Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Waste prevention indicators and their implications from a life cycle perspective: a review

  • SPECIAL FEATURE: REVIEW
  • 3R Policy Indicators
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 3Rs (reduce, reuse, and recycle) approach to waste management has been established internationally as one of the fundamental concepts for a sustainable society. In particular, the “reduce” aspect, which is the highest priority and also refers to waste prevention, implies similar concepts and definitions among regions. To outline useful recent research findings related to waste prevention, this paper reviewed and discussed the current situation, including (1) definitions, (2) indicators, (3) policy and behavior, and (4) prevention effects from the life cycle perspective. It was found that although various waste prevention indicators have been proposed in the EU, Japan, and by international authorities, the indicators actually adopted in their policies are limited by some issues, for example, a lack of data availability. Food waste, C&D waste, and WEEE (e-waste) were identified as higher priorities for waste prevention. Some current challenges for promoting waste prevention are to (1) make the definition of waste types clearer; (2) develop a standardized, consistent monitoring method; (3) clarify the causal linkage between prevention effects and stakeholders’ behavior, and (4) quantify the environmental effects of waste prevention. Each of these aspects is essential and will be useful when considering waste prevention indicators and targets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sakai S, Yoshida H, Hirai Y, Asari M, Takigami H, Takahashi S, Tomoda K, Peeler MV, Wejchert J, Schmid-Unterseh T, Douvan AR, Hathaway R, Hylander LD, Fischer C, Oh GJ, Jinhui L, Chi NK (2011) International comparative stud of 3R and waste management policy developments. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 13:86–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cox J, Giorgi S, Sharp V, Strange K, Wilson DC, Blakey N (2010) Household waste prevention—a review of evidence. Waste Manage Res 28:193–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilts H (2012) National waste prevention programs: indicators on progress and barriers. Waste Manage Res 30(9):29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilts H, Dehoust G, Jepsen D, Knappe F (2013) Eco-innovation for waste prevention—best practices, drivers and barriers. Sci Total Environ 461–462:823–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (2014) Discussion paper 3R policy indicator factsheets ver. 1. IGES, Japan

  6. Gentil E, Gallo D, Christensen TH (2011) Environmental evaluation of municipal waste prevention. Waste Manag 31(12):2371–2379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nessi S, Rigamonti L, Grosso M (2012) LCA of waste prevention activities: a case study for drinking water in Italy. J Environ Manage 108:73–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nessi S, Rigamonti L, Grosso M (2014) Waste prevention in liquid detergent distribution: a comparison base on life cycle assessment. Sci Total Environ 499:373–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. OECD (2000) Reference manual on strategic waste prevention

  10. EU (2008) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2009 on waste and repealing certain Directives (text with EEA relevance). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:312:0003:0030:en:PDF. Accessed 26 Sept 2014

  11. MOE, Japan (2000) Basic act on establishing a sound material-cycle society. http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=2042&vm=04&re=01&new=1. Accessed 9 Jan 2015

  12. MOE, Japan (2013) Fundamental plan for establishing a sound material-cycle society. https://www.env.go.jp/en/focus/docs/files/20131018-79.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2015

  13. OECD (2008) Measuring material flows and resource productivity Synthesis report. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  14. ARCADIS, Vito, Umweltbundesamt & Bio Intelligence Service (2010) Analysis of the evolution of waste reduction and the scope of waste prevention. European Commission DG Environment, Antwerp. Service Request 6 under the FrameWork Contract “Sustainable Resource Management”. European Commission. Brussels

  15. Reisinger H, van Acoleyen M, O’Connor C, Hestin M, Laureysens L, Morton G, Dolley P, Nelen D, Vanderreydt I (2011) Evolution of (bio-) waste generation/prevention and (bio-) waste prevention indicators Final Report, A project under the Framework contract ENV. G. 4/FRA/2008/0112

  16. ERA-NET SKEP Project EIPOT (2008) Development of a methodology for the assessment of global environmental impacts of traded goods and services—development of RACER evaluation framework

  17. Watson D, Milios L, Bakas I, Herczeg M, Kjær B, Tojo N (2013) Proposals for targets and indicators for waste prevention in four waste streams. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. OECD website, Environmental indicators, modelling and outlooks, OECD work on material flows and resource productivity, http://www.oecd.org/env/indicators-modelling-outlooks/oecdworkonmaterialflowsandresourceproductivity.htm. Accessed 10 Feb 2015

  19. OECD working group on environmental information and outlooks (2004) OECD workshop on material flow and related indicators Chair’s summary. ENV/EPOC/SE(2004)2, OECD, Paris

  20. OECD (2011) Resource productivity in the G8 and the OECD—a report in the framework of the Kobe 3R action plan. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  21. OECD (2015) OECD green growth studies Material resources, productivity and the environment. OECD, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A report of the working group on decoupling to the international resource panel. Fischer-Kowalski M, Swilling M, von Weizsäcker E.U, Ren Y, Moriguchi Y, Crane W, Krausmann F, Eisenmenger N, Giljum S, Hennicke P, Kemp R, Lankao PR, Manalang ABS, Sewerin S

  23. UNEP (2014) Decoupling 2: technologies, opportunities and policy options. A report of the working group on decoupling to the international resource panel. von Weizsäcker E.U, de Larderel J, Hargroves K, Hudson C, Smith M, Rodrigues M

  24. Hashimoto S, Moriguchi Y (2004) Proposal of six indicators of material cycles for describing society’s metabolism: from the viewpoint of material flow analysis. Resour Conserv Recycl 40(3):185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hashimoto S, Moriguchi Y, Saito A, Ono T (2004) Six indicators of material cycles for describing society’s metabolism: application to wood resource in Japan. Resour Conserv Recycl 40(3):201–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. OECD working party on pollution prevention and control (2000) Reference manual on strategic waste prevention. ENV/EPOC/PPC(2000)5/FINAL. OECD, Paris

  27. OECD (2002) OECD workshop on waste prevention: Toward performance indicators. ENV/EPOC/WGWPR/SE(2002)1/FINAL, OECD, Paris

  28. OECD working group on waste prevention and recycling, working group on environmental information and outlooks (2004) Towards waste prevention performance indicators: Part 1: Pressure indicators and drivers for waste generation, Part 2: Response indicators, Part3: Indicators based on material flow accounts. ENV/EPOC/WGWPR/SE(2004)1/FINAL, OECD, Paris

  29. EU (2008) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (Text with EEA relevance). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008L0098. Accessed 23 Jan 2015

  30. EU (2011) Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (recast) (Text with EEA relevance). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32011L0065&from=EN. Accessed 23 Jan 2015

  31. EU (2004) Directive 2004/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:f8128bcf-ee21-4b9c-b506-e0eaf56868e6.0004.02/DOC_1&format=PDF. Accessed 23 Jan 2015

  32. MOE, Japan (2005) Fundamental plan for establishing a sound material-cycle society. https://www.env.go.jp/en/recycle/smcs/f_plan.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2015

  33. Government of Japan (2008) Fundamental plan for establishing a sound material-cycle society (Tentative translation by Ministry of the Environment). http://www.env.go.jp/en/recycle/smcs/2nd-f_plan.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2015

  34. Takiguchi H, Takemoto K (2008) Japanese 3R policies based on material flow analysis. J Ind Ecol 12(5–6):792–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zaman AU, Lehmann S (2013) The zero waste index: a performance measurement tool for waste management system in a “zero waste city”. J Clean Prod 50:123–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zaman AU (2014) Identification of key assessment indicators of the zero waste management systems. Ecol Ind 36:682–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shen L, Ochoa JJ, Shah MN, Zhang X (2011) The application of urban sustainability indicators—a comparison between various practices. Habitat International 35(1):17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. EC (2005) Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions—taking sustainable use of resource forward—a Thematic Strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste. COM/2005/0666 final

  39. The Environment Council. (2004) NRWF household waste prevention toolkit

  40. WRAP website, Household waste prevention toolkit, http://www.wrap.org.uk/content/household-waste-prevention-toolkit. Accessed 16 Feb 2015

  41. EC (2011) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions ‘Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe’. COM(2011) 571 final

  42. EU (2013) Decision No 1386/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 on a General Union Environment Action Programme to 2020 ‘Living well, within the limits of our planet’ (Text with EEA relevance). L 354/171

  43. EC (2014) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions ‘Towards a circular economy—a zero waste programme for Europe.’ COM(2014) 398 final

  44. EC (2012) Preparing a waste prevention programme—guidance document

  45. European Environment Agency (EEA) (2014) Waste prevention in Europe—the status in 2013. EEA, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  46. EIONET website, Quantitative targets. http://scp.eionet.europa.eu/facts/WPP. Accessed 13 Jan 2015

  47. UNEP (2006) Strategic approach to international chemicals management—SAICM texts and resolutions of the international conference on Chemical Management. UNEP, Geneva. http://www.saicm.org/images/saicm_documents/saicm%20texts/SAICM_publication_ENG.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2015

  48. SAICM secretariat, UNITAE, IOMC (2009) Guidance for developing SAICM implementation plans. 2009 Edition. http://www.saicm.org/images/saicm_documents/Publications/SIP%20Guidiance/Guidance%20for%20Developing%20SAICM%20Implementation%20Plans%20_3Nov09__2009%20edition_Final_En.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2015

  49. Yano J, Hirai Y, Okamoto K, Sakai S (2013) Dynamic flow analysis of current and future end-of-life vehicles generation and lead content in automobile shredder residue. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 16(1):52–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. EC (2011) Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe (COM(2011) 571 final). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0571&from=EN. Accessed 26 Jan 2015

  51. European Parliament (2012) Resolution of 19 January 2012 on how to avoid food wastage: strategies for a more efficient food chain in the EU (2011/2175 (INI))

  52. EC (2014) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2008/98/EC on waste, 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste, 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste, 2000/53/EC on end-of-life vehicles, 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and 2012/19/EU on waste electrical and electronic equipment (Text with EEA relevance). COM(2014) 397 final

  53. MOE, MAFF, Japan (2013) Law for Promotion of Recycling and Related Activities for the Treatment of Cyclical Food Cyclical Resources. http://law.e-gov.go.jp/htmldata/H12/H12HO116.html. Accessed 26 Jan 2015 (in Japanese)

  54. UNEP (2012) Annex II Inclusion of new activities relating to the environmentally sound management of nanotechnologies and manufactured nanomaterials and hazardous substances within the life-cycle of electrical and electronic products in the Global Plan of Action of the Strategic Approach. http://www.saicm.org/images/ICCM3%20Annex%20II-e.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2015

  55. Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare (2013) Il Programma Nazionale di Prevenzione dei Rifiuti. http://www.minambiente.it/sites/default/files/archivio/normativa/dm_07_10_2013_programma.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2015 (in Italian)

  56. Vides aizsardzības un reģionālās attīstības ministrija (2013) Atkritumu apsaimniekošanas valsts plans 2013.–2020.gadam. http://polsis.mk.gov.lv/view.do?id=4276. Accessed 13 Jan 2015 (in Latvian)

  57. Naturvårdsverket (2014) Tillsammans vinner vi på ett giftfritt och resurseffektivt samhälle—Sveriges program för att förebygga avfall 2014-2017. http://www.naturvardsverket.se/Nerladdningssida/?fileType=pdf&downloadUrl=/upload/miljoarbete-i-samhallet/miljoarbete-i-sverige/avfall/avfallsforebyggande-programmet/avfallsforebyggande-programmet-giftfritt-resurseffektivt-samhalle.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2015 (in Swedish)

  58. Oguchi M, Murakami S, Sakanakura H, Kida A, Kameya T (2011) A preliminary categorization of end-of-life electrical and electronic equipment as secondary metal resources. Waste Manag 31(9–10):2150–2160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Brook Lyndhurst, Social Marketing Practice, Resource Recovery Forum (2009) WR1204: Household Waste Prevention Evidence Review. A project for Defra’s WREP

  60. Read M, Gregory MK, Phillips PS (2009) An evaluation of four key methods for monitoring household waste prevention campaigns in the UK. Resource, Conservation and Recycling 54(1):9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Sharp V, Giorgi S, Wilson DC (2010) Delivery and impact of household waste prevention intervention campaigns (at local level). Waste Manage Res 28(3):256–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zorpas AA, Lasaridi K (2013) Measuring waste prevention. Waste Manag 33(5):1047–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Sharp V, Giorgi S, Wilson DC (2010) Methods to monitor and evaluate household waste prevention. Waste Manage Res 28(3):269–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Møller H, Hanssen OJ, Gustavsson J, Östergren K, Stenmarck Å, Dekhtyar P (2014) Report on review of (food) waste reporting methodology and practice. Ostfold Research, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  65. Møller H, Hanssen OJ, Svanes E, Hartikainen H, Silvennoinen K, Gustavsson J, Östergren K, Schneider F, Soethoudt H, Canali M, Politano A, Gaiani S, Redlingshöfer B, Moates G, Waldron K, Stenmarck Å (2014) Standard approach on quantitative techniques to be used to estimate food waste levels. Ostfold Research, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  66. DORSET Country Council (2010) Waste prevention in Dorset -Key lessons from a selection of campaign initiatives

  67. Tasaki T, Yamakawa H (2011) An estimation of the effectiveness of waste prevention by using point-of-sales (POS) data -the case of refills for shampoo and hair conditioner in Japan. Resource, Conservation and Recycling 57:61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. WRAP (2009) Household food and drink waste in the UK. WRAP, Banbury

    Google Scholar 

  69. WRI (2013) Reducing food loss and waste. WRI, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  70. FAO (2011) Global food losses and food waste. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  71. WRAP (2013) Final Report on Household Food and Drink Waste in the United Kingdom 2012. WRAP, Banbury

    Google Scholar 

  72. Beretta C, Stoessel F, Baier U, Hellweg S (2013) Quantifying food losses and the potential for reduction in Switzerland. Waste Manag 33(3):764–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Lebersorger S, Schneider F (2011) Discussion on the methodology for determining food waste in household waste composition studies. Waste Manag 31(9–10):1924–1933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. MAFF, Japan website, Food loss statistics (in Japanese). http://www.maff.go.jp/j/tokei/kouhyou/syokuhin_loss/. Accessed 2013 Nov 26

  75. Takatsuki H (1983) Study of packing materials and domestic waste. J Env Conserv Eng 12(7):425–432 (in Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Östergren K, Gustavsson J, Bos-Brouwers H, Timmermans T, Hansen O, Møller H, Anderson G, O’Connor C, Soethoudt H, Quested T, Easteal S, Politano A, Bellettato C, Canali M, Falasconi L, Gaiani S, Vittuari M, Schneider F, Moates G, Waldron K, Redlingshöfer B (2014) FUSIONS definitional framework for food waste full report. The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  77. WRI website, Food Loss & Waste Protocol, http://www.wri.org/our-work/project/food-loss-waste-protocol. Accessed 10 Feb 2015

  78. Salhofer S, Obersteiner G, Schneider F, Lebersorger S (2008) Potentials for the prevention of municipal solid waste. Waste Manag 28:245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Nessi S, Rigamonti L, Grosso M (2013) Discussion on methods to include prevention activities in waste management LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1358–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Cleary J (2010) The incorporation of waste prevention activities into life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: methodological issues. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:579–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Yamakawa H, Watanabe K, Fukuoka M, Sugiura J, Satoh M, Tasaki T, Hashimoto S, Motoshita M (2011) Report on systematization and application of analytical and evaluative methods of waste prevention. (in Japanese)

  82. Schneider F (2013) The evolution of food donation with respect to waste prevention. Waste Manag 33(3):755–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. European Union Committee (2014) Counting the cost of food waste: EU food waste prevention

  84. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Barr S, Gilg AW, Ford NJ (2001) A conceptual framework for understanding and analysing attitudes towards household-waste management. Environ Plan A 33(11):2025–2048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Barr S, Gilg AW, Ford NJ (2001) Differences between household waste reduction, reuse and recycling behaviour: a study of reported behaviours, intentions and explanatory variable. Environ Waste Manag 4(2):69–82

    Google Scholar 

  87. Tonglet M, Phillips PS, Read AD (2004) Using the theory of planned behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour: a case study from Brixworth, UK. Res Conserv Recycl 41(3):191–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Defra (2005) UK Sustainable Development Strategy, Securing the Future

  89. Tucker P, Douglas P (2007) WR0112: understanding household waste prevention behaviour, technical report no. 3: conceptual and operational model of household waste prevention behaviour

  90. Tonglet M, Phillips PS, Bates MP (2004) Determining the drivers for householder pro-environmental behaviour: waste minimisation compared to recycling. Res Conserv Recycl 42(1):27–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Bortoleto AP, Kurisu KH, Hanaki K (2012) Model development for household waste prevention behaviour. Waste Manag 32(12):2195–2207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Stefan V, van Herpen E, Tudoran AA, Lähteenmäki L (2013) Avoiding food waste by Romanian consumers: the importance of planning and shopping routines. Food Qual Prefer 28(1):375–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Kurisu KY, Bortoleto AP (2011) Comparison of waste prevention behaviors among three Japanese megacity regions in the context of local measures and socio-demographics. Waste Manag 31(7):1441–1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Ebreo A, Vining J (2001) How similar and reasons for reducing waste as predictors of self-reported behaviour. Environ Behav 33(3):424–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Ackroyd J, Coulter B, Phillips PS, Read AD (2003) Business excellence through resource efficiency (BETRE): an evaluation of the UKs highest recruiting, facilitated self-help waste minimisation project. Resour Conserv Recycl 38(4):271–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Ackroyd J, Jespersen S, Doyle A, Phillips PS (2008) A critical appraisal of the UK’s largest rural waste minimisation project: business excellence through resource efficiency (betre) rural in East Sussex, England. Res Conversat Recycl 52(6):896–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. WRAP. LOVE FOOD hate waste, http://www.lovefoodhatewaste.com/. Accessed 10 Feb 2015

  98. FUSIONS website, http://www.eu-fusions.org/. Accessed 10 Feb 2015

  99. Hanssen O. J, Stenmarck Å, Dekhtyar P, O’Connor C, Östergren K (2014) Review of EUROSTATs reporting method and statistics

  100. Consumer Affairs Agency, Japan website, The NO-FOODLOSS PROJECT, http://www.caa.go.jp/adjustments/index_9.html. Accessed 10 Feb 2015 (in Japanese)

  101. FAO website, The No-Foodloss Project in Japan, http://www.fao.org/save-food/news-and-multimedia/news/news-details/en/c/242644. Accessed 10 Feb 2015

  102. Matsumoto city website, http://www.city.matsumoto.nagano.jp/shisei/kankyojoho/syokuhin_loss.html. Accessed 10 Feb 2015 (in Japanese)

  103. Kyoto city, gomigen-net website, information center for food waste in Kyoto. http://www.sukkiri-kyoto.com/index.html. Accessed 10 Feb 2015 (in Japanese)

  104. Skovgaard M, Hedal N, Villanueva A, Andersen F. M, Larsen H (2008) Municipal waste management and greenhouse gases. ETC/RWM working paper

  105. Bakas I, Sieck M, Hermann T, Andersen F. M, Larsen H (2011) Projections of municipal waste management and greenhouse gases. ETC/SCP working paper

  106. MOE, Japan(2009)Report on reduction effects on resource consumption and environmental impacts through 3R. (in Japanese)

  107. MOE, Japan(2010)Report on reduction effects on environmental impacts through 3R. (in Japanese)

  108. Munesue Y, Masui T, Fushima T (2014) The effects of reducing food losses and food waste on global food insecurity natural resources and greenhouse gas emissions. Environ Eco Policy Stud 17(1):43–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Ekvall T, Assefa GB, Jörklund A, Eriksson O, Finnveden G (2007) What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management. Waste Manag 27(8):989–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Cleary J (2010) The incorporation of waste prevention activities into life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: methodological issues. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:579–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Nessi S, Rigamonti L, Grosso M (2013) Discussion on methods to include prevention activities in waste management LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1358–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Joint Research Centre of the European Commission (2011) Supporting environmentally sound decisions for waste management: a technical guide to life cycle thinking (LCT) and life cycle assessment (LCA) for waste experts and LCA practitioners. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra, Italy

  113. Monier V, Mudgal S, Escalon V, O’Connor C, Anderson G, Reisinger H, Dolley P, Ogilvie S, Morton G. G (2010) Preparatory study on food waste across EU27. Final report. European Commission (DG ENV) Directorate C-Industry (Ed.), Contract #: 07.0307/2009/540024/SER/G4

  114. Bernstad Saraiva Schott A, Andersson T (2015) Food waste minimization from a life cycle perspective. J Environ Manage 147(1):219–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Matsuda T, Yano J, Hirai Y, Sakai S (2012) Life-cycle greenhouse gas inventory analysis of household waste management and food waste reduction activities in Kyoto, Japan. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(6):743–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Williams H, Wikström F (2010) Environmental impact of packaging and food losses in a life cycle perspective: a comparative analysis of five food items. J Clean Prod 19(1):43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Lankey RL, Mcmichael FC (2000) Life-cycle methods for comparing primary and rechargeable batteries. Environ Sci Technol 34(11):2299–2304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Parsons D (2007) The environmental impact of disposable versus re-chargeable batteries for consumer use. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(3):197–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Zink T, Maker F, Geyer R, Amirtharajah R, Akella V (2014) Comparative life cycle assessment of smartphone reuse: repurposing vs. refurbishment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(5):1099–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environment Preservation Research Center, Kyoto University, Yoshida Honmachi, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan

    Junya Yano & Shin-ichi Sakai

Authors
  1. Junya Yano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shin-ichi Sakai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junya Yano.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 29 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yano, J., Sakai, Si. Waste prevention indicators and their implications from a life cycle perspective: a review. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 18, 38–56 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-015-0406-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-015-0406-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation