients. Using the segmentation performed with 3D Slicer, the diaphragm shape was reconstructed with open-source Free Pascal Compiler. From this graduated model, the length of the muscle fibers, the radius of curvature, and the area of the diaphragm—the main determinants of its function—can be measured. Inter- and intra-user variabilities were evaluated with Bland and Altman plots and linear mixed models. Except for the coronal length (p = 0.049), there were not statistically significant inter- or intra-user differences (p values ranging from 0.326 to 0.910) suggesting that this method is reproducible and repeatable. In conclusion, 3D Slicer can be applied to CT scans for determining the shape of the diaphragm in COPD patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
All the data are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author (Olivier Taton).
Abbreviations
- COPD:
-
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- DICOM:
-
Digital imaging and communications in medicine
- FRC:
-
Functional residual capacity
- PACS:
-
Picture archiving and communication system
References
De Troyer A, Boriek AM. Mechanics of the respiratory muscle. Compr Physiol. 2011;1:1273–1300.
Similowski T, Yan S, Gauthier AP, Macklem PT, Bellemare F. Contractile properties of the human diaphragm during chronic hyperinflation. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:917–923.
Fessler HE, Permutt S. Lung volume reduction surgery and airflow limitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157:715–722.
Pazokifard B, Sowmya A, Moses D. Automatic 3D modelling of human diaphragm from lung MDCT images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016;11:767–776.
Karami E, Wang Y, Gaede S, Lee TY, Samani A. Anatomy-based algorithm for automatic segmentation of human diaphragm in non-contrast computed tomography images. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016;3:046004.
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30:1323–1341.
Nardelli P, Jaeger A, O'Shea C, Khan KA, Kennedy MP, Cantillon-Murphy P. Pre-clinical validation of virtual bronchoscopy using 3D Slicer. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017;12:25–38.
Rios Velazquez E, Aerts HJWL, Gu Y, Goldgof DB, De Ruysscher D, Dekker A, Korn R, Gillies RJ, Lambin P. A semiautomatic CT-based ensemble segmentation of lung tumors: comparison with oncologists’ delineations and with the surgical specimen. Radiother Oncol. 2012;105:167–173.
Rios Velazquez E, Parmar C, Jermoumi M, Mak RH, van Baardwijk A, Fennesy FM, Lewis JH, De Ruysscher D, Kikinis R, Lambin P, Aerts HJWL. Volumetric CT-based segmentation of NSCLC using 3D-Slicer. Sci Rep. 2013;3:3529.
Yip SSF, Parmar C, Blezek D, San Jose Estepar R, Piper S, Kim J, Aerts HJWL. Application of the 3D slicer chest imaging platform segmentation algorithm for large lung nodule delineation. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0178944.
Negroni D, Zagaria D, Paladini A, Falaschi Z, Arcoraci A, Barini M, Carriero A. COVID-19 CT scan segmentation: how we do it. J Digit Imaging. 2022;35:424–431.
Cassart M, Pettiaux N, Gevenois PA, Paiva M, Estenne M. Effect of chronic hyperinflation on diaphragm length and surface area. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156:504–508.
Rangayyan RM, Vu RH, Boag GS. Automatic delineation of the diaphragm in computed tomographic images. J Digit Imaging. 2008;21:S134–147.
Cassart M, Hamacher J, Verbandt Y, Wildermuth S, Ritscher D, Russi EW, de Francquen P, Cappello M, Weder W, Estenne M. Effects of lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema on diaphragm dimensions and configuration. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:1171–1175.
Boyko M, Vonderdank S, Gürleyen H, Gibis N, Schulz A, Erbuth A, Bastian A. Endoscopic lung volume reduction results in improvement of diaphragm mobility as measured by sonography. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020;15:1465–1470.
Estenne M. Effect of lung transplant and volume reduction surgery on respiratory muscle function. J Appl Physiol. 2009;107:977–986.
Chang Y, Bae J, Kim N, Park JY, Lee SM, Seo JB. Three-dimensional quadratic modeling and quantitative evaluation of the diaphragm on a volumetric CT scan in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Med Phys. 2016;43:4273.
Salito C, Luoni E, Aliverti A. Alterations of diaphragm and rib cage morphometry in severe COPD patients by CT analysis. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:6390–6393.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Benoit Beyer for advice in diaphragm segmentation, and Samantha Phillips for editing their manuscript.
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception, design, material preparation, data collection, and analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Olivier Taton and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
The authors declare that the study was approved by the institutional ethics committee and certify that the study was performed in accordance with ethical standards as laid down in 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Consent to Participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent to Publish
The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images in Figs. 1, 2, and 3.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Taton, O., Van Muylem, A., Leduc, D. et al. CT-Based Evaluation of the Shape of the Diaphragm Using 3D Slicer. J Digit Imaging. Inform. med. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01069-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01069-y