Skip to main content
Log in

Homework goal orientation, interest, and achievement: testing models of reciprocal effects

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whereas it is often a challenge to keep students motivated and interested in academic tasks, it is more of a challenge to have students stay motivated and interested in academic tasks outside school during nonschool hours—homework. Prior research, however, has largely overlooked the reasons or purposes students have for doing homework and their interest in homework. Informed by achievement goal theory and interest theory, along with cultural differences pertaining to these theories, the present study uses reciprocal models to study longitudinal relationships among homework goal orientation, interest, and math achievement. Participants were 1450 Chinese students in grade 8. Results found reciprocal influences of mastery-approach and math achievement. Additionally, prior mastery-approach had a positive effect on subsequent performance-approach. Furthermore, prior interest had a positive effect on subsequent mastery-approach. Meanwhile, prior performance-approach negatively influenced subsequent achievement. Taken together, the present study points to the complex interplay among mastery-approach, performance-approach, homework interest, and math achievement over time. These findings hold important practical implications (e.g., to promote mastery-approach and math achievement simultaneously and to help students focus on developing competencies through math homework, not how well they have done compared with their peers).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adachi, P., & Willoughby, T. (2015). Interpreting effect sizes when controlling for stability effects in longitudinal autoregressive models: implications for psychological science. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2014.963549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bempechat, J., Li, J., Neier, S. M., Gillis, C. A., & Holloway, S. D. (2011). The homework experience: perceptions of low-income youth. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22, 250–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1102200204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bong, M. (2001). Between- and within- domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: self-efficacy, task-value and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. (2005). Goal theorists should move on from performance goals. Educational Psychologist, 40, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4003_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J. (2003). Investigating parental roles in students’ learning of mathematics from a cross-national perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., & Stevenson, H. W. (1989). Homework: a cross-cultural examination. Child Development, 60(3), 551–561. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. W., & Wong, Y. L. (2015). Chinese mindset: theories of intelligence, goal orientation and academic achievement in Hong Kong students. Educational Psychology, 35, 714–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.893559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H. (1989). Homework. White Plains: Longman.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., Nye, B., & Greathouse, S. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076001001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corno, L. (2000). Looking at homework differently. Elementary School Journal, 100, 529–548. https://doi.org/10.1086/499654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corno, L., & Xu, J. (2004). Homework as the job of childhood. Theory Into Practice, 43(3), 227–233.

  • Du, J., Xu, J., & Fan, X. (2016). Investigating factors that influence students' help seeking in math homework: A multilevel analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 48, 29–35.

  • Eccles, J. S. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic choice: origins and changes. In J. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 87–134). San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J. (2006). The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9028-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Dweck, C. S. (2005). Competence and motivation: competence as the core of achievement motivation. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 3–12). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, P. H., Dobbs-Oates, J., Doctoroff, G. L., & Arnold, D. H. (2012). Early math interest and the development of math skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 673–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H. M. G. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 507–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00645.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, H., Xu, J., Cai, Z., He, J., & Fan, X. (2017) Homework and student's achievement in math and science: A 30-year meta-analysis, 1986–2015. Educational Research Review 20, 35–54.

  • Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hau, K. T., & Salili, F. (1996). Achievement goals and causal attributions of Chinese students. In S. Lau (Ed.), Growing up the Chinese way: Chinese child and adolescent development (pp. 121–145). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: a critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151–179. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070002151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jõgi, A. L., Kikas, E., Lerkkanen, M. K., & Mägi, K. (2015). Cross-lagged relations between math-related interest, performance goals and skills in groups of children with different general abilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.03.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köller, O., Baumert, J., & Schnabel, K. (2001). Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 448–470. https://doi.org/10.2307/749801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. (2002). A cultural model of learning: Chinese “heart and mind for wanting to learn”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 248–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033003003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., Guo, J., Arens, A. K., & Murayama, K. (2016). Breaking the double-edged sword of effort/trying hard: developmental equilibrium and longitudinal relations among effort, achievement, and academic self-concept. Developmental Psychology, 52(8), 1273–1290. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76, 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J., Yu, K., & Hau, K. T. (2014). Motivation and engagement in the ‘Asian Century’: a comparison of Chinese students in Australia, Hong Kong, and Mainland China. Educational Psychology, 34, 417–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.814199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487–503. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meece, J. L., & Miller, S. D. (2001). A longitudinal analysis of elementary school students’ achievement goals in literacy activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(4), 454–480. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meissel, K., & Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2016). Cultural invariance of goal orientation and self-efficacy in New Zealand: relations with achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 92–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, M. J., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: an under explored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710–718. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu, G. M. (2014). Chinese Australians’ Chineseness and their mathematics achievement: the role of habitus. Australian Educational Researcher, 41(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-014-0152-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ni, Y., Li, Q., Li, X., & Zhang, Z. H. (2011). Influence of curriculum reform: an analysis of student mathematics achievement in Mainland China. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.06.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, J. G. (1992). Students as educational theorists. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Students perceptions in the classroom (pp. 267–287). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niepel, C., Brunner, M., & Preckel, F. (2014). Achievement goals, academic self-concept, and school grades in mathematics: longitudinal reciprocal relations in above average ability secondary school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulick, I., Watermann, R., & Nückles, M. (2013). Achievement goals and school achievement: the transition to different school tracks in secondary school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phan, H. P. (2010). Empirical model and analysis of mastery and performance-approach goals: a developmental approach. Educational Psychology, 30, 547–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2010.491936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (1998). The differential impact of task value and mastery orientation on males’ and females’ self-regulated learning. In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, A. K. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning: proceedings of the Seeon conference on interest and gender (pp. 337–353). Kiel, Germany: IPN.

  • Plante, I., O’Keefe, P. A., & Théorêt, M. (2013). The relation between achievement goal and expectancy-value theories in predicting achievement-related outcomes: a test of four theoretical conceptions. Motivation and Emotion, 37(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9282-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U. (2001). The role of interest in motivation and learning. In J. M. Collis & S. Messick (Eds.), Intelligence and personality: bridging the gap in theory and measurement (pp. 163–194). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaton, M., Parker, P., Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Yeung, A. S. (2014). The reciprocal relations between self-concept, motivation and achievement: juxtaposing academic self-concept and achievement goal orientations for mathematics success. Educational Psychology, 34, 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.825232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selig, J. P., & Little, T. D. (2012). Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 265–278). New York: Gilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senko, C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46, 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senko, C., & Miles, K. M. (2008). Pursuing their own learning agenda: how mastery-oriented students jeopardize their class performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 561–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siu, M. K. (1995). Mathematics education in ancient China: what lesson do we learn from it? Historia Scientiarum, 4, 223–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton, L. M. (2006). Using multilevel structural equation modeling techniques with complex sample data. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: a second course (pp. 345–383). Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, M., Du, J., Xu, J., & Liu, F. (2019). Homework goal orientation scale: measurement invariance and latent mean differences across gender and grade level. Psychology in the Schools, 56, 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, X., & Wong, N. Y. (2005). A culture-bound look on mathematics beliefs: differences between China and U.S.A. students. Mathematics Educator, 8, 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Nagy, N., Lenski, A., Niggli, A., & Schnyder, I. (2015). Using individual interest and conscientiousness to predict academic effort: additive, synergistic, or compensatory effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(1), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Schnyder, I., & Niggli, A. (2006). Predicting homework effort: support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trautwein, U., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., Lüdtke, O., Nagy, G., & Jonkmann, K. (2012). Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy-value theory: a latent interaction modeling study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 763–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D. B. (2004). Family background factors and mathematics success: a comparison of Chinese students. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2005.04.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281-324). https://doi.org/10.1037/10222-000.

  • Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Fredricks, J. A., Simpkins, S., Roeser, R. W., & Schiefele, U. (2015). Development of achievement motivation and engagement. In M. E. Lamb & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, Vol. 3. Socioemotional processes (7th ed., pp. 657-700). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  • Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R., & Davis-Kean, P. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Social, emotional, and personality development. Volume 3 of the Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., pp. 933-1002). Editors-in-Chief: W. Damon & R. M. Lerner. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  • Xu, J. (2008). Models of secondary students’ interest in homework: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 1180–1205. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208323276.

  • Xu, J. (2015). Investigating factors that influence conventional distraction and tech-related distraction in math homework. Computers & Education, 81, 304–314.

  • Xu, J. (2016). A study of the validity and reliability of the teacher homework involvement scale: A psychometric evaluation. Measurement, 93, 102–107.

  • Xu, J. (2018). Reciprocal effects of homework self-concept, interest, effort, and math achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 55, 42–52.

  • Xu, J., Yuan, R., Xu, B., & Xu, M. (2014). Modeling students’ time management in math homework. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 33–42.

  • Yang, F., Xu, J., Tan, H., & Liang, N. (2016). What keeps Chinese students motivated in doing math homework? An empirical investigation. Teachers College Record, 118(8), 1–26.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianzhong Xu.

Additional information

Current themes of research

Teaching and learning in the school, home, and online settings, in home-school relationships, and in partnerships with families from diverse cultural backgrounds.

Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education

Fan, H., Xu, J., Cai, Z., He, J., & Fan, X. (2017). Homework and students’ achievement in math and science: A 30-year meta-analysis, 1986–2015. Educational Research Review, 20, 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.003.

Sun, M., Du, J., Xu, J., & Liu, F. (2019). Homework Goal Orientation Scale: Measurement invariance and latent mean differences across gender and grade level. Psychology in the Schools, 56, 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22206.

Xu, J. (2008). Models of secondary students’ interest in homework: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 1180–1205. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208323276.

Xu, J. (2015). Investigating factors that influence conventional distraction and tech-related distraction in math homework. Computers & Education, 81, 304–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.024.

Xu, J. (2018). Reciprocal effects of homework self-concept, interest, effort, and math achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 55, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.09.002.

Xu, J., Yuan, R., Xu, B., & Xu, M. (2014). Modeling students’ time management in math homework. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.011.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, J. Homework goal orientation, interest, and achievement: testing models of reciprocal effects. Eur J Psychol Educ 36, 359–378 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00472-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00472-7

Keywords

Navigation