Skip to main content
Log in

Preoperative transferrin level is a novel indicator of short- and long-term outcomes after esophageal cancer surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to examine whether preoperative serum transferrin, a rapid-turnover protein, correlates with short- and long-term outcomes after esophagectomy.

Methods

Preoperative transferrin levels, calculated by summing serum iron and unsaturated iron-binding capacity, were evaluated in 224 patients who underwent esophagectomy for stage I–III esophageal cancer without preoperative treatment. Transferrin levels are directly proportional to total iron-binding capacity (TIBC), and we defined TIBC < 250 μg/dL as low transferrin. We evaluated the relationship between preoperative transferrin levels and short- and long-term outcomes after esophagectomy using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses.

Results

Of all patients, 25 (11.2%) had low preoperative transferrin levels. Low preoperative transferrin levels were strongly correlated with worse preoperative performance status, advanced pathological T stage, and more open esophagectomy (p = 0.0078, 0.0001, and 0.013, respectively). Patients with low preoperative transferrin levels experienced significantly more frequent postoperative pneumonia in univariate and multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 3.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.032–10.033, p = 0.0443]. Additionally, these patients were significantly correlated with worse overall survival (OS) in univariate and multivariate analyses (HR 2.75, 95% CI 1.018–7.426, p = 0.0460). Furthermore, we investigated the relationship between OS and postoperative pneumonia to elucidate why low preoperative transferrin, which is an independent risk factor for postoperative pneumonia, leads to poor prognosis. Patients with postoperative pneumonia were strongly associated with a shorter OS (p = 0.0099).

Conclusion

Preoperative serum transferrin levels may be a novel indicator of postoperative pneumonia and OS after esophagectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F Bray J Ferlay I Soerjomataram 2018 Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries CA Cancer J Clin 68 394 424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. A Pennathur MK Gibson BA Jobe 2013 Oesophageal carcinoma Lancet 381 400 412

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. JC Flanagan R Batz SS Saboo 2016 Esophagectomy and gastric pull-through procedures: surgical techniques, imaging features, and potential complications Radiographics 36 107 121

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. S Kinugasa M Tachibana H Yoshimura 2004 Postoperative pulmonary complications are associated with worse short- and long-term outcomes after extended esophagectomy J Surg Oncol 88 71 77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. H Takeuchi H Miyata M Gotoh 2014 A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database Ann Surg 260 259 266

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. X Zhang X Chen T Wu 2015 Modified glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor in gastriccancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis Int J Clin Exp Med 8 15222 15229

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. RD Dolan BJA Laird PG Horgan 2018 The prognostic value of the systemic inflammatory response in randomised clinical trials in cancer: a systematic review Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 132 130 137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. JF Feng Q Zhao QX Chen 2014 Prognostic significance of Glasgow prognostic score in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma Saudi J Gastroenterol 20 48 53

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. X Zhang Y Jiang Y Wang 2018 Prognostic role of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Medicine (Baltimore) 97 e13585

    Google Scholar 

  10. N Hirahara Y Tajima Y Fujii 2018 Preoperative prognostic nutritional index predicts long-term surgical outcomes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma World J Surg 42 2199 2208

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Y Suyama K Adachi Y Notsu 2009 Efficacy of corrected rapid turnover protein increment index (CRII) for early detection of improvement of nutrition status in patients with malnutrition J Clin Biochem Nutr 45 44 48

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. M Roche TY Law J Kurowicki 2018 Albumin, prealbumin, and transferrin may be predictive of wound complications following total knee arthroplasty J Knee Surg 31 946 951

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. E Takemoto J Yoo SR Blizzard 2019 Preoperative prealbumin and transferring: relation to 30-day risk of complication in elective spine surgical patients Medicine (Baltimore) 98 e14741

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. A Fonseca-Nunes A Agudo N Aranda 2015 Body iron status and gastric cancer risk in the EURGAST study Int J Cancer 137 2904 2914

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. T Onodera N Goseki G Kosaki 1984 Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 85 1001 1005

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. K Sun S Chen J Xu 2014 The prognostic significance of the prognostic nutritional index in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 140 1537 1549

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. F Zhang Z Chen P Wang 2016 Combination of platelet count and mean platelet volume (COP-MPV) predicts postoperative prognosis in both resectable early and advanced stage esophageal squamous cell cancer patients Tumour Biol 37 9323 9331

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 17: 1471-1474

  19. (2017) The Society of Thoracic surgeons composite score for evaluating esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 103: 1661–1667

  20. N Yoshida M Watanabe Y Baba 2014 Risk factors for pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer Surg Today 44 526 532

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. N Yoshida Y Baba H Shigaki 2016 Preoperative Nutritional Assessment by Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) is useful to estimate postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer World J Surg 40 1910 1917

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. D Dindo N Demartines PA Clavien 2004 Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey Ann Surg 240 205 213

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. MK Ferguson AD Celauro V Prachand 2011 Prediction of major pulmonary complications after esophagectomy Ann Thorac Surg 91 1494 1500 discussion 1500-1491

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. A Shiozaki H Fujiwara H Okamura 2012 Risk factors for postoperative respiratory complications following esophageal cancer resection Oncol Lett 3 907 912

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. CE Avendano PA Flume GA Silvestri 2002 Pulmonary complications after esophagectomy Ann Thorac Surg 73 922 926

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. N Yoshida H Yamamoto H Baba 2020 Can minimally invasive esophagectomy replace open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer? Latest analysis of 24,233 esophagectomies from the Japanese National Clinical Database Ann Surg 272 118 124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. H Nagawa O Kobori T Muto 1994 Prediction of pulmonary complications after transthoracic oesophagectomy Br J Surg 81 860 862

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. MK Ferguson AE Durkin 2002 Preoperative prediction of the risk of pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for cancer J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123 661 669

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. S Law KH Wong KF Kwok 2004 Predictive factors for postoperative pulmonary complications and mortality after esophagectomy for cancer Ann Surg 240 791 800

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. SC Dickhaut JC DeLee CP Page 1984 Nutritional status: importance in predicting wound-healing after amputation J Bone Joint Surg Am 66 71 75

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. AS Detsky JP Baker K O'Rourke 1987 Predicting nutrition-associated complications for patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 11 440 446

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. MM Meguid MM Mughal D Debonis 1986 Influence of nutritional status on the resumption of adequate food intake in patients recovering from colorectal cancer operations Surg Clin North Am 66 1167 1176

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. B Filip M Scarpa F Cavallin 2015 Postoperative outcome after oesophagectomy for cancer: nutritional status is the missing ring in the current prognostic scores Eur J Surg Oncol 41 787 794

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. J Ignacio de Ulíbarri A González-Madroño NG Villar de 2005 CONUT: a tool for controlling nutritional status. First validation in a hospital population Nutr Hosp 20 38 45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. M Kanda M Koike C Tanaka 2019 Risk prediction of postoperative pneumonia after subtotal esophagectomy based on preoperative serum cholinesterase concentrations Ann Surg Oncol 26 3718 3726

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. DS Seres 2005 Surrogate nutrition markers, malnutrition, and adequacy of nutrition support Nutr Clin Pract 20 308 313

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. SR Atkinson K Hamesch I Spivak 2020 Serum transferrin is an independent predictor of mortality in severe alcoholic hepatitis Am J Gastroenterol 115 398 405

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. F Tustumi CM Kimura FR Takeda 2016 Prognostic factors and survival analysis in esophageal carcinoma Arq Bras Cir Dig 29 138 141

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. I Kruhlikava J Kirkegård FV Mortensen 2017 Impact of body mass index on complications and survival after surgery for esophageal and gastro-esophageal-junction cancer Scand J Surg 106 305 310

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. T Song Q Wan W Yu 2017 Pretreatment nutritional risk scores and performance status are prognostic factors in esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy Oncotarget 8 98974 98984

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. K Sugimura H Miyata N Shinno 2020 Prognostic impact of postoperative complications following salvage esophagectomy for esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy Oncology 98 280 288

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. N Wu G Chen H Hu 2015 Low pretherapeutic serum albumin as a risk factor for poor outcome in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas Nutr Cancer 67 481 485

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. M Sakai M Sohda T Miyazaki 2018 Association of preoperative nutritional status with prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing salvage esophagectomy Anticancer Res 38 933 938

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. N Hirahara T Matsubara H Hayashi 2018 Prognostic importance of controlling nutritional status in patients undergoing curative thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer Am J Ther 25 e524 e532

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. J Wei M Jin Y Shao 2019 High preoperative serum prealbumin predicts long-term survival in resected esophageal squamous cell cancer Cancer Manag Res 11 7997 8003

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. F Bozzetti 2009 Screening the nutritional status in oncology: a preliminary report on 1000 outpatients Support Care Cancer 17 279 284

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. T Fukuda Y Seto K Yamada 2008 Can immune-enhancing nutrients reduce postoperative complications in patients undergoing esophageal surgery? Dis Esophagus 21 708 711

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. H Takeuchi S Ikeuchi Y Kawaguchi 2007 Clinical significance of perioperative immunonutrition for patients with esophageal cancer World J Surg 31 2160 2167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. T Jordan DM Mastnak N Palamar 2018 Nutritional therapy for patients with esophageal cancer Nutr Cancer 70 23 29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the people who contributed to this work.

Funding

There was no financial support for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TY wrote the manuscript. HS planed study concept and design. TM, TA, KE, KH, and KO collected the clinical data. MI, SI, YB and YM conducted critical revision of manuscript. NY and HB coordinated the study, oversaw collection and analysis of the results. All authors discussed the data and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hideo Baba.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (Registry Number 1909).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamane, T., Sawayama, H., Yoshida, N. et al. Preoperative transferrin level is a novel indicator of short- and long-term outcomes after esophageal cancer surgery. Int J Clin Oncol 27, 131–140 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-021-02031-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-021-02031-6

Keywords

Navigation