Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Restoration of Full Data from Sparse Data in Low-Dose Chest Digital Tomosynthesis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chest digital tomosynthesis (CDT) provides more limited image information required for diagnosis when compared to computed tomography. Moreover, the radiation dose received by patients is higher in CDT than in chest radiography. Thus, CDT has not been actively used in clinical practice. To increase the usefulness of CDT, the radiation dose should reduce to the level used in chest radiography. Given the trade-off between image quality and radiation dose in medical imaging, a strategy to generating high-quality images from limited data is need. We investigated a novel approach for acquiring low-dose CDT images based on learning-based algorithms, such as deep convolutional neural networks. We used both simulation and experimental imaging data and focused on restoring reconstructed images from sparse to full sampling data. We developed a deep learning model based on end-to-end image translation using U-net. We used 11 and 81 CDT reconstructed input and output images, respectively, to develop the model. To measure the radiation dose of the proposed method, we investigated effective doses using Monte Carlo simulations. The proposed deep learning model effectively restored images with degraded quality due to lack of sampling data. Quantitative evaluation using structure similarity index measure (SSIM) confirmed that SSIM was increased by approximately 20% when using the proposed method. The effective dose required when using sparse sampling data was approximately 0.11 mSv, similar to that used in chest radiography (0.1 mSv) based on a report by the Radiation Society of North America. We investigated a new approach for reconstructing tomosynthesis images using sparse projection data. The model-based iterative reconstruction method has previously been used for conventional sparse sampling reconstruction. However, model-based computing requires high computational power, which limits fast three-dimensional image reconstruction and thus clinical applicability. We expect that the proposed learning-based reconstruction strategy will generate images with excellent quality quickly and thus have the potential for clinical use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vikgren J, Zachrisson S, Svalkvist A, Johnsson AA, Boijsen M, Flinck A, Kheddache S, Båth M: Comparison of chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: human observer study of clinical cases. Radiology 249:1031–1041, 2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dobbins, III JT, McAdams HP: Chest tomosynthesis: technical principles and clinical update. Eur J Radiol 72:244–251, 2009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tingberg A: X-ray tomosynthesis: a review of its use for breast and chest imaging. Radiat Prot Dosim 139:100–107, 2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dobbins, III JT, McAdams HP, Godfrey JD, Li CM: Digital tomosynthesis of the chest. J Thorac Imaging 23:86–92, 2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M, Yasaka K, Hanaoka S, Akai H, Sato J, Kunimatsu A, Ohtomo K: Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Eur Radiol 22:1613–1623, 2012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Samei E, Ricahrd S: Assessment of the dose reduction potential of a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm using a task-based performance metrology. Med Phys 41:314–323, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nishida J, Kitagawa K, Nagata M, Yamazaki A, Nagasawa N, Sakuma H: Model-based iterative reconstruction for multi-detector row CT assessment of the adamkiewicz artery. Radiology 270:282–291, 2014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu L, Ren JSJ, Liu C, Jia J: Deep convolutional neural network for image deconvolution. Adv Neural Inf Proces Syst 27:1790–1798, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  9. Han X: MR-based synthetic CT generation using a deep convolutional neural network method. Med Phys 44:1408–1419, 2017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kang E, Min J, Ye JC: A deep convolutional neural network using directional wavelets for low-dose X-ray CT reconstruction. Med Phys 44:e360–e375, 2017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Giesteby L, Yang Q, Xi Y, Zhou Y, Zhang J, Wang G: Deep learning methods to guide CT image reconstruction and reduce metal artifacts, Proc Vol 10132 Med Imag. Phys of Med Imag 10132, 2017

  12. Dong C, Loy CC, He K, Tang X: Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 38:295–307, 2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu J, Zarshenas A, Qadir A, Wei Z, Yang L, Fajardo L, Suzuki K: Radiation dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) by means of deep learning-based supervised image processing. Proc Vol 10574 Med Imag, Imag Process 10574, 2018

  14. Medical imaging database. Available at https://wiki.cancerimagingarchive.net/display/Public/SPIE-AAPM+Lung+CT+Challenge. Accessed 24 August 2018

  15. Choi S, Lee S, Lee H, Lee D, Choi S, Shin J, Seo C-W, Kim H-J: Development of a prototype chest digital tomosynthesis (CDT) R/F system with fast image reconstruction using graphic processing unit (GPU) programming. Nucl Inst Methods Phys Res A 848:174–181, 2017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee D, Choi S, Lee H, Kim D, Choi S, Kim H-J: Quantitative evaluation of anatomical noise in chest digital tomosynthesis, digital radiography, and computed tomography. J Instrum 12:T04006, 2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T: U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 234–241, 2015

  18. An open-source software library for machine learning. Access on 1 September 2018. Available at https://www.tensorflow.org/.

  19. Horé A, Ziou D: Image quality metrics: PSNR vs. SSIM. Int Conf Pattern Recog 2366–2369, 2010

  20. Eskicioglu AM, Fisher PS: Image quality measures and their performance. IEEE Trans Commun 43:2959–2965, 1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A Monte Carlo simulation tool for calculating patient dose. Access on 1 September 2018. Available at http://www.stuk.fi/palvelut/pcxmc-a-monte-carlo-program-for-calculating-patient-doses-in-medical-x-ray-examinations.

  22. Khelassi-Toutaoui N, Berkani Y, Tsapaki V, Toutaoui AE, Merad A, Frahi-Amroun A, Brahimi Z: Experimental evaluation of PCXMC and prepare codes used in conventional radiology. Radiat Prot Dosim 131:374–378, 2008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ladia A, Messaris G, Delis H, Panayiotakis G: Organ dose and risk assessment in paediatric radiography using the PCXMC 2.0. J Phys Conf Ser 637:012014, 2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sabol JM: A Monte Carlo estimation of effective dose in chest tomosynthesis. Med Phys 36:5480–5487, 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee C, Park S, Lee JK: Specific absorbed fraction for Korean adult voxel phantom from internal photon source. Radiat Prot Dosim 123:360–368, 2007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sechopoluos I: A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part II. Image reconstruction, processing and analysis, and advanced applications. Med Phys 40:014302, 2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fahrig R, Dixon R, Payne T, Morin RL, Ganguly A, Strobel N: Dose and image quality for a cone-beam C-arm CT system. Med Phys 33:4541–4550, 2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Goldman LW: Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality. J Nucl Med Technol 35:213–225, 2007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Barrett JF, Keat N: Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. RadioGraphics 24:1679–1691, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Abbas S, Lee T, Shin S, Lee R, Cho S: Effects of sparse sampling schemes on image quality in low-dose CT. Med Phys 40:111915, 2013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, Kujak JL, Lawder HJ, Pavlicek W: Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:764–771, 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Beister M, Kolditz D, Kalender WA: Iterative reconstruction methods in X-ray CT. Phys Med 28:94–108, 2012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Radiation Dose in X-ray and CT Exam. Access on 1 September 2018. Available at https://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=safety-xray.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Radiation Technology R&D program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (No. NRF-2017M2A2A6A01070263).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hee-Joung Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, D., Kim, HJ. Restoration of Full Data from Sparse Data in Low-Dose Chest Digital Tomosynthesis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. J Digit Imaging 32, 489–498 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-018-0124-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-018-0124-5

Keywords

Navigation