Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The influence of cyclic stress on surface properties of soft liners

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soft polymers used under tissue-supported prostheses have limited service life because of surface degradation. Purpose: This paper evaluates the changes in surface properties and softness of soft relining materials after cyclic loading in water. Materials and Methods: 3 polysiloxane (Silagum AM Comfort, Molloplast B, Mollosil Plus) and 2 acrylic-based (Vertex Soft, Astron LC Soft) proprietary soft relining materials and a vinyl polysiloxane (Imprint 2 Garant) as the reference impression material evaluated. A stainless steel block for detail reproduction was used on the basis of the apparatus recommended by the ISO 4823:1992 test method for preparing a standardized surface. A control group from each material was only subjected to water immersion. Non-destructive cyclic loading was carried out with a strain of 16.6 % and a frequency of 1.6 Hz 200,000 times in distilled water at 37 °C. The specimens were then duplicated and compared with the controls using roughness measurements, detail reproduction and Scanning Electron Microscope. Shore A hardness values before and after cycling were also measured. Results: After degradation in the form of mechanical cycling in water, loss of substance and loss of surface detail was observed. Surface properties and Shore A hardness values of acrylic-based soft liners changed significantly (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The chemical composition of the soft relining materials seemed to affect their potential of preserving the surface texture and softness after mechanical cycling. Mechanical cycling influences the surface degradation process leading to changes of the surface texture. Polysiloxane-based materials preserved their softness, surface texture and surface smoothness better under cyclic loading compared to acrylic resin -based plasticized materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nevalainen MJ, Närhi TO, Ainamo A. A 5-year follow-up study on the prosthetic rehabilitation of the elderly in Helsinki, Finland. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31:647–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Braden M, Wright PS, Parker S. Soft lining materials: a review. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1995;3:163–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Garcia LT, Jones JD. Soft liners. Dent Clin North Am. 2004;48:709–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mutluay MM, Oğuz S, Ørstavik D, Fløystrand F, Doğan A, Söderling E, Närhi T, Olsen I. Experiments on in vivo biofilm formation and in vitro adhesion of Candida species on polysiloxane liners. Gerodontology. 2010;27:283–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mutluay MM, Oguz S, Fløystrand F, Saxegaard E, Dogan A, Bek B, Ruyter IE. A prospective study on the clinical performance of polysiloxane soft liners: one-year results. Dent Mater J. 2008;27:440–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Allison RT, Douglas WH. Micro-colonization of the denture-fitting surface by Candida albicans. J Dent. 1973;1:198–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Radford DR, Challacombe SJ, Walter JD. Denture plaque and adherence of Candida albicans to denture-base materials in vivo and in vitro. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1999;10:99–116 Review.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Radford DR, Sweet SP, Challacombe SJ, Walter JD. Adherence of Candida albicans to denture-base materials with different surface finishes. J Dent. 1998;26:577–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Veres EM, Wolfaardt JF, Becker PJ. An evaluation of the surface characteristics of a facial prosthetic elastomer. Part I: Review of the literature on the surface characteristics of dental materials with maxillofacial prosthetic application. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63:193–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man: a review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol. 1995;22:1–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Verran J, Maryan CJ. Retention of Candida albicans on acrylic resin and silicone of different surface topography. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:535–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nikawa H, Jin C, Makihira S, Egusa H, Hamada T, Kumagai H. Biofilm formation of Candida albicans on the surfaces of deteriorated soft denture lining materials caused by denture cleansers in vitro. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:243–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nikawa H, Nishimura H, Makihira S, Hamada T, Sadamori S, Samaranayake LP. Effect of serum concentration on Candida biofilm formation on acrylic surfaces. Mycoses. 2000;43:139–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nikawa H, Hamada T, Yamamoto T, Kumagai H. Effects of salivary or serum pellicles on the Candida albicans growth and biofilm formation on soft lining materials in vitro. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:594–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wright PS. Observations on long-term use of a soft-lining material for mandibular complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72:385–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmidt WF Jr, Smith DE Jr. A six-year retrospective study of Molloplast-B-lined dentures. Part II: Liner serviceability. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50:459–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mäkilä E, Hopsu-Havu VK. Mycotic growth and soft denture lining materials. Acta Odontol Scand. 1977;35:197–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor RL, Bulad K, Verran J, McCord JF. Colonization and deterioration of soft denture lining materials in vivo. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2008;16:50–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bulad K, Taylor RL, Verran J, McCord JF. Colonization and penetration of denture soft lining materials by Candida albicans. Dent Mater. 2004;20:167–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Huddar DA, Hombesh MN, Sandhyarani B, Chandu GS, Nanjannawar GS, Shetty R. Effect of denture cleanser on weight, surface roughness and tensile bond strength of two resilient denture liners. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012;13:607–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Garcia RM, Léon BT, Oliveira VB, Del Bel Cury AA. Effect of a denture cleanser on weight, surface roughness, and tensile bond strength of two resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:489–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jin C, Nikawa H, Makihira S, Hamada T, Furukawa M, Murata H. Changes in surface roughness and colour stability of soft denture lining materials caused by denture cleansers. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:125–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hong G, Li Y, Maeda T, Mizumachi W, Sadamori S, Hamada T, Murata H. Influence of storage methods on the surface roughness of tissue conditioners. Dent Mater J. 2008;27:153–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hermann C, Mesquita MF, Consani RL, Henriques GE. The effect of aging by thermal cycling and mechanical brushing on resilient denture liner hardness and roughness. J Prosthodont. 2008;17:318–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Anil N, Hekimoglu C, Sahin S. The effect of accelerated aging on color stability of denture liners. J Oral Sci. 1998;40:105–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Polyzois G, Kostoulas I, Nikolovieni D, Mitsoudis A, Frangou M. Color changes of autopolymerized silicone or acrylic soft denture liners: the effect of accelerated aging. Odontology. 2013;101:193–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lear CS, Moorrees CF. Swallowing frequency; a detection system employing FM telemetry. J Dent Res. 1966;45:1222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tamura F, Suzuki S, Mukai Y. An evaluation of the viscoelastic characteristics of soft denture liners. J Prosthodont. 2002;11:270–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Murata H, Taguchi N, Hamada T, Kawamura M, McCabe JF. Dynamic viscoelasticity of soft liners and masticatory function. J Dent Res. 2002;81:123–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Eleni PN, Krodika M, Polyzois G, Gettleman L, Bisharat GI. Effects of outdoor weathering on facial prosthetic elastomers. Odontology. 2011;99:68–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Aloul RK, Shen C. The influence of plasticizer loss on the viscoelasticity of temporary soft liners. J Prosthodont. 2002;11:254–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Scandinavian Institute of Dental Materials for supporting the pilot study that lead to the present manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Murat Mutluay.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mutluay, M.M., Tezvergil-Mutluay, A. The influence of cyclic stress on surface properties of soft liners. Odontology 105, 214–221 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-016-0260-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-016-0260-7

Keywords

Navigation