Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sacral neurostimulation for low anterior resection syndrome after radical resection for rectal cancer: evaluation of treatment with the LARS score

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Sacral neurostimulation (SNS) has proven to be an effective treatment modality for low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). The primary aim of this study is to investigate the impact of SNS on all symptoms of LARS, not merely on fecal incontinence. Furthermore, we wanted to evaluate whether the LARS score could be useful as a tool to evaluate SNS treatment.

Methods

All patients diagnosed with minor or major LARS, unresponsive to conservative therapy for fecal incontinence, who underwent sacral neuromodulation for LARS at Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium, were prospectively enrolled in the study. The primary endpoint was the reduction in the severity of LARS. This was assessed by validated questionnaires: the LARS score and the Wexner score.

Results

Eleven patients underwent definite implantation of the SNS device. All patients showed a substantial decrease in their Wexner scores: The mean score was reduced from 17.7 to 4.6 (Z: 2.93; p: 0.0033). Additionally, the mean LARS score dropped from 36.9 to 11.4 (Z: 2.93; p: 0.0033). Furthermore, there was a significant amelioration of all symptoms of LARS.

Conclusions

Our study shows that SNS is effective for all symptoms of LARS. The authors believe that in patients who receive SNS for LARS, it could be useful to determine the LARS score to evaluate the complexity of the symptoms and their response to treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pachler J, Wille-Jørgensen P (2005) Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cornish JA, Tilney HS, Heriot AG et al (2007) A meta-analysis of quality of life for abdominoperineal excision of rectum versus anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:2056–2068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S (2012) Low anterior resection syndrome score. Ann Surg 255:922–928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ziv Y, Zbar A, Bar-Shavit Y, Igov I (2013) Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS): cause and effect and reconstructive considerations. Tech Coloproctol 17:151–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ (1998) Quality of life after treatment for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85:1036–1043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Farage MA, Miller KW, Berardesca E et al (2008) Psychosocial and societal burden of incontinence in the aged population: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 277:285–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim KH, Yu CS, Yoon YS et al (2011) Effectiveness of biofeedback therapy in the treatment of anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1107–1113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M (1995) Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 346:1124–1127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Matzel KE, Schmidt RA (1990) Neuroanatomy of the striated muscular anal continence mechanism. Implications for the use of neurostimulation. Dis Colon Rectum 33:666–673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chiarioni G, Palsson OS, Asteria CR et al (2013) Neuromodulation for fecal incontinence: an effective surgical intervention. World J Gastroenterol 19:7048

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nandivada P, Nagle D (2014) Surgical therapies for fecal incontinence. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 30:69–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bregendahl S, Emmertsen KJ, Lous J et al (2013) Bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection with and without neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study. Colorectal Dis 15:1130–1139

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramage L, Qiu S, Kontovounisios C et al (2015) A systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation for low anterior resectio syndrome. Colorectal Dis 17:762–771

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Emmertsen K, Bregendahl S, Fassov J et al (2013) A hyperactive postprandial response in the neorectum—the clue to low anterior resection syndrome after total mesorectal excision surgery? Colorectal Dis 15:599–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ratto C, Grillo E, Parello A et al (2005) Sacral neuromodulation in treatment of fecal incontinence following anterior resection and chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1027–1036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwandner O (2013) Sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and “low anterior resection syndrome” following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:665–669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Matzel KE (2011) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: its role in the treatment algorithm. Colorectum Dis 13:10–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. de Miguel M, Oteiza F, Ciga MA et al (2011) Sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence following low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 13:72–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moya P, Arroyo A, Soriano-Irigaray L et al (2012) Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with severe fecal incontinence after rectal resection. Tech Coloproctol 16:263–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomas G, Bradshaw E, Vaizey C (2015) A review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence following rectal surgery and radiotherapy. Colorectal Dis 17:939–942

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gourcerol G, Vitton V, Leroi AM et al (2011) How sacral nerve stimulation works in patients with faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 13:e203–e211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Martelucci J (2016) Low anterior resection syndrome: a treatment algorithm. Dis Colon Rectum 59:79–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Matzel K, Stadelmaier U, Bittorf B et al. (2002) Bilateral sacral spinal nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence after low anterior rectum resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 17:430–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jarrett M, Matzel K, Stosser M et al. (2005) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence following a rectosigmoid resection for colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 20:446–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Holzer B, Rosen HR, Zaglmaier W, Klug R, Beer B, Novi G, Schiessel R (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation in patients after rectal resection–preliminary report. J Gastrointest Surg 12:921–925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. D’Hondt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have potential and real conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

All patients undergoing the PNE or SNS procedure provided informed consent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’Hondt, M., Nuytens, F., Kinget, L. et al. Sacral neurostimulation for low anterior resection syndrome after radical resection for rectal cancer: evaluation of treatment with the LARS score. Tech Coloproctol 21, 301–307 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1612-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1612-1

Keywords

Navigation