Skip to main content
Log in

Radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer in elderly patients: analysis of the Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Whether concurrent chemotherapy with radiotherapy (CRT) is effective for elderly patients with head and neck cancer is a controversial topic. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of CRT vs. radiation therapy (RT) among elderly patients in Japan.

Methods

Data from the Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan were extracted and analyzed. Patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx who received definitive CRT or RT between 2011 and 2014 were included.

Results

CRT was administered to 78% of the 1057 patients aged ≥ 70 years and 67% of the 555 patients aged ≥ 75 years. For the patients aged ≥ 75 years, the overall survival (OS) rate was significantly better in the CRT group than in the RT group (P < 0.05), while the progression-free survival (PFS) rate was not significantly different (P > 0.05). The add-on effect of CRT was significantly poor in elderly patients (P < 0.05), and it was not a significant factor in the multivariate analysis for patients aged ≥ 75 years. After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in the OS and PFS rates between the patients aged ≥ 70 years and those aged ≥ 75 years (all, P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Although aggressive CRT is administered to elderly patients in Japan, its effectiveness is uncertain. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to verify whether CRT is superior to RT alone for elderly patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data generated in this study are available in the article.

References

  1. Pignon JP, Bourhis J, Domenge C et al (2000) Chemotherapy added to locoregional treatment for head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma: three meta-analyses of updated individual data. MACH-NC Collaborative Group. Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy on Head and Neck Cancer. Lancet 355:949–955

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pignon JP, le Maître A, Maillard E et al (2009) Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother Oncol 92:4–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lacas B, Carmel A, Landais C et al (2021) Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): An update on 107 randomized trials and 19,805 patients, on behalf of MACH-NC Group. Radiother Oncol 156:281–293

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. VanderWalde NA, Meyer AM, Deal AM et al (2014) Effectiveness of chemoradiation for head and neck cancer in an older patient population. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 89:30–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ward MC, Reddy CA, Adelstein DJ et al (2016) Use of systemic therapy with definitive radiotherapy for elderly patients with head and neck cancer: a National Cancer Data Base analysis. Cancer 122(22):3472–3483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oosting SF, Desideri I, Staelens D et al (2021) Treatment patterns in older patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: results from an EORTC led survey. J Geriatr Oncol 12:1261–1265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. United Nations (2019) World Population Ageing 2019 Highlights. Available from: https://www.un-ilibrary.org/content/books/9789210045537. Accessed Aug 2023

  8. Japan Society for Head and Neck Cancer (2022) Report of Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan Clinical Statistics of Registered Patients, 2019. Available from: http://www.jshnc.umin.ne.jp/report.html. Accessed Aug 2023

  9. Saito Y, Yoshimoto S, Kitayama M et al (2023) Elective neck dissection for T3–T4N0 laryngeal carcinoma: evidence from Japan’s National Head and Neck Cancer Registry. Int J Clin Oncol 28:209–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sarris EG, Harrington KJ, Saif MW et al (2013) Multimodal treatment strategies for elderly patients with head and neck cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 40:465–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ouchi Y, Rakugi H, Arai H et al (2017) Redefining the elderly as aged 75 years and older: proposal from the Joint Committee of Japan Gerontological Society and the Japan Geriatrics Society. Geriatr Gerontol Int 17:1045–1047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferreira JC, Patino CM (2017) Subgroup analysis and interaction tests: why they are important and how to avoid common mistakes. J Bras Pneumol 43:162

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahn MJ, D’Cruz A, Vermorken JB et al (2016) Clinical recommendations for defining platinum unsuitable head and neck cancer patient populations on chemoradiotherapy: a literature review. Oral Oncol 53:10–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Castro Jr G, Alves GV, Castro AF et al (2018) Criteria for eligibility to cisplatin in the curative treatment of head and neck cancer: consensus opinion from a panel of experts. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 131:30–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharma A, Kumar M, Bhasker S et al (2022) An open-label, noninferiority phase III RCT of weekly versus three weekly cisplatin and radical radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (ConCERT trial). J Clin Oncol 40:6004–6004

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mehanna H, Robinson M, Hartley A et al (2019) Radiotherapy plus cisplatin or cetuximab in low-risk human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (De-ESCALaTE HPV): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 393:51–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gillison ML, Trotti AM, Harris J et al (2019) Radiotherapy plus cetuximab or cisplatin in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (NRG Oncology RTOG 1016): a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 393:40–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zandberg DP, Cullen K, Bentzen SM et al (2018) Definitive radiation with concurrent cetuximab vs. radiation with or without concurrent cytotoxic chemotherapy in older patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: analysis of the SEER-medicare linked database. Oral Oncol 86:132–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Amini A, Eguchi M, Jones BL et al (2018) Comparing outcomes of concurrent chemotherapy regimens in patients 65 years old or older with locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 124:4322–4331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Forastiere AA, Zhang Q, Weber RS et al (2012) Long-term results of RTOG 91-11: a comparison of three nonsurgical treatment strategies to preserve the larynx in patients with locally advanced larynx cancer. J Clin Oncol 31:845–852

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our deepest gratitude to the members of the Japanese Society for Head and Neck Cancer who participated in the Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan and to the members of the Cancer Registry Committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KY: conceptualization and design; development of the methodology; acquisition and analysis of the data; and writing, review, and revision of the article. YU: development of the methodology and review and revision of the article. SK: review and revision of the article. JT: review and revision of the article. DK: ethics review; acquisition and processing of data; and review of the article. MK: acquisition of data and review of the article. KN: review and revision of the article. TM: review and revision of the article. FK: analysis of the data and review and revision of the article. YF: analysis of the data and review and revision of the article. YS: review and revision of the article. KK: review and revision of the article. SY: ethics review; and review of the article. KN: ethics review and review of the article. AH: review and revision of the article. HA: review and revision of the article; and funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koichi Yasuda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

KK is an employee of an institute of Hitachi Ltd. and currently works for Hokkaido University under a secondary agreement, but KK declares that this research has no relationship with Hitachi Ltd.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 39 KB)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yasuda, K., Uchinami, Y., Kano, S. et al. Radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer in elderly patients: analysis of the Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 29, 241–247 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-023-02450-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-023-02450-7

Keywords

Navigation