Abstract
Public discussion on the quality of education in different corners of the world very much relies on the data provided by the international large-scale assessment (ILSA) studies. While aware of different methodological keystones and technicalities embedded in these, the idea behind this special issue is to contribute to the understanding of how students solve ILSA items and the kinds of literacy skills they rely on. A shared element of reported studies is that they seek to document and analyse test-taking as a concrete practice using different theoretical and methodological perspectives. We find such scrutiny to be important and significant at this point in time as it offers some new lenses through which ILSA items could be inspected and further discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A twin study the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) is designed to measure children’s reading literacy.
References
Abu-Hilal, M. M., Abdelfattah, F. A., Alshumrani, S. A., Abduljabbar, A. S., & Marsh, H. W. (2013). Construct validity of self-concept in TIMSS’s student background questionnaire: a test of separation and conflation of cognitive and affective dimensions of self-concept among Saudi eighth graders. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(4), 1201–1220.
Baumert, J. (2009). International comparison: strengths and weaknesses—and how to overcome the weaknesses. In F. Oser, U. Renold, & E. G. John (Eds.), Vet boost: towards a theory of professional competencies (pp. 25–37). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180.
Brunner, M., Artelt, C., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2007). Coaching for the PISA test. Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 111–122.
Bybee, R. (2008). Scientific literacy, environmental issues, and PISA 2006: the 2008 Paul F-Brandwein lecture. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(6), 566–585.
D’Amore, B. (2014). La ricerca in didattica della matemática e la sua applicazione concreta in aula [Research in mathematics didactics and its application in the classroom]. In D’Amore B. (Ed.), La didattica della matematica: strumenti per capire e per intervenire (pp. 9–14). Bologna: Pitagora.
Fensham, P. J. (1995). STS and comparative assessment of scientific theory. Research in Science Education, 25(1), 33–38.
Giddens, A. (2002). Runaway world: how globalisation is shaping our lives. London: Profile Books.
Kjærnsli, M., & Svein, L. (2004). PISA and scientific literacy: similarities and differences between Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48(3), 271–286.
Linnakylä, P., & Malin, A. (2008). Finnish students’ school engagement profiles in the light of PISA 2003. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(6), 583–602.
Linnakylä, P., Malin, A., & Taube, K. (2004). Factors behind low reading literacy achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48(3), 231–249.
Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Kreuter, F., & Ihme, J. M. (2007). Are there test administrator effects in large-scale educational assessments? Using cross-classified multilevel analysis to probe for effects on mathematics achievement and sample attrition. Methodology, 3(4), 149–159.
Ma, X., & Klinger, D. A. (2000). Hierarchical linear modeling of student and school effects on academic achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 25(1), 41–55.
Maddox, B. (2017). Observing testing situations: validation as jazz. In B. D. Zumbo & A. M. Hubley (Eds.), Understanding and investigating response processes in validation research (pp. 179–172). Cham: Springer.
McGaw, B. (2008). The role of the OECD in international comparative studies of achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(3), 223–243.
Nardi, E. (2008). Cultural biases: a non-Anglophone perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(3), 259–266.
Neumann, J. (2005). TIMSS, PISA, PIRLS and low educational achievement in world society. Prospects, 35(2), 229–248.
Nilsen, T. & Gustafsson, J.-E. (Eds.) (2016). Teacher quality, instructional quality and student outcomes relationships across countries, cohorts and time. Springer International Publishing AG Basel: Springer Open.
Nortvedt, G.A. (2013). Are girls or boys better at mathematics? A commentary on the game of reporting gender differences. Proceedings of the International Groups for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME 37), 385–392.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: science, reading, mathematics and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Olsen Vegar, R. & Lie, S. (2009). Everyday conceptions around the world. In R. W. Bybee & B. J. McCrae (Eds.), PISA science 2006: implications for science teachers and teaching (pp. 101–110), NSTA Press.
Papanastasiou, C. (2002). School, teaching and family influence on student attitudes toward science: based on TIMSS data Cyprus. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 28(1), 71–86.
Papanastasiou, C. (2008). A residual analysis of effective schools and effective teaching in mathematics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34(1), 24–30.
Papanastasiou, E., Zembylas, M., & Vrasidas, C. (2003). Can computer use hurt science achievement? The USA results from PISA. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(3), 325–332.
Pavlović Babić, D., & Baucal, A. (2011). The big improvement in PISA 2009 reading achievements in Serbia: improvement of the quality of education or something else? CEPS Journal, 1(3), 31–52.
Radišić, J., Videnović, M., & Baucal, A. (2015). Math anxiety—contributing school and individual level factors. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(1), 1–20.
Richland, L. E., Zur, O., & Holyoak, K. J. (2007). Cognitive supports for analogies in the mathematics classroom. Science, 316(5828), 1128–1129.
Rochex, J.-Y. (2006). Social, methodological and theoretical issues regarding assessment. Lessons from a secondary analysis of PISA 2000 literacy tests. Review of Research in Education, 30(1), 163–212.
Rutkowski, L., & Rutkowski, D. (2016). A call for a more measured approach to reporting and interpreting PISA results. Educational Researcher, 45(4), 252–257.
Santagata, R., & Barbieri, A. (2005). Mathematics teaching in Italy: a cross-cultural video analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(4), 291–312.
Scherer, R., & Beckmann, J. F. (2014). The acquisition of problem solving competence: evidence from 41 countries that math and science education matters. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 2(1), 10.
Schleicher, A. (2007). Where immigrant students succeed: a comparative review of performance and engagement in PISA 2003. Intercultural Education, 17(5), 507–516.
Schur, Y., & Kozulin, A. (2008). Cognitive aspects of science problem solving: two mediated learning experience based programs. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 7(2), 266–287.
Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). The OECD and the expansion of PISA: new global modes of governance in education. British Educational Research Journal, 406, 917–936.
Takayama, K. (2008). The politics of international league tables: PISA in Japan’s achievement crisis debate. Comparative Education, 44(4), 387–407.
Thorpe, G. (2006). Multilevel analysis of PISA 2000 reading results for the UK using pupil scale variable. School Effectiveness and Research, 48(3), 325–341.
van Langen, A., Bosker, R., & Dekkers, H. (2006). Exploring cross-national differences in gender gaps in education. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(2), 155–177.
Wagemaker, H. (2008). Choices and trade-offs: reply to McGaw. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(3), 267–278.
Williams, T., Williams, K., Kastberg, D., & Jocelyn, L. (2005). Achievement and affect in OECD nations. Oxford Review of Education, 31(4), 517–545.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Roger Säljö. Department of Education, Communication and Learning, Faculty of Education, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. E-mail: roger.saljo@ped.gu.se
Current themes of research:
Research on learning, interaction and human development in a sociocultural perspective. Issues of how people learn to use cultural tools and how we acquire competences and skills that are foundational to learning in a socially and technologically complex society. Issues that concern how the so-called new technologies transform human learning practices inside and outside formal schooling.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Säljö, R. (2018). Conceptual change, materiality and hybrid minds in T. G. Amin & O. Levrini (Eds.), Converging perspectives on conceptual change. Mapping an emerging paradigm in the learning sciences (pp. 113-120).London: Routledge.
Mäkitalo, Å., Linell, P., & Säljö, R. (Eds.), (2017). Memory practices and learning. Interactional, institutional and sociocultural perspectives. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing,
Adalberon, E. & Säljö, R. (2017). Informal use of social media in higher education: a case study of Facebook groups. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 12(4), 114-128.
Hjörne, E., & Säljö, R. (2017). Categorizing learners beyond the classroom. In S. Wortham, D. Kim & S. May (Eds.), Discourse and education. Encyclopedia of language and education, 3rd Ed. (pp. 123-134), New York, NY:Springer International Publishing.
Säljö, R. (2017). Apps and learning: a sociocultural perspective. In N. Kucirkova & G. Falloon (Eds.), Apps, technology and younger learners: international evidence for teaching (pp. 3-13). London: Routledge.
Jelena Radišić. Department of Teacher Education and School Research, Faculty of Educational Sciences,University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. E-mail: jelena.radisic@ils.uio.no
Current themes of research:
Student, teacher and school characteristics affecting academic achievement. Quality and efficacy of the education system (secondary analysis of PISA and TIMSS results). Teacher beliefs and practices and their impact on student learning. Motivation for learning. Mathematics anxiety. Emergent literacy.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Radišić, J., Videnović, M., & Baucal, A. (2018). Distinguishing successful students in mathematics: a comparison across European countries. Psihologija, 51(1), 69-89.
Marković, J., Radišić, J., Jovanović, V. & Ranković, T. (2017). Developing a model for dropout prevention and intervention in primary and secondary schools in Serbia: assessing the model effectiveness. Psihološka istraživanja, 20(1), 145–169.
Radišić, J. & Baucal, A. (2016). Using video-stimulated recall to understand teachers’ perceptions of teaching and learning in the classroom setting. Psihološka istraživanja, 19(2), 165–183.
Radišić, J. & Jošić, S. (2015). Challenges, obstacles and outcomes of applying inquiry method in primary school mathematics: example of an experienced teacher. Teaching Innovations, 28(3), 99–115.
Radišić, J., Videnović, M., & Baucal, A. (2015). Math anxiety—contributing school and individual level factors. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(1), 1–20.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Säljö, R., Radišić, J. Promoting teaching, learning and informed decision-making through the lenses of international large-scale assessment: looking beyond numbers. Eur J Psychol Educ 33, 419–426 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0388-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0388-7