Skip to main content
Log in

Missed cervical spine injuries: aim for the top

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the incidence of missed cervical spine injuries by radiology registrars in a major trauma centre and to identify any common blind spots.

Materials and methods

All patients with an acute traumatic injury who underwent a CT scan of the cervical spine in our unit, which serves a population of approximately 900,000, between September 2016 and December 2017 and whom had a separate radiology trainee report and final neuroradiology consultant report available were included in the study. We recorded the date and time of the scan, the registrar error and the registrar grade. An error was defined as follows: (1) a missed fracture; (2) a missed ligamentous injury; (3) overcall of a fracture (e.g. degenerative calcification or nutrient vessel). Groups were compared with the chi-square test.

Results

Five hundred seventy-three CT scans of the cervical spine fitted the inclusion criteria and were analysed. There were a total of 149 injuries over eight levels in 96 patients. There were 12 registrar errors (2.1% discrepancy rate), of which 11 were missed acute injuries (9 fractures and 2 disco-ligamentous injuries). The grade of the registrar was not significant (p = 0.603). Seventy-three percent (8/11) missed injuries were disproportionately at the cranio-cervical junction, where only 11.6% of traumatic cervical spine injuries occur p < 0.0001. Forty-five percent of the missed injuries included occipital condyle fractures, which occurred in only 12/149 injuries (8%).

Conclusions

Radiology registrars safely report emergency CT scans of the cervical spine performed following trauma with a low discrepancy rate. Missed cervical spine injuries commonly occur at the cranio-cervical junction, which should become a standard review area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCaughey EJ et al (2016) Changing demographics of spinal cord injury over a 20-year period: a longitudinal population-based study in Scotland. Spinal Cord 54(4):270–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McDaid D, La Park A, Gall A, Purcell M, Bacon M (2019) Understanding and modelling the economic impact of spinal cord injuries in the United Kingdom. Spinal Cord 57(9):778–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cross CE, Kapoor V, Todd B (2012) The litigation burden to the NHS from spinal injuries and surgery: analysis of consecutive closed claims. Orthop Proc 94-B(Supp_XXVI):387

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stiell IG et al (2001) The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. J Am Med Assoc 286(15):1841–1848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2016) Spinal injury: assessment and initial management, NICE guidelines SG41. NICE, London

  6. Briggs RH, Rowbotham E, Johnstone AL, Chalmers AG (2010) Provisional reporting of polytrauma CT by on-call radiology registrars. Is it safe? Clin Radiol 65(8):616–622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fredø HL, Rizvi SA, Lied B, Rønning P, Helseth E (2012) The epidemiology of traumatic cervical spine fractures: a prospective population study from Norway. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 20:85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruno MA, Walker EA, Abujudeh HH (2015) Understanding and confronting our mistakes: the epidemiology of error in radiology and strategies for error reduction. Radiographics 35(6):1668–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Robinson PJ (1997) Radiology’s Achilles’ heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the Röntgen image. Br J Radiol 70(839):1085–1098

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bahrami S, Yim CM (2009) Quality initiatives: blind spots at brain imaging. Radiographics 29(7):1877–1896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim YW, Mansfield LT (2014) Fool me twice: delayed diagnoses in radiology with emphasis on perpetuated errors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202(3):465–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson PA, Montesano PX (1988) Morphology and treatment of occipital condyle fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13(7):731–736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Joaquim AF, Ghizoni E, Tedeschi H (2014) Upper cervical injuries - a rational approach to guide surgical management. J Spinal Cord Med 37(2):139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa C. Werndle.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Werndle, M.C., Myers, J. & Mortimer, A. Missed cervical spine injuries: aim for the top. Emerg Radiol 29, 491–497 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-022-02026-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-022-02026-4

Keywords

Navigation