Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Short-term efficacy and safety of three novel sphincter-sparing techniques for anal fistulae: a systematic review

  • Review
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The surgical treatment of complex anal fistulae, particularly those involving a significant portion of the anal sphincter in which fistulotomy would compromise continence, is challenging. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT), fistula tract laser closure (FiLaC™) and over-the-scope clip (OTSC®) proctology system are all novel sphincter-sparing techniques targeted at healing anal fistulae. In this study, all published articles on these techniques were reviewed to determine efficacy, feasibility and safety.

Methods

A systematic search of major databases was performed using defined terms. All studies reporting on experience of these techniques were included and outcomes (fistula healing and safety) evaluated.

Results

Eighteen studies (VAAFT—12, FiLaC™—3, OTSC®—3) including 1245 patients were analysed. All were case series, and outcomes were heterogeneous with follow-up ranging from 6 to 69 months and short-term (< 1 year) healing rates of 64–100%. Morbidity was low with only minor complications reported. There was one report of minor incontinence following the first reported study of FiLaC™, and this was treated successfully at 6 months with rubber band ligation of hypertrophied prolapsed mucosa. There are inconsistencies in the technique in studies of VAAFT and FiLaC™.

Conclusions

All three techniques appear to be safe and feasible options in the management of anal fistulae, and short-term healing rates are acceptable with no sustained effect on continence. There is, however, a paucity of robust data with long-term outcomes. These techniques are thus welcome additions; however, their long-term place in the colorectal surgeon’s armamentarium, whether diagnostic or therapeutic, remains uncertain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dudukgian H (2011) Why do we have so much trouble treating anal fistula? World J Gastroenterol 17:3292. doi:10.3748/wjg.v17.i28.3292

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Atkin GK, Martins J, Tozer P et al (2011) For many high anal fistulas, lay open is still a good option. Tech Coloproctol 15:143–150. doi:10.1007/s10151-011-0676-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD et al (1996) Anal fistula surgery. Factors associated with recurrence and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 39:723–729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meinero P, Mori L (2011) Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT): a novel sphincter-saving procedure for treating complex anal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol 15:417–422. doi:10.1007/s10151-011-0769-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Prosst RL, Ehni W (2012) The OTSC® Proctology clip system for anorectal fistula closure: the ‘anal fistula claw’: case report. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 21:307–312. doi:10.3109/13645706.2012.692690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilhelm A (2011) A new technique for sphincter-preserving anal fistula repair using a novel radial emitting laser probe. Tech Coloproctol 15:445–449. doi:10.1007/s10151-011-0726-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwandner O (2013) Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) combined with advancement flap repair in Crohn’s disease. Tech Coloproctol 17:221–225. doi:10.1007/s10151-012-0921-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kochhar G, Saha S, Andley M et al (2014) Video-assisted anal fistula treatment. JSLS J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 18(e2014):00127. doi:10.4293/JSLS.2014.00127

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meinero P, Mori L, Gasloli G (2014) Video-assisted anal fistula treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 57:354–359. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mendes CRS, de Ferreira LSM, Sapucaia RA et al (2014) Video-assisted anal fistula treatment: technical considerations and preliminary results of the first Brazilian experience. Arq Bras Cir Dig 27:77–81

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wałęga P, Romaniszyn M, Nowak W (2014) VAAFT: a new minimally invasive method in the diagnostics and treatment of anal fistulas–initial results. Pol Przegl Chir 86:7–10. doi:10.2478/pjs-2014-0002

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grolich T, Skricka T, Robek O et al (2014) Role of video assisted anal fistula treatment in our management of fistula-in-ano. Acta Chir Iugosl 61:83–85. doi:10.2298/ACI1402083G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Seow-En I, Seow-Choen F, Koh PK (2016) An experience with video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) with new insights into the treatment of anal fistulae. Tech Coloproctol 20:389–393. doi:10.1007/s10151-016-1450-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang H, Liu H, Li Z et al (2017) Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) for complex anal fistula: a preliminary evaluation in China. Med Sci Monit 23:2065–2071. doi:10.12659/MSM.904055

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Selvarajan A (2015) Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT): Johor Bahru’s humble beginnings. Int J Integr Med Sci 2:175–177. doi:10.16965/ijims.2015.125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chowbey PK, Khullar R, Sharma A et al (2015) Minimally invasive anal fistula treatment (MAFT)—an appraisal of early results in 416 patients. Indian J Surg 77:716–721. doi:10.1007/s12262-013-0977-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pini Prato A, Zanaboni C, Mosconi M et al (2016) Preliminary results of video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) in children. Tech Coloproctol 20:279–285. doi:10.1007/s10151-016-1447-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zarin M, Khan MI, Ahmad M et al (2015) VAAFT: video assisted Anal fistula treatment; bringing revolution in Fistula treatment. Pak J Med Sci 31:716–721. doi:10.12669/pjms.315.6836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Öztürk E, Gülcü B (2014) Laser ablation of fistula tract. Dis Colon Rectum 57:360–364. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Giamundo P, Geraci M, Tibaldi L, Valente M (2014) Closure of fistula-in-ano with laser–FiLaC™: an effective novel sphincter-saving procedure for complex disease. Colorectal Dis 16:110–115. doi:10.1111/codi.12440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilhelm A, Fiebig A, Krawczak M (2017) Five years of experience with the FiLaC™ laser for fistula-in-ano management: long-term follow-up from a single institution. Tech Coloproctol. doi:10.1007/s10151-017-1599-7

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gautier M, Godeberge P, Ganansia R et al (2015) Easy clip to treat anal fistula tracts: a word of caution. Int J Colorectal Dis 30:621–624. doi:10.1007/s00384-015-2146-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mennigen R, Laukötter M, Senninger N, Rijcken E (2015) The OTSC® proctology clip system for the closure of refractory anal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol 19:241–246. doi:10.1007/s10151-015-1284-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Prosst RL, Joos AK (2016) Short-term outcomes of a novel endoscopic clipping device for closure of the internal opening in 100 anorectal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol. doi:10.1007/s10151-016-1537-0

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tozer P, Sala S, Cianci V et al (2013) Fistulotomy in the tertiary setting can achieve high rates of fistula cure with an acceptable risk of deterioration in continence. J Gastrointest Surg 17:1960–1965. doi:10.1007/s11605-013-2198-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zbar AP (2012) Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT): a novel sphincter-saving procedure to repair complex anal fistulas: response to comment by Chivate. Tech Coloproctol 16:467. doi:10.1007/s10151-012-0870-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chivate SD (2012) Comment on Meinero and Mori: video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT): a novel sphincter-saving procedure to repair complex anal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol 16:465-6-70. doi:10.1007/s10151-012-0873-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Giamundo P, Esercizio L, Geraci M et al (2015) Fistula-tract laser closure (FiLaC™): long-term results and new operative strategies. Tech Coloproctol. doi:10.1007/s10151-015-1282-9

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stijns J, Wasowicz DK, Zimmerman DDE (2017) Does laser fistuloplasty (FiLaC™) offer any benefit over surgical closure of the internal orifice? Tech Coloproctol. doi:10.1007/s10151-017-1626-8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wilhelm A (2017) Anal fistula surgery: what are the patients expecting from the surgeon? Tech Coloproctol 21:491–492. doi:10.1007/s10151-017-1642-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Akbari A (2011) The role of red blood cells in wound healing. doi:10.14288/1.0071773. https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0071773

  32. Prosst RL, Joos AK (2016) Short-term outcomes of a novel endoscopic clipping device for closure of the internal opening in 100 anorectal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol. doi:10.1007/s10151-016-1537-0

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kirschniak A, Kratt T, Stüker D et al (2007) A new endoscopic over-the-scope clip system for treatment of lesions and bleeding in the GI tract: first clinical experiences. Gastrointest Endosc 66:162–167. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2007.01.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mennigen R, Senninger N, Laukoetter MG (2014) Novel treatment options for perforations of the upper gastrointestinal tract: Endoscopic vacuum therapy and over-the-scope clips. World J Gastroenterol 20:7767–7776. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7767

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. van der Hagen SJ, Baeten CG, Soeters PB, van Gemert WG (2006) Long-term outcome following mucosal advancement flap for high perianal fistulas and fistulotomy for low perianal fistulas: recurrent perianal fistulas: failure of treatment or recurrent patient disease? Int J Colorectal Dis 21:784–790. doi:10.1007/s00384-005-0072-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kontovounisios C, Tekkis P, Tan E et al (2016) Adoption and success rates of perineal procedures for fistula-in-ano: a systematic review. Color Dis. doi:10.1111/codi.13330

    Google Scholar 

  37. Agha RA, Fowler AJ, Rajmohan S et al (2016) Preferred reporting of case series in surgery; the PROCESS guidelines. Int J Surg 36:319–323. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fistula Research Unit, St Mark’s Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK

    S. O. Adegbola, K. Sahnan, G. Pellino, P. J. Tozer, A. Hart, R. K. S. Phillips, J. Warusavitarne & O. D. Faiz

  2. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK

    S. O. Adegbola, K. Sahnan, P. J. Tozer, A. Hart, R. K. S. Phillips, J. Warusavitarne & O. D. Faiz

Authors
  1. S. O. Adegbola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Sahnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Pellino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. J. Tozer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Hart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. K. S. Phillips
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. Warusavitarne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. O. D. Faiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. O. Adegbola.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The present paper as a review of the literature was exempt from approval.

Informed consent

For this review of the literature, informed consent was not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adegbola, S.O., Sahnan, K., Pellino, G. et al. Short-term efficacy and safety of three novel sphincter-sparing techniques for anal fistulae: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 21, 775–782 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1699-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1699-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation