Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The use of sonic and ultrasonic activation of endodontic sealer to improve sealer filling quality in the root canal: a scoping review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This scoping review aimed to map whether the use of sonic and ultrasonic methods to activate the endodontic sealer improves the sealer filling quality in the root canal, considering the bond strength and intratubular penetration to the root dentin as evaluation criteria. The study protocol was prospectively registered and is available online (https://osf.io/x5fma/). Reporting was based on PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. The search was performed in Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. We selected studies without time and language restrictions that used sonic or ultrasonic methods to activate endodontic sealer, whose outcomes were bond strength and intratubular penetration. Three researchers independently selected the articles and collected data. Of 1422 articles, 19 were read in full and 13 studies were included. The vast majority of studies opted for direct activation of the endodontic sealer. The most investigated sealers were the epoxy resin-based sealers, and the ultrasonic activation method was the most explored. For the bond strength outcome, there was a trend toward higher values when the sealer was activated ultrasonically, but the findings seem to be divergent. The sonic activation was not effective for its intended purpose. For the outcome of intratubular penetration, the vast majority of studies indicate that the use of sonic and ultrasonic methods to activate the endodontic sealer is capable of increasing intratubular penetration. The use of sonic and ultrasonic methods to directly activate the endodontic sealer can increase the intratubular penetration of the sealer, but their benefits on the bond strength are uncertain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Data available on request from the authors.

References

  1. Gillen BM, Looney SW, Gu LS, Loushine BA, Weller RN, Loushine RJ, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Impact of the quality of coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on success of root canal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2011;37:895–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Song M, Park M, Lee CY, Kim E. Periapical status related to the quality of coronal restorations and root fillings in a Korean population. J Endod. 2014;40:182–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Holland R, Gomes Filho JE, Cintra LTA, Queiroz ÍOA, Estrela C. Factors affecting the periapical healing process of endodontically treated teeth. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017;25:465–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Schäfer E, Nelius B, Bürklein S. A comparative evaluation of gutta-percha filled areas in curved root canals obturated with different techniques. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16:225–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schäfer E, Schrenker C, Zupanc J, Bürklein S. Percentage of gutta-percha filled areas in canals obturated with cross-linked gutta-percha core-carrier systems, single-cone and lateral compaction technique. J Endod. 2016;42:294–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Girelli CFM, de Lima CO, Silveira FF, Lacerda MFLS, Nunes E. Marginal gaps and voids using two warm compaction techniques and different sealers: a micro-CT study. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27:2805–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Sousa EL, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. Microorganisms from canals of root-filled teeth with periapical lesions. Int Endod J. 2003;36:1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Adib V, Spratt D, Ng YL, Gulabivala K. Cultivable microbial flora associated with persistent periapical disease and coronal leakage after root canal treatment: a preliminary study. Int Endod J. 2004;37:542–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Piai GG, Duarte MAH, Nascimento ALD, Rosa RAD, Só MVR, Vivan RR. Penetrability of a new endodontic sealer: a confocal laser scanning microscopy evaluation. Microsc Res Tech. 2018;81:1246–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagas E, Uyanik MO, Eymirli A, Cehreli ZC, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV, Durmaz V. Dentin moisture conditions affect the adhesion of root canal sealers. J Endod. 2012;38:240–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Arslan H, Abbas A, Karatas E. Influence of ultrasonic and sonic activation of epoxy-amine resin-based sealer on penetration of sealer into lateral canals. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20:2161–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim JA, Hwang YC, Rosa V, Yu MK, Lee KW, Min KS. Root canal filling quality of a premixed calcium silicate endodontic sealer applied using gutta-percha cone-mediated ultrasonic activation. J Endod. 2018;44:133–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. Int Endod J. 2007;40:415–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Güven Y, Ali A, Arslan H. Efficiency of endosonic blue, eddy, ultra X and endoactivator in the removal of calcium hydroxide paste from root canals. Aust Endod J. 2022;48:32–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wiesse PEB, Silva-Sousa YT, Pereira RD, Estrela C, Domingues LM, Pécora JD, Sousa-Neto MD. Effect of ultrasonic and sonic activation of root canal sealers on the push-out bond strength and interfacial adaptation to root canal dentine. Int Endod J. 2018;51:102–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Paixão S, Rodrigues C, Grenho L, Fernandes MH. Efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic activation during endodontic treatment: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Acta Odontol Scand. 2022;80:588–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yaylali IE, Kececi AD, Ureyen KB. Ultrasonically activated irrigation to remove calcium hydroxide from apical third of human root canal system: a systematic review of in vitro studies. J Endod. 2015;41:1589–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. da Rosa AF, Fischer BV, Dias-Junior LCL, Serique AVC, Bortoluzzi EA, Teixeira CDS, da Fonseca Roberti Garcia L. Effectiveness of different supplementary protocols for remaining filling material removal in endodontic reintervention: an integrative review. Odontology. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-023-00845-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13:141–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Moher D, Peters MDJ, Horsley T, Weeks L, Hempel S, Akl EA, Chang C, McGowan J, Stewart L, Hartling L, Aldcroft A, Wilson MG, Garritty C, Lewin S, Godfrey CM, Macdonald MT, Langlois EV, Soares-Weiser K, Moriarty J, Clifford T, Tunçalp Ö, Straus SE. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Guimarães BM, Amoroso-Silva PA, Alcalde MP, Marciano MA, de Andrade FB, Duarte MA. Influence of ultrasonic activation of 4 root canal sealers on the filling quality. J Endod. 2014;40(7):964–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nikhil V, Bansal P, Sawani S. Effect of technique of sealer agitation on percentage and depth of MTA Fillapex sealer penetration: a comparative in-vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18:119–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Alcalde MP, Bramante CM, Vivan RR, Amorso-Silva PA, Andrade FB, Duarte MAH. Intradentinal antimicrobial action and filling quality promoted by ultrasonic agitation of epoxy resin-based sealer in endodontic obturation. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017;25:641–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Oliveira KV, Silva BMD, Leonardi DP, Crozeta BM, Sousa-Neto MD, Baratto-Filho F, Gabardo MCL. Effectiveness of different final irrigation techniques and placement of endodontic sealer into dentinal tubules. Braz Oral Res. 2017;31:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Prasad PK, Sankhala A, Tiwari A, Parakh S, Madan GR, Singh A. Influence of ultrasonics on the penetration depth of AH plus, acroseal, and EndoREZ root canal sealers: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2018;21:221–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. De Bem IA, de Oliveira RA, Weissheimer T, Bier CAS, Só MVR, Rosa RAD. Effect of ultrasonic activation of endodontic sealers on intratubular penetration and bond strength to root dentin. J Endod. 2020;46:1302–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Padoin K, Bohrer TC, Ceolin LG, Bier CAS, Rosa RAD, Morgental RD. Does ultrasonic activation improve the bond strength and root canal filling quality of endodontic sealers? Braz Dent J. 2022;33:28–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Song D, Yang SE. Comparison of dentinal tubule penetration between a calcium silicate-based sealer with ultrasonic activation and an epoxy resin-based sealer: a study using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Eur J Dent. 2022;16:195–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tonini R, Salvadori M, Bartoli M, Francinelli J, Bertoletti P, Garo ML, Salgarello S. Carrier-based obturation: effect of sonication technique on sealer penetration in dentinal tubules: a confocal laser scanning microscope study. Appl Sci. 2022;12:8877. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178877.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Maharani N, Ricardo S, Ayu D, Putri N. Differences in penetration of two types of calcium silicate-based sealers with ultrasonic activation into dentinal tubules. Int J Pharm Res. 2021;9:3339–44.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pérez-Alfayate R, Algar-Pinilla J, Mercade M, Foschi F. Sonic activation improves bioceramic sealer’s penetration into the tubular dentin of curved root canals: a confocal laser scanning microscopy investigation. Appl Sci. 2021;11:3902. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093902.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Keles A, Askerbeyli Ors S, Purali N, Kucukkaya ES. Effect of different sealer activation techniques on dentinal tubule penetration. Aust Endod J. 2023;00:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stelzer R, Schaller HG, Gernhardt CR. Push-out bond strength of RealSeal SE and AH plus after using different irrigation solutions. J Endod. 2014;40:1654–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pawar AM, Pawar S, Kfir A, Pawar M, Kokate S. Push-out bond strength of root fillings made with C-point and BC sealer versus gutta-percha and AH plus after the instrumentation of oval canals with the self-adjusting file versus WaveOne. Int Endod J. 2016;49:374–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Albino Souza M, Dalla Lana D, Gabrielli E, Barbosa Ribeiro M, Miyagaki DC, Cecchin D. Effectiveness of final decontamination protocols against Enterococcus faecalis and its influence on bond strength of filling material to root canal dentin. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2017;17:92–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hashem M, El-Hejazi AA, Niaz MO, Alsadon O, Alolayani BM, Fouad H. Bond strength of root canal filling with radicular dentin previously treated with either photobiomodulation or photodynamic therapy: effect of disinfection protocols. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2020;30:101733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101733.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tedesco M, Chain MC, Bortoluzzi EA, da Fonseca Roberti Garcia L, Alves AMH, Teixeira CS. Comparison of two observational methods, scanning electron and confocal laser scanning microscopies, in the adhesive interface analysis of endodontic sealers to root dentine. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22:2353–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Furtado TC, de Bem IA, Machado LS, Pereira JR, Só MVR, da Rosa RA. Intratubular penetration of endodontic sealers depends on the fluorophore used for CLSM assessment. Microsc Res Tech. 2021;84:305–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang Z, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. Dentin extends the antibacterial effect of endodontic sealers against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. J Endod. 2014;40:505–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bittmann B, Haupert F, Schlarb AK. Ultrasonic dispersion of inorganic nanoparticles in epoxy resin. Ultrason Sonochem. 2009;16:622–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Neelakantan P, Sharma S, Shemesh H, Wesselink PR. Influence of irrigation sequence on the adhesion of root canal sealers to dentin: a fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and push-out bond strength analysis. J Endod. 2015;41:1108–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Collado-González M, García-Bernal D, Oñate-Sánchez RE, Ortolani-Seltenerich PS, Lozano A, Forner L, Llena C, Rodríguez-Lozano FJ. Biocompatibility of three new calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers on human periodontal ligament stem cells. Int Endod J. 2017;50:875–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Alves Silva EC, Tanomaru-Filho M, da Silva GF, Delfino MM, Cerri PS, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM. Biocompatibility and bioactive potential of new calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers: bio-C sealer and sealer plus BC. J Endod. 2020;46:1470–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Borges AH, Guedes OA, Pereira TM, Guapo-Pavarina R, da Rosa WLO, Piva E. Evaluation of selective physicochemical and biological properties of different root canal sealers. Iran Endod J. 2019;14(2):126–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV, De-Deus G, Zehnder M. The impact of root dentine conditioning on sealing ability and push-out bond strength of an epoxy resin root canal sealer. Int Endod J. 2011;44:491–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Amoroso-Silva PA, Guimarães BM, Marciano MA, Duarte MA, Cavenago BC, Ordinola-Zapata R, Almeida MM, Moraes IG. Microscopic analysis of the quality of obturation and physical properties of MTA Fillapex. Microsc Res Tech. 2014;77:1031–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tedesco M, Chain MC, Felippe WT, Alves AMH, Garcia LDFR, Bortoluzzi EA, Cordeiro MR, Teixeira CS. Correlation between bond strength to dentin and sealers penetration by push-out test and CLSM analysis. Braz Dent J. 2019;30:555–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. De-Deus G, Brandão MC, Leal F, Reis C, Souza EM, Luna AS, Paciornik S, Fidel S. Lack of correlation between sealer penetration into dentinal tubules and sealability in nonbonded root fillings. Int Endod J. 2012;45:642–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Machado R, Silva Neto UX, Carneiro E, Fariniuk LF, Westphalen VP, Cunha RS. Lack of correlation between tubular dentine cement penetration, adhesiveness and leakage in roots filled with gutta percha and an endodontic cement based on epoxy amine resin. J Appl Oral Sci. 2014;22:22–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Camilleri J. Sealers and warm gutta-percha obturation techniques. J Endod. 2015;41:72–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Carneiro SM, Sousa-Neto MD, Rached FA Jr, Miranda CE, Silva SR, Silva-Sousa YT. Push-out strength of root fillings with or without thermomechanical compaction. Int Endod J. 2012;45:821–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lee K-W, Williams MC, Camps JJ, Pashley DH. Adhesion of endodontic sealers to dentin and gutta-percha. J Endod. 2002;28:684–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Eymirli A, Sungur DD, Uyanik O, Purali N, Nagas E, Cehreli ZC. Dentinal tubule penetration and retreatability of a calcium silicate–based sealer tested in bulk or with different main core material. J Endod. 2019;45:1036–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Nagas E, Cehreli Z, Uyanik MO, Durmaz V. Bond strength of a calcium silicate based sealer tested in bulk or with different main core materials. Braz Oral Res. 2014;28:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for their support.

Funding

This study was partly funded by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) “Grant number 001”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GP: conceptualization; data curation; investigation; methodology; software; validation; visualization; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. YP: data curation; investigation; methodology; software; validation; visualization; writing—review and editing. SFdeP: conceptualization; data curation; investigation; methodology; software; validation; visualization; writing—review and editing. CASB: conceptualization; funding acquisition; investigation; methodology; project administration; resources; software; supervision; validation; visualization; writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guilherme Pauletto.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pauletto, G., Padoin, Y., de Pellegrin, S.F. et al. The use of sonic and ultrasonic activation of endodontic sealer to improve sealer filling quality in the root canal: a scoping review. Odontology (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-024-00901-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-024-00901-9

Keywords

Navigation