Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A mathematical model of herding in horse-harem group

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ethology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In animal groups, individual interactions achieve coordinated movements to maintain cohesion. In horse-harem groups, herding is a behaviour in which stallions chase mares from behind; it is considered to assist with group cohesiveness. The mechanisms of the group cohesion were studied using the methods of drone filming and video tracking during herding and two phases of interactions were found based on the mares’ timing of movement initiation. The study shows that mares that move first are those nearest to the stallion; while the movement initiation of the later mares is determined by the distance from the nearest moving mare. Thus, as a second step to the full understanding of group cohesion, we propose a mathematical model of mares herded by a harem stallion, which is a modification of a sheep model during shepherding. Our model is a linear combination of the five components: inertia, repulsion from the stallion, short-range repulsion, synchronisation attraction, and attraction to the centre of the group. We tune the parameters of our proposed models based on the data and successfully reproduce the movements and directional trends of the mares.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ákos Z, Beck R, Nagy M, Vicsek T, Kubinyi E (2014) Leadership and path characteristics during walks are linked to dominance order and individual traits in dogs. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballerini M, Cabibbo N, Candelier R, Cavagna A, Cisbani E, Giardina I, Lecomte V, Orlandi A, Parisi G, Procaccini A (2008) Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: evidence from a field study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:1232–1237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berger J (1977) Organizational systems and dominance in feral horses in the grand canyon. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourjade M, Thierry B, Maumy M, Petit O (2009) Decision-making in przewalski horses (Equus ferus przewalskii) is driven by the ecological contexts of collective movements. Ethology 115:321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd L, Keiper R (2005) Behavioural ecology of feral horses. The domestic horse, the evolution, development and management of its behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 55–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks DE, Matthews A (2005) Equine opthalmology. Saunders, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown D, Cox AJ (2009) Innovative uses of video analysis. Phys Teach 47:145–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie KS, Gilbert SL, Brown CL, Hatfield M, Hanson L (2016) Unmanned aircraft systems in wildlife research: current and future applications of a transformative technology. Front Ecol Environ 14:241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couzin ID, Krause J, James R, Ruxton GD, Franks NR (2002) Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. J Theor Biol 218:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couzin ID, Krause J, Franks NR, Levin SA (2005) Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move. Nature 433:513–516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feh C (2005) Relationships and communication in socially natural horse herds. In: The domestic horse, the evolution, development and management of its behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 83–93

  • Ferdinandy B, Ozogány K, Vicsek T (2017) Collective motion of groups of self-propelled particles following interacting leaders. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 479:467–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff IR, Sundaresan SR, Cordingley J, Larkin HM, Sellier MJ, Rubenstein DI (2007) Social relationships and reproductive state influence leadership roles in movements of plains zebra, Equus burchellii. Anim Behav 73:825–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginther O, Lara A, Leoni M, Bergfelt D (2002) Herding and snaking by the harem stallion in domestic herds. Theriogenology 57:2139–2146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Go CK, Lao B, Yoshimoto J, Ikeda K (2016) A reinforcement learning approach to the shepherding task using SARSA. In: Proc 2016 international joint conference on neural networks. IEEE, pp 3833–3836

  • Greenebaum JB (2010) Training dogs and training humans: symbolic interaction and dog training. Anthrozoös 23:129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grünbaum D, Viscido S, Parrish JK (2005) Extracting interactive control algorithms from group dynamics of schooling fish. In: Cooperative control. Springer, pp 103–117

  • Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd. J Theor Biol 31:295–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert-Read JE (2016) Understanding how animal groups achieve coordinated movement. J Exp Biol 219:2971–2983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huth A, Wissel C (1992) The simulation of the movement of fish schools. J Theor Biol 156:365–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue S, Yamamoto S, Ringhofer M, Mendonça RS, Pereira C, Hirata S (2018) Spatial positioning of individuals in a group of feral horses: a case study using drone technology. Mamm Res 64:249–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King AJ, Wilson AM, Wilshin SD, Lowe J, Haddadi H, Hailes S, Morton AJ (2012) Selfish-herd behaviour of sheep under threat. Curr Biol 22:R561–R562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger K, Flauger B, Farmer K, Hemelrijk C (2014) Movement initiation in groups of feral horses. Behav Process 103:91–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukeman R, Li YX, Edelstein-Keshet L (2010) Inferring individual rules from collective behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:12576–12580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy M, Akos Z, Biro D, Vicsek T (2010) Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks. Nature 464:890–893

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozogány K, Vicsek T (2015) Modeling the emergence of modular leadership hierarchy during the collective motion of herds made of harems. J Stat Phys 158:628–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit O, Gautrais J, Leca JB, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg JL (2009) Collective decision-making in white-faced capuchin monkeys. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 276:3495–3503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ransom JI, Cade BS (2009) Quantifying equid behavior-a research ethogram for free-roaming feral horses. USGS professional paper techniques and methods report, vol 2, pp A9

  • Reynolds C (1987) Flocks, herds and schools: a distributed behavioral model. In: ACM SIGGRAPH’87, pp 25–34

  • Ringhofer M, Inoue S, Mendonça RS, Pereira C, Matsuzawa T, Hirata S, Yamamoto S (2017) Comparison of the social systems of primates and feral horses: Data from a newly established horse research site on Serra D’Arga, northern Portugal. Primates 58:479–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringhofer M, Go CK, Inoue S, Mendonça RS, Hirata S, Kubo T, Ikeda K, Yamamoto S (2019) Herding mechanisms to maintain the cohesion of a harem group: two interaction phases during herding. J Ethol 38:71–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney NJ, Cowan S (2011) Training methods and owner-dog interactions: links with dog behaviour and learning ability. Appl Anim Behav Sci 132:169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savalois N, Lescureux N, Brunois F (2013) Teaching the dog and learning from the dog: interactivity in herding dog training and use. Anthrozoös 26:77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squires VR, Daws GT (1975) Leadership and dominance relationships in Merino and Border Leicester sheep. Appl Anim Ethol 1:263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strandburg-Peshkin A, Farine DR, Couzin ID, Crofoot MC (2015) Shared decision-making drives collective movement in wild baboons. Science 348:1358–1361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strömbom D, Mann RP, Wilson AM, Hailes S, Morton AJ, Sumpter DJ, King AJ (2014) Solving the shepherding problem: heuristics for herding autonomous, interacting agents. J R Soc Interface 11:20140719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swierczek NA, Giles AC, Rankin CH, Kerr RA (2011) High-throughput behavioral analysis in C. elegans. Nat Methods 8:592–598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Syme GJ, Syme LA (1975) The concept of spatial leadership in farm animals: an experiment with sheep. Anim Behav 23:921–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waring GH (1983) Horse behavior. The behavioral traits and adaptations of domestic and wild horses, including ponies. Noyes Publications, Mill Road

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamanaka O, Takeuchi R (2018) Umatracker: an intuitive image-based tracking platform. J Exp Biol 221:jeb182469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yokoi S, Ansai S, Kinoshita M, Naruse K, Kamei Y, Young LJ, Okuyama T, Takeuchi H (2016) Mate-guarding behavior enhances male reproductive success via familiarization with mating partners in medaka fish. Front Zool 13:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Peter Ian Mancao for the assistance in pre-processing and stabilising the drone videos. This work was funded in part by JSPS-KAKENHI, 15H01619, 15H01620, 17H05862, 17H05863, 18K18342, 19H00629, and Kyoto University SPIRITS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Japan

    Clark Kendrick Go, Bryan Lao, Takatomi Kubo & Kazushi Ikeda

  2. Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

    Monamie Ringhofer & Shinya Yamamoto

Authors
  1. Clark Kendrick Go
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Monamie Ringhofer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bryan Lao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Takatomi Kubo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shinya Yamamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kazushi Ikeda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazushi Ikeda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. The field observations complied with the guidelines for animal studies in the wild issued by the Wildlife Research Center of Kyoto University, Japan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Go, C.K., Ringhofer, M., Lao, B. et al. A mathematical model of herding in horse-harem group. J Ethol 38, 343–353 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-020-00656-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-020-00656-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation