Skip to main content
Log in

The utility of spectral Doppler evaluation of acute appendicitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The use of spectral Doppler, peak systolic velocity (PSV), and resistive index (RI) imaging criteria to improve the accuracy of acute appendicitis diagnosis is hypothesized.

Methods

Graded compression ultrasound was performed for suspected patients. The spectral Doppler evaluation was conducted while observing the appendix. A total of 152 patients (82 males and 70 females, ages 4–63 years, mean age of 24.5 years) were examined using the spectral Doppler waveform between 2018 and 2019. RI and PSV values of patients with and without appendicitis were compared to histopathologic findings. SPSS 26 was used to analyze the data, including using descriptive statistics and measures of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).

Results

Appendicitis was confirmed in 95 patients (62.5%) and rejected in 57 patients (37.5%). For the diagnosis of appendicitis, the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for RI (0.92 with 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88, 0.97; P = 0.001) and PSV (0.96, with 95% CI: 0.93, 1.00; P = 0.001) was calculated. The discriminatory RI ≥ 0.49 demonstrated high sensitivity (90.5%) and low specificity (86%), and the discriminatory PSV ≥ 9.6 cm/s had high specificity (94.7%) and sensitivity (94.7%) for appendicitis.

Conclusion

By incorporating spectral Doppler criteria into routine graded compression ultrasound, the diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis was increased. In comparison, high PSV and RI values of the appendix with a cut-off point of 9.6 cm/s and 0.49 differ significantly between positive and negative appendectomy patients.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V (2012) Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period 1993–2008. J Surg Res 175(2):185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.07.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Austin-Page LR, Pham PK, Elkhunovich M (2020) Evaluating changes in diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for appendicitis: does practice make perfect? J Emerg Med 59(4):563–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.06.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Monsonis B, Mandoul C, Millet I, Taourel P (2020) Imaging of appendicitis: tips and tricks. Eur J Radiol 130:109165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper M, Jurgielewicz P, Welch K (2020) Diagnosis of acute uncomplicated appendicitis with point of care ultrasound in stable emergency department patient. Vis J Emerg Med 18(September 2019):2019–2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visj.2019.100668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benedetto G, Ferrer Puchol MD, LlavataSolaz A (2019) Suspicion of acute appendicitis in adults. The value of ultrasound in our hospital. Radiología (Engl Ed) 61(1):51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rxeng.2018.11.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lourenco P, Brown J, Leipsic J, Hague C (2016) The current utility of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Clin Imaging 40(5):944–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.03.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Segev L, Segev Y, Rayman S, Nissan A, Sadot E (2016) The diagnostic performance of ultrasound for acute appendicitis in pregnant and young nonpregnant women: a case-control study. Int J Surg 34:81–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan I, Bicknell SG, Graham M (2005) Utility and diagnostic accuracy of sonography in detecting appendicitis in a community hospital. Am J Roentgenol 184(6):1809–1812. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.6.01841809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lehmann D, Uebel P, Weiss H, Fiedler L, Bersch W (2000) Sonographische darstellbarkeit der normalen und der entzundeten appendix-bei patienten mit rechtsseitigen unterbauchschmerzen. Ultraschall Med 21(3):101–106. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2000-3788

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eng KA, Abadeh A, Ligocki C, Lee YK, Moineddin R, Adams-Webber T, Schuh S, Doria AS (2018) Acute appendicitis: a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, and MRI as second-line imaging tests after an initial US. Radiology 288(3):717–727. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018180318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Körner H, Söndenaa K, Söreide JA, Andersen E, Nysted A, Lende TH, Kjellevold KH (1997) Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World J Surg 21(3):313–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002689900235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Raman SS, Lu DSK, Kadell BM, Vodopich DJ, Sayre J, Cryer H (2002) Accuracy of nonfocused helical CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 5-year review. Am J Roentgenol 178(6):1319–1325. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.178.6.1781319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wong SK, Chan LP, Yeo A (2002) Helical CT imaging and clinically suspected appendicitis: correlation of CT and histological findings. Clin Radiol 57(8):741–745. https://doi.org/10.1053/crad.2002.0950

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fuchs JR, Schlamberg JS, Shortsleeve MJ, Schuler JG (2002) Impact of abdominal CT imaging on the management of appendicitis: an update. J Surg Res 106(1):131–136. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsre.2002.6441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A, Greenlee RT, Weinmann S, Solberg LI, Feigelson HS, Roblin D, Flynn MJ, Vanneman N, Smith-Bindman R (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 167(8):700. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.311

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sodickson A, Baeyens PF, Andriole KP, Prevedello LM, Nawfel RD, Hanson R, Khorasani R (2009) Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology 251(1):175–184. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2511081296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pelin M, Paquette B, Revel L, Landecy M, Bouveresse S, Delabrousse E (2018) Acute appendicitis: factors associated with inconclusive ultrasound study and the need for additional computed tomography. Diagn Interv Imaging 99(12):809–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2018.07.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Penticuff R, Jeffrey RB, Olcott EW (2021) Hyperechoic periappendiceal fat: evaluation of criteria for improving specificity in the sonographic diagnosis of appendicitis in pediatric patients. J Ultrasound Med 40(2):285–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Partain KN, Patel A, Travers C, McCracken CE, Loewen J, Braithwaite K, Heiss KF, Raval MV (2016) Secondary signs may improve the diagnostic accuracy of equivocal ultrasounds for suspected appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg 51(10):1655–1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.03.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Baldisserotto M, Peletti AB (2007) Is colour Doppler sonography a good method to differentiate normal and abnormal appendices in children? Clin Radiol 62(4):365–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2006.11.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stewart JK, Olcott EW, Jeffrey RB (2012) Sonography for appendicitis: nonvisualization of the appendix is an indication for active clinical observation rather than direct referral for computed tomography. J Clin Ultrasound 40(8):455–461. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.21928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Linam LE, Munden M (2012) Sonography as the first line of evaluation in children with suspected acute appendicitis. J Ultrasound Med 31(8):1153–1157. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2012.31.8.1153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kessler N, Cyteval C, Gailix B, Lesnik A, Blayac PM, Pujol J, Bruel JM, Taourel P (2004) Appendicitis: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US, and laboratory findings. Radiology 230(2):472–478. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2302021520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ohba G, Hirobe S, Komori K (2016) The usefulness of combined B mode and doppler ultrasonography to guide treatment of appendicitis. Eur J Pediatr Surg 26(6):533–536. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1570756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Matthew Fields J, Davis J, Alsup C, Bates A, Au A, Adhikari S, Farrell I (2017) Accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for diagnosing acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med 24(9):1124–1136. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Quillin SP, Siegel MJ (1994) Appendicitis: efficacy of color Doppler sonography. Radiology 191(2):557–560. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.191.2.8153340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Quillin SP, Siegel MJ (1993) Color Doppler US of children with acute lower abdominal pain. Radiographics 13(6):1281–1293; discussion 1294. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.13.6.8290724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chan L, Shin LK, Pai RK, Jeffrey RB (2011) Pathologic continuum of acute appendicitis: sonographic findings and clinical management implications. Ultrasound Q 27(2):71–79. https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0b013e31821b6eea

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shin LK, Jeffrey RB, Berry GJ, Olcott EW (2017) Spectral Doppler waveforms for diagnosis of appendicitis: potential utility of point peak systolic velocity and resistive index values. Radiology 285(3):990–998. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017162251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ung C, Chang ST, Jeffrey RB, Patel BN, Olcott EW (2013) Sonography of the normal appendix: its varied appearance and techniques to improve its visualization. Ultrasound Q 29(4):333–341. https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0b013e3182a2aa8e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chang ST, Jeffrey RB, Olcott EW (2014) Three-step sequential positioning algorithm during sonographic evaluation for appendicitis increases appendiceal visualization rate and reduces CT use. Am J Roentgenol 203(5):1006–1012. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.12334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kruskal JB, Newman PA, Sammons LG, Kane RA (2004) Optimizing Doppler and color flow US: application to hepatic sonography. Radiographics 24(3):657–675. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.243035139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pozniak MA, Zagzebski JA, Scanlan KA (1992) Spectral and color Doppler artifacts. Radiographics 12(1):35–44. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.12.1.1734480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Incesu L, Yazicioglu AK, Selcuk MB, Ozen N (2004) Contrast-enhanced power Doppler US in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Eur J Radiol 50(2):201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0720-048X(03)00102-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Anandalwar SP, Callahan MJ, Bachur RG, Feng C, Sidhwa F, Karki M, Taylor GA, Rangel SJ (2015) Use of white blood cell count and polymorphonuclear leukocyte differential to improve the predictive value of ultrasound for suspected appendicitis in children. J Am Coll Surg 220(6):1010–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.01.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jaremko JL, Crockett A, Rucker D, Magnus KG (2011) Incidence and significance of inconclusive results in ultrasound for appendicitis in children and teenagers. Can Assoc Radiol J 62(3):197–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2010.03.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nielsen JW, Boomer L, Kurtovic K, Lee E, Kupzyk K, Mallory R, Adler B, Bates DG, Kenney B (2015) Reducing computed tomography scans for appendicitis by introduction of a standardized and validated ultrasonography report template. J Pediatr Surg 50(1):144–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.10.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Patriquin HB, Garcier JM, Lafortune M, Yazbeck S, Russo P, Jequier S, Ouimet A, Filiatrault D (1996) Appendicitis in children and young adults: Doppler sonographic-pathologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 166(3):629–633. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.166.3.8623640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohadeseh Zadehmir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bakhshandeh, T., Maleknejad, A., Sargolzaie, N. et al. The utility of spectral Doppler evaluation of acute appendicitis. Emerg Radiol 29, 371–375 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-021-02010-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-021-02010-4

Keywords

Navigation