Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

VAAFT for complex anal fistula: a useful tool, however, cure is unlikely

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Therapeutic options for complex anal fistula (CAF) are limited. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) allows examination of these anatomically complex fistulae from within. The aim of the present study was to evaluate outcomes of VAAFT for a series of CAF.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on consecutive patients at a single centre with complex anal cryptoglandular and Crohn’s fistulae managed with VAAFT from June 2016 to June 2019. CAF was diagnosed as high intersphincteric/transsphincteric tract, multiple/secondary tracts, horseshoe or anovaginal fistulae. Patients were treated with ‘therapeutic intent’ if the internal opening was closed at the time of ablation and ‘diagnostic/staged/palliative’ VAAFT if there was no ablation/partial treatment/ablation-only, respectively. Symptom improvement was a reduction in reported pain, discharge, or pad use.

Results

Eighty-four patients (73 cryptoglandular, 11 Crohn’s, M:F 2.5:1, median age 43 [22–77] years), underwent 105 VAAFT procedures. Twenty patients had > 1 VAAFT. Median follow-up was 8 (1–46) months. 40 (48%) had multiple or secondary tracts; an additional 16 (19%) had horseshoe and 3 (4%) anovaginal fistulae. Of the 84 patients, 19 [16/73 (22%) cryptoglandular and 3/11 (27%) Crohn’s fistulae] healed. 34 (40%) unhealed reported improved symptoms; 23 (27%) no improvement; and 6 (7%) were worse. Sixteen (19%) had CAF > 5 years of whom none healed, albeit 50% reported symptom improvement. Five patients (6%) developed faecal incontinence: 2 temporary, 1 to flatus only and 1 to liquid and 1 to solid, all managed conservatively.

Conclusions

VAAFT is a useful minimally invasive procedure for complex fistula with no other minimally invasive options. Complete healing is rare, and, although symptoms can be improved in a number of cases, there is a small risk of incontinence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

References

  1. Seow-Choen F, Nicholls RJ (1992) Anal fistula. BJS Br J Surg 79(3):197–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sainio P (1984) Fistula-in-ano in a defined population. Incidence and epidemiological aspects. Ann Chir Gynaecol 73(4):219–224.

  3. Tozer P, Sala S, Cianci V, Kalmar K, Atkin GK, Rahbour G et al (2013) Fistulotomy in the tertiary setting can achieve high rates of fistula cure with an acceptable risk of deterioration in continence. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 17(11):1960–1965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Steele SR, Kumar R, Feingold DL, Rafferty JL, Buie WD, Standards Practice Task Force of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the management of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(12):1465–1474.

  5. Lunniss PJ, Kamm MA, Phillips RK (1994) Factors affecting continence after surgery for anal fistula. Br J Surg 81(9):1382–1385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vogel JD, Johnson EK, Morris AM, Paquette IM, Saclarides TJ, Feingold DL et al (2016) Clinical practice guideline for the management of anorectal abscess, fistula-in-ano, and rectovaginal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 59(12):1117–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meinero P, Mori L (2011) Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT): a novel sphincter-saving procedure for treating complex anal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol 15(4):417–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Narang SK, Keogh K, Alam NN, Pathak S, Daniels IR, Smart NJ (2017) A systematic review of new treatments for cryptoglandular fistula in ano. Surg J R Coll Surg Edinb Irel 15(1):30–39

    Google Scholar 

  9. La Torre M, Lisi G, D’Agostino E, Boccuzzi M, Campanelli M, Varriale M et al (2020) Lift and VAAFT for high trans-sphincteric anal fistula: a single center retrospective analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 35(6):1149–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zarin M, Khan MI, Ahmad M, Ibrahim M, Khan MA (2015) VAAFT: video assisted anal fistula treatment; bringing revolution in fistula treatment. Pak J Med Sci 31(5):1233–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang H-H, Liu H-L, Li Z, Xiao Y-H, Li A-J, Chang Y et al (2017) Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) for complex anal fistula: a preliminary evaluation in China. Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res 30(23):2065–2071

    Google Scholar 

  12. Seow-En I, Seow-Choen F, Koh PK (2016) An experience with video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) with new insights into the treatment of anal fistulae. Tech Coloproctol 20(6):389–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu H, Tang X, Chang Y, Li A, Li Z, Xiao Y et al (2020) Comparison of surgical outcomes between video-assisted anal fistula treatment and fistulotomy plus seton for complex anal fistula: a propensity score matching analysis - Retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg Lond Engl 75:99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mendes CRS, Ferreira LS de M, Sapucaia RA, Lima MA, Araujo SEA. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment: technical considerations and preliminary results of the first Brazilian experience. Arq Bras Cir Dig ABCD Braz Arch Dig Surg. 2014;27(1):77–81.

  15. Kochhar G, Saha S, Andley M, Kumar A, Saurabh G, Pusuluri R, et al. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment. JSLS. 2014;18(3).

  16. Emile SH, Elfeki H, Shalaby M, Sakr A (2018) A Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT). Surg Endosc 32(4):2084–2093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wałęga P, Romaniszyn M, Nowak W (2014) VAAFT: a new minimally invasive method in the diagnostics and treatment of anal fistulas–initial results. Pol Przegl Chir 86(1):7–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Adegbola SO, Sahnan K, Pellino G, Tozer PJ, Hart A, Phillips RKS et al (2017) Short-term efficacy and safety of three novel sphincter-sparing techniques for anal fistulae: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 21(10):775–782

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Garg P, Singh P (2017) Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) in Cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis. Int J Surg Lond Engl 46:85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lopez MPJ, Onglao MAS, Monroy HJ (2020) Initial experience with video-assisted anal fistula treatment in the philippines. Ann Coloproctol 36(2):112–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Regusci L, Fasolini F, Meinero P, Caccia G, Ruggeri G, Serati M et al (2020) Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) for complex anorectal fistula: efficacy and risk factors for failure at 3-year follow-up. Tech Coloproctol 24(7):741–746

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Adegbola SO, Sahnan K, Tozer PJ, Strouhal R, Hart AL, Lung PFC et al (2018) Symptom amelioration in crohn’s perianal fistulas using video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT). J Crohns Colitis 12(9):1067–1072

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwandner O (2013) Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) combined with advancement flap repair in Crohn’s disease. Tech Coloproctol 17(2):221–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chowbey PK, Khullar R, Sharma A, Soni V, Najma K, Baijal M (2015) Minimally invasive anal fistula treatment (MAFT)—an appraisal of early results in 416 patients. Indian J Surg 77(Suppl 2):716–721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Meinero P, Mori L, Gasloli G (2014) Video-assisted anal fistula treatment: a new concept of treating anal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 57(3):354–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Romaniszyn M, Walega P. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment: pros and cons of this minimally invasive method for treatment of perianal fistulas. Gastroenterol Res Pract [Internet]. 2017. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5478827/. (Accessed 2020 Nov 15)

  27. Giarratano G, Shalaby M, Toscana C, Sileri P (2020) Video-assisted anal fistula treatment for complex anal fistula: a long-term follow-up study. Colorectal Dis 22(8):939–944

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cheung F, Appleton N, Rout S, Kalaiselvan R, Nicholson J, Samad A et al (2018) Video-assisted anal fistula treatment: a high volume unit initial experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 100(1):37–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Owen HA, Buchanan GN, Schizas A, Cohen R, Williams AB (2016) Quality of life with anal fistula. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 98(5):334–338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Panes J, Reinisch W, Rupniewska E, Khan S, Forns J, Khalid JM et al (2018) Burden and outcomes for complex perianal fistulas in Crohn’s disease: systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 24(42):4821–4834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim AH, Roberts C, Feagan BG, Banerjee R, Bemelman W, Bodger K et al (2018) Developing a standard set of patient-centred outcomes for inflammatory bowel disease—an international cross-disciplinary consensus. J Crohns Colitis 12(4):408–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Adegbola SO, Dibley L, Sahnan K, Wade T, Verjee A, Sawyer R, et al. Development and initial psychometric validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for Crohn’s perianal fistula: the Crohn’s Anal Fistula Quality of Life (CAF-QoL) scale. Gut 2020.

  33. Ferrer-Márquez M, Espínola-Cortés N, Reina-Duarte A, Granero-Molina J, Fernández-Sola C, Hernández-Padilla JM (2017) Design and psychometric evaluation of the quality of life in patients with anal fistula questionnaire. Dis Colon Rectum 60(10):1083–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank our gastrointestinal radiology colleagues Dr Peter Boavida and Dr Kamini Patel for their expertise.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have made substantial contributions to the conception and analysis of the work. They have all been involved in the drafting or revising of the work and have approved the final version for publication. They all agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. J. G. Chase.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards

This study was registered within the Trust as an audit (Ref. Number 2255-3833) and approval was gained from the data protection officer. The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chase, T.J.G., Quddus, A., Selvakumar, D. et al. VAAFT for complex anal fistula: a useful tool, however, cure is unlikely. Tech Coloproctol 25, 1115–1121 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02492-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02492-x

Keywords

Navigation