Abstract
Studies suggest that being mimicked can positively affect human social interactions, not only in adults but also in children and even in individuals with atypical social competences. Outside of the human species, however, little is still known about this so-called ‘social glue function’ of mimicry; with only two studies—both on primates—testing whether other animals can show increased affiliation towards humans who mimic them. The present paper provides two pioneer studies on whether dogs—a domesticated species strongly attached to humans—show increased preference toward humans who display matching behaviour (walking). Results from both studies, including several tests, evidenced no preference of dogs for the human experimenter who matched the dogs’ walk. Methodological issues are discussed and a number of new routes of experimentation are proposed that we hope will prove valuable for future studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnetta B, Rochat P (2004) Imitative games by 9-, 14-, and 18-month-old infants. Infancy 6:1–36
Agresti A (1990) Categorical data analysis. Wiley, New York
Aoki Y, Yamasue H (2015) Reply: does imitation act as an oxytocin nebulizer in autism spectrum disorder? Brain 138:e361–e361
Bavelas JB, Black A, Lemery CR, Mullett J (1986) “I show how you feel”: motor mimicry as a communicative act. J Pers Soc Psychol 50:322–329
Call J, Bräuer J, Kaminski J, Tomasello M (2003) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. J Comp Psychol 117:257–263
Carpenter M, Uebel J, Tomasello M (2013) Being mimicked increases prosocial behavior in 18-month-old infants. Child Dev 84:1511–1518
Cirelli LK (2018) How interpersonal synchrony facilitates early prosocial behavior. Curr Opin Psychol 20:35–39
Contaldo A, Colombi C, Narzisi A, Muratori F (2016) The social effect of “being imitated” in children with autism spectrum disorder. Front Psychol 7:726
de Coster L, Verschuere B, Goubert L (2013) I suffer more from your pain when you act like me: being imitated enhances affective responses to seeing someone else in pain. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 13:519–532
Denwood MJ (2016) runjags: an R package providing interface utilities, model templates, parallel computing methods and additional distributions for MCMC models in JAGS. J Stat Softw 71(9):1–25. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v071.i09
Dijksterhuis A, Bargh JA (2001) The perception-behavior expressway: automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 33:1–40
Duranton C, Gaunet F (2015) Canis sensitivus: affiliation and dogs' sensitivity to others' behavior as the basis for synchronization with humans? J Vet Behav 10:513–524
Hare B, Tomasello M (2005) Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends Cogn Sci 9:439–444
Isomura T, Nakano T (2016) Automatic facial mimicry in response to dynamic emotional stimuli in five-month-old infants. Proc Biol Sci 283:20161948
Kaminski J, Marshall-Pescini S (2014) The social dog: behavior and cognition. Elsevier, New York
Kouzakova M, van Baaren R, van Knippenberg A (2010) Lack of behavioral imitation in human interactions enhances salivary cortisol levels. Horm Behav 57:421–426
Kühn S, Müller BC, van Baaren RB, Wietzker A, Dijksterhuis A, Brass M (2010) Why do I like you when you behave like me? Neural mechanisms mediating positive consequences of observing someone being imitated. Soc Neurosci 5:384–392
Lakin JL, Jefferis VE, Cheng CM, Chartrand TL (2003) The Chameleon effect as social glue: evidence for the evolutionary significance of non-conscious mimicry. J Nonverbal Behav 27:145–162
Leander NP, Chartrand TL, Bargh JA (2012) You give me the chills: embodied reactions to inappropriate amounts of behavioral mimicry. Psychol Sci 23:772–779
Naderi S, Miklósi Á, Dóka A, Csányi V (2001) Co-operative interactions between blind persons and their dogs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 74:59–80
Nagasawa M, Mitsui S, En S, Ohtani N, Ohta M, Sakuma Y, Onaka T, Mogi K, Kikusi T (2015) Social evolution. Oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human–dog bonds. Science 348:333–336
O’Hara SJ, Reeve AV (2011) A test of the yawning contagion and emotional connectedness hypothesis in dogs, Canis familiaris. Anim Behav 81:335–340
Palagi E, Nicotra V, Cordoni G (2015) Rapid mimicry and emotional contagion in domestic dogs. R Soc Open Sci 2:150505
Paukner A, Suomi SJ, Visalberghi E, Ferrari PF (2009) Capuchin monkeys display affiliation toward humans who imitate them. Science 325:880–883
Plummer M (2003) JAGS: a program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on distributed statistical computing (DSC 2003), March 20–22, Vienna, Austria. ISSN 1609-395X
R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Sclafani V, Paukner A, Suomi SJ, Ferrari PF (2015) Imitation promotes affiliation in infant macaques at risk for impaired social behaviors. Dev Sci 18:614–621
Silva K, Bessa J, de Sousa L (2012) Auditory contagious yawning in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris): first evidence for social modulation. Anim Cogn 15:721–724
Silva K, Bessa J, de Sousa L (2013) Familiarity-connected or stress-based contagious yawning in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris)? Some additional data. Anim Cogn 16:1007–1009
Stel M, van den Bos K, Sim S, Rispens S (2013) Mimicry and just world beliefs: mimicking makes men view the world as more personally just. Br J Soc Psychol 52:397–411
Tunçgenç B, Cohen E, Fawcett C (2015) Rock with me: the role of movement synchrony in infants' social and nonsocial choices. Child Dev 86:976–984
Warton DI, Hui FK (2011) The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology. Ecology 92:3–10
Webb CE, Rossignac-Milon M, Higgins ET (2017) Stepping forward together: could walking facilitate interpersonal conflict resolution? Am Psychol 72:374–385
Wilkinson GN, Rogers CE (1973) Symbolic description of factorial models for analysis of variance. Appl Stat 22:392–399
Wiltermuth SS, Heath C (2009) Synchrony and cooperation. Psychol Sci 20:1–5
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the owners of the dogs tested in the present study and to Mariana Filipe, Alexandra Valongueiro, Daniel Martins, Katrin Schumann, Alex Taylor and Lola Bräuer for their valuable help during data collection. We also thank Anika Rütz and Melanie Henschel for inter-observer reliability coding and Annette Günzel for creating Fig. 1. Special thanks goes also to Sebastião Castro Lemos and Quinta do Côvo. The authors also thank Roger Mundry for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript and Russell Gray for financial support. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge the contribution of two anonymous referees whose comments significantly improved this manuscript.
This observational study adhered to the Guidelines for the use of Animals in Research of Germany.
Funding
The study was partly financed by the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History (Russell Gray).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
The Doglab of the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History has a general approval for conducting non-invasive studies of dog human interactions. There is no particular certificate number.
Informed consent
All dog owners signed a consent form that their dogs participated in the research here presented.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 (MP4 11636 kb)
Supplementary file2 (MP4 15690 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Silva, K., Bräuer, J., de Sousa, L. et al. An attempt to test whether dogs (Canis familiaris) show increased preference towards humans who match their behaviour. J Ethol 38, 223–232 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-020-00644-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-020-00644-4