Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinicopathological characteristics, survival outcome and prognostic factors of very young gastric cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Experimental Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To explore the clinicopathological characteristics, survival outcomes, and prognosis of very young gastric cancer (GC). From January 1, 2011 to January 1, 2021, GC patients under 30 years old treated in three tertiary hospitals were enrolled. Clinicopathological characteristics were summarized, prognostic factors and survival outcomes including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were retrospectively analyzed. One hundred patients were finally included, with a median age of 23 years.73 (73.0%) were female. Most patients had initial symptoms of abdominal pain (66.0%). The most common tumor locations were gastric antrum (38.0%) and gastric body (37.0%). The main histological types were diffuse (81.0%) and poorly differentiated (91.0%). Most patients presented with stage III–IV disease (82.0%) at diagnosis and the common sites of metastasis were ovary (39.5%) and peritoneum (27.6%). The mOS of the whole group was 23.3 months (95% CI 17.2–29.4). Moreover, the mOS of patients at stage I–II was not reached. The mOS of patients at stage III and stage IV was 40.6 months (95% CI 10.2–70.9) and 10.3 months (95% CI 8.9–11.6), respectively. The mDFS of stage I–III patients was 28.5 months (95% CI 14.7–42.3), and the mPFS of the metastatic patients was 4.5 months (95% CI 4.0–5.0). TNM stage (P = 0.005) and radical surgery (P = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of overall survival. The very young GC were predominantly female, diffuse type, and advanced diagnosis. TNM stage and radical surgery were independent prognosis factors for overall survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, et al. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: an overview. Int J Cancer. 2021.

  2. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Machlowska J, Baj J, Sitarz M, Maciejewski R, Sitarz R. Gastric cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, classification, genomic characteristics and treatment strategies. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(11):4012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sites AJB. SEER cancer statistics review 1975–2011. MD: National Cancer Institute. 2014.

  5. Li J. Gastric cancer in young adults: a different clinical entity from carcinogenesis to prognosis. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020;2020:9512707.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wong M, Huang J, Chan P, et al. Global incidence and mortality of gastric cancer, 1980–2018. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(7): e2118457.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Z, Xu J, Shi Z, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic of gastric cancer in young patients. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51(9):1043–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kong X, Wang JL, Chen HM, Fang JY. Comparison of the clinicopathological characteristics of young and elderly patients with gastric carcinoma: a meta analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2012;106(3):346–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee J, Kim S, Eun C, et al. Impact of age on stage-specific mortality in patients with gastric cancer: a long-term prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8): e0220660.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang J, Gan L, Xu MD, et al. The prognostic value of age in non-metastatic gastric cancer after gastrectomy: a retrospective study in the U.S. and China. J Cancer. 2018;9(7):1188–99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tekesin K, Emin Gunes M, Tural D, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis and survival outcome of gastric cancer in young patients: a large cohort retrospective study. J BUON. 2019;24(2):672–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Al-Refaie W, Hu C, Pisters P, Chang G. Gastric adenocarcinoma in young patients: a population-based appraisal. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(10):2800–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao B, Zhang J, Zhang J, et al. Assessment of the 8th edition of TNM staging system for gastric cancer: the results from the SEER and a single-institution database. Future Oncol (London, England). 2018;14(29):3023–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao B, Mei D, Lv W, et al. Clinicopathologic features, survival outcome, and prognostic factors in gastric cancer patients 18–40 years of age. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2020;9(4):514–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou L, Jiang Z, Gu W, Han S. STROBE-clinical characteristics and prognosis factors of gastric cancer in young patients aged </=30 years. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(26):e26336.

  16. Derakhshan M, Liptrot S, Paul J, Brown I, Morrison D, McColl K. Oesophageal and gastric intestinal-type adenocarcinomas show the same male predominance due to a 17 year delayed development in females. Gut. 2009;58(1):16–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Maeta M, Yamashiro H, Oka A, Tsujitani S, Ikeguchi M, Kaibara N. Gastric cancer in the young, with special reference to 14 pregnancy-associated cases: analysis based on 2,325 consecutive cases of gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 1995;58(3):191–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ueo H, Matsuoka H, Tamura S, Sato K, Tsunematsu Y, Kato T. Prognosis in gastric cancer associated with pregnancy. World J Surg. 1991;15(2):293–7 (discussion 8).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jaspers V, Gillessen A, Quakernack K. Gastric cancer in pregnancy: do pregnancy, age or female sex alter the prognosis? Case reports and review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999;87(1):13–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yaghoobi M, Rakhshani N, Sadr F, et al. Hereditary risk factors for the development of gastric cancer in younger patients. BMC Gastroenterol. 2004;4:28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mun DG, Bhin J, Kim S, et al. Proteogenomic characterization of human early-onset gastric cancer. Cancer Cell. 2019;35(1):111-24 e10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chang W, Yeh Y, Sheu B. The impacts of H. pylori virulence factors on the development of gastroduodenal diseases. J Biomed Sci. 2018;25(1):68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Blaser M, Falkow S. What are the consequences of the disappearing human microbiota? Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7(12):887–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Moelans CB, Milne AN, Morsink FH, Offerhaus GJ, van Diest PJ. Low frequency of HER2 amplification and overexpression in early onset gastric cancer. Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2011;34(2):89–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moore A, Hikri E, Goshen-Lago T, et al. Young-onset gastric cancer and Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)—a major player in the pathogenesis? BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Guan W, Yuan L, Yan X, Yang D, Qiu M. More attention should be paid to adult gastric cancer patients younger than 35 years old: extremely poor prognosis was found. J Cancer. 2019;10(2):472–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Cho S, Park J, Liu Y, et al. Sporadic early-onset diffuse gastric cancers have high frequency of somatic CDH1 alterations, but low frequency of somatic RHOA mutations compared with late-onset cancers. Gastroenterology. 2017;153(2):536-49.e26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Feng F, Sun L, Liu Z, et al. Prognostic values of normal preoperative serum cancer markers for gastric cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(36):58459–69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hayden JD, Cawkwell L, Sue-Ling H, et al. Assessment of microsatellite alterations in young patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 1997;79(4):684–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cancer Genome Atlas Research N. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2014;513(7517):202–9.

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. The idea of the study was put forward by JL; Data collection and analysis and the first draft of the manuscript were performed by NZ. The manuscript was revised and polished by YY and JC; YS and ZP contributed to date collection. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junhe Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethics approval

The ethical committee of each hospital approved the study and informed consents were obtained from all the patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhong, N., Yu, Y., Chen, J. et al. Clinicopathological characteristics, survival outcome and prognostic factors of very young gastric cancer. Clin Exp Med 23, 437–445 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-022-00822-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-022-00822-3

Keywords

Navigation