Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The choice of comorbidity scoring system in Chinese peritoneal dialysis patients

  • Original article
  • Published:
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Several comorbidity scoring systems have been developed and validated, mostly in western hemodialysis patients with a high risk of cardiovascular disease. The performance of comorbidity scoring, however, depends on the patient population. In this study, we determine the optimal comorbidity scoring system for predicting survival of incident Chinese PD patients.

Methods

We studied 461 incident PD patients. The performance of Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Hemmelgarn score, and Liu score as the survival predictor was compared.

Results

The mean age was 57.7 ± 13.7 years. The median CCI, Hemmelgarn, and Liu scores were 4 [inter-quartile range (IQR) 2–5], 1 (IQR 0–2), and 4 (IQR 2–5), respectively. Patients were followed for 45.5 ± 33.0 months. All 3 comorbidity scores were predictors of patient survival by univariate analysis. After adjusting for confounding factors, CCI was the best predictor of patient survival among the 3 indices, with each point increase in CCI conferring 31% excess in mortality risk [95% confidence interval (CI) 21–41%, p < 0.001]. In contrast, each point increase in Liu score confers 20% excess in mortality risk (95% CI 13–27%, p < 0.001). Although the Hemmelgarn score is an independent predictor of patient survival, over 70% of patients score 0 or 1 by this system, limiting its role as a prognostic marker.

Conclusion

CCI should be the preferred method for quantifying comorbidity load in incident Chinese PD patients, and it is a good predictor of survival in this group of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bowling CB, O’Hare AM. Managing older adults with CKD: individualized versus disease-based approaches. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;59:293–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. de Groot V, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. How to measure comorbidity. a critical review of available methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:221–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fried L, Bernardini J, Piraino B. Charlson Comorbidity Index as a predictor of outcomes in incident peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;37:337–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fried L, Bernardini J, Piraino B. Comparison of the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the Davies score as a predictor of outcomes in PD patients. Perit Dial Int. 2003;23:568–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Iorio B, Cillo N, Cirillo M, De Santo NG. Charlson Comorbidity Index is a predictor of outcomes in incident hemodialysis patients and correlates with phase angle and hospitalization. Int J Artif Organs. 2004;27:330–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Davies SJ, Russell L, Bryan J, Phillips L, Russell GI. Comorbidity, urea kinetics, and appetite in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients: their interrelationship and prediction of survival. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995;26:353–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Khan IH, Catto GR, Edward N, Fleming LW, Henderson IS, MacLeod AM. Influence of coexisting disease on survival on renal-replacement therapy. Lancet. 1993;341:415–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van Manen JG, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW, Boeschoten EW, Bossuyt PM. Krediet RT How to adjust for comorbidity in survival studies in ESRD patients: a comparison of different indices. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;40:82–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miskulin DC, Martin AA, Brown R, Fink NE, Coresh J, Powe NR, Zager PG, Meyer KB, Levey AS. Predicting 1 year mortality in an outpatient haemodialysis population: a comparison of comorbidity instruments. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19:413–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hemmelgarn BR, Manns BJ, Quan H, Ghali WA. Adapting the Charlson Comorbidity Index for use in patients with ESRD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42:125–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu J, Huang Z, Gilbertson DT, Foley RN, Collins AJ. An improved comorbidity index for outcome analyses among dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2010;77:141–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kwan BC, Szeto CC. Is peritoneal dialysis kinder for the heart? Perit Dial Int. 2011;31:135–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Twardowski ZJ, Nolph KD, Khanna R, Prowant BF, Ryan LP, Moore HL, Neilsen MP. Peritoneal equilibration test. Perit Dial Bull. 1987;7:138–47.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mak TW, Cheung CK, Cheung CM, Leung CB, Lam CW, Lai KN. Interference of creatinine measurement in CAPD fluid was dependent on glucose and creatinine concentrations. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1997;12:184–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Krediet RT, Boeschoten EW, Zuyderhoudt FM, Strackee J, Arisz L. Simple assessment of the efficacy of peritoneal transport in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Blood Purif. 1986;4:194–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nolph KD, Moore HL, Twardowski ZJ, Khanna R, Prowant B, Meyer M, Ponferrada L. Cross-sectional assessment of weekly urea and creatinine clearances in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. ASAIO J. 1992;38:M139–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Olden RW, Krediet RT, Struijk DG, Arisz L. Measurement of residual renal function in patients treated with continuous peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996;7:745–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Enia G, Sicuso C, Alati G, Zoccali C. Subjective global assessment of nutrition in dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1993;8:1094–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kopple JD, Block G, Humphreys MH. A malnutrition inflammation score is correlated with morbidity and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38:1251–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bergstrom J, Heimburger O, Lindholm B. Calculation of the protein equivalent of total nitrogen appearance from urea appearance. Which formulas should be used? Perit Dial Int. 1998;18:467–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Forbes GB, Brunining GJ. Urinary creatinine excretion and lean body mass. Am J Clin Nutr. 1976;29:1359–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu PH, Lin YT, Lee TC, Lin MY, Kuo MC, Chiu YW, Hwang SJ, Chen HC. Predicting mortality of incident dialysis patients in Taiwan—a longitudinal population-based study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e61930.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jang SH, Chea JW, Lee KB. Charlson Comorbidity Index using administrative database in incident PD patients. Clin Nephrol. 2010;73:204–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rattanasompattikul M, Feroze U, Molnar MZ, Dukkipati R, Kovesdy CP, Nissenson AR, Norris KC, Kopple JD, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Charlson comorbidity score is a strong predictor of mortality in hemodialysis patients. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012;44:1813–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ho YW, Chau KF, Choy BY, Fung KS, Cheng YL, Kwan TH, Wong PN, Lai WM, Yuen SK, Lo SH, Chan CK, Leung CB. Hong Kong renal registry report 2012. Hong Kong J Nephrol. 2013;15:28–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Miskulin DC, Meyer KB, Martin AA, Fink NE, Coresh J, Powe NR, Klag MJ, Levey AS. Comorbidity and its change predict survival in incident dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;41:149–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheuk Chun Szeto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This study was supported by the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) research accounts 6901031. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Dr. CC Szeto receives research grant and consultancy from Baxter Healthcare. The authors declare no other conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee at which the studies were conducted and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Chinese University of Hong Kong (IRB Approval Number CREC-2008.276).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, T.KW., Chow, K.M., Kwan, B.CH. et al. The choice of comorbidity scoring system in Chinese peritoneal dialysis patients. Clin Exp Nephrol 22, 159–166 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-017-1418-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-017-1418-5

Keywords

Navigation