Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Valuing productivity costs in a changing macroeconomic environment: the estimation of colorectal cancer productivity costs using the friction cost approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The European Journal of Health Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The friction cost approach (FCA) has been proposed as an alternative to the human capital approach for productivity cost valuation. However, FCA estimates are context dependent and influenced by extant macroeconomic conditions. We applied the FCA to estimate colorectal cancer labor productivity costs and assessed the impact of a changing macroeconomic environment on these estimates.

Methods

Data from colorectal cancer survivors (n = 159) derived from a postal survey undertaken in Ireland March 2010 to January 2011 were combined with national wage data, population-level survival data, and occupation-specific friction periods to calculate temporary and permanent disability, and premature mortality costs using the FCA. The effects of changing labor market conditions between 2006 and 2013 on the friction period were modeled in scenario analyses. Costs were valued in 2008 euros.

Results

In the base-case, the total FCA per-person productivity cost for incident colorectal cancer patients of working age at diagnosis was €8543. In scenario 1 (a 2.2 % increase in unemployment), the fall in the friction period caused total productivity costs to decrease by up to 18 % compared to base-case estimates. In scenario 2 (a 9.2 % increase in unemployment), the largest decrease in productivity cost was up to 65 %. Adjusting for the vacancy rate reduced the effect of unemployment on the cost results.

Conclusions

The friction period used in calculating labor productivity costs greatly affects the derived estimates; this friction period requires reassessment following changes in labor market conditions. The influence of changes in macroeconomic conditions on FCA-derived cost estimates may be substantial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Drummond, M., Sculpher, M., Torrance, G., O’Brien, B.J., Stoddart, G.L.: Methods for the economic evaluation of healthcare programmes, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jonsson, B.: Ten arguments for a societal perspective in the economic evaluation of medical innovations. Eur. J. Health Econ. 10, 357–359 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Krol, M., Brouwer, W., Rutten, F.: Productivity costs in economic evaluations: past, present, future. Pharmacoeconomics. 31, 537–549 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brouwer, W.B., Koopmanschap, M.A.: The friction-cost method: replacement for nothing and leisure for free? Pharmacoeconomics. 23, 105–111 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nyman, J.A.: Productivity costs revisited: toward a new US policy. Health Econ. 21, 1387–1401 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanly, P., Pearce, A., Sharp, L.: The cost of premature cancer-related mortality: a review and assessment of the evidence. Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 14, 355–377 (2014)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, W., Anis, A.H.: Health-related productivity loss: NICE to recognize soon, good to discuss now. Pharmacoeconomics. 32, 425–427 (2014)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koopmanschap, M.A., Rutten, F.F., van Ineveld, B.M., van Roijen, L.: The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease. J. Health Econ. 14, 171–189 (1995)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Johannesson, M., Karlsson, G.: The friction cost method: a comment. J. Health Econ. 16, 249–255 (1997)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van den Hout, W.B.: The value of productivity: human-capital versus friction-cost method. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 69(Suppl 1), 89–91 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, W., Bansback, N., Anis, A.H.: Measuring and valuing productivity loss due to poor health: a critical review. Soc. Sci. Med. 72, 185–192 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Krol, M., Brouwer, W., Rutten, F.: Productivity costs in economic evaluations: past, present, future. Pharmacoeconomics. 31(7), 537–549 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kigozi J, Jowett S, Lewis M, Barton P, Coast J.: Estimating productivity costs using the friction cost approach in practice: a systematic review. Eur. J. Health Econ. Nov 12. (Epub ahead of print) (2014)

  14. Eurostat.: Unemployment rate by sex and age groups–quarterly average, %. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=jvs_q_nace2&lang=en. Accessed 15 Aug 2014

  15. Central Statistics Office.: StatBank: ILO Participation and Unemployment Rates by Sex, Quarter and Statistic. http://www.cso.ie/px/pxeirestat/Statire/SelectVarVal/Define.asp?maintable=QNQ20&PLanguage=0Accessed. Accessed 14 Aug 2015

  16. Eurostat.: Job vacancy statistics–quarterly data, NACE Rev. 2. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=jvs_q_nace2&lang=en. Accessed 14 Aug 2015

  17. Ferlay, J., Steliarova-Foucher, E., Lortet-Tieulent, J., et al.: Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur. J. Cancer 49, 1374–1403 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. De Angelis, R., Sant, M., Coleman, M.P., et al.: Cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE–5-a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 15, 23–34 (2014)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hanly, P., Walsh, P.M., O Ceilleachair, A., et al.: Work-related productivity losses in an era of ageing populations: the case of colorectal cancer. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 55, 128–134 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. National Cancer Registry Ireland Database.: http://www.ncri.ie/ (2009). Accessed 10 Oct 2009

  21. Central Statistics Office.: http://www.cso.ie/px/pxeirestat/database/eirestat/Irish%20Life%20Tables/Irish%20Life%20Tables_statbank.asp?SP=Irish%20Life%20Tables&Planguage=0 (2007). Accessed 23 June 2011

  22. Central Statistics Office.: National Employment Survey 2008 and 2009. http://www.cso.ie/en/media/csoie/releasespublications/documents/earnings/2009/nes_200809.pdf 2011. Accessed 3 Aug 2011

  23. Central Statistics Office.: Employee Skills, Training and Job Vacancies Survey. http://www.cso.ie/en/media/csoie/releasespublications/documents/earnings/current/empskills.pdf. Accessed 14 Nov 2010

  24. Central Statistics Office. Quarterly national household survey quarter 4 2009. http://www.cso.ie/en/media/csoie/releasespublications/documents/labourmarket/2009/qnhs_q42009.pdf. Accessed 2 Aug 2011

  25. Hanly, P., Timmons, A., Walsh, P.M., Sharp, L.: Breast and prostate cancer productivity costs: a comparison of the human capital approach and the friction cost approach. Value Health 15, 429–436 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Brenner, H., Rachet, B.: Hybrid analysis for up-to-date long-term survival rates in cancer registries with delayed recording of incident cases. Eur. J. Cancer 40, 2494–2501 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Erdogan E, Koopmanschap M, Bouwmans-Frijters C, Hakkaart L. Productivity costs using the friction cost approach: new evidence using data from several European countries. Technical University report, Department of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam (2011)

  28. Hanly, P., Pearce, A., Sharp, L.: The cost of premature cancer-related mortality: a review and assessment of the evidence. Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 14, 355–377 (2014)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pissarides, C.: Equilibrium unemployment theory, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Krol, M., Papenburg, J., Koopmanschap, M., Brouwer, W.: Do productivity costs matter?: the impact of including productivity costs on the incremental costs of interventions targeted at depressive disorders. Pharmacoeconomics. 29, 601–619 (2011)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Knies, S., Severens, J.L., Ament, A.J., Evers, S.M.: The transferability of valuing lost productivity across jurisdictions. Differences between national pharmacoeconomic guidelines. Value Health. 13, 519–527 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Oliva, J., Lobo, F., Lopez-Bastida, J., Zozaya, N., Romay, R.: Indirect costs of cervical and breast cancers in Spain. Eur. J. Health Econ. 6, 309–313 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. OECD.: Statistics on average effective age and official age of retirement in OECD countries. http://www.oecd.org/els/public-pensions/ageingandemploymentpolicies-statisticsonaverageeffectiveageofretirement.htm. Accessed 21 Sept 2013

Download references

Acknowledgments

Data collection was funded by the Health Research Board (SA/2004/1). We appreciate the support of COST Action IS1211 CANWON. We are grateful to the colorectal cancer survivors who took part in the survey, the clinicians and nurses who supported the fieldwork, and Alan O’Ceilleachair who undertook the patient survey. We also thank the clerical support team at the National Cancer Registry who aided with survey administration and data input and Paul Walsh for providing survival estimates.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Hanly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hanly, P., Koopmanschap, M. & Sharp, L. Valuing productivity costs in a changing macroeconomic environment: the estimation of colorectal cancer productivity costs using the friction cost approach. Eur J Health Econ 17, 553–561 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-015-0698-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-015-0698-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation