Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling the influence of the extrinsic musculature on phonation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neck muscles play important roles in various physiological tasks, including swallowing, head stabilization, and phonation. The mechanisms by which neck muscles influence phonation are not well understood, with conflicting reports on the change in fundamental frequency for ostensibly the same neck muscle activation scenarios. In this work, we introduce a reduced-order muscle-controlled vocal fold model, comprising both intrinsic muscle control and extrinsic muscle effects. The model predicts that when the neck muscles pull the thyroid cartilage in the superior–anterior direction (with a sufficiently large anterior component), inferior direction, or inferior–anterior direction, tension in the vocal folds increases, leading to fundamental frequency rise during sustained phonation. On the other hand, pulling in the superior direction, superior–posterior direction, or inferior–posterior direction (with a sufficiently large posterior component) tends to decrease vocal fold tension and phonation fundamental frequency. Varying the pulling force location alters the posture and phonation biomechanics, depending on the force direction. These findings suggest potential roles of particular neck muscles in modulating phonation fundamental frequency, with implications for vocal hyperfunction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. We define the VF plane to be the plane parallel to the superior surfaces of the VFs.

  2. These simplifying assumptions are not adopted in the full numerical phonation model used in the simulations presented in Sect. 5.

  3. The case of inferior thyroid cartilage pulling with \(a_\textrm{CT}=a_\textrm{TA}=0.4\) exhibits changes in SPL within 8 dB.

References

  • Altman KW, Atkinson C, Lazarus C (2005) Current and emerging concepts in muscle tension dysphonia: a 30-month review. J Voice 19(2):261–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Alzamendi GA, Peterson SD, Erath BD, Hillman RE, Zañartu M (2022) Triangular body-cover model of the vocal folds with coordinated activation of the five intrinsic laryngeal muscles. J Acoust Soc Am 151(1):17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Angsuwarangsee T, Morrison M (2002) Extrinsic laryngeal muscular tension in patients with voice disorders. J Voice 16(3):333–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson JE (1978) Correlation analysis of the physiological factors controlling fundamental voice frequency. J Acoust Soc Am 63(1):211–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Auvenshine RC, Pettit NJ (2018) The hyoid bone: an overview. CRANIO®

  • Chhetri DK, Neubauer J, Berry DA (2012) Neuromuscular control of fundamental frequency and glottal posture at phonation onset. J Acoust Soc Am 131(2):1401–1412

    Google Scholar 

  • Chhetri DK, Neubauer J, Sofer E, Berry DA (2014) Influence and interactions of laryngeal adductors and cricothyroid muscles on fundamental frequency and glottal posture control. J Acoust Soc Am 135(4):2052–2064

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi H-S, Berke GS, Ye M, Kreiman J (1993) Function of the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle in phonation: in vivo laryngeal model. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 109(6):1043–1051

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi HS, Ye M, Berke GS (1995) Function of the interarytenoid (ia) muscle in phonation: in vivo laryngeal model. Yonsei Med J 36(1):58–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejonckere PH, Kob M (2009) Pathogenesis of vocal fold nodules: new insights from a modelling approach. Folia Phoniat Logopaed 61(3):171–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinoza VM, Zañartu M, Van Stan JH, Mehta DD, Hillman RE (2017) Glottal aerodynamic measures in women with phonotraumatic and nonphonotraumatic vocal hyperfunction. J Speec, Lang Hear Res 60(8):2159–2169

    Google Scholar 

  • Galindo GE, Peterson SD, Erath BD, Castro C, Hillman RE, Zañartu M (2017) Modeling the pathophysiology of phonotraumatic vocal hyperfunction with a triangular glottal model of the vocal folds. J Speech Lang Hear Res 60(9):2452–2471

    Google Scholar 

  • Galindo GE, Zañartu M, Yuz JI (2014) A discrete-time model for the vocal folds. IEEE EMBS international student conference, pp. 74-77

  • Gervasio A, Mujahed I, Biasio A, Alessi S (2010) Ultrasound anatomy of the neck: the infrahyoid region. J Ultras 13(3):85–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto T, Urabe M, Chee-Sheng F, Murakoshi A, Kikuchi T, Michiwaki Y, Koike T (2020) Development of a musculoskeletal model of hyolaryngeal elements for understanding pharyngeal swallowing mechanics. Appl Sci 10(18):6276

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman RE, Stepp CE, Van Stan JH, Zañartu M, Mehta DD (2020) An updated theoretical framework for vocal hyperfunction. Am J Speech Langu Pathol 18:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocevar-Boltezar I, Janko M, Zargi M (1998) Role of surface emg in diagnostics and treatment of muscle tension dysphonia. Acta Otolaryngol 118(5):739–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Honda K, Hirai H, Masaki S, Shimada Y (1999) Role of vertical larynx movement and cervical lordosis in f0 control. Lang Speech 42(4):401–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong KH, Ye M, Kim YM, Kevorkian KF, Berke GS (1997) The role of strap muscles in phonation: in vivo canine laryngeal model. J Voice 11:23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong YT, Hong KH, Jun J-P, Hwang PH (2015) The effects of dynamic laryngeal movements on pitch control. Am J Otolaryngol 36(5):660–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter EJ, Titze IR (2007) Refinements in modeling the passive properties of laryngeal soft tissue. J Appl Physiol 103(1):206–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JL, Lochbaum CC (1962) Speech synthesis. Proceedings of the fourth international congress on acoustics

  • Kirzinger A, Jürgens U (1994) Role of extralaryngeal muscles in phonation of subhuman primates. J Comparat Physiol Sensory Neural Behav Physiol 175(2):215–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovač T, Popović B, Marjanović K, Wertheimer V, Kovačević M, Nikolić V, Radić R (2010) Morphometric characteristics of thyroid cartilage in people of eastern croatia. Colleg Antropolog 34(3):1069–1073

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfqvist A, Baer T, McGarr NS, Story RS (1989) The cricothyroid muscle in voicing control. J Acoust Soc Am 85(3):1314–1321

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowell SY, Kelley RT, Colton RH, Smith PB, Portnoy JE (2012) Position of the hyoid and larynx in people with muscle tension dysphonia. Laryngoscope 122(2):370–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Moisik SR, Gick B (2017) The quantal larynx: the stable regions of laryngeal biomechanics and implications for speech production. J Speech Langu Hear Res 60(3):540–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison MD, Rammage LA (1993) Muscle misuse voice disorders: description and classification. Acta Oto Laryngol 113(3):428–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen JD, Vasavada AN, Merryweather AS (2018) The inclusion of hyoid muscles improve moment generating capacity and dynamic simulations in musculoskeletal models of the head and neck. PloS one 13(6):e0199912

    Google Scholar 

  • Movahhedi M, Geng B, Xue Q, Zheng X (2021) Effects of cricothyroid and thyroarytenoid interaction on voice control: muscle activity, vocal fold biomechanics, flow, and acoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 150(1):29–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen DD, Kenny DT, Tran ND, Livesey JR (2009) Muscle tension dysphonia in vietnamese female teachers. J Voice 23(2):195–208

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Keeffe R, Shirazi SY, Mehrdad S, Crosby T, Johnson AM, Atashzar SF (2022) Perilaryngeal-cranial functional muscle network differentiates vocal tasks: a multi-channel semg approach. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 69:3678

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Keeffe R, Shirazi Y, Mehrdad S, Crosby T, Johnson AM, Atashzar SF (2023) Perilaryngeal functional muscle network in patients with vocal hyperfunction-a case study. bioRxiv, 2023-01

  • Pearson WG, Langmore SE, Zumwalt AC (2011) Evaluating the structural properties of suprahyoid muscles and their potential for moving the hyoid. Dysphagia 26(4):345–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubeau B, Chevrie-Muller C, Saint Guily JL (1997) Electromyographic activity of strap and cricothyroid muscles in pitch change. Acta Otolaryngol 117(3):459–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy N (2008) Assessment and treatment of musculoskeletal tension in hyperfunctional voice disorders. Int J Speech Langu Pathol 10(4):195–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Serry MA, Stepp CE, Peterson SD (2021) Physics of phonation offset: Towards understanding relative fundamental frequency observations. J Acoust Soc Am 149(5):3654–3664

    Google Scholar 

  • Story BH (2005) A parametric model of the vocal tract area function for vowel and consonant simulation. J Acoust Soc Am 117(5):3231–3254

    Google Scholar 

  • Story BH (2008) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-based vocal tract area functions obtained from the same speaker in 1994 and 2002. J Acoust Soc Am 123(1):327–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukekawa R, Itoh I (2006) Anatomical study of the human omohyoid muscle: regarding intermediate morphologies between normal and anomalous morphologies of the superior belly. Anatom Sci Int 81(2):107–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Titze IR, Alipour F (2006) The myoelastic-aerodynamic theory of phonation. J Acoust Soc Am 123:1902

    Google Scholar 

  • Titze IR, Hunter EJ (2007) A two-dimensional biomechanical model of vocal fold posturing. J Acoust Soc Am 121(4):2254–2260

    Google Scholar 

  • Titze IR, Jiang J, Drucker DG (1988) Preliminaries to the body-cover theory of pitch control. J Voice 1(4):314–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Titze IR, Luschei ES, Hirano M (1989) Role of the thyroarytenoid muscle in regulation of fundamental frequency. J Voice 3(3):213–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Titze IR, Story BH (2002) Rules for controlling low-dimensional vocal fold models with muscle activation. J Acoust Soc Am 112(3):1064–1076

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ee CA (2000) Tensile properties of the human muscular and ligamentous cervical spine. Duke University

  • Van Stan JH, Ortiz AJ, Cortes JP, Marks KL, Toles LE, Mehta DD et al (2021) Differences in daily voice use measures between female patients with nonphonotraumatic vocal hyperfunction and matched controls. J Speech Langu Hear Res 64(5):1457–1470

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilkman E, Sonninen A, Hurme P, Körkkö P (1996) External laryngeal frame function in voice production revisited: a review. J Voice 10(1):78–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Weibel ER, Cournand AF, Richards DW (1963) Morphometry of the human lung, vol 1. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zañartu M, Galindo GE, Erath BD, Peterson SD, Wodicka GR, Hillman RE (2014) Modeling the effects of a posterior glottal opening on vocal fold dynamics with implications for vocal hyperfunction. J Acoust Soc Am 136(6):3262–3271

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang K, Siegmund T, Chan RW (2006) A constitutive model of the human vocal fold cover for fundamental frequency regulation. J Acoust Soc Am 119(2):1050–1062

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z (2016) Respiratory laryngeal coordination in airflow conservation and reduction of respiratory effort of phonation. J Voice 30(6):760-e7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Research reported in this work was supported by the NIDCD of the NIH under Award No. P50DC015446 and ANID BASAL FB0008. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.A.S. and S.D.P. conceived of the study. M.A.S. and G.A. developed the model. M.A.S. generated preliminary results and figures. All the authors analyzed and interpreted the results. M.A.S. wrote the first draft of the article. All the authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean D. Peterson.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

M.Z has a financial interest in Lanek SPA, a company focused on developing and commercializing biomedical devices and technologies. His interests were reviewed and are managed by the Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María in accordance with its conflict-of-interest policies.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Serry, M.A., Alzamendi, G.A., Zañartu, M. et al. Modeling the influence of the extrinsic musculature on phonation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 22, 1365–1378 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-023-01724-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-023-01724-3

Keywords

Navigation