Skip to main content
Log in

Low-profile visualized intraluminal support stent for the endovascular treatment of traumatic intracranial internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optimal treatment strategies for traumatic intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) pseudoaneurysms are controversial. The low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) device is a braided stent with a metal coverage rate between traditional laser cut stents and flow diversion devices. We report here our therapy strategy using the LVIS stent-assisted coiling for treatment of traumatic intracranial ICA pseudoaneurysms. Patients with traumatic intracranial ICA pseudoaneurysms treated by the LVIS stent-assisted coiling in our center between January 2015 and June 2021 were reviewed. The complications, radiographic, and clinical outcomes of these patients were analyzed. A total of 12 patients with 12 pseudoaneurysms were included. The mean maximum aneurysm diameter was 6.2 ± 3.1 mm. Nine patients had a subarachnoid hemorrhage; five patients with Hunt-Hess grade III and four patients with grade IV. All procedures were successfully performed without intraoperative complications. Immediate postoperative angiogram showed that six (50%) aneurysms were Raymond grade 1, four (33.3%) were grade 2, and two (16.7%) were grade 3. Postoperative multiple cerebral infarction occurred in two patients because of vasospasm. Of the ten patients with angiographic follow-up (mean, 29.9 months), two received additional coiling because of recanalization of the pseudoaneurysm, and all aneurysms were completely obliterated at the last examination of the patients. During the clinical follow-up period (mean, 26.8 months), the overall mortality and morbidity were 25% (3/12) and 8.3% (1/12), respectively. LVIS stent-assisted coiling was a feasible approach for the treatment of traumatic ICA pseudoaneurysms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable

References

  1. Zheng Y, Lu Z, Shen J, Xu F (2020) Intracranial pseudoaneurysms: evaluation and management. Front Neurol 11:582. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00582

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Spanos K, Karathanos C, Stamoulis K, Giannoukas AD (2016) Endovascular treatment of traumatic internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysm. Injury 47:307–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen JE, Gomori JM, Segal R, Spivak A, Margolin E, Sviri G, Rajz G, Fraifeld S, Spektor S (2008) Results of endovascular treatment of traumatic intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 63:476–485. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000324995.57376.79 (discussion 485-476)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Griauzde J, Gemmete JJ, Chaudhary N, Pandey AS, Garton HJ (2014) Basilar artery pseudoaneurysm presenting at 5-month follow-up after traumatic atlanto-occipital dislocation in a 7-year-old girl treated with intracranial stent placement and coiling. J Neurointerv Surg 6:e8. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010573.rep

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lim YC, Kang JK, Chung J (2012) Reconstructive stent-buttressed coil embolization of a traumatic pseudoaneurysm of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154:477–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1251-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morinaga Y, Nii K, Sakamoto K, Inoue R, Mitsutake T, Hanada H (2019) Stent-assisted coil embolization for a ruptured posterior communicating artery pseudoaneurysm after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma. World Neurosurg 123:301–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ogilvy CS, Tawk RG, Mokin M, Yang X, Levy EI, Hopkins LN, Siddiqui AH (2011) Stent-assisted coiling treatment of pediatric traumatic pseudoaneurysm resulting from tumor surgery. Pediatr Neurosurg 47:442–448. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen SH, McCarthy DJ, Sheinberg D, Hanel R, Sur S, Jabbour P, Atallah E, Chalouhi N, Dumont A, Amenta P, Hasan D, Raper D, Liu K, Jane JA Jr, Crowley RW, Aguilar-Salinas P, Bentley J, Monteith S, Mitchell BD, Yavagal DR, Peterson EC, Starke RM (2019) Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of intracranial pseudoaneurysms. World Neurosurg 127:e86–e93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sami MT, Gattozzi DA, Soliman HM, Reeves AR, Moran CJ, Camarata PJ, Ebersole KC (2018) Use of pipeline™ embolization device for the treatment of traumatic intracranial pseudoaneurysms: Case series and review of cases from literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 169:154–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.04.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang W, Li MH, Li YD, Gu BX, Wang J, Zhang PL, Li M (2011) Treatment of traumatic internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysms with the Willis covered stent: a prospective study. J Trauma 70:816–822. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181f892af

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang W, Liang X, Chen G, Yang P, Zhang J, Liu H, Zhao S, Li Y, Sun B, Kang J (2020) Treatment of intracranial pseudoaneurysms with a novel covered stent: a series of 19 patients with midterm follow-up. Front Neurol 11:580877. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.580877

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu Q, Qi C, Zhang Y, Deng L, Li G, Su W (2019) Low-profile visualized intraluminal support stent-only technique for intracranial aneurysms-a report of 12 cases with midterm follow-up. World Neurosurg 129:e40–e47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roy D, Milot G, Raymond J (2001) Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 32:1998–2004. https://doi.org/10.1161/hs0901.095600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bouthillier A, van Loveren HR, Keller JT (1996) Segments of the internal carotid artery: a new classification. Neurosurgery 38:425–432. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199603000-00001 (discussion 432-423)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Jehani HM, Alwadaani HA, Almolani FM (2016) Traumatic intracranial internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysm presenting as epistaxis treated by endovascular coiling. Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) 21:60–63. https://doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2016.1.20150514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Altali K, Arruza L, López-Ibor L, Aleo E (2014) Effective coil embolization of intracavernous carotid artery pseudoaneurysm with parental artery preservation following severe head trauma in a pediatric patient. Childs Nerv Syst 30:967–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2312-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cappabianca P, Briganti F, Cavallo LM, de Divitiis E (2001) Pseudoaneurysm of the intracavernous carotid artery following endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery, treated by endovascular approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 143:95–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007010170144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hjortoe S, Wagner A, Cortsen M (2010) Endovascular embolization of intracranial iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms. A report of two cases and review of the literature. Neuroradiol J 23:479–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/197140091002300420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Elias AE, Chaudhary N, Pandey AS, Gemmete JJ (2013) Intracranial endovascular balloon test occlusion: indications, methods, and predictive value. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 23:695–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2013.03.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang C, Tian Z, Liu J, Jing L, Paliwal N, Wang S, Zhang Y, Xiang J, Siddiqui AH, Meng H, Yang X (2016) Flow diverter effect of LVIS stent on cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: a comparison with Enterprise stents and the Pipeline device. J Transl Med 14:199. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-016-0959-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 81960330).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: Song Tan, Xiaobing Zhou, Yang Wang. Data collection and analysis: Yuzhao Lu, Lingfeng Lai, Xiaofei Huang, Bin Li. Drafting the article: Song Tan. Critically revising the article: Xiaobing Zhou, Yang Wang. Reviewed submitted version of manuscript: all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the ethics committee of First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi province, China (approval number: 2020–047).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was not required because of the retrospective design of our study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, S., Zhou, X., Lu, Y. et al. Low-profile visualized intraluminal support stent for the endovascular treatment of traumatic intracranial internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysms. Neurosurg Rev 45, 2231–2237 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01714-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01714-y

Keywords

Navigation