Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of histology on patterns of failure and clinical outcomes in patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Unlike metastatic disease, histological differences are usually not considered while planning chemoradiotherapy. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and relapse patterns between squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas, and investigated possible histology-specific approaches for chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes and relapse patterns in patients who received definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Katsura hospital between 2003 and 2012.

Results

A total of 68 and 33 patients with squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas, respectively, were enrolled. Patients with adenocarcinoma had less advanced T stages, and a larger proportion of female patients. Other factors were not different between the two groups. The median follow-up duration in all patients and survivors was 21.3 months and 91.4 months, respectively. Median survival and relapse-free survival were not significantly different between the two groups. In contrast, the failure patterns and incidences of distant failure were significantly different. Patients with squamous cell carcinomas had predominantly locoregional disease features and a shorter duration from relapse to death compared to patients with adenocarcinoma.

Conclusion

Failure pattern was significantly different between the two histologies. Among relapsed patients, the prognosis was poorer in those with squamous cell carcinomas than those with adenocarcinomas. Further studies, to evaluate histology-specific approaches in chemoradiotherapy, are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Auperin A, Le Pechoux C, Rolland E et al (2010) Meta-analysis of concomitant versus sequential radiochemotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(13):2181–2190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Marino P, Preatoni A, Cantoni A (1995) Randomized trials of radiotherapy alone versus combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy in stages IIIa and IIIb nonsmall cell lung cancer. A meta-analysis. Cancer 76(4):593–601

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pritchard RS, Anthony SP (1996) Chemotherapy plus radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced, unresectable, non-small-cell lung cancer. A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 125(9):723–729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Segawa Y, Kiura K, Takigawa N et al (2010) Phase III trial comparing docetaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy with mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: OLCSG 0007. J Clin Oncol 28(20):3299–3306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamamoto N, Nakagawa K, Nishimura Y et al (2010) Phase III study comparing second- and third-generation regimens with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group WJTOG0105. J Clin Oncol 28(23):3739–3745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanna N, Neubauer M, Yiannoutsos C et al (2008) Phase III study of cisplatin, etoposide, and concurrent chest radiation with or without consolidation docetaxel in patients with inoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: the Hoosier Oncology Group and U.S. Oncology. J Clin Oncol 26(35):5755–5760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kelly K, Chansky K, Gaspar LE et al (2008) Phase III trial of maintenance gefitinib or placebo after concurrent chemoradiotherapy and docetaxel consolidation in inoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: SWOG S0023. J Clin Oncol 26(15):2450–2456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Senan S, Brade A, Wang LH et al (2016) PROCLAIM: randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed-cisplatin or etoposide-cisplatin plus thoracic radiation therapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy in locally advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol 34(9):953–962

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D et al (2018) Overall survival with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC. N Engl J Med 379(24):2342–2350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D et al (2017) Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 377(20):1919–1929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Furuse K, Fukuoka M, Kawahara M et al (1999) Phase III study of concurrent versus sequential thoracic radiotherapy in combination with mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 17(9):2692–2699

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Albain KS, Swann RS, Rusch VW et al (2009) Radiotherapy plus chemotherapy with or without surgical resection for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374(9687):379–386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bradley JD, Paulus R, Komaki R et al (2015) Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): a randomised, two-by-two factorial phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 16(2):187–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pujol JL, Paz-Ares L, de Marinis F et al (2014) Long-term and low-grade safety results of a phase III study (PARAMOUNT): maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care immediately after induction treatment with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 15(6):418–425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J et al (2008) Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(21):3543–3551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K et al (2010) Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med 362(25):2380–2388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim DW et al (2014) First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med 371(23):2167–2177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transpl 48(3):452–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nygard L, Vogelius IR, Fischer BM et al (2018) A competing risk model of first failure site after definitive chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 13(4):559–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Casiraghi M, Maisonneuve P, Piperno G et al (2017) Salvage surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 29(2):233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schreiner W, Dudek W, Lettmaier S et al (2018) Long-term survival after salvage surgery for local failure after definitive chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 66(2):135–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kong FM, Ten Haken RK, Schipper M et al (2017) Effect of midtreatment PET/CT-adapted radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase 2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 3(10):1358–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Woody NM, Stephans KL, Andrews M et al (2017) A histologic basis for the efficacy of SBRT to the lung. J Thorac Oncol 12(3):510–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shiue K, Cerra-Franco A, Shapiro R et al (2018) Histology, tumor volume, and radiation dose predict outcomes in NSCLC patients after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. J Thorac Oncol 13(10):1549–1559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Saunders M, Dische S, Barrett A et al (1999) Continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) versus conventional radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: mature data from the randomised multicentre trial CHART Steering committee. Radiother Oncol 52(2):137–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Deng L, Liang H, Burnette B et al (2014) Irradiation and anti-PD-L1 treatment synergistically promote antitumor immunity in mice. J Clin Invest 124(2):687–695

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Reynders K, Illidge T, Siva S et al (2015) The abscopal effect of local radiotherapy: using immunotherapy to make a rare event clinically relevant. Cancer Treat Rev 41(6):503–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhong WZ, Wang Q, Mao WM et al (2018) Gefitinib versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin as adjuvant treatment for stage II-IIIA (N1–N2) EGFR-mutant NSCLC (ADJUVANT/CTONG1104): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 19(1):139–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Akamatsu H, Kaira K, Murakami H et al (2014) The impact of clinical outcomes according to EGFR mutation status in patients with locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma who recieved concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol 37(2):144–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Chan OSH, Lee VHF, Mok TSK et al (2017) the role of radiotherapy in epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive patients with oligoprogression: a matched-cohort analysis. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 29(9):568–575

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. De Ruysscher D, Dingemans AC, Praag J et al (2018) Prophylactic cranial irradiation versus observation in radically treated stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase III NVALT-11/DLCRG-02 study. J Clin Oncol 36(23):2366–2377

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Edanz Group for editing a draft of this manuscript, all reviewers, editors and we thank all the attending physicians.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yukinori Matsuo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ito, H., Matsuo, Y., Ohtsu, S. et al. Impact of histology on patterns of failure and clinical outcomes in patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 25, 274–281 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01566-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01566-z

Keywords

Navigation