Skip to main content
Log in

Math anxiety—contributing school and individual level factors

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

PISA 2003 survey data indicate high levels of mathematics anxiety among students in Serbia. More than a half of Serbian students are concerned with whether they will have difficulties in a mathematics class or earn poor marks. At the same time, the achievement on the mathematical literacy scale is very poor. Building on control-value theory, the analysis in this paper focuses on exploring possible correlates of math anxiety, separating the school level factors from individual level factors (HLM), and differences between different groups of students in respect to their relationship towards mathematics (hierarchical cluster analysis). Data suggest high levels of anxiety within the Serbian student body to be a rather systemic problem not contributed to a particular school. Approximately 6 % of the total variance in math anxiety is explained by the between schools differences, while 94 % of differences accounts for the within the school variance. The achievement and interest in mathematics, high mathematics self-concept, and school and classroom atmosphere are associated with a lower level of math anxiety. The only school level factor that has a minor, but significant effect is the index of economic, social, and cultural status. Based on students’ attitudes towards mathematics, they can be divided into three clusters. Dimensions that distinguish the clusters are interest in mathematics and presence of math anxiety. The group displaying anxiety, scores the lowest among the three in math achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For details please see Bai et al. 2009; Hembree 1990; Kazelskis 1998; Krinzinger et al. 2009; Meece et al. 1990; Newstead 1998; Wigfield and Meece 1988.

  2. Although Pekrun's control-value model is one among the several important motivational or social-cognitive models relevant to this study (e.g., that of Jacquelynne S. Eccles, Paul Pintrich) it is our belief that comprehensiveness of the model and exploration of relationships between particular emotions and different correlates addressed in the study reflect in the most relevant way the theoretical framework necessary for this particular investigation. This is of course a personal opinion of the authors and in no way favors one theoretical framework over the other.

  3. The author describes mathematics affect as a composition of three distinctive dimensions: the attitude towards mathematics, anxiety and utility of mathematics.

  4. Mathematical literacy is an individual’s capacity to identify and understand the role that mathematics plays in the world, to make well-founded judgments and to use and engage with mathematics in ways that meet the needs of that individual’s life as a constructive, concerned and reflective citizen (OECD 2003).

  5. Math anxiety of students in Serbia is significantly higher than the OECD average and is 0.28.

  6. One year of schooling effect in OECD member countries corresponds to 38 points at math literacy scale (OECD 2010).

  7. The girls outperform at the national entrance test in mathematics.

  8. Typically 35 students from the population of 15 years old are at random selected within the selected schools. If fewer than thirty-five 15 years old go to a selected school, then all of the students will be invited to partake.

  9. A single correct answer within a multiple choice item or closed constructed response items.

  10. Examples of released items may be found at http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/34993147.zip

  11. The background questionnaires provide information about students’ and their family backgrounds; aspects of students’ lives (e.g., attitudes to learning and life inside school); strategies of self-regulated learning, motivational preferences and goal orientations; and aspects of learning and instruction (e.g., students’ motivation, engagement, and confidence in respect to the major domain of assessment).

  12. In both cases, two new categorical variables were created in order to examine a possible system effect, and value 1 was given to all respondents who did not answer the question.

  13. All HLM analyses were conducted using HLM version 6.06. Hierarchical cluster analysis was undertaken using SPSS 20.

  14. Full variable names are given in Table 1.

  15. Represents ratio between male and female students for each school.

References

  • Ashcraft, M. A. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 181–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, H., Wang, L. S., Pan, W., & Frey, M. (2009). Measuring mathematics anxiety: Psychometric analysis of a bidimensional affective scale. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36(3), 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucal, A., & Pavlović Babić, D. (2010). Kvalitet i pravednost obrazovanja u Srbiji: Obrazovne šanse siromašnih, Analiza podataka PISA 2003 i 2006 [Quality and equity of education in Serbia: Education pportunities of children living in poverty, analysis of PISA 2003 and 2006 results]. Beograd: Tim za socijalno uključivanje i smanjenje siromaštva, Ministarstvo prosvete Republike Srbije, Institut za psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, M., McKeachie, W., Lin, Y., & Holinger, D. (1981). Test anxiety: Deficits in information processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 816–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M. (2007). Understanding students’ affective processes in the classroom. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotions in education (pp. 37–56). London: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.). (1999). Handbook of self-regulation. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassady, J., & Johnson, R. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 270–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cates, G. L., & Rhymer, K. N. (2003). Examining the relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance: an instructional hierarchy perspective. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimou, A. (2009). Politics or policy: the short life and adventures of educational reform in Serbia (2001–2003). In A. Dimou (Ed.), Transition and the politics of history education in southeast Europe (pp. 159–200). Gottingen: V & R Unipress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A., Papadaki, M., Papantoniou, G., & Kiosseoglou, G. (1997). Effects of cognitive ability and affect on school mathematics performance and feelings of difficulty. American Journal of Psychology, 110(2), 225–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A., Papadaki, M., Papantoniou, G., & Kiosseoglou, G. (1999). Individual differences in school mathematics performance and feelings of difficulty: the effects of cognitive ability, affect, age, and gender. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(1), 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU. (2002). Key competencies. Brussels: EU Directorate General for Education and Culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU. (2007). Science education now: a renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. EU: Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurydice. (2010). New skills for new jobs. Btussels: Eurydice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Girls and mathematics—A “hopeless” issue? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(4), 497–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., Hall, N., & Haag, L. (2006). Academic emotions from a socio-cognitive perspective: Antecedents and domain-specificity of students’ affect in the context of Latin instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 289–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harackicwitz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58, 47–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. D., & Leffingwell, R. J. (1999). The role of instructor in creating math anxiety in students from kindergarten through college. Mathematics Teacher, 92(7), 583–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. D., Wilkins, J. L. M., Long, M. H., & Wang, F. (2012). Testing a motivational model of achievement: how students’ mathematical beliefs and interests are related to their achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazelskis, R. (1998). Some dimensions of mathematics anxiety: a factor analysis across instruments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 623–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesici, S., & Erdogan, A. (2010). Mathematics anxiety according to middle school students’ achieve motivation and social comparison. Education, 131(1), 54–63.

  • Krapp, A. (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction, 15, 381–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreft, I. G. G., de Leeuw, J., & Aiken, L. S. (1995). The effect of different forms of centering in Hierarchical Linear Models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krinzinger, H., Kaufmann, L., & Willmes, K. (2009). Math anxiety and math ability in early primary school years. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 206–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X. (1999). A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety and toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 502–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X., & Cartwright, F. (2003). A longitudinal analysis of gender differences in affective outcomes in mathematics during middle and high school. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(4), 413–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macher, D., Paechter, M., Papousek, I., & Ruggeri, K. (2012). Statistics anxiety, trait anxiety, learning behavior, and academic performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmivuori, M.-L. (2006). Affect and self-regulation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Washington: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, G., Davies, D., Westerman, S., & Stammers, R. (2000). Human performance. Cognition, stress, and individual differences. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents’ course enrolment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mincu, M. E. (2009). Myth, rhetoric and ideology in eastern European education. European Education, 41(1), 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newstead, K. (1998). Aspects of children’s mathematics anxiety. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36(1), 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2003). PISA 2003 assessment framework—mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2005). PISA 2003 technical report. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2010). Mathematics teaching and learning strategies in PISA. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R. (2000). A social-cognitive, control-value theory of achievement. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational psychology of human development: Developing motivation and motivating development (pp. 143–163). New York: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Perry, R. P., Kramer, K., & Hochstadt, M. (2004). Beyond test anxiety: Development and validation of the test emotions questionnaire (TEQ). Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 17, 287–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: an integrative approach to emotions in education. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotions in education (pp. 13–37). London: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pešić, J., & Stepanović, I. (2004). Škola kao sredina za učenje-učenička percepcija i njihove strategije [School as a learning space—Students’ perceptions and strategies]. In D. Plut & Z. Krnjaić (Eds.), Društvena kriza i obrazovanje – dokument o jednom vremenu [A social crises and education – documenting an era] (pp. 24–69). Beograd: Institut za psihologiju.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal-orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452–502). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P., & DeGroot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radišić, J., & Baucal, A. (2012). Understanding practice of mathematics and language teachers from their own perspective, paper presented at the 25th International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Malmo 5-8 January 2012. Retrieved from http://www.icsei.net/fileadmin/ICSEI/icsei_2012/papers/1791918_ABS.pdf

  • Richardson, F. C., & Woolfolk, R. L. (1980). Mathematics anxiety. In I. G. Sarason (Ed.), Test anxiety: Theory, research, and application (pp. 271–288). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., Keefe, D. E., Hayes, B. E., & Shearin, E. N. (1986). Cognitive interference: Situational determinants and trait-like characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J. (2000). Improving school effectiveness, Fundamentals of Educational Planning No. 68. Paris: UNESCO/International Institute for Educational Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, P. A., & DeCuir, J. T. (2002). Inquiry on emotions in education. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., & Sydeman, S. J. (1994). State-trait anxiety inventory and state-trait anger expression inventory. In M. E. Maurish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment (pp. 292–321). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanković, D. (2011). Obrazovne promene u Srbiji (2000-2010) [Education reform in Serbia (2000-2010)]. In M. Vujačić, J. Pavlović, D. Stanković, V. Džinović, & I. Đerić (Eds.), Predstave o obrazovnim promenama u Srbiji: Refleksije o prošlosti, vizije budućnosti [Representations on education reforms in Serbia: reflections on past, present, and future] (pp. 41–62). Belgrade: Institut za pedagoška istraživanja.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teodorović, J. (2012). Student background factors influencing student achievement in Serbia. Educational Studies, 38(1), 89–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Videnović, M., & Radišić, J. (2011). Anksioznost u vezi sa učenjem matematike – matematika bauk ili ne? [Mathematics related anxiety: Mathematics bogeyman or not?]. Psihološka istraživanja, 14(2), 157–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Meece, J. L. (1988). Math anxiety in elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 210–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., Battle, A., Keller, L. B., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Sex differences in motivation, self-concept, career aspiration, and career choice: implications for cognitive development. In A. McGillicuddy-De Lisi & R. De Lisi (Eds.), Biology, society, and behavior: the development of sex differences in cognition (pp. 93–124). Westport: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: the state of the art. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidner, M. (2007). Test anxiety in educational contexts: concepts, findings, and future directions. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotions in education (pp. 165–184). London: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jelena Radišić or Marina Videnović.

Additional information

Jelena Radišić, PhD is a research associate at the Institute for Educational Research in Belgrade (Serbia).

Current themes of research:

Her main field of interest involves exploring the teaching and learning processes and everyday classroom practices, including perspectives of both the teacher and the student. Another line of her work is connected with exploring emergent literacy. In her work, she employs both quantitative and qualitative research methods.

Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:

Radišić, J., & Ševa, N. (2013). Exploring the Factor Structure of the Parent Reading Belief Inventory (PRBI): Example of Serbia. Psihologija, 46(3), 315–329. DOI: 10.2298/PSI130716007R

Radišić, J., Raković, J., Pantić, N., Marković, J., Maksimović, A. & Marković, M. (2012). Teachers as proponents and opponents of education reforms – the case of Serbia In J. Madalińska-Michalak, H., Niemi, & S. Chong (Eds.), Research, Policy and Practice in Teacher Education in Europe (pp. 223-239), Lodz: University of Lodz

Radišić, J. (2011). “What do you mean by that?” How personal meanings are developed and constructed in literature classes at upper secondary level in (Eds.). A. Baucal,, F. Arcidiacono, & Budjevac, N., Studying interaction in different contexts: a qualitative view (pp. 153–186). Belgrade: Institute of Psychology.

Videnović, M., & Radišić, J. (2011). Mathematics related anxiety: Mathematics bogeyman or not? Psihološka istraživanja, 14(2), 157-177. (in Serbian)

Marina Videnović works as a researcher at the Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade.

Current themes of research:

Her main field of interest is related to relevant issues of youth development such as spare time and risk behaviors. In her work she employs both quantitative and qualitative research methods.

Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:

Pešić, J., Videnović, M., & Plut, D. (2013). Educational activities of secondary school students in Serbia: a time-diary analysis. Zbornik Instituta za pedagoška istraživanja, 54, 169-184.

Pešić, J., Videnović, M., & Plut, D. (2012). Leisure and positive development of youth: The time use analysis. Psihološka istraživanja, 15(2), 153-168.

Videnović, M., & Radišić, J. (2011). Mathematics related anxiety: Mathematics bogeyman or not? Psihološka istraživanja, 14(2), 157-177. (in Serbian)

Videnović, M., Pešić, J., & Plut, D. (2010). Young people's leisure time: Gender differences. Psihologija, 43(2), 199-214.

Aleksander Bauca, PhD is a professor at the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy at the University of Belgrade.

Current themes of research:

His main field of interest is the socio-cultural developmental psychology and studies of development of new competencies through symmetric (collaborative peer learning) and asymmetric (learning with adults) social interaction. The author’s work is also related to improvement of traditional pre-post test research design by integration with the Item Response Theory (IRT) and involvement of qualitative case studies.

Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:

Baucal, A., Arcidiacono, F., & Budjevac, N. (2013). “Is there an equal (amount of) juice?” Exploring the repeated question effect in conservation through conversation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(2), 476-495.

Pavlović Babić, D., Baucal, A. (2011). The Big Improvement in PISA 2009 Reading Achievements in Serbia: Improvement of the Quality of Education or Something Else? CEPS Journal, 1(3), 31-52

Tartas, V., Baucal, A., & Perret-Clermont, A.N. (2010). Can You Think With Me? The Social and Cognitive Conditions and the Fruits of Learning. In: K. Littleton, C. Howe (Eds.), Educational Dialogues: Understanding and Promoting Productive interaction (pp. 64-82). London: Routledge.

Baucal, A., Pavlović Babić, D., Willms, D. (2006). Differential Selection into Secondary Schools in Serbia. Prospects, 36(4), 539-546.

Baucal, A. (2006). Development of mathematical and language literacy among Roma students. Psihologija, 39(2),207-227.

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of Serbia grants number 179034 and 179018

Appendix

Appendix

List of items measuring Math anxiety (ANXMAT)

  • I often worry that it will be difficult for me in mathematics classes.

  • I get very tense when I have to do mathematics homework.

  • I get very nervous doing mathematics problems.

  • I feel helpless when doing a mathematics problem.

  • I worry that I will get poor marks in mathematics.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Radišić, J., Videnović, M. & Baucal, A. Math anxiety—contributing school and individual level factors. Eur J Psychol Educ 30, 1–20 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0224-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0224-7

Keywords

Navigation