Abstract
Research on human multitasking suggests several measures to evaluate performance. However, the suggested measures evaluate performance either when tasks are performed sequentially, or when tasks are performed in a parallel manner. There is a lack of models with performance measures that consider concurrently sequential and parallel task execution. This paper aims to develop a measure of human performance that considers both sequential and parallel execution of tasks in multitasking conditions. First, the literature is reviewed to select a taxonomy to model the features and execution of tasks during multitasking. Task features include a list of tasks, task demands (in terms of physical, psychological, and emotional loads), and coordination between tasks (in terms of priorities, similarities, dependence, and time constraints). Task execution is represented as a network of sequential and overlapping tasks. Second, a set of measures are identified to evaluate human performance in multitasking conditions. The analysis of literature suggests a task switching cost model for sequential task execution and a task interference ratio when tasks are executed in parallel. To enable combining switching cost (i.e., sequential execution) and interference ratio (i.e., parallel execution) in multitasking conditions, a classification scheme based on tasks’ modalities is utilized. Finally, the developed model is applied to different scenarios.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler RF, Benbunan-Fich R (2015) The effects of task difficulty and multitasking on performance. Interact Comput 27:430–439
Altmann EM (2004a) Advance preparation in task switching what work is being done? Psychol Sci 15:616–622
Altmann EM (2004b) The preparation effect in task switching: carryover of soa. Mem Cogn 32:153–163
Baddeley AD, Hitch GJ (1974) Working memory. Psychol Learn Motiv 8:47–89
Ben-Shakhar G, Sheffer L (2001) The relationship between the ability to divide attention and standard measures of general cognitive abilities. Intelligence 29:293–306
Bojko A, Kramer AF, Peterson MS (2004) Age equivalence in switch costs for prosaccade and antisaccade tasks. Psychol Aging 19:226
Braverman A, Meiran N (2010) Task conflict effect in task switching. Psychol Res 74:568–578
Burgess PW, Veitch E, de Lacy Costello A, Shallice T (2000) The cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of multitasking. Neuropsychologia 38:848–863
De Jong R (2000) 15 An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In: Control of cognitive processes, p 357
Delbridge KA (2002) Individual differences in multi-tasking ability: exploring a nomological network. Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University
Derakshan N, Smyth S, Eysenck MW (2009) Effects of state anxiety on performance using a task-switching paradigm: an investigation of attentional control theory. Psychon Bull Rev 16:1112–1117
Drews FA, Yazdani H, Godfrey CN, Cooper JM, Strayer DL (2009) Text messaging during simulated driving. Hum Factors 51:762–770
Dzubak CM (2008) Multitasking: the good, the bad, and the unknown. J Assoc Tutor Prof 1:1–12
Endsley MR (1995) Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Fact 37:65–84
Endsley MR (2017) Direct measurement of situation awareness: validity and use of SAGAT. In: Situational awareness. Routledge, pp 129–156
Fleishman EA, Quaintance MK, Broedling LA (1984) Taxonomies of human performance: the description of human tasks. Academic Press
Garavan H (1998) Serial attention within working memory. Mem Cogn 26:263–276
Hahn S, Andersen GJ, Kramer AF (2003) Multidimensional set switching. Psychon Bull Rev 10:503–509
Hambrick DZ, Oswald FL, Darowski ES, Rench TA, Brou R (2010) Predictors of multitasking performance in a synthetic work paradigm. Appl Cogn Psych 24:1149–1167
Hart SG (1978) Subjective time estimation as an index of workload. Proceedings of the airline pilots association symposium on man-system interface: advances in workload study. Washington, DC, USA, pp 115–131
Hart SG (2006) NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 50, No. 9. Sage publications, Sage, CA: Los Angeles, CA, pp 904–908
Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of nasa-tlx (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv Psych 52:139–183
Huizinga M, van der Molen MW (2011) Task switching and shifting between stopping and going: developmental change in between-trial control adjustments. J Exp Child Psychol 108:484–503
Junco R, Cotten SR (2012) The relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Comput Educ 59:505–514
Kahneman D (1973) Attention and effort, vol 1063. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Kleinman S (ed) (2009) The culture of efficiency: technology in everyday life, vol 55. Peter Lang
Kleinsorge T, Gajewski PD (2004) Preparation for a forthcoming task is sufficient to produce subsequent shift costs. Psychon Bull Rev 11:302–306
Koch I (2003) The role of external cues for endogenous advance reconfiguration in task switching. Psychon Bull Rev 10:488–492
Koch I (2005) Sequential task predictability in task switching. Psychon Bull Rev 12:107–112
Kolski C (2013) Human-computer interactions in transport. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA
Konig CJ, Buhner M, Murling G (2005) Working memory, fluid intelligence, and attention are predictors of multitasking performance, but polychronicity and extraversion are not. Human Perform 18:243–266
Kray J, Lindenberger U (2000) Adult age differences in task switching. Psychol Aging 15:126
Law AS, Logie RH, Pearson DG (2006) The impact of secondary tasks on multitasking in a virtual environment. Acta Physiol 122:27–44
Lee FJ, Taatgen NA (2002) Multitasking as skill acquisition. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society, vol 24, No. 24
Mansi G, Levy Y (2013) Do instant messaging interruptions help or hinder knowledge workers’ task performance? Int J Inf Manage 33(3):591–596
Mayr U (2002) Inhibition of action rules. Psychon Bull Rev 9:93–99
Mayr U, Keele SW (2000) Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition. J Exp Psychol Gen 129:4
Meiran N (1996) Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22:1423
Meiran N (2000) Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychol Res 63:234–249
Meiran N, Chorev Z (2005) Phasic alertness and the residual task-switching cost. Exper Psych 52:109–124
Meiran N, Chorev Z, Sapir A (2000) Component processes in task switching. Cogn Psychol 41:211–253
Merlau M (2010) Does dual task interference affect concurrent duration production?. Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. https://scholarworks.rit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1337&context=theses
Meyer DE, Kieras DE (1997) A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: part i. Basic mechanisms. Psychol Rev 104:3
Monsell S, Sumner P, Waters H (2003) Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches. Mem Cogn 31:327–342
National Research Council (1998) Modeling human and organizational behavior: application to military simulations. National Academies Press
Navon D, Gopher D (1979) On the economy of the human-processing system. Psychol Rev 86:214
Nieuwenhuis S, Monsell S (2002) Residual costs in task switching: testing the failure-to-engage hypothesis. Psychon Bull Rev 9:86–92
Oswald FL, Hambrick DZ, Jones LA (2017) Keeping all the plates spinning: understanding and predicting multitasking performance. In: Learning to solve complex scientific problems. Routledge, pp 77–96
Otto SC, Wahl KR, Lefort CC, Frei WH (2012) Exploring the impact of multitasking in the workplace. J Bus 3:154–162
Ou CX, Davison RM (2011) Interactive or interruptive? Instant messaging at work. Decis Support Syst 52:61–72
Pester-DeWan J, Oonk H (2006) Human performance benefits of standard measures and metrics for network-centric warfare. In: Proceedings of human factors issues in network-centric warfare symposium
Putze F, Jarvis J-P, Schultz T (2010) Multimodal recognition of cognitive workload for multitasking in the car. In 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) IEEE, pp 3748–3751
Rangra S, Sallak M, Schön W, Vanderhaegen F (2017) A graphical model based on performance shaping factors for assessing human reliability. IEEE Trans Reliab 66(4):1120–1143
Reid GB, Nygren TE (1988) The subjective workload assessment technique: a scaling procedure for measuring mental workload. Adv Psych 52:185–218
Rogers RD, Monsell S (1995) Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen 124:207
Rubin O, Meiran N (2005) On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 31:1477
Rubinstein JS, Meyer DE, Evans JE (2001) Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:763
Rubio S, Díaz E, Martín J, Puente JM (2004) Evaluation of subjective mental workload: a comparison of swat, nasa-tlx, and workload profile methods. Appl Psychol 53:61–86
Salvucci DD (2005) A multitasking general executive for compound continuous tasks. Cogn Sci 29:457–492
Salvucci DD (2006) Modeling driver behavior in a cognitive architecture. Hum Factors 48:362–380
Sanbonmatsu DM, Strayer DL, Medeiros-Ward N, Watson JM (2013) Who multi-tasks and why? Multitasking ability, perceived multitasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking. PLoS One 8:e54402
Sathyanarayana A, Boyraz P, Hansen JH (2014) Effects of multitasking on drivability through can-bus analysis. In: Smart mobile in- vehicle systems. Springer, New York, NY, pp 169–182
Schuch S, Koch I (2003) The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29:92
Spiers HJ, Maguire EA (2006) Thoughts, behaviour, and brain dynamics during navigation in the real world. Neuroimage 31:1826–1840
Spink A, Cole C, Waller M (2008) Multitasking behavior. Ann Rev Inf Sci Technol 42:93–118
Steinhauser M, Hübner R (2005) Mixing costs in task shifting reflect sequential processing stages in a multicomponent task. Mem Cogn 33:1484–1494
Stephan DN, Koch I (2011) The role of input–output modality compatibility in task switching. Psychol Res 75:491–498
Sykes ER (2011) Interruptions in the workplace: a case study to reduce their effects. Int J Inf Manage 31:385–394
Taylor RM (2017) Situational awareness rating technique (SART): the development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In: Situational awareness. Routledge, pp 111–128
Tornay FJ, Milán EG (2001) A more complete task-set reconfiguration in random than in predictable task switch. Q J Exper Psych 54:785–803
Umebayashi K, Okita T (2013) A carry-over task rule in task switching: an erp investigation using a go/nogo paradigm. Biol Psychol 92:295–300
Vanderhaegen F (1999) Toward a model of unreliability to study error prevention supports. Interact Comput 11(5):575–595
Vanderhaegen F (2010) Human-error-based design of barriers and analysis of their uses. Cogn Technol Work 12(2):133–142
Vanderhaegen F (2016) A rule-based support system for dissonance discovery and control applied to car driving. Expert Syst Appl 15(65):361–371
Vanderhaegen F, Wolff M, Mollard R (2019) Synchronization of stimuli with heart rate: a new challenge to control attentional dissonances. Autom Chall Socio-technical Syst 15:1–28
Wickens CD (1980) The structure of attentional resources. In: Nickerson R (ed) Attention and performance VIII. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 239–257
Wickens CD (1981) Processing resources in attention, dual task performance, and workload assessment (no. Epl-81-3/onr-81-3). Illinois University at Urbana Engineering-Psychology Research Lab
Wickens CD (2002) Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theor Issues Ergonom Sci 3:159–177
Wickens CD (2007) Attention to attention and its applications: a concluding view. In: Attention: from theory to practice, pp 239–249
Wickens CD (2008) Multiple resources and mental workload. Hum Fact 50:449–455
Wickens CD, Hollands JG (2000) Attention, time-sharing, and workload. Eng Psychol Hum Perform 3:439–479
Wickens CD, Santamaria A, Sebok A (2013) A computational model of task overload management and task switching. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, SAGE Publications, San Diego, CA, USA, pp 763–767
Yeung N, Monsell S (2003) Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: the role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29:455
Zakay D, Block RA (1997) Temporal cognition. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 6(1):12–16
Zakay D, Shub J (1998) Concurrent duration production as a workload measure. Ergonomics 41:1115–1128
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NSTIP strategic program number (12-INF2574-02) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The authors would like to thank all personnel involved in this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahmad, A., Ghaleb, M., Darmoul, S. et al. A combined multitasking performance measure involving sequential and parallel task executions. Cogn Tech Work 23, 131–142 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00615-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00615-x