Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of the efficacy in improving trigeminal neuralgia in petroclival meningioma between microsurgery and radiosurgery: a meta-analysis

  • Research
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to systematically review studies in the literature to assess the superiority between microsurgery and radiosurgery regarding the efficacy in improving petroclival meningioma (PCM)-related trigeminal neuralgia (TN). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane clinical trial databases were systematically searched from the inception until December 08, 2022. The overall proportion of patients with improved TN after treatment in all six included studies was 56% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35–76.9%). Higgins I2 statistics showed significant heterogeneity (I2 = 90%). Subgroup analysis showed that the proportion of improved TN was higher in the microsurgery group than that in the radiosurgery group (89%; 95% CI, 81–96.5% vs. 37%, 95% CI, 22–52.7%, respectively, p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis (for studies that documented the number of posttreatment Barrow Neurological Institute scores 1 and 2) revealed that the proportion of pain-free without medication after treatment was higher in the microsurgery group than that in the radiosurgery group (90.7%; 95% CI, 81–99.7% vs. 34.5%, 95% CI, 21.3–47.7.7%, respectively, p < 0.01). Based on the results of this meta-analysis, we concluded that microsurgery is superior to radiosurgery in controlling PCM-related TN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within its supplementary materials.

Code availability

Statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.0.4; The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

References

  1. Ahn SJ, Yoo MR, Suh SH, Lee SK, Lee KS, Son EJ, Chung TS (2014) Gadolinium enhanced 3D proton density driven equilibrium MR imaging in the evaluation of cisternal tumor and associated structures: comparison with balanced fast-field-echo sequence. PLoS One 9:e103215. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103215

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen ASS, Heinskou TB, Rochat P et al (2022) Microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia - a prospective study of 115 patients. J Headache Pain 23:145. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01520-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartindale M, Mohamed A, Bell J, Kircher M, Hill J, Anderson D, Leonetti J (2020) Neurotologic complications following microvascular decompression: a retrospective study. J Neurol Surg Part B, Skull Base 81:37–42. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1677688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang JW, Chang JH, Park YG, Chung SS (2000) Gamma knife radiosurgery for idiopathic and secondary trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 93(Suppl 3):147–151. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2000.93.supplement

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chivukula S, Kim W, Zhuo X, Tenn S, Kaprealian T, DeSalles A, Pouratian N (2017) Radiosurgery for secondary trigeminal neuralgia: revisiting the treatment paradigm. World Neurosurg 99:288–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cruccu G, Di Stefano G, Truini A (2020) Trigeminal neuralgia. N Engl J Med 383:754–762. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1914484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 315:629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Flannery TJ, Kano H, Lunsford LD et al (2010) Long-term control of petroclival meningiomas through radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 112:957–964. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.8.jns09695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gao B, Zhang Y, Tan J et al (2021) Surgical treatment and clinical outcomes of petroclival meningiomas: a single-center experience of 107 patients. Front Oncol 11:761284. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.761284

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Giammattei L, di Russo P, Starnoni D et al (2021) Petroclival meningiomas: update of current treatment and consensus by the EANS skull base section. Acta Neurochir 163:1639–1663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04798-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gomes da Silva VT, Teles Gomes MQ, Maria da Roz L, Yamaki VN, Prudente do Espirito S, Teixeira MJ, Figueiredo EG (2021) Petroclival meningioma leading to trigeminal neuralgia: a Kawase approach application. World Neurosurg 151:110-116.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.133

  12. Hall JC, Ung TH, McCleary TL et al (2022) Stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia secondary to tumor: a single-institution retrospective series. Neurosurg Focus 53:E3. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.8.focus22381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Harrison G, Kano H, Lunsford LD, Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D (2016) Quantitative tumor volumetric responses after Gamma knife radiosurgery for meningiomas. J Neurosurg 124:146–154. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.12.jns141341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang CF, Tu HT, Liu WS, Lin LY (2008) Gamma knife surgery for trigeminal pain caused by benign brain tumors. J Neurosurg 109(Suppl):154–159. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns/2008/109/12/s24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ichimura S, Kawase T, Onozuka S, Yoshida K, Ohira T (2008) Four subtypes of petroclival meningiomas: differences in symptoms and operative findings using the anterior transpetrosal approach. Acta Neurochir 150:637–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-008-1586-x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Flickinger JC et al (1996) Stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: a multiinstitutional study using the gamma unit. J Neurosurg 84:940–945. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1996.84.6.0940

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuroki A, Kayama T, Song J, Saito S (1999) Removal of petrous apex meningioma and microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia through the anterior petrosal approach. Case report. Neurol Med-Chir 39:447–451. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.39.447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li L, Seaman SC, Bathla G, Smith MC, Dundar B, Noeller J, Hitchon PW (2020) Microvascular decompression versus stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: a single-institution experience. World Neurosurg 143:e400–e408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.07.161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6:e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin Y, Gao Q, Jin H et al (2021) Analysis of approaches in the microsurgical treatment of 102 cases of petroclival meningioma in a single center. Front Neurol 12:627736. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.627736

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Love S, Coakham HB (2001) Trigeminal neuralgia: pathology and pathogenesis. Brain: J Neurol 124:2347–2360. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/124.12.2347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Masalha W, Heiland DH, Steiert C et al (2022) A retrospective evaluation of the retrosigmoidal approach for petroclival meningioma surgery and prognostic factors affecting clinical outcome. Front Oncol 12:786909. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.786909

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Muhsen BA, Ali AM, Jain A, Ibrahim B, Nagera E, Borghei-Razavi H, Adada B (2021) Microsurgical resection of petroclival meningiomas treated with stereotactic radiosurgery to address persistent post-treatment trigeminal pain. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 202:106533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Park HH, Kim WH, Jung HH, Chang JH, Lee KS, Chang WS, Hong CK (2020) Radiosurgery vs. microsurgery for newly diagnosed, small petroclival meningiomas with trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurg Rev 43:1631–1640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01346-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Park SH, Chang JW (2020) Gamma knife radiosurgery on the trigeminal root entry zone for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: results and a review of the literature. Yonsei Med J 61:111–119. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2020.61.2.111

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Pollock BE, Schoeberl KA (2010) Prospective comparison of posterior fossa exploration and stereotactic radiosurgery dorsal root entry zone target as primary surgery for patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 67:633–638. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000377861.14650.98. (discussion 638-639)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sadik ZHA, Lie ST, Leenstra S, Hanssens PEJ (2018) Volumetric changes and clinical outcome for petroclival meningiomas after primary treatment with Gamma knife radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 129:1623–1629. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.7.jns17380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shulev Y, Trashin A, Gordienko K (2011) Secondary trigeminal neuralgia in cerebellopontine angle tumors. Skull Base: Off J North Am Skull Base Soc [et al] 21:287–294. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1284218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Spallone A, Makhmudov UB, Mukhamedjanov DJ, Tcherekajev VA (1999) Petroclival meningioma. An attempt to define the role of skull base approaches in their surgical management. Surg Neurol 51:412–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-3019(98)00100-1. (discussion 419-420)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tuleasca C, Régis J, Sahgal A et al (2018) Stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review. J Neurosurg 130:733–757. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.9.jns17545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Van Havenbergh T, Carvalho G, Tatagiba M, Plets C, Samii M (2003) Natural history of petroclival meningiomas. Neurosurgery 52:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200301000-00006. (discussion 62-54)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Young RF, Vermeulen SS, Grimm P, Blasko J, Posewitz A (1997) Gamma knife radiosurgery for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: idiopathic and tumor related. Neurology 48:608–614. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.48.3.608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Jae Woong Jeon, a chairman of BORNTOBE Clinic, who gave us warm advice and help.

Funding

This research was conducted with the support of the special research fund from Korea University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JB conceived and designed the study. JB, HR, and HJ conducted the literature search. JB, WK, THK, and JHK were involved in the analysis and interpretation of data. JB drafted the manuscript. The study was supervised by JB and JHK. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong Hyun Kim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This meta-analysis has been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Consent to participate

The risk expected from this “meta-analysis” is not greater than the level I risk. In addition, all of the included patients’ dataset were anonymized. There is no reason to presume the refusal of the research subject’s consent, and the risk to the enrolled patients is extremely low even if consent is waived. Consent exemption does not infringe on the rights or welfare of the subject. It is not the research for drug/medical device approval, and it is not research regulated by a foreign regulatory agency.

Consent for publication

For this type of meta-analysis, formal consent from patients is not required.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 13 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Byun, J., Roh, H., Jo, H. et al. Comparison of the efficacy in improving trigeminal neuralgia in petroclival meningioma between microsurgery and radiosurgery: a meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 46, 314 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-02225-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-02225-8

Keywords

Navigation