Abstract
Background
A Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) has shown a one-to-one male-to-female mortality ratio, notwithstanding the statistically longer life expectancy of women in the general population. This finding contrasts with the recent report that Japanese women on dialysis treatment have a more favorable longevity. Accordingly, we further investigated the clinical procedures and outcomes to clarify the sex differences in Japanese patients undergoing dialysis treatment.
Methods
Subjects were incident dialysis patients who participated in a multicenter prospective cohort study from October 2011 to September 2013. The all-cause mortality was analyzed by a Cox proportional hazard regression model and studied separately in women and men with or without cardiovascular disease (CVD) at baseline.
Results
Overall, 492 (32.3%) of the 1520 test subjects were women. All-cause mortality was higher in men (28.6%) than in women (19.9%, p < 0.001). Female sex (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54–0.90) and history of CVD (HR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.18–1.95) were independent predictors of all-cause mortality. In patients without CVD, female gender was strong independent contributor (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.30–0.70, p < 0.001). In contrast, patients with CVD showed no difference in survival between the sexes (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.67–1.24, p = 0.597).
Conclusion
Our study demonstrated that women undergoing chronic dialysis therapy had a lower mortality risk than men. However, complication with CVD canceled out the survival advantage in Japanese women on chronic dialysis. We should reevaluate the risk of women with CVD undergoing dialysis and apply the optimal care for CVD.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Garcia M, Mulvagh SL, Merz CNB, Buring JE, Manson JE. Cardiovascular disease in women: clinical perspectives. Circ Res. 2016;118:1273–93.
Regitz-Zagrosek V, Oertelt-Prigione S, Prescott E, Franconi F, Gerdts E, Foryst-Ludwig A, et al. Gender in cardiovascular diseases: impact on clinical manifestations, management, and outcomes. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:24–34.
Daly C, Clemens F, Lopez Sendon JL, Tavazzi L, Boersma E, Danchin N, et al. Gender differences in the management and clinical outcome of stable angina. Circulation. 2006;113:490–8.
Poon S, Goodman SG, Yan RT, Bugiardini R, Bierman AS, Eagle KA, et al. Bridging the gender gap: Insights from a contemporary analysis of sex-related differences in the treatment and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J. 2012;163:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2011.09.025.
Hess CN, McCoy LA, Duggirala HJ, Tavris DR, O’Callaghan K, Douglas PS, et al. Sex-based differences in outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarct. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3: e000523.
Hecking M, Bieber BA, Ethier J, Kautzky-Willer A, Sunder-Plassmann G, Säemann MD, et al. Sex-specific differences in hemodialysis prevalence and practices and the male-to-female mortality rate: the dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study (DOPPS). PLOS Med. 2014;11: e1001750.
Carrero JJ, de Jager DJ, Verduijn M, Ravani P, de Meester J, Heaf JG, et al. Cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality among men and women starting dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:1722–30.
Carrero JJ, De Mutsert R, Axelsson J, Dekkers OM, Jager KJ, Boeschoten EW, et al. Sex differences in the impact of diabetes on mortality in chronic dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:270–6.
Artan AS, Kircelli F, Ok E, Yilmaz M, Asci G, Dogan C, et al. Dialyzing women and men: Does it matter? An observational study. Clin Kidney J. 2016;9:486–93.
Adams SV, Rivara M, Streja E, Cheung AK, Arah OA, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Mehrotra R. Sex differences in hospitalizations with maintenance hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:2721–8.
Hata J, Kiyohara Y. Epidemiology of stroke and coronary artery disease in Asia. Circ J. 2013;77:1923–32.
Finegold JA, Asaria P, Francis DP. Mortality from ischaemic heart disease by country, region, and age: Statistics from World Health Organisation and United Nations. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:934–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.046.
Hishida M, Tamai H, Morinaga T, Maekawa M, Aoki T, Tomida H, et al. Aichi cohort study of the prognosis in patients newly initiated into dialysis (AICOPP): Baseline characteristics and trends observed in diabetic nephropathy. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2016;20:795–807.
Okazaki M, Inaguma D, Imaizumi T, Kada A, Yaomura T, Tsuboi N, et al. Unfavorable effects of history of volume overload and late referral to a nephrologist on mortality in patients initiating dialysis: a multicenter prospective cohort study in Japan. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19:1.
Numasawa Y, Kohsaka S, Miyata H, Noma S, Suzuki M, Ishikawa S, et al. Gender differences in-hospital clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions: an insight from a Japanese multicenter registry. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0116496.
Regitz-Zagrosek V, Lehmkuhl E, Hocher B, Goesmann D, Lehmkuhl HB, Hausmann H, Hetzer R. Gender as a risk factor in young, not in old, women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:2413–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.09.031.
Malas MB, Canner JK, Hicks CW, Arhuidese IJ, Zarkowsky DS, Qazi U, et al. Trends in incident hemodialysis access and mortality. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:441–8.
Ozeki T, Shimizu H, Fujita Y, Inaguma D, Maruyama S, Ohyama Y, et al. The type of vascular access and the incidence of mortality in Japanese dialysis patients. Intern Med. 2017;56:481–5.
Ros S, Remón C, Qureshi AR, Quiros P, Lindholm B, Carrero JJ. Increased risk of fatal infections in women starting peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 2013;33:487–94.
Hasegawa T, Bragg-Gresham JL, Yamazaki S, Fukuhara S, Akizawa T, Kleophas W, et al. Greater first-year survival on hemodialysis in facilities in which patients are provided earlier and more frequent pre-nephrology visits. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4:595–602.
Hayashi T, Kimura T, Yasuda K, Sasaki K, Obi Y, Nagayama H, et al. Early nephrology referral 6 months before dialysis initiation can reduce early death but does not improve long-term cardiovascular outcome on dialysis. Circ J. 2016;80:1008–16.
Carrero JJ, Hecking M, Ulasi I, Sola L, Thomas B. Chronic kidney disease, gender, and access to care: A global perspective. Semin Nephrol. 2017;37:296–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2017.02.009.
Ashuntantang GE, Garovic VD, Heilberg IP, Lightstone L. Kidneys and women’s health: Key challenges and considerations. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14:203–10.
World Health Organization. Tobacco use data by country. Available from https://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.1805?lang=en
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YK and TM participated in the design of the study and interpretation of the data. DI surveyed and collected information about prognosis. TM and TI performed the statistical analyses. YK drafted the manuscript, and AF, TI, HT, TK, and SM revised it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee at the locations where the studies were conducted (IRB approval number R18-069) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The AICOPP study was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network on January 18, 2012 (ID 000007096).
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all recruited individual participants included in the AICOPP study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kozaki, Y., Morinaga, T., Fukatsu, A. et al. Sex differences in clinical outcomes in Japanese incident dialysis patients: a prospective observational multicenter study. Clin Exp Nephrol 26, 466–475 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-021-02168-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-021-02168-8