Skip to main content
Log in

A Feasibility Study of Telementoring for Identifying the Appendix Using Smartphone-Based Telesonography

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the feasibility of the clinical application of novice-practitioner-performed/offsite-mentor-guided ultrasonography for identifying the appendix. A randomized crossover study was conducted using a telesonography system that can transmit the ultrasound images displayed on the ultrasound monitor (ultrasound sequence video) and images showing the practitioner’s operations (background video) to a smartphone without any interruption in motion over a Long-Term Evolution (LTE) network. Thirty novice practitioners were randomly assigned to two groups. The subjects in group A (n = 15) performed ultrasonography for the identification of the appendix under mentoring by an onsite expert, whereas those in group B (n = 15) performed the same procedure under mentoring by an offsite expert. Each subject performed the procedure on three simulated patients. After a 4-week interval, they performed the procedure again under the other type of mentoring. A total of 90 ultrasound examinations were performed in each scenario. The primary outcomes were the success rate for identifying the appendix and the time required to identify the appendix. The success rates for identifying the appendix were 91.1 % (82/90) in onsite-mentored ultrasonography and 87.8 % (79/90) in offsite-mentored ultrasonography; both rates were high, and there was no significant difference (p = 0.468) between them. The time required in the case of offsite mentoring (median, 242.9 s; interquartile range (IQR), 238.2) was longer than that for onsite mentoring (median, 291.4 s; IQR, 200.9); however, the difference was not significant (p = 0.051). It appears that offsite mentoring can allow novice onsite practitioners to perform ultrasonography as effectively as they can under onsite mentoring, even for examinations that require proficiency in rather complex practices, such as identifying the appendix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LTE:

Long-Term Evolution

IQR:

Interquartile range

CT:

Computed tomography

ED:

Emergency department

SD:

Standard deviation

SP:

Simulated patient

KSUM:

Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine

FPS:

Frames per second

Mbps:

Megabit per second

IP:

Internet protocol

ACR:

American College of Radiology

KB:

Kilobytes

3G:

3rd generation

References

  1. Park JB, Choi HJ, Lee JH, Kang BS: An assessment of the iPad 2 as a CT teleradiology tool using brain CT with subtle intracranial hemorrhage under conventional illumination. J Digit Imaging 26:683–690, 2013

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Choi HJ, Lee JH, Kang BS: Remote CT reading using an ultramobile PC and web-based remote viewing over a wireless network. J Telemed Telecare 18:26–31, 2012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim C, Kang BS, Choi HJ, et al: Nationwide online social networking for cardiovascular care in Korea using Facebook. J Am Med Inform Assoc 21:17–22, 2014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim C, Kang B, Choi HJ, Park JB: A feasibility study of real-time remote CT reading for suspected acute appendicitis using an iPhone. J Digit Imaging 28:399–406, 2015

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Schlechtweg PM, Kammerer FJ, Seuss H, Uder M, Hammon M: Mobile image interpretation: diagnostic performance of CT exams displayed on a tablet computer in detecting abdominopelvic hemorrhage. J Digit Imaging 2015

  6. Seong NJ, Kim B, Lee S, et al: Off-site smartphone reading of CT images for patients with inconclusive diagnoses of appendicitis from on-call radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:3–9, 2014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwartz AB, Siddiqui G, Barbieri JS, et al: The accuracy of mobile teleradiology in the evaluation of chest X-rays. J Telemed Telecare 20:460–463, 2014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim C, Cha H, Kang BS, Choi HJ, Lim TH, Oh J: A feasibility study of smartphone-based telesonography for evaluating cardiac dynamic function and diagnosing acute appendicitis with control of the image quality of the transmitted videos. J Digit Imaging 2015

  9. Ogedegbe C, Morchel H, Hazelwood V, Chaplin WF, Feldman J: Development and evaluation of a novel, real time mobile telesonography system in management of patients with abdominal trauma: study protocol. BMC Emerg Med 12:19, 2012

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. McBeth P, Crawford I, Tiruta C, et al: Help is in your pocket: the potential accuracy of smartphone- and laptop-based remotely guided resuscitative telesonography. Telemed J E Health 19:924–30, 2013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Biegler N, McBeth PB, Tiruta C, et al: The feasibility of nurse practitioner-performed, telementored lung telesonography with remote physician guidance—‘a remote virtual mentor.’. Crit Ultrasound J 5:5, 2013

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim C, Kang BS, Choi HJ, Lim TH, Oh J, Chee Y: Clinical application of real-time tele-ultrasonography in diagnosing pediatric acute appendicitis in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 33:1354–1359, 2015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. iTunes. Accessed January 5 2016. Available at http://www.apple.com/itunes

  14. Huynh-Thu Q, Ghanbari M: Temporal aspect of perceived quality in mobile video broadcasting. IEEE Trans on Broadcast 54:641–651, 2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Agboma F, Liotta A: Quality of experience management in mobile content delivery systems. Telecommun. Syst 49:85–98, 2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Assembly ITU Radiocommunication. BT-500.13. Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. International Telecommunication Union 2012

  17. Kim SC, Kim BI: Analysis on subjective image quality assessments for smart phone/pad environments. Electronics and Telecommunications Trends 28:125–136, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  18. Puylaert JB: Ultrasonography of the acute abdomen: gastrointestinal conditions. Radiol Clin North Am 41:1227–1242, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning of South Korea: The result of the quality of wireless communication services in Korea in 2015. Accessed on January 5 2016. Available at http://www.msip.go.kr/web/msipContents/contentsView.do?cateId=mssw311&artId=1233890&snsMId=NzM%3D&getServerPort=80&snsLinkUrl=%2Fweb%2FmsipContents%2FsnsView.do&getServerName=www.msip.go.kr Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6eKM8BPbZ

  20. Kim C, Kang B, Park JB, Ha YR: The use of clinician-performed ultrasonography to determine the treatment method for suspected paediatric appendicitis. Hong Kong J Emerg Med. 22:31–40, 2015

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Alpinion Medical Systems, which developed the tele-ultrasonography system in collaboration with us and provided this system to us free of charge for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changsun Kim.

Ethics declarations

Funding Source

No external funding was secured for this study.

Financial Disclosure

The authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, Y., Kim, C., Choi, H.J. et al. A Feasibility Study of Telementoring for Identifying the Appendix Using Smartphone-Based Telesonography. J Digit Imaging 30, 148–155 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9921-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9921-x

Keywords

Navigation