Abstract
Provider payment systems for mental health care that incentivize cost control and quality improvement have been a policy focus in a number of countries. In England, a new prospective provider payment system is being introduced to mental health that should encourage providers to control costs and improve outcomes. The aim of this research is to investigate the relationship between costs and outcomes to ascertain whether there is a trade-off between controlling costs and improving outcomes. The main data source is the Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS) for the years 2011/12 and 2012/13. Costs are calculated using NHS reference cost data while outcomes are measured using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). We estimate a bivariate multi-level model with costs and outcomes simultaneously. We calculate the correlation and plot the pairwise relationship between residual costs and outcomes at the provider level. After controlling for a range of demographic, need, social, and treatment variables, residual variation in costs and outcomes remains at the provider level. The correlation between residual costs and outcomes is negative, but very small, suggesting that cost-containment efforts by providers should not undermine outcome-improving efforts under the new payment system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kobel, C., et al.: DRG systems and similar patient classification systems in Europe. In: Busse, R., et al. (eds.) Diagnosis-Related Groups in Europe moving towards transparency, efficiency and quality in hospitals. Open University Press, England (2011)
Swan-Tan, S., et al.: DRGs and cost accounting: which is driving which? In: Busse, R., et al. (eds.) Diagnosis-Related Groups in Europe Moving towards transparency, efficiency and quality in hospitals. Open University Press, England (2011)
Mason, A., Goddard, M.: Payment by results in mental health: a review of the international literature and an economic assessment of the approach in the English NHS. CHE Research Paper 50, 2009
Jacobs, R.: Payment by results for mental health services: economic considerations of case-mix funding. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 20, 155–164 (2014)
Monitor and NHS England: 2014/15 National Tariff Payment System. Monitor, London (2013)
Trauer, T.: Outcome measurement—applications and utility. In: Trauer, T. (ed.) Outcome measurement in mental health theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, UK (2010)
Wing, J.K., Curtis, R.M., Beevor, A.S.: HoNOS—Health of the Nation Outcome Scales: report of research and development. Royal College of Psychiatrists Research Unit, London (1996)
Self, R., Painter, J., Davis, R.: A report on the development of a mental health currency model, (including suggestions on the development and testing of PbR tariffs). Department of Health, London (2008)
Monitor and NHS England: Guidance on mental health currencies and payment. Monitor, London (2013)
Department of Health Payment by Results team: Mental Health Payment by Results Guidance for 2013–14. Department of Health, Leeds (2013)
England, N.H.S., Improvement, N.H.S.: 2017/18 and 2018/19 National Tariff Payment System: a consultation notice. NHS Improvement, London (2016)
Department of Health: Reference Costs 2011–12. Department of Health, Leeds (2012)
Dickey, B., Normand, S.L.: Toward a model for testing the relationship between quality of care and costs. J. Ment. Health Policy Econ. 7(1), 15–21 (2004)
Haas, L., et al.: The trade-off between costs and quality of care in the treatment of psychosomatic patients with somatoform pain disorder. Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy 11(4), 359–368 (2013)
Hendryx, M.: State mental health funding and mental health system performance. J. Ment. Health Policy Econ. 11(1), 17–25 (2008)
Schulz, R.I., Greenley, J.R., Peterson, R.W.: Management, cost, and quality of acute inpatient psychiatric services. Med. Care 21(9), 911–928 (1983)
Carey, K., Burgess Jr., J.F.: On measuring the hospital cost/quality trade-off. Health Econ. 8(6), 509–520 (1999)
Schreyogg, J., Stargardt, T.: The trade-off between costs and outcomes: the case of acute myocardial infarction. Health Serv. Res. 45(6 Pt 1), 1585–1601 (2010)
Weech-Maldonado, R., Shea, D., Mor, V.: The relationship between quality of care and costs in nursing homes. Am. J. Med. Qual. 21(1), 40–48 (2006)
Hvenegaard, A., et al.: Exploring the relationship between costs and quality: does the joint evaluation of costs and quality alter the ranking of Danish hospital departments? Eur. J. Health Econ. 12(6), 541–551 (2011)
Gutacker, N., et al.: Truly inefficient or providing better quality of care? Analysing the relationship between risk-adjusted hospital costs and patients’ health outcomes. Health Econ. 22(8), 931–947 (2013)
Hauck, K., Street, A.: Performance assessment in the context of multiple objectives: a multivariate multilevel analysis. J. Health Econ. 25(6), 1029–1048 (2006)
Gutacker, N., Street, A.: Multidimensional performance assessment using dominance criteria. CHE Research Paper 115, 2015
Rabash, J., et al.: MLwiN Version 2.1. 2009, Centre for Multilevel Modelling: University of Bristol
Goldstein, H.: Restricted unbiased iterative generalized least-squares estimation. Biometrika 76(3), 622–623 (1989)
Leckie, G,. Charlton, C.: runmlwin: a program to run the MLwiN multilevel modeling software from within Stata. J. Stat. Softw. 52(11), 1–40 (2012)
StataCorp, Stata 13.0. 2014, StataCorp LP.: College Station, Texas
The Commission to review the provision of acute inpatient psychiatric care for adults, Improving acute inpatient psychiatric care for adults in England. Interim report. The Commission to review the provision of acute inpatient psychiatric care for adults (2015)
Sabes-Figuera, R., et al.: Developing a tool for collecting and costing activity data on psychiatric inpatient wards. Epidemiol. Psychiatr. Sci. 21(4), 393–399 (2012)
Csipke, E., et al.: Inpatient care 50 years after the process of deinstitutionalisation. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 49(4), 665–671 (2014)
House of Commons Health Committee: Post-legislative scrutiny of the Mental Health Act 2007 first report of session 2013–14. House of Commons, London (2013)
Dow, M.G., Boaz, T.L., Thornton, D.: Risk adjustment of Florida mental health outcomes data: concepts, methods, and results. J. Behav. Health Serv. Res. 28(3), 258–272 (2001)
Rosen, A.K., et al.: Improving risk adjustment of self-reported mental health outcomes. J. Behav. Health Serv. Res. 37(3), 291–306 (2010)
Hendryx, M.S., Dyck, D.G., Srebnik, D.: Risk-adjusted outcome models for public mental health outpatient programs. Health Serv. Res. 34(1 Pt 1), 171–195 (1999)
Kramer, T., et al.: Comparing outcomes of routine care for depression: the dilemma of case-mix adjustment. J. Behav. Health Serv. Res. 28(3), 287–300 (2001)
Health and Social Care Information Centre: Lower layer super output area. NHS data dictionary. Health and Social Care Information Centre, Leeds (2013)
Noble, M., McLennan, D., Wilkinson, K., Whitworth, A., Barnes, H., Dibben, C.: The English indices of deprivation 2007. Communities and Local Government, London (2008)
NHS England and NHS Improvement: Linking quality and outcome measures to payment for mental health Technical Guidance. NHS Improvement, London (2016)
Yeomans, D.: Clustering in mental health payment by results: a critical summary for the clinician. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 20, 227–234 (2014)
Jencks, S.F., et al.: Bringing excluded psychiatric facilities under the Medicare Prospective Payment System. A review of research evidence and policy options. Med. Care 25(9 Suppl), S1–S51 (1987)
PriceWaterhouseCoopers: An evaluation of the reimbursement system for NHS-funded care: report for monitor. PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP, UK (2012)
Acknowledgements
This work is funded by a Centre for Health Economics (University of York) PhD Studentship held by Valerie Moran. Under a Data Sharing Agreement with NHS Digital the MHMDS dataset is released on condition that it is not shared with any third party. Copyright © 2011/2012–2012/13, re-used with the permission of NHS Digital. All rights reserved.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moran, V., Jacobs, R. Investigating the relationship between costs and outcomes for English mental health providers: a bi-variate multi-level regression analysis. Eur J Health Econ 19, 709–718 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-017-0915-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-017-0915-5