Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting Risk Stratification in Early-Stage Endometrial Carcinoma: Significance of Multiparametric MRI Radiomics Model

  • Published:
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) risk stratification prior to surgery is crucial for clinical treatment. In this study, we intend to evaluate the predictive value of radiomics models based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for risk stratification and staging of early-stage EC. The study included 155 patients who underwent MRI examinations prior to surgery and were pathologically diagnosed with early-stage EC between January, 2020, and September, 2022. Three-dimensional radiomics features were extracted from segmented tumor images captured by MRI scans (including T2WI, CE-T1WI delayed phase, and ADC), with 1521 features extracted from each of the three modalities. Then, using five-fold cross-validation and a multilayer perceptron algorithm, these features were filtered using Pearson’s correlation coefficient to develop a prediction model for risk stratification and staging of EC. The performance of each model was assessed by analyzing ROC curves and calculating the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. In terms of risk stratification, the CE-T1 sequence demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy of 0.858 ± 0.025 and an AUC of 0.878 ± 0.042 among the three sequences. However, combining all three sequences resulted in enhanced predictive accuracy, reaching 0.881 ± 0.040, with a corresponding increase in the AUC to 0.862 ± 0.069. In the context of staging, the utilization of a combination involving T2WI with CE-T1WI led to a notably elevated predictive accuracy of 0.956 ± 0.020, surpassing the accuracy achieved when employing any singular feature. Correspondingly, the AUC was 0.979 ± 0.022. When incorporating all three sequences concurrently, the predictive accuracy reached 0.956 ± 0.000, accompanied by an AUC of 0.986 ± 0.007. It is noteworthy that this level of accuracy surpassed that of the radiologist, which stood at 0.832. The MRI radiomics model has the potential to accurately predict the risk stratification and early staging of EC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN sstimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer J Clin, 71(3): 209–49, 2021.

  2. Lortet-tieulent J, Ferlay J, Bray F, et al. International Patterns and Trends in Endometrial Cancer Incidence, 1978-2013. J Natl Cancer Insti, 110(4): 354–61, 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA: Cancer J Clin, 70(1): 7–30, 2020.

  4. Zhang Q, Yu X, Lin M, et al. Multi-b-value diffusion weighted imaging for preoperative evaluation of risk stratification in early-stage endometrial cancer. Eur J Radiol, 119: 108637, 2019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamilton CA, Pothuri B, Arend RC, et al. Endometrial cancer: A society of gynecologic oncology evidence-based review and recommendations. Gynecol Oncol, 160(3): 817–26, 2021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nwachukwu C, Baskovic M, Von Eyben R, et al. Recurrence risk factors in stage IA grade 1 endometrial cancer. Journal of gynecologic oncology, 32(2): e22, 2021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Frost JA, Webster KE, Bryant A, et al. Lymphadenectomy for the management of endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10(10): Cd007585, 2017.

  8. Popovic V, Milosavljevic N, Radojevic MZ, et al. Analysis of postoperative radiotherapy effects within risk groups in patients with FIGO I, II, and III endometrial cancer. Ind J Cancer, 56(4): 341–7, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Visser NCM, Reijnen C, Massuger L, et al. Accuracy of endometrial sampling in endometrial carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol, 130(4): 803–13, 2017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen J, Gu H, Fan W, et al. MRI-Based Radiomic Model for Preoperative Risk stratification in Stage I Endometrial Cancer. J Cancer, 12(3): 726–34, 2021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamada I, Miyasaka N, Kobayashi D, et al. Endometrial carcinoma: Texture analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps and its correlation with histopathologic findings and prognosis. Radiol Imaging Cancer, 1(2): e190054, 2019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ueno Y, Forghani B, Forghani R, et al. Endometrial carcinoma: MR Imaging-based texture model for preoperative risk stratification-A. Preliminary analysis. Radiology, 284(3): 748–57, 2017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ytre-Hauge S, Dybvik JA, Lundervold A, et al. Preoperative tumor texture analysis on MRI predicts high-risk disease and reduced survival in endometrial cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging : JMRI, 48(6): 1637–47, 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lefebvre T L, Ueno Y, Dohan A, et al. Development and Validation of Multiparametric MRI-based Radiomics Models for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Endometrial Cancer. Radiology, 305(2): 375–86, 2022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yan BC, Li Y, Ma FH, et al. Preoperative assessment for high-risk endometrial cancer by developing an MRI- and clinical-based radiomics nomogram: A multicenter study. J Magn Reson Imaging: JMRI, 52(6): 1872–82, 2020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liang W, Xu L, Yang P, et al. Novel Nomogram for Preoperative Prediction of Early Recurrence in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Frontiers in oncology, 8: 360, 2018.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 31(1):12–39, 2021.

  18. Nougaret S, Reinhold C, Alsharif SS, et al. Endometrial Cancer: Combined MR Volumetry and Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Assessment of Myometrial and Lymphovascular Invasion and Tumor Grade. Radiology, 276(3): 797–808, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nougaret S, Horta M, Sala E, et al. Endometrial Cancer MRI staging: Updated Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. European radiology, 29(2): 792–805, 2019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yan B, Liang X, Zhao T, et al. Preoperative prediction of deep myometrial invasion and tumor grade for stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma: a simple method of measurement on DWI. European radiology, 29(2): 838–48, 2019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao I, Gong J, Xi Y, et al. MRI-based radiomics nomogram may predict the response to induction chemotherapy and survival in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. European radiology, 30(1): 537–46, 2020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. De Perrot T, Hofmeister J, Burgermeister S, et al. Differentiating kidney stones from phleboliths in unenhanced low-dose computed tomography using radiomics and machine learning. European radiology, 29(9): 4776–82, 2019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Park H J, Lee SS, Park B, et al. Radiomics Analysis of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI for Staging Liver Fibrosis. Radiology, 290(2): 380–7, 2019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kido A, Nishio M. MRI-based Radiomics Models for Pretreatment Risk Stratification of Endometrial Cancer. Radiology, 305(2): 387–9, 2022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang J, Zhang Q, Wang T, et al. Multimodal MRI-Based Radiomics-Clinical Model for Preoperatively Differentiating Concurrent Endometrial Carcinoma From Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia. Frontiers in oncology, 12: 887546, 2022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen X, Wang X, Gan M, et al. MRI-based radiomics model for distinguishing endometrial carcinoma from benign mimics: A multicenter study. European journal of radiology, 146: 110072, 2022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zheng T, Yang L, Du J, et al. Combination Analysis of a Radiomics-Based Predictive Model With Clinical Indicators for the Preoperative Assessment of Histological Grade in Endometrial Carcinoma. Frontiers in oncology, 11: 582495, 2021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao M, Wen F, Shi J, et al. MRI-based radiomics nomogram for the preoperative prediction of deep myometrial invasion of FIGO stage I endometrial carcinoma. Medical physics, 49(10): 6505–16, 2022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rodríguez-Ortega A, Alegre A, Lago V, et al. Machine Learning-Based Integration of Prognostic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers for Myometrial Invasion Stratification in Endometrial Cancer. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI, 54(3): 987–95, 2021

  30. Stanzione A, Cuocolo R, Del Grosso R, et al. Deep Myometrial Infiltration of Endometrial Cancer on MRI: A Radiomics-Powered Machine Learning Pilot Study. Academic radiology, 28(5): 737–44, 2021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Luo Y, Mei D, Gong J, et al. Multiparametric MRI-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Predicting Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Endometrial Carcinoma. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 52(4): 1257–62, 2020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Long L, Sun J, Jiang L, et al. MRI-based traditional radiomics and computer-vision nomogram for predicting lymphovascular space invasion in endometrial carcinoma. Diagnostic and interventional imaging, 102(7-8): 455–62, 2021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yan BC, Li Y, Ma FH, et al. Radiologists with MRI-based radiomics aids to predict the pelvic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer: a multicenter study. European radiology, 31(1): 411–22, 2021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Meyer HJ, Hamerlag G, Leifels L, et al. Histogram analysis parameters derived from DCE-MRI in head and neck squamous cell cancer - Associations with microvessel density. Eur J Radiol, 120: 108669, 2019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hu Y, Zhang Y, Cheng J. Diagnostic value of molybdenum target combined with DCE-MRI in different types of breast cancer. Oncol Lett, 18(4): 4056–63, 2019.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Colombo N, Preti E, Landoni F, et al. Endometrial cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology : Official J Europe Soc Med Oncol, 24 Suppl 6: vi33–8, 2013.

  37. Donato V, Kontopantelis E, Cuccu I, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-radiomics in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 33(7):1070–1076, 2023.

  38. Zhang K, Zhang Y, Fang X, et al. Nomograms of combining apparent diffusion coefficient value and radiomics for preoperative risk evaluation in endometrial carcinoma. Front Oncol, 11: 705456, 2021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Cuccu I, D’oria O, Sgamba L, et al. Role of genomic and molecular biology in the modulation of the treatment of endometrial cancer: Narrative review and perspectives. Healthcare (Basel). 11(4):571, 2023.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Golia D'Augè T, Cuccu I, Santangelo G, et al. Novel Insights into Molecular Mechanisms of Endometrial Diseases. Biomolecules. 9;13(3):499, 2023.

  41. Bogani G, Ray-coquard I, Concin N, et al. Endometrial carcinosarcoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023;33(2):147–174.

  42. Bogani G, Monk BJ, Coleman RL, et al. Selinexor in patients with advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer. Curr Probl Cancer. 100963, 2023.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are particularly grateful to all the people who have given us help on our article.

Funding

This work was supported by the Outstanding Young Scientific Research and Innovation Team of Hebei University (605020521007); The Youth Scientific research fund of Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University (2019Q041); a preliminary study on the correlation between functional MRI parameters and Ki-67 in endometrial carcinoma, Baoding Science and Technology Bureau project (2041ZF132).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design of the research: Huan Meng, Jia-Ning Wang, Xiao-Ping Yin, and Lin-Yan Xue. Acquisition of data: Huan Meng, Yu Zhang, Ya-Nan Yu, and Jing Wang. Analysis and interpretation of the data: Huan Meng, Yu-Feng Sun, Jing Wang, and Ya-Nan Yu. Statistical analysis: Huan Meng, Yu-Feng Sun, Yu Zhang, and Lin-Yan Xue. Obtaining financing: Huan Meng, Xiao-Ping Yin, and Jia-Ning Wang. Writing of the manuscript: Huan Meng. Critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content: Xiao-Ping Yin. All authors read and approved the final draft.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lin-Yan Xue or Xiao-Ping Yin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as was revised in 2013). The study was approved by Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University (No.HDFY-LL-2019–042). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Huan Meng and Yu-Feng Sun contributed equally to this study

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meng, H., Sun, YF., Zhang, Y. et al. Predicting Risk Stratification in Early-Stage Endometrial Carcinoma: Significance of Multiparametric MRI Radiomics Model. J Digit Imaging. Inform. med. 37, 81–91 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-023-00936-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-023-00936-4

Keywords

Navigation