Abstract
The study of the relationship between environmental change and human mobility has largely focused on the movement of people as it is driven by environmental change with little regard for those who stay when faced with many of the same adverse conditions. An emerging body of work recognizes and seeks to understand the lack of migration, or immobility, in the contexts of environmental and climatic change, primarily through the notion of “trapped populations.” Theoretically, however, our understandings of immobility in relation to environmental change are underdeveloped and oversimplified, and do not do justice to the diversity, dynamism, or unevenness of (im)mobilities. In order to advance knowledge, this paper connects knowledge from environmental migration studies to immobility in broader migration research. Although there is no silver theoretical bullet, it explores the strengths and weaknesses of three frameworks in explaining and understanding (im)mobility decision-making, patterns, and consequences: (1) the New Economics of Labour Migration; (2) the aspirations-(cap)abilities framework; and (3) the mobilities paradigm. In order to break away from both sedentary and mobility biases, it asserts that scholars should theorize and analyze the entire mobility spectrum in the face of environmental change, rather than considering immobility as a separate outcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A sedentary bias fuels governance aimed at stopping migration through the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions, funding for adaptation efforts and development in communities of origin rather than in destinations, and restrictive migration policies.
Most research focuses on immobility in areas of origin and not immobility “on the move,” e.g., when do people stop migrating, settle, or become “trapped in transit.” This is an important gap in the literature.
For more on the frequency and usage of trapped populations, see Ayeb-Karlsson et al. (2018).
Milan and Ruano (2014) distinguish between entire household migration and the migration of one member within the household.
Carling (2002) does touch upon refugee contexts such as conflict, noting that the problem of involuntary immobility is likely to be particularly acute in these cases.
Although scholars debate whether or not mobilities is indeed a paradigm.
An example of this is the TransRe project, which elaborated on translocal social resilience in Thailand, by interrogating how migration-induced intensifying translocal relations alter the environment and the capacity to deal with environmental changes in the places of origin of migrants.
References
Abreu A (2012) The new economics of labor migration: beware of neoclassicals bearing gifts. Forum Soc Econ 41(1):46–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12143-010-9077-2
Abu M, Codjoe SNA, Sward J (2014) Climate change and internal migration intentions in the forest-savannah transition zone of Ghana. Popul Environ 35(4):341–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-013-0191-y
Adams H (2016) Why populations persist: mobility, place attachment and climate change. Popul Environ 37(4):429–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-015-0246-3
Adey P (2006) If mobility is everything then it is nothing: towards a relational politics of (im)mobilities. Mobilities 1(1):75–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100500489080
Afifi T (2011) Economic or environmental migration? The push factors in Niger. Int Migr 49(s1):e95–e124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00644.x
Afifi T, Milan A, Etzold B, Schraven B, Rademacher-Schulz C et al (2015) Human mobility in response to rainfall variability: opportunities for migration as a successful adaptation strategy in eight case studies. Migr Dev. https://doi.org/10.1080/21632324.2015.1022974
Atiglo DY (2017) Gender, vulnerability to environmental change and migration in the Volta Delta. University of Ghana, Ghana
Ayeb-Karlsson S, Smith CD, Kniveton D (2018) A discursive review of the textual use of ‘trapped’ in environmental migration studies: the conceptual birth and troubled teenage years of trapped populations. Ambio 47(5):557–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-1007-6
Baldwin A, Fröhlich C, Rothe D (2019) From climate migration to anthropocene mobilities: shifting the debate. Mobilities 14(3):289–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2019.1620510
Barnett JR, Webber M (2010) Accommodating migration to promote adaptation to climate change. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, 5270
Bateman JM, Edwards B (2002) Gender and evacuation: a closer look at why women are more likely to evacuate for hurricanes. Nat Hazard Rev 3(3):107–117. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2002)3:3(107)
Beine M, Noy I, Parsons C (2019) Climate change, migration and voice: an explanation for the immobility paradox. IZA Discussion Paper, 12640
Bettini G (2013) Climate Barbarians at the Gate? A critique of apocalyptic narratives on ‘climate refugees’. Risky Nat Nat Risk 45:63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.09.009
Bettini G, Gioli G (2016) Waltz with development: insights on the developmentalization of climate-induced migration. Migr Dev 5(2):171–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/21632324.2015.1096143
Black R, Collyer M (2014a) Populations “trapped” at times of crisis. Forced Migr Rev 45:52–56
Black R, Collyer M (2014b) “Trapped” populations: limits on mobility at times of crisis. In: Martin SF, Weerasinghe S, Taylor A (eds) Humanitarian crises and migration. Routledge, London, pp 287–305
Black R, Bennett SRG, Thomas SM, Beddington JR (2011) Climate change: migration as adaptation. Nature 478(7370):447–449. https://doi.org/10.1038/478477a
Black R, Arnell NW, Adger WN, Thomas D, Geddes A (2013) Migration, immobility and displacement outcomes following extreme events. Environ Sci Policy 27(Supplement 1):S32–S43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.09.001
Blondin S (2020) Understanding involuntary immobility in the Bartang Valley of Tajikistan through the prism of motility. Mobilities 15(4):543–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2020.1746146
Boas I, Kloppenburg S, van Leeuwen J, Lamers M (2018) Environmental mobilities: an alternative lens to global environmental governance. Glob Environ Polit 18(4):107–126. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00482
Boas I, Farbotko C, Adams H, Sterly H, Bush S et al (2019) Climate migration myths. Nat Clim Change 9(12):901–903. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0633-3
Buchori I, Pramitasari A, Sugiri A, Maryono M, Basuki Y et al (2018) Adaptation to coastal flooding and inundation: Mitigations and migration pattern in Semarang City, Indonesia. Ocean Coast Manag 163:445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.07.017
Carling J (2002) Migration in the age of involuntary immobility: theoretical reflections and Cape Verdean experiences. J Ethn Migr Stud 28(1):5–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830120103912
Carling J, Schewel K (2018) Revisiting aspiration and ability in international migration. J Ethn Migr Stud 44(6):945–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1384146
Castles S (2011) Understanding global migration: a social transformation perspective. J Ethn Migr Stud 36(10):1565–1586. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2010.489381
Cresswell T (2010) Towards a politics of mobility. Environ Plan D Soc Space 28(1):17–31. https://doi.org/10.1068/d11407
de Haas H (2014) Migration theory: quo vadis? IMI WP-100-2014 / DEMIG Project Paper 24
de Haas H, Fokkema T (2010) Intra-household conflicts in migration decisionmaking: return and pendulum migration in Morocco. Popul Dev Rev 36(3):541–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00345.x
El-Hinnawi E (1985) Environmental refugees: Vol. null (null, Ed.)
Faist T (2000) The volume and dynamics of international migration and transnational social spaces. Oxford University Press
Farbotko C, Dun O, Thornton F, McNamara KE, McMichael C (2020) Relocation planning must address voluntary immobility. Nat Clim Chang 10(8):702–704. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0829-6
Foresight (2011) Foresight: migration and global environmental change final project report. The Government Office for Science
Gemenne F (2011) How they became the human face of climate change. Research and policy interactions in the birth of the ‘environmental migration’ concept. In: Piguet DGP (ed) Migration and climate change. Cambridge University Press/UNESCO, Cambridge, pp 225–259
Gioli G, Milan A (2018) Gender, migration, and (global) environmental change. In: McLeman R, Gemenne F (eds) Routledge handbook of environmental displacement and migration. Routledge, London, pp 135–150
Glick Schiller N, Basch L, Blanc-Szanton C (1992) Towards a definition of transnationalism. Ann N Y Acad Sci 645(1):ix–xiv. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb33482.x
Hammar T, Brochmann G, Tamas K, Faist T (eds) (1997) International migration, immobility and development: multidisciplinary perspectives. Berg, Oxford
Hannam K, Sheller M, Urry J (2006) Editorial: mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities 1(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100500489189
Hui A (2016) The boundaries of interdisciplinary fields: temporalities shaping the past and future of dialogue between migration and mobilities research. Mobilities 11(1):66–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2015.1097033
Hunter LM, Luna JK, Norton RM (2015) Environmental dimensions of migration. Ann Rev Sociol 41(1):377–397. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112223
Ionesco D, Mokhnacheva D, Gemenne F (2016) The atlas of environmental migration. Routledge, London
Jónsson G (2008) Migration aspirations and immobility in a Malian Soninke village (Vol. 10). International Migration Institute, University of Oxford
Jónsson G (2011) Non-migrant, sedentary, immobile, or ‘left behind’? Reflections on the absence of migration. The International Migration Institute (IMI), Oxford Department of International Development. Working Paper, 39
Levitt P, Glick Schiller N (2004) Conceptualizing simultaneity: a transnational social field perspective on society. Int Migr Rev 38(3):1002–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00227.x
Lilleør HB, Van den Broeck K (2011) Economic drivers of migration and climate change in LDCs. Glob Environ Change 21(Supplement 1):S70–S81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.002
Logan JR, Issar S, Xu Z (2016) Trapped in place? Segmented resilience to hurricanes in the Gulf Coast, 1970–2005. Demography 53(5):1511–1534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-016-0496-4
Lubkemann SC (2008) Involuntary immobility: on a theoretical invisibility in forced migration studies. J Refug Stud 21(4):454–475. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fen043
Mallick B, Schanze J (2020) Trapped or voluntary? Non-migration despite climate risks. Sustainability 12(11):4718. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114718
Mallick B, Sultana Z, Bennett CM (2020) How do sustainable livelihoods influence environmental (non-)migration aspirations? Appl Geogr 124:102328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102328
McKay D (2007) “Sending dollars shows feeling” – emotions and economies in Filipino migration. Mobilities 2(2):175–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100701381532
McLeman R, Smit B (2006) Migration as an adaptation to climate change. Clim Change 76(1):31–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-9000-7
Milan A, Ruano S (2014) Rainfall variability, food insecurity and migration in Cabricán, Guatemala. Clim Dev 6(1):61–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2013.857589
Millock K (2015) Migration and environment. Annu Rev Resour Econ 7(1):35–60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100814-125031
Murphy DWA (2014) Theorizing climate change, (im)mobility and socio-ecological systems resilience in low-elevation coastal zones. Clim Dev 7(4):380–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2014.953904
Myers N (1993) Environmental refugees in a globally warmed world. Bioscience 43(11):752–761. https://doi.org/10.2307/1312319
Nawrotzki RJ, DeWaard J (2018) Putting trapped populations into place: climate change and inter-district migration flows in Zambia. Reg Environ Change 18(2):533–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1224-3
Nguyen LD, Raabe K, Grote U (2015) Rural–urban migration, household vulnerability, and welfare in Vietnam. World Dev 71:79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.11.002
Noy I (2017) To leave or not to leave? Climate change, exit, and voice on a Pacific Island, Cesifo. Econ Stud 63(4):403–420
Penning-Rowsell EC, Sultana P, Thompson PM (2013) The ‘last resort’? Population movement in response to climate-related hazards in Bangladesh. Environ Sci Policy 27(Supplement 1):S44–S59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.009
Piguet E (2018) Theories of voluntary and forced migration. In: McLeman R, Gemenne F (eds) Routledge handbook of environmental migration and displacement. Routledge, London, pp 17–28
Portes A (1997) Globalization from below: the rise of transnational communities. ESRC Transnational Communities Programme Working Paper, 1. Princeton University
Rigaud KK, de Sherbinin A, Jones B, Bergmann J, Clement V et al (2018) Groundswell: preparing for internal climate migration. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/29461License:CCBY3.0IGO. Accessed 15 Jan 2021
Sakdapolrak P, Naruchaikusol S, Ober K, Peth S, Porst L et al (2016) Migration in a changing climate. Towards a translocal social resilience approach. DIE ERDE J Geographys Soc Berlin 147(2):81–94. https://doi.org/10.12854/erde-147-6
Scannell L, Gifford R (2013) Personally relevant climate change: the role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environ Behav 45(1):60–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511421196
Schewel K (2019) Understanding immobility: moving beyond the mobility bias in migration studies. Int Migr Rev. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918319831952
Sheller M (2018) Theorising mobility justice. Tempo Social 30(2):17–34. https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2018.142763
Sheller M, Urry J (2006) The new mobilities paradigm. Environ Plan A 38(2):207–226
Stark O, Bloom DE (1985) The new economics of labor migration. Am Econ Rev 75(2):173–178
Stark O, Lucas REB (1988) Migration, remittances, and the family. Econ Dev Cult Change 36(3):465–481
Tacoli C (2009) Crisis or adaptation? Migration and climate change in a context of high mobility. Environ Urban 21(2):513–525
Thiede BC, Brown DL (2013) Hurricane Katrina: who stayed and why? Popul Res Policy Rev 32(6):803–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-013-9302-9
Thieme S, Wiesmann U, Hurni H (2011) Sustaining a multi-local life: possible theoretical foundations for livelihood and transnational migration studies. In: Perspectives of the Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) North-South (No. 6; Issue 6, pp 331–341). Universität Bern. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-61737
Urry J (2000) Sociology beyond societies: mobilities for the twenty-first century. Routledge, London
Urry J (2007) Mobilities. Polity Press, Cambridge
Warner K, Afifi T (2014) Where the rain falls: evidence from 8 countries on how vulnerable households use migration to manage the risk of rainfall variability and food insecurity. Clim Dev 6(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2013.835707
Wesselbaum D (2020) Revisiting the climate driver and inhibitor mechanisms of international migration. Clim Dev. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2020.1711700
Wiegel H, Boas I, Warner J (2019) A mobilities perspective on migration in the context of environmental change. Wires Clim Change 10(6):e610. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.610
Yang D, Choi H (2007) Are Remittances Insurance? Evidence from Rainfall Shocks in the Philippines. World Bank Econ Rev 21(2):219–248
Zickgraf C (2018) Immobility. In: Gemenne F, McLeman R (eds) Routledge handbook on enviromental displacement and migration. Routledge, London, pp 71–84
Zickgraf C (2019) Keeping people in place: political factors of (Im)mobility and climate change. Soc Sci 8(8):228. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8080228
Zickgraf C, Vigil Diaz Telenti S, de Longueville F, Ozer P, Gemenne F (2016) The impact of vulnerability and resilience to environmental changes on mobility patterns in West Africa (Vol. 14). World Bank. https://www.knomad.org/publication/impact-vulnerability-and-resilience-environmental-changes-mobility-patterns-west-africa. Accessed 7 Jan 2021
Acknowledgements
The author acknowledges the support of the editors of the Special Issue and wishes to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback in the publication process. Lastly, the author appreciates the funding provided by the European Commission through the HABITABLE project, through its Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement #869395.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Bishawjit Mallick and accepted by Topical Collection Chief Editor Christopher Reyer.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Environmental Non-Migration: Frameworks, Methods, and Cases
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zickgraf, C. Theorizing (im)mobility in the face of environmental change. Reg Environ Change 21, 126 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01839-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01839-2