Abstract
Cancer registration in Japan has a long history spanning over 60 years; the first population-based cancer registry was established in Miyagi prefecture in 1951. The progress made in the regional population-based cancer registries in terms of standardization and quality improvement during the 10 years of the third comprehensive strategy for cancer control was highlighted in the history of cancer registration in Japan. However, there were still weak points regarding local government-oriented cancer registries that remained, e.g., the reporting of cancer cases to the population-based cancer registries was not a mandatory task for medical institutions. After the Cancer Control Act in 2006, the Act on Promotion of Cancer Registries was finally enacted in Japan on December 6, 2013. According to that Act, hospital managers must report information on any primary cancer that was first diagnosed in their institutions from January 1, 2016 to the prefectural governors. Given the increasing number of cases and amount of information recorded, it would have been almost impossible to maintain our cancer registries using the same system, and changes were required to obtain reliable cancer statistics. This was particularly important in Japan, because the country is facing a hyper-aging society, with two to three million cancer patients requiring entry of detailed information. We appreciate the long history of the Japanese cancer registry, but it is necessary to make dramatic changes to bring the registry up to date and to be able to track the increasing amount of information.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Okamoto N (2008) A history of the cancer registration system in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 13(2):90–96
Sobue T (2008) Current activities and future directions of the cancer registration system in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 13(2):97–101
Sobue T (2008) Cancer registration system: an introduction. Int J Clin Oncol 13(2):89
Bray F, Parkin DM (2009) Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness. Eur J Cancer 45(5):747–755
Parkin DM, Bray F (2009) Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods part II. Completeness. Eur J Cancer 45(5):756–764
Wingo PA, Jamison PM, Hiatt RA et al (2003) Building the infrastructure for nationwide cancer surveillance and control—a comparison between the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (United States). Cancer Causes Control 14(2):175–193
Matsuda T, Marugame T, Kamo K et al (2009) Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2003: based on data from 13 population-based cancer registries in the Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ) Project. Jpn J Clin Oncol 39(12):850–858
Forman D, Bray F, Brewster DH et al (eds) (2013) Cancer incidence in five continents, vol X. IARC, Lyon, France
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Matsuda, T., Sobue, T. Recent trends in population-based cancer registries in Japan: the Act on Promotion of Cancer Registries and drastic changes in the historical registry . Int J Clin Oncol 20, 11–20 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-014-0765-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-014-0765-4