Skip to main content
Log in

Chestnut goby, Gymnogobius castaneus (O’Shaughnessy 1875), as a suitable host of Anemina arcaeformis (Heude 1877) in floodplain water bodies, Hokkaido, Northern Japan

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Limnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined a host-parasite relationship between chestnut goby Gymnogobius castaneus (O’Shaughnessy 1875) and a unionid mussel Anemina arcaeformis (Heude 1877) in three floodplain water bodies of the Ishikari River. Field observations of gravidity between summer (July 2016) and spring (May 2017) revealed that female A. arcaeformis began incubating eggs in September, and all reached a fully ripe-glochidia-gravid stage by May with a decreasing trend in the proportion of gravid individuals. Two laboratory experiments, in which field-caught G. castaneus were artificially infected by glochidia of A. arcaeformis, showed that transformation rates were among the highest ever reported for A. arcaeformis (an average across all the surviving individuals: 47.9%) with a shorter development time in warmer environments. Transformation rates did not differ among sympatric or allopatric pairs, nor decrease when infected twice. Relatively high transformation rates were attributed to high glochidia attachments to gills and mouth cavity (approximately 30% of initially attached individuals) following the highest to fins, or a reduced immunity against infection due to colder environments. Overall, our study demonstrated that chestnut goby (G. castaneus) served as a suitable host of winter-breeding A. arcaeformis. Together with records of the expanded distribution of these two species in the past 30 years, it might be relatively recently that these two have colonized the study areas after extensive land changes, with A. arcaeformis having benefited from a successful host-parasite relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen DC, Vaughn CC, Kelly JF, Cooper JT, Engel MH (2012) Bottom-up biodiversity effects increase resource subsidy flux between ecosystems. Ecology 93:2165–2174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson CL, Vaughn CC, Forshay KJ, Cooper JT (2013) Aggregated filter-feeding consumers alter nutrient limitation: consequences for ecosystem and community dynamics. Ecology 94:1359–1369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer G, Wächtler K (eds) (2012) Ecology and evolution of the freshwater mussels Unionoida, vol 145. Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolotov IN, Bespalaya YV, Gofarov MY, Kondakov AV, Konopleva ES, Vikhrev IV (2016) Spreading of the Chinese pond mussel, Sinanodonta woodiana, across Wallacea: one or more lineages invade tropical islands and Europe. Biochem Syst Ecol 67:58–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cabana G, Rasmussen JB (1996) Comparison of aquatic food chains using nitrogen isotopes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93:10844–10847

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell ML, Zanatta DT, Woolnough DA (2016) A multi-basin approach determines variability in host fish suitability for unionids in tributaries of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Freshw Biol 61:1035–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douda K, Vrtílek M, Slavík O, Reichard M (2012) The role of host specificity in explaining the invasion success of the freshwater mussel Anodonta woodiana in Europe. Biol Invasions 14:127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douda K, Sell J, Kubíková-Peláková L, Horký P, Kaczmarczyk A, Mioduchowska M (2014) Host compatibility as a critical factor in management unit recognition: population-level differences in mussel-fish relationships. J Appl Ecol 51:1085–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira T, Rasband W (2012) ImageJ user guide. ImageJ/Fiji, 1

  • Fukuhara S, Tabe M, Kondo T (2013) Breeding season of Anemina arcaeformis (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in a small creek. Venus 71:121–123 (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson L, Showers W, Kwak T, Levine J, Stoskopf M (2007) Temporal and spatial variability in stable isotope compositions of a freshwater mussel: implications for biomonitoring and ecological studies. Oecologia 152:140–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haag WR (2012) North American freshwater mussels: natural history, ecology, and conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haag WR, Williams JD (2014) Biodiversity on the brink: an assessment of conservation strategies for North American freshwater mussels. Hydrobiologia 735:45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashida K, Hirayama A, Ueda H (2010) Changes in fish fauna in oxbow lakes on the Ishikari River and the influence of invasive fish species. Annu J Hydraul Eng 54:1261–1266 (In Japanese with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Howerth EW, Keller AE (2006) Experimentally induced glochidiosis in smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu). Vet Pathol 43:1004–1007

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue T, Suda Y, Sano M (2005) Food habits of fishes in the surf zone of a sandy beach at Sanrimatsubara, Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan. Ichthyol Res 52:9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondo T (2008) Monograph of Unionoida in Japan (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Spec Publ Malacol Soc Jpn 3:1–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo M, Ito K, Senge M (2015) Host fish species for glochidia of Anemina arcaeformis revealed by artificial infection experiment. Venus 73:127–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung TLF (2014) Fish as parasites: an insight into evolutionary convergence in adaptations for parasitism. J Zool 294:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lydeard C, Cowie RH, Ponder WF, Bogan AE, Bouchet P, Clark SA, Cummings KS, Frest TJ, Gargominy O, Herbert DG, Hershler R, Perez KE, Roth B, Seddon M, Strong EE, Thompson FG (2004) The global decline of nonmarine mollusks. Bioscience 54:321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyaji N, Kohyama K (1997) Process of extinction of mire and land use changes on Ishikari Peatland, central Hokkaido. Report of the Pro Natura Foundation (Japan), FY1994-1995. Pro Natura Foundation, Tokyo, pp 49–57 (In Japanese with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Natsumeda T, Tsuruta T, Iguchi K (2010) An evaluation of the ecological features of endangered freshwater fish commonly distributed in Japan. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 76:169–184 (In Japanese with English summary)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negishi JN, Kayaba Y, Tsukahara K, Miwa Y (2008) Unionoid mussels as imperiled indicator organisms: habitat degradation processes and restoration approaches. Ecol Civil Eng 11:195–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negishi JN, Sagawa S, Kayaba Y, Sanada S, Kume M, Miyashita T (2012) Mussel responses to flood pulse frequency: the importance of local habitat. Freshw Biol 57:1500–1511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Negishi JN, Katsuki K, Kume M, Nagayama S, Kayaba Y (2014a) Terrestrialization alters organic matter dynamics and habitat quality for freshwater mussels (Unionoida) in floodplain backwaters. Freshw Biol 59:1026–1038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Negishi JN, Soga M, Ishiyama N, Suzuki N, Yuta T, Sueyoshi M, Yamazaki C, Koizumi I, Mizugaki S, Hayashida K, Nunokawa M, Yoshimura N (2014b) Geomorphic legacy controls macrophyte distribution within and across disconnected floodplain lakes. Freshw Biol 59:942–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole KE, Downing JA (2004) Relationship of declining mussel biodiversity to stream-reach and watershed characteristics in an agricultural landscape. J North Am Benthol Soc 23:114–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/

  • Rauque CA, Viozzi GP, Semenas LG (2003) Component population study of Acanthocephalus tumescens (Acanthocephala) in fishes from Lake Moreno, Argentina. Folia Parasitol 50:72–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reckendorfer W, Baranyi C, Funk A, Schiemer F (2006) Floodplain restoration by reinforcing hydrological connectivity: expected effects on aquatic mollusc communities. J Appl Ecol 43:474–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichard M, Polačik M, Tarkan AS, Spence R, Gaygusuz Ö, Ercan E, Ondračková M, Smith C (2010) The bitterling-mussel coevolutionary relationship in areas of recent and ancient sympatry. Evolution 64:3047–3056

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts AD, Barnhart MC (1999) Effects of temperature, pH, and CO2 on transformation of the glochidia of Anodonta suborbiculata on fish hosts and in vitro. J North Am Benthol Soc 18:477–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers CL, Dimock RV Jr (2003) Acquired resistance of bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus to glochidia larvae of the freshwater mussel Utterbackia imbecillis (Bivalvia: Unionidae) after multiple infections. J Parasitol 89:51–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers SO, Watson BT, Neves RJ (2001) Life history and population biology of the endangered tan riffleshell (Epioblasma florentina walkeri) (Bivalvia: Unionidae). J North Am Benthol Soc 20:582–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salonen JK, Luhta PL, Moilanen E, Oulasvirta P, Turunen J, Taskinen J (2017) Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) differ in their suitability as hosts for the endangered freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) in northern Fennoscandian rivers. Freshw Biol 62:1346–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwalb AN, Morris TJ, Mandrak NE, Cottenie K (2013) Distribution of unionid freshwater mussels depends on the distribution of host fishes on a regional scale. Divers Distrib 19:446–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu F, Ouyang S (2003) Morphological observation on Anodonta arcaeformis in different habitats. Sichuan J Zool 23:322–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer DL (2008) Freshwater mussel ecology: a multifactor approach to distribution and abundance, vol 1. Univ of California Press, California

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taeubert JE, Denic M, Gum B, Lange M, Geist J (2010) Suitability of different salmonid strains as hosts for the endangered freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.). Aquat Conserv Marine Freshw Ecosyst 20:728–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taeubert JE, El-Nobi G, Geist J (2014) Effects of water temperature on the larval parasitic stage of the thick-shelled river mussel (Unio crassus). Aquat Conserv Marine Freshw Ecosyst 24:231–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn CC, Hakenkamp CC (2001) The functional role of burrowing bivalves in freshwater ecosystems. Freshw Biol 46:1431–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wächtler K, Dreher-Mansur MC, Richter T (2001) Larval types and early postlarval biology in naiads (Unionoida). In: Ecology and evolution of the freshwater mussels Unionoida (pp. 93-125). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Weber AM, Bauer JE, Watters GT (2017) Assessment of nutritional subsidies to freshwater mussels using a multiple natural abundance isotope approach. Freshw Biol 62:615–629

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to A. Agui and Sapporo Regional Office of Hokkaido Development Bureau, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) for their laboratory and field assistance. MLIT kindly provided logistical support for catching fish. This study is partly supported by the research fund for the Ishikari River provided by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism, and also in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 11950749 to JNN) from the Japan Society for Promotion of Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junjiro N. Negishi.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Takuya Sato.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10201_2018_553_MOESM1_ESM.jpg

Checking the gravidity in the field (A); measurements of shell length using a photograph (B); gently opening the shells with a pair of reverse plier (C); A. arcaeformis at an egg-gravid stage (D); an extracted slurry of immature glochidia (E) (JPG 582 kb)

10201_2018_553_MOESM2_ESM.jpg

Anemina arcaeformis at a glochidia-gravid stage (A); glochidia attached to a fin of Gymnogobius castaneus (B); ripe and viable glochidia (C); a transformed juvenile of A. arcaeformis (D) (JPG 318 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Negishi, J.N., Miura, K., Izumi, H. et al. Chestnut goby, Gymnogobius castaneus (O’Shaughnessy 1875), as a suitable host of Anemina arcaeformis (Heude 1877) in floodplain water bodies, Hokkaido, Northern Japan. Limnology 19, 343–354 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-018-0553-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-018-0553-3

Keywords

Navigation