Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

rSILS: initial clinical experience with single-port robotic (SPr) right colectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The da Vinci Single-Port (SP) robot is a novel platform designed to facilitate single-incision robotic surgery (rSILS). The objective of this study was to describe our initial experience using this platform for SP robotic (SPr) right colectomy.

Methods

Under a Food and Drug Administration-regulated feasibility study and Institutional Review Board approval, a patient with cecal adenocarcinoma underwent an SPr right colectomy. The primary endpoint was the safety and feasibility of the first SPr right colectomy performed in the USA. Secondary endpoints included perioperative metrics, morbidity and mortality.

Results

An SPr Standard right colectomy was performed through a 4-cm single incision without the need for conversion or additional port placement. Estimated blood loss was 100 mL and there were no intraoperative complications. The robot was docked once with a docking time of 19 min. Total console time was 116 min and operative time was 219 min. The patient tolerated clear liquids on postoperative day (POD) 0 and a low-residue diet on POD 1. The patient had flatus and a bowel movement on POD 1. She was discharged home on POD 3. Final pathology showed pT3N0 cecal adenocarcinoma with negative margins and 0/24 lymph nodes positive for disease.

Conclusions

Our initial experience demonstrates that an SPr right colectomy is feasible and can be safely completed. We completed an oncologic resection of a cecal adenocarcinoma without complications. The SP robot facilitates the utilization of robotic technology in a single-incision platform to perform colorectal procedures and offers promising benefits in the advancement of robotic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Salem JF, Gummadi S, Marks JH (2018) Minimally invasive surgical approaches to colon cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 27(2):303–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soc.2017.11.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Laparoscopically assisted colectomy is as safe and effective as open colectomy in people with colon cancer Abstracted from: Nelson H, Sargent D, Wieand HS, et al; for the Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2050–2059 (2004). Cancer Treat Rev 30 (8):707–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2004.09.001

  3. Group CS (2000) COLOR: a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. Dig Surg 17(6):617–622. https://doi.org/10.1159/000051971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH, Geisler DP (2008) Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 10(8):823–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01660.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne GH (2002) Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45(12):1689–1694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-7261-2(discussion 1695–1686)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maggiori L, Tuech JJ, Cotte E, Lelong B, Denost Q, Karoui M, Vicaut E, Panis Y (2018) Single-incision laparoscopy versus multiport laparoscopy for colonic surgery: a multicenter, double-blinded. Randomized Controlled Trial Ann Surg 268(5):740–746. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2008) Single-port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23(10):1013–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-008-0519-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marks JH, Montenegro GA, Shields MV, Frenkel JL, Marks GJ (2015) Single-port laparoscopic colorectal surgery shows equivalent or better outcomes to standard laparoscopic surgery: results of a 190-patient, 7-criterion case-match study. Surg Endosc 29(6):1492–1499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3830-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ostrowitz MB, Eschete D, Zemon H, DeNoto G (2009) Robotic-assisted single-incision right colectomy: early experience. Int J Med Robot 5(4):465–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Juo YY, Agarwal S, Luka S, Satey S, Obias V (2015) Single-incision robotic colectomy (SIRC) case series: initial experience at a single center. Surg Endosc 29(7):1976–1981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3896-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bae SU, Jeong WK, Baek SK (2017) Current status of robotic single-port colonic surgery. Int J Med Robot. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marks J, Ng S, Mak T (2017) Robotic transanal surgery (RTAS) with utilization of a next-generation single-port system: a cadaveric feasibility study. Tech Coloproctol 21(7):541–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1655-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marks JH, Salem JF, Anderson BK, Josse JM, Schoonyoung HP (2020) Single-port robotic left colectomy: first clinical experience using the SP robot (rSILS). Tech Coloproctol 24(1):57–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-02129-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lim MS, Melich G, Min BS (2013) Robotic single-incision anterior resection for sigmoid colon cancer: access port creation and operative technique. Surg Endosc 27(3):1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2549-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S (2010) Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc 24:2200–2205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. H Marks.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. John Marks has worked with Intuitive Surgical in a consultative role. They had no influence on the study design nor on the results or interpretation of data. Furthermore, they had no involvement in writing the manuscript and no influence in the decision to submit the article to this journal. All authors declare they have no conflict of interest

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Main Line Health Institutional Review Board. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individuals involved in the study

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marks, J.H., Kunkel, E., Salem, J. et al. rSILS: initial clinical experience with single-port robotic (SPr) right colectomy. Tech Coloproctol 24, 817–822 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02218-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02218-5

Keywords

Navigation