Skip to main content
Log in

Consilience for universal design: the emergence of a third culture

  • LONG PAPER
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consilience offers a powerful mechanism for borrowing from other disciplines, thereby extending the scope of what can be known. This paper looks at the foundations of the activity of design as a means of providing IT systems that cater for diverse needs. Developing systems that are expected to satisfy needs continuously (i.e., systems that are expected to evolve) calls for a dynamic activity of design that is responsive to changes in the environment. The contrast with the scientific assumption of ordered development invokes a new classification, supported by insights from other disciplines that place the range of approaches in context. Design is neither orderly nor linear; it implies a continuous and active search to resolve trade-offs and satisfy changing constraints. The paper concludes by making a case for design as an alternative culture that borrows from, and supports, both the scientific and the literary cultures. Acceptance of the role of practice as an interface alongside the more traditional cultures enables researchers and practitioners to access and adopt a larger variety of methods and general approaches underpinning an even larger corpus of insights. Consilience can occur at different levels and offer a variety of benefits. Balancing scientific enquiry with artistic flair and creativity through careful sensemaking that supports sharing across cultures provides the greatest benefit from learning to look across rather than blindly focusing inwards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackoff, R.L.: A Concept of Corporate Planning. Wiley, New York (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ackoff, R.L.: The art and science of mess management. Interfaces 11, 20–26 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adams, J.L.: Flying Buttresses, Entropy, and O-rings: The World of the Engineer. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adams, R.: Natural Computing and Interactive System Design. Pearson, Harlow (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Adams, R., Langdon, P.: Assessment, insight and awareness in user centred that includes users with special needs. In: Keates, S., Clarkson. P.J., Langdon, P., Robinson, P. (eds) Springer, London (2004)

  6. Alexander, C.: Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alexander, C.: The Timeless Way of Buildings. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alexander, C.: A Pattern Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andriole, S.J.: Flexible life cycle for multidisciplinary C2 information systems engineering. In: Andriole, S.J., Halpin, S.M. (eds) Information Technology for Command and Control: Methods and Tools for Systems Development and Evaluation. IEEE, New York, pp 107–136 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Archer, B.L.: Systematic method for designers. Design 172, 61–69 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Archer, B.L.: The structure of the design process. In: Broadbent, G., Ward, A. (eds) Design Methods in Architecture. Lund Humphries, London, pp 76–102 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Archer, B.L.: Design as a discipline: whatever became of design methodology? Des. Stud. 1(1), 17–18 (1979a)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Archer, B.L.: The three Rs. Des. Stud. 1(1), 18–20 (1979b)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Arthur, L.J.: Rapid Evolutionary Development: Requirements, Prototyping and Software Creation. Wiley, New York (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Arthur, W.B.: On Learning and Adaptation in the Economy (No. 92-07-038). Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Asimow, W.: Introduction to Design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bacon, J.: Scientific judgement: contribution to or substitute for policy. Paper presented at the Speech of the Director General of the HSE, Foundation for Science & Technology, 11 February 1997

  18. Baron, J.: Thinking and Deciding. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bazjanac, V.: Architectural design theory: models of the design process. In: Spillers, W.R. (eds) Basic Questions of Design Theory. North-Holland, New York, pp 3–20 (1974)

  20. Bessant, J.R., McMahon, B.J.: Participant observation of a major design decision in industry. Des. Stud. 1(1), 21–28 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bijl, A.: An approach to design theory. In: Yoshikawa, H., Warman, E.A. (eds) Design Theory in CAD. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 3–25 (1987)

  22. Birrell, N.D., Ould, M.A.: A Practical Handbook for Software Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Blum, B.I.: Beyond Programming: To a new era of Design. Oxford University Press, New York (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Boehm, B.W.: Software process management: lessons learned from history. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 9th ICSE, March 1987

  25. Brand, S.: How Buildings Learn: What Happens When They Fail, revised edn. Phoenix, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brightman, H.J.: Differences in ill-structured problem solving along the organisational hierarchy. Decis. Sci. 9, 1–18 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brooks, F.P.J.: The Mythical Man-month. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Brooks, F.P.J.: No silver bullet: essence and accident in software engineering. In: Kugler, H.J. (ed.) Information Processing, vol. 86. Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp. 1069–1076 (1986)

  29. Brooks, F.P.J.: The Mythical Man-month Revisited. Talk given at the IEE, 2 December 1997

  30. Buchanan, R.: Wicked problems: managing the entrapment trap. Innovation 10, 31–33 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Buchanan, R.: Wicked problems in design thinking. Des. Issues 8(2), 5–21 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Carroll, J.M., Thomas, J.C., Malhotra, A.: Presentation and representation in design problem solving. Am. J. Psychol. 93, 269–284 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Charette, R.N.: Applications Strategies for Risk Analysis. Intertext/McGraw-Hill, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Checkland, P.: Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Wiley, Chichester (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Checkland, P., Holwell, S.: Information, Systems, and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field. Wiley, Chichester (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Churchman, C.W.: Wicked problems. Manage. Sci. 14(4), B141–B142 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Clarke, L.: Acceptable Risk? Making Decisions in a Toxic Environment. University of California Press, Berkeley (1989)

  38. Collins, H.C., Pinch, T.: What Everyone should Know about Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Colquhoun, A.: Typology and the design method. Perspecta: Yale Architect. J. 12, 71–74 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Corbato, F.J., Clingen, C.T.: A managerial view of the multics system development. In: Wegner, P. (eds) Research Directions in Software Technology. MIT, Cambridge, pp 139–160 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cosgrove, J.: Needed: a new planning framework. Datamation 17(23), 37–39 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Coyne, R.D. et al.: Knowledge based Design Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Cross, N., Naughton, J., Walker, D.: Design method and scientific method. Des. Stud. 2(4), 195–201 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cuff, D.: Architecture: The Story of Practice. MIT, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Daellenbach, H.G.: Systems and Decision Making: A Management Science Approach. Wiley, Chichester (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Dalcher, D.: Falling down is part of growing up: the study of failure and the software engineering community. In: Diaz-Herrera, J.L. (eds) Software Engineering Education. LNCS. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 489–496 (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Dalcher, D.: Disaster in London: the LAS case study. Paper presented at the IEEE Engineering of Computer based Systems Symposium (ECBS99), Nashville (1999)

  48. Dalcher, D.: Towards continuous development. In: Kirikova, M. et al. (eds) Information Systems Development, Advances in Methodologies, Components and Management. Kluwer, New York, pp. 53–68 (2002a)

  49. Dalcher, D.: Safety, risk and danger: a new dynamic perspective. Cutter IT J. 15(2), 23–27 (2002b)

  50. Dalcher, D.: Beyond normal failures: dynamic management of software projects. Technol. Analy. Strategic Manage. 15(4), 421–439 (2003a)

  51. Dalcher, D.: Learning from failure. Software Process Improvem. Practice 7(2), 71–89 (2003b)

  52. Davis, G.B., Olson, M.H.: Management Information Systems, Conceptual Foundations, Structure and Development. McGraw-Hill, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Deutsch, D.: The Fabric of Reality. Allen Lane, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Douglas, M., Wildavsky, A.: Risk and Culture: An Essay of the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. California University Press, Berkeley (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Dym, C.L.: Engineering Design: A Synthesis of Views. Cambridge University Press, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Dym, C.L., Little, P.: Engineering Design: A Project based Introduction. Wiley, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Dyson, F.: Introduction. The scientist as a rebel. In: Cornwell, J. (eds) Nature’s Imagination. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1–11 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Elster, J.: Nuts and Bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Esherick, J.: Problems of the design of a design system. In: Jones, J.C., Thornley, D.G. (eds) Conference on Design Methods. Macmillan, London pp. 59–74 (1963)

  60. Ferguson, E.S.: The mind’s eye: non-verbal thought in technology. Science 197, 827–836 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ferguson, E.S.: Engineering and the Mind’s Eye. MIT, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Fortune, J., Peters, G.: Learning from Failure—The Systems Approach. Wiley, Chichester (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Freeman, P.: Fundamentals of Design. In: Freeman, P., Wasserman, A.I. (eds) Software Design Techniques, 4th edn. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, pp. 2–22 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Freudenburg, W.R.: Perceived risk, real risk: social science and the art of probabilistic risk assessment. Science 242, 44–49 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Funtowitz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R.: A new problem solving strategy for global environmental issues. Natl. Forum 38–41 (1990)

  66. Funtowitz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R.: Risk management as a postnormal science. Risk Anal. 12(1), 95–97 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Funtowitz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R.: Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science. In: Krimsky, S., Golding, D. (eds) Social Theories of Risk. Praeger, Westport, pp. 251–274 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Funtowitz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R.: Risk management, post-normal science, and extended peer communities. In: Hood, C., Jones, D.K.C. (eds) Accident and Design: Contemporary Debates in Risk Management. UCL, London, pp. 172–181 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Gal, S.: Footholds for design. In: Winograd, T. (eds) Bringing Design to Software. Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp. 215–227 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Giddings, R.V.: Accommodating uncertainty in software design. Commun. ACM 27(5), 428–434 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Glass, R.L.: On design. IEEE Softw. 16(2), 103–104 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Gorman, M.E., Carlson, W.B.: Interpreting invention as a cognitive process: the case of Alexander Graham Bell, Thomas Edison and the telephone. Sci. Technol. Human Values 15, 131–164 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Gosling, W.: The Design of Engineering Systems. Heywood, London (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Gragg, C.I.: Whose fault was it? Harv. Bus. Rev. 42, 107–110 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Gregory, S.A.: The Design Method. Butterworth, London (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Hogarth, R.M., Kunreuther, H.: Decision making under ignorance: arguing with yourself. J. Risk Uncertain. 10, 15–36 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  77. Holyoak, K.J.: Problem solving. In: Osherson, D.N., Smith, E.E. (eds) Thinking. MIT, Cambridge, pp. 117–146 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Hopper, P.: Emergent grammar. Berkley Lingusit. Soc. 13, 53–79 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Hunt, E.: Some comments on the study of complexity. In: Sternberg, R.J., Frensch, P.A. (eds) Complex Problem Solving: Principles and Mechanisms. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, pp. 383–396 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  80. Huxley, A.: Science, Liberty, and Peace. Harper, London (1946)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Janis, I.L.: Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  82. Jemison, D.: Scientific uncertainty and the political process. In: Kunreuther, H., Slovic, P. (eds) Challenges in Risk Assessment and Risk Management. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Thousand Oaks, pp. 35–43 (1996)

  83. Jones, J.C.: Design Methods: Seeds of Human Futures. Wiley, New York (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  84. Kasperson, R.E.: The social amplification of risk: progress in developing an integrative framework. In: Krimsky, S., Golding, D. (eds) Social Theories of Risk. Praeger, Westport, pp. 153–178 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  85. Kasperson, R.E., Kasperson, J.X.: The social amplification and attenuation of risk, the annals of the American academy of political and social science. In: Kunreuther, H., Slovic, P. (eds) Challenges in Risk Assessment and Risk Management. American Academy of Political and Social Science, Thousand Oaks, no. 545, pp. 95–105 (1996)

  86. Kelley, D., Hartfield, B.: The designer’s stance. In: Winograd, T. (eds) Bringing Design to Software. Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp. 151–164 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  87. Klein, G.A.: Analytical versus recognitional approaches to design decision making. In: Rouse, W.B., Boff, K.R. (eds) System Design. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 175–188 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  88. Koen, B.V.: Toward a definition of the engineering method. Eng. Educat. 75, 47–52 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  89. Koestler, A.: The act of creation. Hutchinson, London (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  90. Kunreuther, H., Slovic, P. (eds.): Challenges in Risk Assessment and Risk Management. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 545. Sage Periodicals Press, Thousand Oaks (1996)

  91. Lehman, M.M.: Some characteristics of S-, E- and P-type programs. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Feast Workshop II. Imperial College of Science and Technology, London, pp. 24–25 (1994)

  92. Lehman, M.M.: Rules and tools for software evolution planning and management. Paper presented at the FEAST 2000. Imperial College, London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  93. Lehman, M.M., Belady, L.A.: Program Evolution: Processes of Software Change. Academic, London (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  94. Lowrance, W.W.: Of Acceptable Risk: Science and the Determination of Safety. William Kaufmann, Los Altos (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  95. Lynn, F.M.: The interplay of science and values in assessing and regulating environmental risks. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 11(2), 40–50 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  96. Mainzer, K.: Thinking in Complexity: The Complex Dynamics of Matter, Mind, and Mankind. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  97. Mann, R.W.: Engineering design. In: McGraw-Hill Encyclopaedia of Science and Technology, vol. 6, pp. 359–372 (1989)

  98. March, L.J.: The logic of design and the question of value. In: March, L.J. (eds) The Architecture of Form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 17–23 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  99. Medawar, P.B.: Advice to a Young Scientist. Pan, London (1981)

  100. Mitchell, T.: The product as illusion. In: Thackara, J. (eds) Design after Modernism. Thames and Hudson, London, pp. 44–51 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  101. Mitroff, I.I., Linstone, H.A.: Unbounded Mind: Breaking the Chains of Traditional Business Thinking. Oxford University Press, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  102. Morgan, G.: Images of Organisation. Sage Publications, London (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  103. Mostow, J.: Towards better models of the design process. AI. Mag. 6(1), 21–27 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  104. Nadler, G.: An investigation of design methodology. Manage. Sci. 13(10), B642–B655 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Nadler, G.: Systems methodology and design. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. 15(6), 685–697 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  106. Page, J.K.: A review of the papers presented at the conference. In: Jones, J.C., Thornley, D.G. (eds) Conference on Design Methods. Macmillan, London pp. 107–112 (1963)

  107. Parnas, D.L., Clements, P.C.: A rational design process: how and why to fake it. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 12(2), 251–257 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  108. Paul, R.J.: Why users cannot ‘get what they want’. ACM SIGIOS Bull. 14(2), 8–12 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  109. Perrow, C.: Normal Accidents, Living with High-Risk Technologies. Basic Books, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  110. Peters, L.J.: Software Design: Methods and Techniques. Yourdon, New York (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  111. Petroski, H.: To Engineer is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design. St Martin’s Press, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  112. Petroski, H.: Design Paradigms: Case Histories of Error and Judgement in Engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)

  113. Petroski, H.: Invention by Design; How Engineers Get from Thought to Thing. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1996)

  114. Pool, R.: Beyond Engineering; How Society Shapes Technology. Oxford University Press, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  115. Purcell, P.A., Mallen, G.L., Goumain, P.G.R.: A strategy for design research. In: Spillers, W.R. (ed.) Basic Questions of Design Theory. North-Holland, New York, pp. 75–93 (1974)

  116. Rappaport, R.A.: Risk and the human environment. In: Kunreuther, H., Slovic, P. (eds) Challenges in Risk Assessment and Risk Management, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 545. American Academy of Political and Social Science, Thousand Oaks, pp. 64–74 (1996)

  117. Ravetz, J.R.: Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  118. Renn, O.: Three Decades of Risk Research: Accomplishments and New Challenges. J. Risk Res. 1(1), 49–71 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Rittel, H.W.: On the planning crisis: systems analysis of the ‘first and second generations’. Bedriftsokonomen 8, 390–396 (1972a)

    Google Scholar 

  120. Rittel, H.W.: Some principles for the design of an educational system for design. J. Archit. Educ. 26(1–2), 16–26 (1972b)

    Google Scholar 

  121. Rittel, H.W., Webber, M.M.: Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 4, 155–169 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Rosa, E.A.: Metaphorical foundations for post-normal risk. J. Risk Res. 1(1), 15–44 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Rosenhead, J.: Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. Wiley, Chichester (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  124. Rubinstein, R., Hersh, H.: The Human Factor: Designing Computer Systems for People. Digital, Burlington (1984)

  125. Rzevski, G.: Prototypes versus pilot systems: strategies for evolutionary information systems development. In: Budde, R. et al. (eds) Approaches to Prototyping. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 356–367 (1984)

  126. Schon, D.A.: Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. Jossey Bass, San Francisco (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  127. Silvers, R.B.: The Hidden Histories of Science. New York Review of Books, New York (1995)

  128. Simon, H.A.: Administrative decision making. Public. Admin. Rev. 25, 31–37 (1965)

  129. Simon, H.A.: The structure of ill structured problems. Artif. Intell. 4, 181–201 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Simon, H.A.: Rational decision making in business organisations. Am. Econ. Rev. 69, 493–513 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  131. Simon, H.A.: Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn. MIT, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  132. Snow, C.P.: The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  133. Snow, C.P.: The Two Cultures: A Second Look. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  134. Stacey, R.D.: The Chaos Frontier: Creative Strategic Control for Business. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  135. Stacey, R.D.: Managing Chaos: Dynamic Business Strategies in an Unpredictable World. Kogan Page, London (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  136. Stevens, R. et al.: Systems Engineering, Coping with Complexity. Prentice-Hall, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  137. Thomas, H., Samson, D.: Subjective aspects of the art of decision analysis; exploring the role of decision analysis in decision structuring, decision support and policy dialogue. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 37, 249–265 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Thome, B.: Systems Engineering, Principles and Practice of Computer-based Systems Engineering. Wiley, Chichester (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  139. Truex, D., Baskerville, R., Klein, H.: Growing systems in emergent organisations. Commun. ACM 42(8), 117–123 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Truex, D., Baskerville, R., Travis, J.: Amethodical systems development: the deferred meaning of systems development methods. Account Manag. Inf. Technol. 10, 53–79 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Tully, C.: System development activity. In: Thome, B. (eds) Systems Engineering, Principles and Practice of Computer-based Systems Engineering. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 45–80 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  142. Voland, G.: Engineering by Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  143. Weinberg, A.M.: Science and trans-science. Minerva 10, 209–222 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  144. Weinberg, A.M.: Science and its limits: the regulator’s dilemma. Issues Sci. Technol. 2, 59–72 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  145. Weisberg, R.W.: Memory, Thought and Behaviour. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  146. Whewell, W.: The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences. J. W. Parker, London (1840)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  147. Winograd, T., Flores, F.: Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  148. Wynne, B.: Science and social responsibility. In: Ansell J, Wharton F (eds) Risk Analysis, Assessment and Management. Wiley, New York, pp. 137–152 (1992a)

    Google Scholar 

  149. Wynne, B.: Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Glob. Environ. Change 2, 111–127 (1992b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Yolles, M.: Management Systems: A Viable Approach. Pitman Publishing, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  151. Wolpert, L.: The Unnatural Nature of Science. Faber and Faber, London (1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darren Dalcher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dalcher, D. Consilience for universal design: the emergence of a third culture. Univ Access Inf Soc 5, 253–268 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-006-0049-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-006-0049-5

Keywords

Navigation