Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multicenter prospective phase II trial of nivolumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic mucosal melanoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Mucosal melanoma is a rare and aggressive malignancy with poorer response compared with cutaneous melanoma. Prospective trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors in unresectable or metastatic mucosal melanoma have not been reported.

Purpose

This phase II trial assessed the efficacy and safety of nivolumab monotherapy for unresectable or metastatic mucosal melanoma.

Patients and methods

Eligibility criteria were as follows: histological diagnosis of unresectable or metastatic mucosal melanoma; age ≥ 20 years; ECOG performance status 0 or 1; and with measurable lesions. Patients received nivolumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The secondary endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival, disease control rate, and toxicity.

Results

Twenty patients were enrolled between December 2014 and July 2017. Two patients without measurable lesions and one patient with uveal melanoma were excluded from analysis of efficacy. The best overall RR was 23.5%. One patient achieved a complete response, three partial response, and five stable disease as their best response. The median progression-free survival was 1.4 months (95% CI 1.2–2.8). The median overall survival was 12.0 months (95% CI 3.5 to not reached). The 1-year overall survival was 50.0% (95% CI 25.9–70.0%). Treatment-related adverse events of grades 3 or 4 occurred in 15% (3/20) of the patients. Grade 3 adverse events were resolved by corticosteroid treatment.

Conclusion

Although this trial met the primary endpoint, the RR was still unsatisfactory. Therefore, further treatment development is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hodi FS, O'Day SJ, McDermott DF et al (2010) Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med 363:711–723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Weber JS, D'Angelo SP, Minor D et al (2015) Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 16:375–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Robert C, Long GV, Brady B et al (2015) Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med 372:320–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R et al (2019) Five-year survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 381:1535–1546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D'Angelo SP, Larkin J, Sosman JA et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab in patients with mucosal melanoma: a pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol 35:226–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamazaki N, Kiyohara Y, Uhara H et al (2017) Cytokine biomarkers to predict antitumor responses to nivolumab suggested in a phase 2 study for advanced melanoma. Cancer Sci 108:1022–1031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujii Y, Nishikawa Y, Nomura M et al (2018) Readministration of nivolumab after persistent immune-related colitis in a patient with recurrent melanoma. Intern Med 57:1173–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sakaizawa K, Ashida A, Uchiyama A et al (2015) Clinical characteristics associated with BRAF, NRAS and KIT mutations in Japanese melanoma patients. J Dermatol Sci 80:33–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hayward NK, Wilmott JS, Waddell N et al (2017) Whole-genome landscapes of major melanoma subtypes. Nature 545:175–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hodi FS, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R et al (2018) Nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone in advanced melanoma (CheckMate 067): 4-year outcomes of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 19:1480–1492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients and their families who participated in the trial.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Motoo Nomura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Motoo Nomura, Isao Oze, Toshiki Masuishi, Tomoya Yokota, Ken Kato, and Masashi Andoh have conflicts of interest to declare and have financial disclosures or funding support. Shunichiro Iwasawa reports grants and lecture fees from ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., and lecture fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K. Hironaga Satake received honoraria from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly Japan, Merck Bio Pharma, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Sanofi, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda, and Yakult Honsha.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nomura, M., Oze, I., Masuishi, T. et al. Multicenter prospective phase II trial of nivolumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic mucosal melanoma. Int J Clin Oncol 25, 972–977 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-020-01618-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-020-01618-9

Keywords

Navigation